scholarly journals Exploring the Epidemiology of Hospital-Acquired Bloodstream Infections in Children in England (January 2009–March 2010) by Linkage of National Hospital Admissions and Microbiological Databases

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 284-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth M. Blackburn ◽  
Katherine L. Henderson ◽  
Mehdi Minaji ◽  
Berit Muller-Pebody ◽  
Alan P. Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
National Hospital ◽  
Hospital Acquired

scholarly journals Hospital-Acquired Bloodstream Infections With MRSA and VRE: Standardized Admission Screening Did Not Impact Rates

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s253-s254
Author(s):  
Jennifer Ellison ◽  
Blanda Chow ◽  
Andrea Howatt ◽  
Ted Pfister ◽  
Kathryn Bush
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Early Initiation ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Screening Practices ◽  
Contact Precautions ◽  
Admission Screening ◽  
Hospital Acquired ◽  
Standardized Screening

Background: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in severely ill patients, contributing to increased length of stay and a higher cost of care. Surveillance of hospital-acquired (HA) BSI is considered a measure of quality of care and has been performed provincially in Alberta since 2011. Prior to October 2015, a nonstandardized, risk-factor–based VRE screening process was used. Screening practices for antibiotic-resistant organisms (AROs) were aligned in October 2015 with a provincially standardized admission screening tool to allow for early initiation of contact precautions for patients colonized or infected with MRSA or VRE. In this data review, we sought to determine whether this admission screening change influenced ARO infections through review of HA-BSI rates. Methods: Prospectively, we reviewed reports of all patients admitted to Alberta Health Services/Covenant Health acute-care and acute-/tertiary-care rehabilitation facilities who met inclusion criteria: (1) positive blood culture identified with MRSA or VRE; (2) new episode for the patient; and (3) positive result occurred on or after calendar day 3 of admission. Data are presented as quarterly rates. Screening practices for MRSA and VRE were standardized provincially in October 2015 to include screening for MRSA on admission for patients who had an inpatient admission, received hemodialysis, or was an inmate in a correctional facility in the past 6 months. We also screened for VRE patients admitted to a solid-organ transplant unit or a hematology unit, regardless of risk factors. Results: We detected no changes in the quarterly rates of HA-BSI with MRSA or VRE after admission screening was standardized. Prior to standardized screening, MRSA BSI rates ranged from 0.12 to 0.25 per 10,000 patient days, with an overall rate of 0.18 per 10,000 patient days. After standardization, rates ranged from 0.09 to 0.30 per 10,000 patient days, with an overall rate of 0.17 per 10,000 patient days (P = .46). VRE BSI rates prior to standardization ranged from 0.03 to 0.13 per 10,000 patient days, with an overall rate of 0.08 per 10,000 patient days, which increased slightly to 0.09 per 10,000 patient days after standardized screening, ranging between 0.04 and 0.16 per 10,000 patient days (P = .61). Conclusions: Following the implementation of standardized admission screening and the early initiation of contact precautions, no significant changes were observed in rates of either HA-BSI with MRSA or VRE. Further investigation is required to identify the most effective strategies to reduce HA-BSIs caused by MRSA and VRE.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Distribution of Pathogens in Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections among Patients with and without Neutropenia following Chemotherapy Evidence for a Proposed Modification to the Current Surveillance Definition

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
James P. Steinberg ◽  
Chad Robichaux ◽  
Sheri Chernetsky Tejedor ◽  
Mary Dent Reyes ◽  
Jesse T. Jacob
Keyword(s):  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
E Coli ◽  
National Healthcare Safety Network ◽  
Proposed Modification ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Hospital Acquired ◽  
Study Hospital

Objective.Many bloodstream infections (BSIs) occurring in patients with febrile neutropenia following cytotoxic chemotherapy are due to translocation of intestinal microbiota. However, these infections meet the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) definition of central line-associated BSIs (CLABSIs). We sought to determine the differences in the microbiology of NHSN-defined CLABSIs in patients with and without neutropenia and, using these data, to propose a modification of the CLABSI definition.Design.Retrospective review.Setting.Two large university hospitals over 18 months.Methods.All hospital-acquired BSIs occurring in patients with central venous catheters in place were classified using the NHSN CLABSI definition. Patients with postchemotherapy neutropenia (500 neutrophils/mm3or lower) at the time of blood culture were considered neutropenic. Pathogens overrepresented in the neutropenic group were identified to inform development of a modified CLABSI definition.Results.Organisms that were more commonly observed in the neutropenic group compared with the nonneutropenic group includedEscherichia coli(22.7% vs 2.5%;P< .001) but not other Enterobacteriaceae,Enterococcus faecium(18.2% vs 6.1%;P= .002), and streptococci (18.2% vs 0%;P< .001). Application of a modified CLABSI definition (removing BSI with enterococci, streptococci, orE. coli) excluded 33 of 66 neutropenic CLABSIs and decreased the CLABSI rate in one study hospital with large transplant and oncology populations from 2.12 to 1.79 cases per 1,000 line-days.Conclusions.Common gastrointestinal organisms were more common in the neutropenia group, suggesting that many BSIs meeting the NHSN criteria for CLABSI in the setting of neutropenia may represent translocation of gut organisms. These findings support modification of the NHSN CLABSI definition.

Can multiple sclerosis nurses help reduce non-elective admissions? An analysis of a service delivery audit

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (Sup3) ◽  
pp. S28-S31
Author(s):  
Gale Metcalfe ◽  
Audrey Owen
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Service Delivery ◽  
Urinary Tract Infections ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Quality Care ◽  
Hospital Episode Statistics ◽  
National Hospital ◽  
Elective Admission ◽  
Tract Infections

Background: It has been identified that nearly one-in-five people with multiple sclerosis (MS) have been admitted to hospital as a non-elective admission in 2018–2019. The average national stay is 7.7 days, at an average cost of £2844. Emergency hospital admissions for people with multiple sclerosis are rising nationally. Method: The authors conducted a 12-month audit of non-elective admissions across two clinical sites, comparing and contrasting the data gathered with national Hospital Episode Statistics. The outcome of the data collection influenced changes in local service delivery. Findings: The most common reasons identified for non-elective admissions related to MS were associated with respiratory issues (4255 admissions), with the most common single cause being urinary tract infections (2960 admissions). Bladder and bowel issues combined also accounted for 3550 admissions in 2018/19. Conclusion: The data identified urinary tract infections and sepsis as the largest presentation of non-elective MS admissions to both trusts. Certain recommendations have been made that will contribute to the improvement of service delivery and better quality care.

scholarly journals Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Antimicrobial Consumption and Hospital-Acquired Candidemia and Multidrug-Resistant Bloodstream Infections

Antibiotics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 816
Author(s):  
Ana Guisado-Gil ◽  
Carmen Infante-Domínguez ◽  
Germán Peñalva ◽  
Julia Praena ◽  
Cristina Roca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Incidence Density ◽  
Antimicrobial Consumption ◽  
Global Trend ◽  
Long Term Impact ◽  
Hospital Acquired ◽  
The Impact

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship strategies has been recommended. This study aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary care Spanish hospital with an active ongoing antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP). For a 20-week period, we weekly assessed antimicrobial consumption, incidence density, and crude death rate per 1000 occupied bed days of candidemia and multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial bloodstream infections (BSI). We conducted a segmented regression analysis of time series. Antimicrobial consumption increased +3.5% per week (p = 0.016) for six weeks after the national lockdown, followed by a sustained weekly reduction of −6.4% (p = 0.001). The global trend for the whole period was stable. The frequency of empirical treatment of patients with COVID-19 was 33.7%. No change in the global trend of incidence of hospital-acquired candidemia and MDR bacterial BSI was observed (+0.5% weekly; p = 0.816), nor differences in 14 and 30-day crude death rates (p = 0.653 and p = 0.732, respectively). Our work provides quantitative data about the pandemic effect on antimicrobial consumption and clinical outcomes in a centre with an active ongoing institutional and education-based ASP. However, assessing the long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on antimicrobial resistance is required.

Classification of bloodstream infections in patients recently discharged from acute-care facilities: Hospital acquired or healthcare-associated community onset?

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 1313-1315
Author(s):  
Riad Khatib ◽  
Mamta Sharma ◽  
Mohamad G. Fakih ◽  
Kathleen M. Riederer ◽  
Leonard B. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Infection Risk ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Discharged Patients ◽  
Acute Care Facilities ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
Hospital Acquired ◽  
Community Onset

AbstractLaboratory-identified bloodstream infections (LAB-ID BSIs) in recently discharged patients are likely to be classified as healthcare-associated community-onset (HCA-CO) infections, even though they may represent hospital-onset (HO) infections. A review of LAB-ID BSIs among patients discharged within 14 days revealed that 109 of 756 cases (14.4%) were HO infections. The BSI risk being misclassified as HCA CO may underestimate the hospital infection risk.

scholarly journals Estimating length of stay and inpatient charges attributable to hospital-acquired bloodstream infections

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuzheng Zhang ◽  
Mingmei Du ◽  
Janice Mary Johnston ◽  
Ellie Bostwick Andres ◽  
Jijiang Suo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Hospital Acquired
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document