scholarly journals Effects of energy restriction during gilt development on milk nutrient profile, milk oligosaccharides, and progeny biomarkers1

2018 ◽  
Vol 96 (8) ◽  
pp. 3077-3088 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shana M Winkel ◽  
Melanie D Trenhaile-Grannemann ◽  
Dana M Van Sambeek ◽  
Phillip S Miller ◽  
Jaime Salcedo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Energy Restriction ◽  
Milk Oligosaccharides ◽  
Nutrient Profile ◽  
Gilt Development

147 Effects of Energy Restriction during Gilt Development on Characterization and Quantification of Milk Oligosaccharides.

2018 ◽  
Vol 96 (suppl_2) ◽  
pp. 78-79
Author(s):  
S M Barnett ◽  
M D Trenhaile-Grannemann ◽  
D M van Sambeek ◽  
P S Miller ◽  
J Salcedo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Energy Restriction ◽  
Milk Oligosaccharides ◽  
Gilt Development

166 Effects of energy restriction during gilt development on milk nutrient profile and progeny biomarkers

2017 ◽  
Vol 95 (suppl_2) ◽  
pp. 78-79
Author(s):  
S. M. Barnett ◽  
M. D. Trenhaile-Grannemann ◽  
P. S. Miller ◽  
T. E. Burkey ◽  
D. M. van Sambeek
Keyword(s):  
Energy Restriction ◽  
Nutrient Profile ◽  
Gilt Development

160 Effects of energy restriction during gilt development on parity 1 progeny growth performance

2017 ◽  
Vol 95 (suppl_2) ◽  
pp. 76-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Barnett ◽  
M. D. Trenhaile-Grannemann ◽  
T. E. Burkey ◽  
P. S. Miller ◽  
D. C. Ciobanu
Keyword(s):  
Growth Performance ◽  
Energy Restriction ◽  
Gilt Development

TRACKING PHOSPHORUS ACROSS THE KELLWASSER EVENT: A NUTRIENT PROFILE FROM EURAMERICA

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Smart ◽  
◽  
Gabriel M. Filippelli ◽  
William Gilhooly ◽  
John Marshall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nutrient Profile

scholarly journals Effects of Different Human Milk Oligosaccharides on Growth of Bifidobacteria in Monoculture and Co-culture With Faecalibacterium prausnitzii

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lianghui Cheng ◽  
Mensiena B. G. Kiewiet ◽  
Madelon J. Logtenberg ◽  
Andre Groeneveld ◽  
Arjen Nauta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Milk ◽  
Human Milk Oligosaccharides ◽  
Milk Oligosaccharides ◽  
Faecalibacterium Prausnitzii

scholarly journals Effects of intermittent (5:2) or continuous energy restriction on basal and postprandial metabolism: a randomised study in normal-weight, young participants

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yangfan Gao ◽  
Kostas Tsintzas ◽  
Ian A. Macdonald ◽  
Sally M. Cordon ◽  
Moira A. Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Blood Glucose ◽  
Serum Insulin ◽  
Fasting Blood Glucose ◽  
Normal Weight ◽  
Energy Restriction ◽  
Healthy Weight ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Postprandial Metabolism ◽  
Continuous Energy ◽  
Time Interaction

Abstract Background/objectives Intermittent energy restriction (IER) may overcome poor long-term adherence with continuous energy restriction (CER), for weight reduction. We compared the effects of IER with CER for fasting and postprandial metabolism and appetite in metabolically healthy participants, in whom excess weight would not confound intrinsic metabolic differences. Subjects/methods In a 2-week randomised, parallel trial, 16 young, healthy-weight participants were assigned to either CER (20% below estimated energy requirements (EER)) or 5:2 IER (70% below EER on 2 non-consecutive days; 5 days at EER, per week). Metabolic and appetite regulation markers were assessed before and for 3 h after a liquid breakfast; followed by an ad libitum lunch; pre- and post-intervention. Results Weight loss was similar in both groups: −2.5 (95% CI, −3.4, −1.6) kg for 5:2 IER vs. −2.3 (−2.9, −1.7) kg for CER. There were no differences between groups for postprandial incremental area under the curve for serum insulin, blood glucose or subjective appetite ratings. Compared with CER, 5:2 IER led to a reduction in fasting blood glucose concentrations (treatment-by-time interaction, P = 0.018, η2p = 0.14). Similarly, compared with CER, there were beneficial changes in fasting composite appetite scores after 5:2 IER (treatment-by-time interaction, P = 0.0003, η2p = 0.35). Conclusions There were no significant differences in postprandial insulinaemic, glycaemic or appetite responses between treatments. However, 5:2 IER resulted in greater improvements in fasting blood glucose, and beneficial changes in fasting subjective appetite ratings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document