scholarly journals Antinuclear Antibodies: Marker of Diagnosis and Evolution in Autoimmune Diseases

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. e62-e73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia M Sur ◽  
Emanuela Floca ◽  
Daniel G Sur ◽  
Marius C Colceriu ◽  
Gabriel Samasca ◽  
...  

Abstract Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are autoantibodies that attack self-proteins within cell nucleus structures; their presence in serum may indicate an autoimmune disease. Also, positive ANA test results have been obtained in chronic infectious diseases, cancers, medication-related adverse events, and even healthy individuals. As a result, a correct interpretation of the presence of ANAs is needed. Identification of ANAs subtypes is an important part of clinical immunology. The presence of ANAs in patient blood specimens is detected using a cell-line substrate from human laryngeal carcinoma (HEp-2 cells). On this substrate, ANAs will bind specific antigens, which will lead to a suggestive fluorescent emission. The fluorescence patterns visualized under the fluorescence microscope can be correlated with certain subtypes of ANA and certain autoimmune diseases. Depending on the subtype of ANA present in the serum and the targeted antigen, several staining patterns are reported, namely, nuclear patterns, nucleolar patterns, cell cycle patterns, or cytoplasmatic patterns. Identification of a certain pattern can lead to diagnosis of a certain autoimmune disease.

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (10) ◽  
pp. 1771-1777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dolores Pérez ◽  
Boris Gilburd ◽  
Óscar Cabrera-Marante ◽  
Jose A. Martínez-Flores ◽  
Manuel Serrano ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Early detection of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in asymptomatic subjects is useful to predict autoimmune diseases years before diagnosis. ANA have been determined by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) using human epithelial type 2 (HEp-2) cells, which is considered the gold standard technique. Multiplex technology (BioPlex ANA Screen) has been introduced for ANA evaluation in recent years. Nevertheless, concordance between BioPlex and IIF is low and there is no harmonization between both methods for detection of autoantibodies. This study has aimed to clarify the clinical significance of autoantibodies detected by BioPlex ANA Screen in subjects with undiagnosed clinical suspicion of autoimmune disease and to determine the predictive value of autoantibodies detected by BioPlex ANA Screen. Methods: A 3-year follow-up study was performed of 411 subjects without a clear diagnosis of autoimmune diseases in whom autoantibodies were detected by BioPlex ANA Screen that were negative by IIF on HEp-2 cells. Results: At 3 years of follow-up, 312 (76%) subjects were positive for autoantibodies by IIF and 99 subjects continued to be negative. A diagnosis of autoimmune disease was found in most of the subjects (87%). Conclusions: BioPlex ANA Screen has greater sensitivity than IIF on HEp-2 cells for autoantibodies detection. Early detection of these antibodies by BioPlex can predict possible development of autoimmune diseases.


2000 ◽  
Vol 83 (01) ◽  
pp. 42-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Vantelon ◽  
B. Godeau ◽  
C. André ◽  
P. Bierling

SummaryIn an attempt to evaluate the frequency of autoimmune markers in autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura (AITP) and to determine if autoimmune markers in patients with isolated AITP were associated with particular disease manifestations, we analyzed records of 122 consecutive adults with AITP. Twenty-nine patients (24%) had significant titers of one or several autoimmune markers at AITP onset. Among them, 16 (13%) had antinuclear antibodies. The presence of autoimmune markers did not correlate with presenting feature, response to treatment or long-term outcome of AITP. Six patients (5%) developed seven autoimmune diseases during follow-up, comprising systemic lupus erythematosus, an antiphospholipid syndrome, autoimmune haemolytic anemia (n = 2), Grave’s disease, Hashimoto’s disease and primary biliary cirrhosis. At AITP onset, three of these patients had isolated biological markers of the autoimmune disease they later developed. The annual average incidence rate of autoimmune diseases was 1% per patient-year in the entire group and 0.4% in the group of patients with no autoimmune markers at AITP onset. This low rate is probably due to careful assessment at diagnosis for concomitant overt autoimmune disease. We recommend extensive screening for autoimmune markers at AITP onset, and careful follow-up of patients with autoimmune markers. Routine screening for autoimmune markers during AITP follow-up is not necessary for patients with no autoimmune markers at AITP onset.Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and other autoimmune disorders can complicate autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura (AITP) or be diagnosed concomitantly with otherwise unremarkable AITP (1, 2). However, the frequency and prognostic value of isolated autoimmune markers (i. e. not associated with an autoimmune disorder), particularly antinuclear antibodies (ANA) at AITP onset or during follow-up is controversial (3-8). For example, the committee organized by George et al. (9) to write guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of AITP stated that the search for ANA and lupus anticoagulant were of “uncertain appropriateness at diagnosis and during follow-up”. In an attempt to help practicians to make decisions, we analyzed the frequency of autoimmune markers and autoimmune disorders at onset and during the follow-up in 122 adults with AITP and no overt autoimmune disease at diagnosis. These consecutive patients were followed by the same physician for a mean period of 6 years, and had routine screening tests for autoimmune markers and disorders at onset, before steroid therapy, and regularly during follow-up.


Author(s):  
Irina A Pashnina ◽  
Irina M Krivolapova ◽  
Tamara V Fedotkina ◽  
Varvara A Ryabkova ◽  
Margarita V Chereshneva ◽  
...  

Incidence of autoimmune diseases increases. Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) testing is a critical tool for their diagnosis. However, ANA prevalence in health increased over last decades, especially among young people. ANA in health occur in low concentrations, with prevalence up to 50% in some populations, which demands a cutoff revision. The review deals with origin and probable physiological or compensatory function of ANA in health, according to the concept of immunological clearance, theory of autoimmune regulation of cell functions and the concept of functional autoantibodies. Considering ANA titers ≤1:320 as a serological marker of autoimmune diseases seems inappropriate. The role of anti-DFS70/LEDGFp75 autoantibodies is highlighted as possible anti-risk biomarker for autoimmune rheumatic disorders. ANA prevalence in health is different in various regions due to several underlying causes discussed in the review, all influencing in additive combinations according to the concept of the mosaic of autoimmunity. Not only titer, but the HEp-2 IFA staining patterns, like AC-2, is also important. Accepting autoantibodies as a kind of bioregulators, not only upper, but also lower borders of their normal range should be determined. Not only their excess, but also lack of them or “autoimmunodeficiency” could be a reason of disorders.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernanda Weyand Banhuk ◽  
Bruna Corrêa Pahim ◽  
Alex Sandro Jorge ◽  
Rafael Andrade Menolli

One characteristic of autoimmune diseases (ADs) is the production of autoantibodies for extractable nuclear autoantigens, which may aid in the discrimination of the different types of autoimmune diseases and is related to different antinuclear antibody (ANA) patterns. The present study verified the profile of patient samples tested for extractable nuclear antigens (ENA) antibodies in a public hospital and correlated the ENA results with ANA patterns and patient diagnoses. The study reviewed data in the medical records of patients who underwent anti-ENA tests at a public hospital in the West of the State of Paraná from February 2011 to January 2017. Patients were classified according to age, ethnicity, gender, anti-ENA test results, ANA results, and the presence or absence of AD. Thirty-six (20.9%) samples of the 172 anti-ENA tests were positive, seven (4.1%) samples were undetermined, and 129 (75%) exhibited negative results. The ANA reagent was found in 84.3% of the anti-ENA-positive samples. The anti-SSA/Ro autoantibody exhibited the highest frequency in the group, 41.7% (15/36). The most common pattern was nuclear fine speckled, which was found in 24.3% of the samples. The association results indicated a significant relationship between ANA titer and diagnosis in the anti-ENA- and ANA-positive patients. The anti-ENA-negative patients were diagnosed with an AD in 35% (45/129) of the cases, and 75% (27/36) of the anti-ENA-positive patients were diagnosed with an AD. Systemic lupus erythematosus and scleroderma were the most common pathologies in the antigen-positive patients. The anti-ENA test is a good marker to aid in the complex clinical diagnosis of patients with autoimmune diseases.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 439-456
Author(s):  
Jenny L. Pierce

Purpose This review article provides an overview of autoimmune diseases and their effects on voice and laryngeal function. Method A literature review was conducted in PubMed. Combinations of the following keywords were used: “autoimmune disease and upper airway,” “larynx,” “cough,” “voice,” “dysphonia,” and “dyspnea.” Precedence was given to articles published in the past 10 years due to recent advances in this area and to review articles. Ultimately, 115 articles were included for review. Results Approximately 81 autoimmune diseases exist, with 18 of those highlighted in the literature as having laryngeal involvement. The general and laryngeal manifestations of these 18 are discussed in detail, in addition to the clinical implications for a laryngeal expert. Conclusions Voice, breathing, and cough symptoms may be an indication of underlying autoimmune disease. However, these symptoms are often similar to those in the general population. Appropriate differential diagnosis and timely referral practices maximize patient outcomes. Guidelines are provided to facilitate correct diagnosis when an autoimmune disease is suspected.


1993 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 915-919 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoko KOMURA ◽  
Hideyo YOSHIDA ◽  
Setsuya FUJITA ◽  
Ryoichi INABA ◽  
Hirotoshi IWATA

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariam Ahmed Saad ◽  
Mostafa Alfishawy ◽  
Mahmoud Nassar ◽  
Mahmoud Mohamed ◽  
Ignatius N Esene ◽  
...  

Introduction: Over 4.9 million cases of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been confirmed since the worldwide pandemic began. Since the emergence of COVID-19, a number of confirmed cases reported autoimmune manifestations. Herein, we reviewed the reported COVID-19 cases with associated autoimmune manifestations. Methods: We searched PubMed database using all available keyword for COVID-19. All related studies between January 1st, 2020 to May 22nd, 2020 were reviewed. Only studies published in English language were considered. Articles were screened based on titles and abstract. All reports of confirmed COVID-19 patients who have associated clinical evidence of autoimmune disease were selected. Results: Among 10006 articles, searches yielded, Thirty-two relevant articles for full-text assessment. Twenty studies meet the eligibility criteria. The twenty eligible articles reported 33 cases of confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis who developed an autoimmune disease after the onset of covid-19 symptoms. Ages of patients varied from a 6 months old infant to 89 years old female (Mean=53.9 years of 28 cases); five cases had no information regarding their age. The time between symptoms of viral illness and onset of autoimmune symptoms ranged from 2 days to 33 days (Mean of the 33 cases=9.8 days). Autoimmune diseases were one case of subacute thyroiditis (3%), two cases of Kawasaki Disease (6.1%), three cases of coagulopathy and antiphospholipid syndrome (9.1%), three cases of immune thrombocytopenic purpura (9.1%), eight cases of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (24.2%), and sixteen cases of Guillain–Barré syndrome (48.5%). Conclusions: COVID-19 has been implicated in the development in a range of autoimmune diseases which may shed a light on the association between autoimmune diseases and infections.


Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1019
Author(s):  
Kyungjin Hong ◽  
Gabriella Iacovetti ◽  
Ali Rahimian ◽  
Sean Hong ◽  
Jon Epperson ◽  
...  

Blood sample collection and rapid separation—critical preanalytical steps in clinical chemistry—can be challenging in decentralized collection settings. To address this gap, the Torq™ zero delay centrifuge system includes a lightweight, hand-portable centrifuge (ZDrive™) and a disc-shaped blood collection device (ZDisc™) enabling immediate sample centrifugation at the point of collection. Here, we report results from clinical validation studies comparing performance of the Torq System with a conventional plasma separation tube (PST). Blood specimens from 134 subjects were collected and processed across three independent sites to compare ZDisc and PST performance in the assessment of 14 analytes (K, Na, Cl, Ca, BUN, creatinine, AST, ALT, ALP, total bilirubin, albumin, total protein, cholesterol, and triglycerides). A 31-subject precision study was performed to evaluate reproducibility of plasma test results from ZDiscs, and plasma quality was assessed by measuring hemolysis and blood cells from 10 subject specimens. The ZDisc successfully collected and processed samples from 134 subjects. ZDisc results agreed with reference PSTs for all 14 analytes with mean % biases well below clinically significant levels. Results were reproducible across different operators and ZDisc production lots, and plasma blood cell counts and hemolysis levels fell well below clinical acceptance thresholds. ZDiscs produce plasma samples equivalent to reference PSTs. Results support the suitability of the Torq System for remotely collecting and processing blood samples in decentralized settings.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 237-244
Author(s):  
Youssef EL Hassouni ◽  
Mohammed Bourhia ◽  
Ahmed Bari ◽  
Riaz Ullah ◽  
Hafiz Majid Mahmood ◽  
...  

Abstract Autoimmune diseases are pathological conditions in which the immune system mistakenly attacks its own tissues. This study evaluates the performance of two techniques, which are identifiers of autoantibody specifics: immunoblot and immunodot. This study was conducted in 300 patients of whom 62 were tested positive for antinuclear antibodies. The patients were initially screened for antinuclear antibodies using indirect immunofluorescence. Then, the identification of specific autoantibodies such as anti-extractable nuclear antigens (ENAs) was carried out using the immunoblot and immunodot techniques. The results showed that immunoblot and immunodot did not present a significant difference in their sensitivity against anti-SSA/52, SSB, CENP-B, PCNA, U1-snRNP, Jo-1, Pm-scl, and Mi-2 (p > 0.05). However, the two techniques showed a significant difference in their sensitivity toward autoantibodies anti-DNAn, anti-histone, anti-SmD1, and anti-ds-DNA (p < 0.05). The immunoblot data were in complete accordance with the immunodot data (100%) regarding the detection of autoantibodies such as anti SSA/52, SSB, CENP-B, PCNA, U1-snRP, Jo-1, Pm-scl, and Mi-2, 80% regarding SmD1, and 75% concerning ds-DNA. We should certainly pay closer attention to the efficiency of the techniques used in the diagnosis of autoimmune diseases.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1321.1-1321
Author(s):  
S. Nagpal ◽  
S. Cole ◽  
A. Floudas ◽  
M. Wechalekar ◽  
Q. Song ◽  
...  

Background:Immune checkpoint blockade with agents targeting CTLA4 and PD-1/PD-L1 alone or in combination has demonstrated exceptional efficacy in multiple cancer types by “unleashing” the cytotoxic action of quiescent, tumor-infiltrating T cells. However, the therapeutic action of these immunotherapies goes hand in hand with the loss of immune tolerance and appearance of immune-related adverse events such as colitis, arthralgia and inflammatory arthritis in responsive patients. Therefore, immune checkpoint molecules have been proposed as targets for the treatment of autoimmune diseases.Objectives:Herein, we interrogate the potential of BTLA/HVEM axis as a target for restoring immune homeostasis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and Sjogren’s Syndrome (SjS) by examining their expression patterns in autoimmune disease tissues.Methods:Message and protein expression of BTLA and HVEM were examined in RA and SLE synovial tissues, SLE cutaneous lesions, SjS salivary glands and peripheral blood samples of autoimmune disease by RNA sequencing and flow cytometry.Results:Tissue dysregulation of the BTLA-HVEM axis was observed: Increased BTLA RNA level in RA synovium, SLE-affected skin, and SjS salivary gland samples, whereas HVEM level was affected only in the RA synovium when compared to unaffected tissues. Detailed immunophenotyping of B, T, and myeloid cell populations in RA, SLE, SjS and healthy control PBMCs revealed differential modulation of the BTLA+ or HVEM+ immune cell subsets in a disease-context dependent manner. SjS patients showed an overall decrease in memory B cells and most of the BTLA+ B cell subsets while a decrease in HVEM+ B cells was observed only in SLE PBMC samples and not RA and SLE samples. Immunophenotyping with a T cell panel exhibited decreased BTLA and HVEM expression on T cell subsets in SjS and SLE but not in RA patients. In addition, protein levels of HVEM were differentially decreased in SLE myeloid cell subsets. Finally, we demonstrate tissue-specific surface expression patterns of BTLA in RA and SLE samples: higher surface BTLA levels on RA and SLE PBMC B cells than matched tissue-derived B cells.Conclusion:Our results demonstrate a dysregulation of the BTLA/HVEM axis in either lesional tissue or peripheral blood in an autoimmune disease context-dependent manner. These results also indicate the potential of targeting BTLA-HVEM axis for the treatment of multiple autoimmune diseases.Disclosure of Interests:Sunil Nagpal Shareholder of: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Suzanne Cole Shareholder of: Janssen Research & Development employee, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development employee, Achilleas Floudas: None declared, Mihir Wechalekar Grant/research support from: Grant from Janssen Research & Development, Qingxuan Song Shareholder of: Employee of Janssen Research, Employee of: Employee of Janssen Research, Tom Gordon: None declared, Roberto Caricchio Grant/research support from: Financial grant from Janssen Research & Development, Douglas Veale: None declared, Ursula Fearon: None declared, Navin Rao Shareholder of: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Ling-Yang Hao Shareholder of: Employee of Janssen Research, Employee of: Employee of Janssen Research


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document