Surgical resection of the primary lesion for osteosarcoma patients with metastasis at initial diagnosis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liuzhe Zhang ◽  
Toru Akiyama ◽  
Takashi Fukushima ◽  
Shintaro Iwata ◽  
Katsushi Takeshita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Primary Lesion ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Unresectable Metastasis

Abstract Background Approximately 10–20% of osteosarcoma patients present with metastasis on diagnosis. Completely resecting the lesion is associated with better prognosis. However, evidence regarding optimal surgical strategies for patients with unresectable metastasis is limited. Methods This retrospective analysis was based on the Japanese Nationwide Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor registry. In total, 335 patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma with metastasis were included. Factors affecting overall survival were identified using multivariate analysis. Kaplan–Meier method was used to compare the overall survival by the status of surgical intervention. Two hundred and four patients who did not undergo surgery for metastasis were divided into two groups, depending on whether they underwent surgery for the primary lesion. The background differences between these two groups were adjusted with propensity score matching, with 43 patients per group. The overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with a log-rank test. Results Factors positively impacting overall survival were age <40, female sex, extremity origin, surgery for the primary lesions, surgery for metastasis and radiotherapy without surgery. For patients with unresectable metastasis, after propensity score matching, the survival rate was higher in the group that underwent primary lesion surgery than the group without surgery. Their median survival was 19 (95% confidence interval: 11.7–26.3) and 11 months (95% confidence interval: 4.5–17.5) (P = 0.02), respectively. Conclusions Surgical resection of the primary osteosarcoma lesion did not worsen prognosis, even in patients with unresectable metastasis. Further study is needed to identify which patient group will benefit from primary lesion resection.

scholarly journals Surgical Resection Significantly Promotes the Overall Survival of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pei-Min Hsieh ◽  
Hung-Yu Lin ◽  
Chao-Ming Hung ◽  
Gin-Ho Lo ◽  
I-Cheng Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Hbv Infection ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis

Abstract Background: The benefits of surgical resection (SR) for various Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain unclear. We investigated the risk factors of overall survival (OS) and survival benefits of SR over nonsurgical treatments in patients with HCC of various BCLC stages.Methods: Overall, 2316 HCC patients were included, and their clinicopathological data and OS were recorded. OS was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed.Results: In total, 66 (2.8%), 865 (37.4%), 575 (24.8%) and 870 (35.0%) patients had BCLC stage 0, A, B, and C disease, respectively. Furthermore, 1302 (56.2%) of all patients, and 37 (56.9%), 472 (54.6%), 313 (54.4%) and 480 (59.3%) of patients with BCLC stage 0, A, B, and C disease, respectively, died. The median follow-up duration time was 20 (range 0-96) months for the total cohort and was subdivided into 52 (8-96), 32 (1-96), 19 (0-84), and 12 (0-79) months for BCLC stages 0, A, B, and C cohorts, respectively. The risk factors for OS were 1) SR and cirrhosis; 2) SR, cirrhosis, and Child-Pugh (C-P) class; 3) SR, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, and C-P class; and 4) SR, HBV infection, and C-P class for the BCLC stage 0, A, B, and C cohorts, respectively. Compared to non-SR treatment, SR resulted in significantly higher survival rates in all cohorts. The 5-year OS rates for SR vs non-SR were 44.0% vs 28.7%, 72.2% vs 42.6%, 42.6% vs 36.2, 44.6% vs 23.5%, and 41.4% vs 15.3% (all p-values<0.05) in the total and BCLC stage 0, A, B, and C cohorts, respectively. After PSM, SR resulted in significantly higher survival rates compared to non-SR treatment in various BCLC stages.Conclusion: SR conferred significant survival benefits to patients with HCC of various BCLC stages and should be considered a recommended treatment for select HCC patients, especially patients with BCLC stage B and C disease.

Impact of morphine use on mortality in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI - preliminary data from a new registry

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Szabo ◽  
A Szabo ◽  
IF Edes ◽  
D Becker ◽  
B Merkely ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Preliminary Data ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Primary Pci ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
P2y12 Antagonists ◽  
Current Guidelines

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Opioids decrease the effect of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors in vitro and observational reports suggest that morphine use is associated with larger infarct size. Our research group presented previously, using a prospective single-center registry, that periprocedural morphine use may have no impact on long-term mortality in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI and clopidogrel. Purpose Our purpose is to check this interaction using a new registry of patients treated according to the current guidelines, including novel antiplatelet agents. Methods From May until November 2020, we collected 196 STEMI patients treated with primary PCI. 88 (44.9%) of them got morphine during the prehospital and periprocedural care. Baseline demographic, anamnestic, procedural, and laboratory data were collected. Survival data were analysed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the log-rank test. To adjust for confounding, a 1:1 propensity score-matching analysis was performed using 114 cases. Results An adequate balance on baseline covariates was achieved during propensity score-matching. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference in 30-days mortality of the patients treated with or without morphine neither in the original nor in the propensity score-matched population (p = 0.094 and p = 0.309, respectively). Conclusion Our preliminary data suggest that morphine may have no impact on mortality in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI and medical therapy according to the current guidelines including novel P2Y12 antagonists. Abstract Figure. Kaplan-Meier curves

Prognostic Significance of Tumor Deposits in Combination with Lymph Node Metastasis in Stage III Colon Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-170
Author(s):  
Peilin Zheng ◽  
Chen Lai ◽  
Weimin Yang ◽  
Zhikang Chen
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Node Metastasis ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Node Metastasis

Tumor deposits in colon cancer are related to poor prognosis, whereas the prognostic power of tumor deposits in combination with lymph node metastasis (LNM) is controversial. This study aimed to compare the overall survival between LNM alone and LNM in combination with tumor deposits, and to verify whether the number of tumor deposits can be considered LNM in patients with both LNM and tumor deposits in stage III colon cancer by propensity score matching (PSM). Patients carrying resected stage III adenocarcinoma of colon cancer were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2010–2015). The Kaplan-Meier method, Cox proportional hazard models and PSM were used. On the whole, 23,168 patients (20,451 (88.3%) with only LNM and 2,717 (11.7%) with both LNM and tumor deposits) were selected. After undergoing PSM, patients with both LNM and tumor deposits showed worse overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.33, 95% confidence interval: 1.20–1.47, P < 0.001). After the number of tumor deposits was added with that of positive regional lymph nodes, patients with both LNM and tumor deposits seemed to have prognostic implications similar to those with LNM alone (hazard ratio = 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 0.93–1.12, P = 0.66). The simultaneous presence of LNM and tumor deposits, as compared with the presence of only LNM, had an association with a worse outcome. Tumor deposits should be considered as LNM in patients with both tumor deposits and LNM in stage III colon cancer.

scholarly journals Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) Combined with Sorafenib in Treatment of HBV Background Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: A Propensity Score Matching Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia Yuan ◽  
Xin Yin ◽  
Bei Tang ◽  
Hui Ma ◽  
Lan Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Portal Vein ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Transarterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Tumor Thrombus ◽  
Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus ◽  
Rank Test

Objectives. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) remains a challenge in management. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been used for patients with PVTT but efficiency was limited with a median overall survival of 4 to 6.1 months. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of TACE combined with sorafenib in HBV background HCC with PVTT. Methods. A total of 498 patients were enrolled in the study including 69 patients who received TACE combined with sorafenib and 429 patients treated with TACE alone between January 1st, 2008, and April 30st, 2014. Using the 1:2 propensity score matching, 138 well-balanced patients were enrolled. Overall survival (OS) was compared between the two groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate the OS, and the differences between groups were analyzed with a log-rank test. Results. TACE combined with sorafenib improved the OS of the patients compared with TACE alone (13.0 vs 6.0 months, p<0.001). After propensity score matching, the median OS of combination therapy and TACE were 13.0 and 7.0 months, respectively (p=0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that the patients younger than 60 years old, male patients, AFP more than 400ng/ml, tumor size more than 5cm, or type III/IV PVTT had OS benefits from TACE combined with sorafenib. Conclusions. Compared with TACE therapy alone, TACE combined with sorafenib could improve OS in HBV background HCC patients with PVTT. The patients who are younger, male, or with more tumor burden may benefit more from combination therapy.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy versus laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in posterior segments: Propensity Score Matching Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 108 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-29
Author(s):  
J. Rhu ◽  
G. S. Choi ◽  
J. M. Kim ◽  
C. H. D. Kwon ◽  
S. J. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Right Hemihepatectomy ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Right Posterior Sectionectomy

Background and Aims: This study was designed to analyze the feasibility of laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy compared to laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma located in the posterior segments. Material and Methods: The study included patients who underwent either laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy or laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma located in segment 6 or 7 from January 2009 to December 2016 at Samsung Medical Center. After 1:1 propensity score matching, patient baseline characteristics and operative and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. Disease-free survival and overall survival were compared using Kaplan–Meier log-rank test. Results: Among 61 patients with laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy and 37 patients with laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, 30 patients from each group were analyzed after propensity score matching. After matching, baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar including tumor size (3.4 ± 1.2 cm in laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs 3.7 ± 2.1 cm in laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, P = 0.483); differences were significant before matching (3.1 ± 1.3 cm in laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs 4.3 ± 2.7 cm in laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, P = 0.035). No significant differences were observed in operative and postoperative data except for free margin size (1.04 ± 0.71 cm in laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs 2.95 ± 1.75 cm in laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, P < 0.001). Disease-free survival (5-year survival: 38.0% in laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs 47.0% in laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, P = 0.510) and overall survival (5-year survival: 92.7% in laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs 89.6% in laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, P = 0.593) did not differ between the groups based on Kaplan–Meier log-rank test. Conclusion: For hepatocellular carcinoma in the posterior segments, laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy was feasible compared to laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy when performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons.

scholarly journals Comparison of overall survival on surgical resection versus transarterial chemoembolization with or without radiofrequency ablation in intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Wen Lin ◽  
Yaw-Sen Chen ◽  
Gin-Ho Lo ◽  
Yao-Chun Hsu ◽  
Chia-Chang Hsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Tace Group ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are recommended to undergo transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). However, TACE in combination with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is not inferior to surgical resection (SR), and the benefits of surgical resection (SR) for BCLC stage B HCC remain unclear. Hence, this study aims to compare the impact of SR, TACE+RFA, and TACE on analyzing overall survival (OS) in BCLC stage B HCC. Methods: Overall, 428 HCC patients were included in BCLC stage B, and their clinical data and OS were recorded. OS was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis. Results: One hundred forty (32.7%) patients received SR, 231 (53.9%) received TACE+RFA, and 57 (13.3%) received TACE. The OS was significantly higher in the SR group than that in the TACE+RFA group [hazard ratio (HR): 1.78; 95% confidence incidence (CI): 1.15-2.75, p=0.009]. The OS was significantly higher in the SR group than that in the TACE group (HR: 3.17; 95% CI: 2.31-4.36, p<0.0001). Moreover, the OS was significantly higher in the TACE+RFA group than that in the TACE group (HR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.21-2.74, p=0.004). The cumulative OS rates at 1, 3 and 5 years in the SR, TACE+RFA, and TACE groups were 89.2%, 69.4% and 61.2%, 86.0%, 57.9% and 38.2%, and 69.5%, 37.0% and 15.2%, respectively. After propensity score matching, the SR group still had a higher OS than those of the TACE+RFA and TACE groups. The TACE+RFA group had a higher OS than that of the TACE group. Conclusion: The SR group had higher OS than the TACE+RFA and TACE groups in BCLC stage B HCC. Furthermore, the TACE+RFA group had higher OS than the TACE group.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy, Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy, and Brachytherapy Boost Modalities in Invasive Cervical Cancer: A Study of the National Cancer Data Base

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 563-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barrett O'Donnell ◽  
Jay C. Shiao ◽  
Todd A. Pezzi ◽  
Nabila Waheed ◽  
Shelly Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Invasive Cervical Cancer ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Brachytherapy Boost

Background and PurposeOur objective was to determine whether stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and brachytherapy boost techniques have comparable overall survival in treating cervical cancer when adjusted for known prognostic factors.Materials and MethodsWe used the National Cancer Database to study women with invasive cervical cancer who were treated with radiation between 2004 and 2013. A logistic regression model was built to identify factors associated with the receipt of SBRT and IMRT. Outcomes were compared using Kaplan-Meier and propensity score matching.ResultsOf all 15,905 patients, 14,394 (90.5%) received brachytherapy, 42 (0.8%) received SBRT, and 1468 (9.2%) received IMRT. After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) for patients who received SBRT boost versus brachytherapy boost (hazard ratio = 1.477, 95% confidence interval = 0.746–2.926, P = 0.263) but a significant OS detriment in patients who received IMRT boost versus brachytherapy boost (hazard ratio = 1.455, 95% confidence interval = 1.300–1.628, P < 0.001).ConclusionsIn a propensity-matched analysis, those who received SBRT boost had equal OS when compared with brachytherapy, but those who received IMRT boost had worse OS when compared with brachytherapy.

scholarly journals Higher Mortality of Ischaemic Stroke Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19 Compared to Historical Controls

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Stephanie L. Harrison ◽  
Elnara Fazio-Eynullayeva ◽  
Deirdre A. Lane ◽  
Paula Underhill ◽  
Gregory Y.H. Lip
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Healthcare Organizations ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Historical Controls

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Increasing evidence suggests patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may develop thrombosis and thrombosis-related complications. Some previous evidence has suggested COVID-19-associated strokes are more severe with worse outcomes for patients, but further studies are needed to confirm these findings. The aim of this study was to determine the association between COVID-19 and mortality for patients with ischaemic stroke in a large multicentre study. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective cohort study was conducted using electronic medical records of inpatients from 50 healthcare organizations, predominately from the USA. Patients with ischaemic stroke within 30 days of COVID-19 were identified. COVID-19 was determined from diagnosis codes or a positive test result identified with CO­VID-19-specific laboratory codes between January 20, 2020, and October 1, 2020. Historical controls with ischaemic stroke without COVID-19 were identified in the period January 20, 2019, to October 1, 2019. 1:1 propensity score matching was used to balance the cohorts with and without CO­VID-19 on characteristics including age, sex, race and comorbidities. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for all-cause 60-day mortality by COVID-19 status were produced. <b><i>Results:</i></b> During the study period, there were 954 inpatients with ischaemic stroke and COVID-19. During the same time period in 2019, there were 48,363 inpatients with ischaemic stroke without COVID-19 (historical controls). Compared to patients with ischaemic stroke without COVID-19, patients with ischaemic stroke and COVID-19 had a lower mean age, had a lower prevalence of white patients, a higher prevalence of black or African American patients and a higher prevalence of hypertension, previous cerebrovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, ischaemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, liver disease, neoplasms, and mental disorders due to known physiological conditions. After propensity score matching, there were 952 cases and 952 historical controls; cases and historical controls were better balanced on all included characteristics (all <i>p</i> &#x3e; 0.05). After propensity score matching, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed the survival probability was significantly lower in ischaemic stroke patients with COVID-19 (78.3% vs. 91.0%, log-rank test <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001). The odds of 60-day mortality were significantly higher for patients with ischaemic stroke and COVID-19 compared to the propensity score-matched historical controls (odds ratio: 2.51 [95% confidence interval 1.88–3.34]). <b><i>Discussion/Conclusions:</i></b> Ischaemic stroke patients with COVID-19 had significantly higher 60-day all-cause mortality compared to propensity score-matched historical controls (ischaemic stroke patients without COVID-19).

scholarly journals Correlation analysis between preoperative systemic immune inflammation index and prognosis of patients after radical gastric cancer surgery: based on propensity score matching method

2022 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xu Zhaojun ◽  
Chen Xiaobin ◽  
An Juan ◽  
Yuan Jiaqi ◽  
Jiang Shuyun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Independent Risk Factor ◽  
Gastrointestinal Surgery ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Immune Inflammation

Abstract Background To explore the correlation between the preoperative systemic immune inflammation index (SII) and the prognosis of patients with gastric carcinoma (GC). Methods The clinical data of 771 GC patients surgically treated in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital from June 2010 to June 2015 were retrospectively analyzed, and their preoperative SII was calculated. The optimal cut-off value of preoperative SII was determined using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the confounding factors between the two groups were eliminated using the propensity score matching (PSM) method, and the correlation between preoperative SII and clinicopathological characteristics was assessed by chi-square test. Moreover, the overall survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method, the survival curve was plotted, and log-rank test was performed for the significance analysis between the curves. Univariate and multivariate analyses were also conducted using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results It was determined by the ROC curve that the optimal cut-off value of preoperative SII was 489.52, based on which 771 GC patients were divided into high SII (H-SII) group and low SII (L-SII) group, followed by PSM in the two groups. The results of Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that before and after PSM, the postoperative 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates in L-SII group were superior to those in H-SII group, and the overall survival rate had a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). Before PSM, preoperative SII [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.707, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.074-3.533, P < 0.001] was an independent risk factor for the prognosis of GC patients. After 1:1 PSM, preoperative SII (HR = 2.669, 95%CI 1.881–3.788, P < 0.001) was still an independent risk factor for the prognosis of GC patients. Conclusions Preoperative SII is an independent risk factor for the prognosis of GC patients. The increase in preoperative SII in peripheral blood indicates a worse prognosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document