Sublobar resection versus lobectomy for patients with resectable stage I non-small cell lung cancer with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a phase III study evaluating survival (JCOG1708, SURPRISE)

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (9) ◽  
pp. 1076-1079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiyo Tanaka ◽  
Yasuhiro Tsutani ◽  
Masashi Wakabayashi ◽  
Tomonori Mizutani ◽  
Keiju Aokage ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Respiratory Function ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Sublobar Resection ◽  
Small Cell Lung

Abstract The standard treatment for the patients with surgically resectable early non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is lung lobectomy. However, if patients have idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis combined with early stage lung cancer, there is no standard treatment for this population. Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis have chronic progressive decline in respiratory function; thus, the preservation of respiratory function is essential. The aim of this trial is to confirm the clinical effectiveness of sublobar resection such as wedge resection or segmentectomy for early NSCLC with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis compared with lobectomy in a randomized phase III trial. The primary endpoint is overall survival. If the non-inferiority of overall survival and minimal invasiveness are proven, it can be a new standard treatment for early NSCLC with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. A planned total 430 patients will be enrolled from 50 institutions over 5 years. This trial has been registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry with code UMIN000032696 [http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm].

Phase III Study of Docetaxel Compared With Vinorelbine in Elderly Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of the West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group Trial (WJTOG 9904)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (22) ◽  
pp. 3657-3663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinzoh Kudoh ◽  
Koji Takeda ◽  
Kazuhiko Nakagawa ◽  
Minoru Takada ◽  
Nobuyuki Katakami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival

Purpose Docetaxel has shown activity in elderly patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This randomized phase III trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of docetaxel versus vinorelbine (the current standard treatment) in elderly patients. Patients and Methods Chemotherapy-naïve patients age 70 years or older with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC and performance status 2 or lower were eligible. Patients randomly received docetaxel 60 mg/m2 (day 1) or vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8) every 21 days for four cycles. The primary end point was overall survival. Overall disease-related symptom improvement was assessed using an eight-item questionnaire. Results In total, 182 patients were enrolled. Median age was 76 years (range, 70 years to 86 years). There was no statistical difference in median overall survival with docetaxel versus vinorelbine (14.3 months v 9.9 months; hazard ratio, 0.780; 95% CI, 0.561 to 1.085; P = .138). There was a significant difference in median progression-free survival (5.5 months v 3.1 months; P < .001). Response rates were also significantly improved with docetaxel versus vinorelbine (22.7% v 9.9%; P = .019). The most common grade 3 to 4 toxicities were neutropenia (82.9% for docetaxel; 69.2% for vinorelbine; P = .031) and leukopenia (58.0% for docetaxel; 51.7% for vinorelbine). Other toxicities were mild and generally well tolerated. Docetaxel improved overall disease-related symptoms over vinorelbine (odds ratio, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.09 to 3.20). Conclusion Docetaxel improved progression-free survival, response rate, and disease-related symptoms versus vinorelbine. Overall survival was not statistically significantly improved at this time. Docetaxel monotherapy may be considered as an option in the standard treatment of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.

scholarly journals Chemotherapy in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and small-cell lung cancer with poor lung function

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiyue Zhang ◽  
Wei Li ◽  
Chunyan Li ◽  
Jie Zhang ◽  
Zhenzhong Su
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Lung Function ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
High Resolution Computed Tomography ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Regimen

Abstract Background Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic interstitial lung disease with unclear pathogenesis. IPF is considered as a risk factor for lung cancer. Compared to other lung cancers, small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) has a lower incidence, but has a more aggressive course. Patients with IPF and SCLC have a lower survival rate, more difficult treatment, and poorer prognosis. Case presentation Case 1 was of a 66-year-old man with IPF for 5 years, who was admitted to our hospital for dyspnea. Case 2 was of a 68-year-old woman, who presented with chest pains, cough, and dyspnea. Both patients had extremely poor lung function. High-resolution computed tomography and pathology revealed that both patients had IPF and SCLC. Chemotherapy comprising nedaplatin (80 mg/m2) and etoposide (100 mg for 5 days) was initiated for both patients. Antifibrotic agents were continued during the chemotherapeutic regimen. Both patients showed improvement in their condition after treatment. Conclusion The favorable outcomes in these 2 cases suggests that chemotherapy is worth considering in the management of patients having SCLC and IPF with poor lung function.

scholarly journals Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in non-small cell lung cancer: impact on survival and acute exacerbation

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Woo Moon ◽  
Moo Suk Park ◽  
Young Sam Kim ◽  
Joon Jang ◽  
Jae Ho Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Nsclc Patients

Abstract Background In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, concomitant idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and emphysema (CPFE) are independently related to poor survival. CPFE is a condition with features of both pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. Here, we evaluated the effect of CPFE and IPF alone on the outcomes of NSCLC patients. Patients and methods We retrospectively evaluated 283 patients with CPFE or IPF who were diagnosed with NSCLC between November 2003 and February 2018 at two tertiary care hospitals in South Korea. Patients were classified into CPFE and IPF groups according to chest computed tomography findings. Results One-hundred-and-seven patients (37.8%; mean age: 70.1 years; men 97.2%) had CPFE. Compared with IPF patients, CPFE patients had a heavier smoking history; lower diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (78.0% vs 64.8%, p <  0.001), and lower forced expiratory volume in 1 s. Of all patients with NSCLC, 71.7% overall died during the follow-up period; 71.6% died in the CPFE group and 72.0% in the IPF group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that CPFE (odds ratio [OR]: 2.26, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09–4.69; P = 0.029) was significantly correlated with acute exacerbations (AEs). In a Cox proportional hazards analysis, stage > III NSCLC, higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and higher gender–age–physiology index score was related to higher mortality. However, CPFE was not related to a higher mortality rate in univariate (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.75–1.32, P = 0.972) or multivariate analysis (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.66–1.21, P = 0.466). Conclusions AE risk, but not all-cause mortality, was higher in patients with CPFE and NSCLC than in those with IPF and NSCLC. Physicians should be aware of the exaggerated risk of AE in patients with concomitant CPFE and NSCLC.

Phase III Study of Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitor Prinomastat in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 842-849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald Bissett ◽  
Ken J. O’Byrne ◽  
J. von Pawel ◽  
Ulrich Gatzemeier ◽  
Allan Price ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Extracellular Proteins ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Study Results

Purpose Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) degrade extracellular proteins and facilitate tumor growth, invasion, metastasis, and angiogenesis. This trial was undertaken to determine the effect of prinomastat, an inhibitor of selected MMPs, on the survival of patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), when given in combination with gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy. Patients and Methods Chemotherapy-naive patients were randomly assigned to receive prinomastat 15 mg or placebo twice daily orally continuously, in combination with gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 day 1, every 21 days for up to six cycles. The planned sample size was 420 patients. Results Study results at an interim analysis and lack of efficacy in another phase III trial prompted early closure of this study. There were 362 patients randomized (181 on prinomastat and 181 on placebo). One hundred thirty-four patients had stage IIIB disease with T4 primary tumor, 193 had stage IV disease, and 34 had recurrent disease (one enrolled patient was ineligible with stage IIIA disease). Overall response rates for the two treatment arms were similar (27% for prinomastat v 26% for placebo; P = .81). There was no difference in overall survival or time to progression; for prinomastat versus placebo patients, the median overall survival times were 11.5 versus 10.8 months (P = .82), 1-year survival rates were 43% v 38% (P = .45), and progression-free survival times were 6.1 v 5.5 months (P = .11), respectively. The toxicities of prinomastat were arthralgia, stiffness, and joint swelling. Treatment interruption was required in 38% of prinomastat patients and 12% of placebo patients. Conclusion Prinomastat does not improve the outcome of chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC.

scholarly journals Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Lung Cancer: Mechanisms and Molecular Targets

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatriz Ballester ◽  
Javier Milara ◽  
Julio Cortijo
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Molecular Targets ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Mesenchymal Transition ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
History Of

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the most common idiopathic interstitial pulmonary disease with a median survival of 2–4 years after diagnosis. A significant number of IPF patients have risk factors, such as a history of smoking or concomitant emphysema, both of which can predispose the patient to lung cancer (LC) (mostly non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)). In fact, IPF itself increases the risk of LC development by 7% to 20%. In this regard, there are multiple common genetic, molecular, and cellular processes that connect lung fibrosis with LC, such as myofibroblast/mesenchymal transition, myofibroblast activation and uncontrolled proliferation, endoplasmic reticulum stress, alterations of growth factors expression, oxidative stress, and large genetic and epigenetic variations that can predispose the patient to develop IPF and LC. The current approved IPF therapies, pirfenidone and nintedanib, are also active in LC. In fact, nintedanib is approved as a second line treatment in NSCLC, and pirfenidone has shown anti-neoplastic effects in preclinical studies. In this review, we focus on the current knowledge on the mechanisms implicated in the development of LC in patients with IPF as well as in current IPF and LC-IPF candidate therapies based on novel molecular advances.

Progression-free survival and overall survival in phase III trials of molecular-targeted agents in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Lung Cancer ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuyuki Hotta ◽  
Etsuji Suzuki ◽  
Massimo Di Maio ◽  
Paolo Chiodini ◽  
Yoshiro Fujiwara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Targeted Agents ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii Trials
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document