Comparative Responses ofAnastrepha ludensandAnastrepha obliqua(Diptera: Tephritidae) to the Synthetic Attractant BioLure

2016 ◽  
Vol 109 (5) ◽  
pp. 2054-2060 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nayeli Déctor ◽  
Edi A. Malo ◽  
Julio C. Rojas ◽  
Pablo Liedo
Keyword(s):  
1969 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 1245-1245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry G. Davis ◽  
Gaines W. Eddy ◽  
T. P. McGovern ◽  
Morton Beroza
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 1119-1125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul E. Kendra ◽  
Nancy D. Epsky ◽  
Wayne S. Montgomery ◽  
Robert R. Heath
Keyword(s):  

1995 ◽  
Vol 88 (5) ◽  
pp. 1307-1315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert R. Heath ◽  
Nancy D. Epsky ◽  
Antonio Guzman ◽  
Barbara D. Dueben ◽  
Ara Manukian ◽  
...  

1973 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 486-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. D. A. Dyer

Frontalin, a synthetic attractant developed from the southern pine beetle (Dendroctonusfrontalis Zimm.), induced spruce beetle (D. rufipennis Kirby) attacks on preselected spruce trees destined for harvest, and adjacent trees. If baited trees were treated with insecticide, spruce beetles and predators (Thanasimusundatulus Say) were killed. Female Dendroctonus predominated on frontalin-baited trees. Some baited trees, unprotected by insecticide, were killed by beetle attacks but many resisted attacks and prevented beetle broods from developing. Green windfall trees were attacked whether or not frontalin was used on adjacent standing trees. Distance between attractant, and attacked unbaited trees appeared to be related to tree size.


1998 ◽  
Vol 130 (3) ◽  
pp. 349-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Bakri ◽  
H. Hadis ◽  
N.D. Epsky ◽  
R.R. Heath ◽  
J. Hendrichs

AbstractField tests were conducted in an argan forest in Morocco to evaluate the performance of a cylindrical dry trap and food-based synthetic attractant (FA) for monitoring the Mediterranean fruit fly (medfly), Ceratitis capitata (Weidemann). This female-targeted trapping system was compared with Jackson traps baited with trimedlure (TML), a male-targeted trapping system. TML-baited traps attracted significantly more males than FA-baited traps (91.4 ± 13.01 and 5.0 ± 0.75 males, respectively), and the FA-baited traps captured significantly more females than did TML-baited traps (9.3 ± 1.93 and 0.1 ± 0.04 females, respectively). For the first month of the field trial, the ratio of mature females to immature females captured in the FA-baited traps was approximately equal, but more immature females were captured in the second month. FA-baited traps were less specific and captured significantly more nontarget flies than did TML-baited traps.


2008 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 1119-1125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul E. Kendra ◽  
Nancy D. Epsky ◽  
Wayne S. Montgomery ◽  
Robert R. Heath

Author(s):  
K.A. Kuznetsov ◽  
N.I. Kulakova ◽  
N.M. Atanov ◽  
Е.В. СИНИЦЫНА

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document