scholarly journals Corrigendum to: A snapshot of health information exchange across five nations: an investigation of frontline clinician experiences in emergency care

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 1269-1269
2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 686-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seth Klapman ◽  
Emily Sher ◽  
Julia Adler-Milstein

Abstract Objective Ensuring the ability to exchange patient information among disparate electronic health records systems is a top priority and a domain of substantial public investment across countries. However, we know little about the extent to which current capabilities meet the needs of frontline clinicians. Materials and Methods We conducted in-person, semistructured interviews with emergency care physicians and nurses in select hospitals in Canada, Denmark, Finland, Germany, and the USA. We characterized the state of health information exchange (HIE) by country and used thematic analysis to identify the perceived benefits of access to complete past medical history (PMH), the conditions under which PMH is sought, and the challenges to accessing and using HIE capabilities. Results HIE approaches, and the information electronically accessible to clinicians, differed by country. Benefits of access to PMH included safer care, reduced patient length of stay, and fewer lab and imaging orders. Conditions under which PMH was sought included moderate-acuity patients, patients with chronic conditions, and instances where accessing PMH was convenient. Challenges to HIE access and use included difficulty knowing where information is located, delay in receiving information, and difficulty finding information within documents. Discussion Even with different HIE approaches across countries, all clinicians reported shortcomings in their country’s approach. Notably, challenges were similar and shaped the conditions under which PMH was sought. Conclusion As countries continue to pursue broad-based HIE, they appear to be facing similar challenges in realizing HIE value and therefore have an opportunity to learn from one another.


Author(s):  
Joshua R Vest ◽  
'Jon Jasperson ◽  
Hongwei Zhao ◽  
Larry D Gamm ◽  
Robert L Ohsfeldt

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. e100241
Author(s):  
Job Nyangena ◽  
Rohini Rajgopal ◽  
Elizabeth Adhiambo Ombech ◽  
Enock Oloo ◽  
Humphrey Luchetu ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe use of digital technology in healthcare promises to improve quality of care and reduce costs over time. This promise will be difficult to attain without interoperability: facilitating seamless health information exchange between the deployed digital health information systems (HIS).ObjectiveTo determine the maturity readiness of the interoperability capacity of Kenya’s HIS.MethodsWe used the HIS Interoperability Maturity Toolkit, developed by MEASURE Evaluation and the Health Data Collaborative’s Digital Health and Interoperability Working Group. The assessment was undertaken by eHealth stakeholder representatives primarily from the Ministry of Health’s Digital Health Technical Working Group. The toolkit focused on three major domains: leadership and governance, human resources and technology.ResultsMost domains are at the lowest two levels of maturity: nascent or emerging. At the nascent level, HIS activities happen by chance or represent isolated, ad hoc efforts. An emerging maturity level characterises a system with defined HIS processes and structures. However, such processes are not systematically documented and lack ongoing monitoring mechanisms.ConclusionNone of the domains had a maturity level greater than level 2 (emerging). The subdomains of governance structures for HIS, defined national enterprise architecture for HIS, defined technical standards for data exchange, nationwide communication network infrastructure, and capacity for operations and maintenance of hardware attained higher maturity levels. These findings are similar to those from interoperability maturity assessments done in Ghana and Uganda.


2014 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 1672-1679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F. Furukawa ◽  
Jennifer King ◽  
Vaishali Patel ◽  
Chun-Ju Hsiao ◽  
Julia Adler-Milstein ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 01 (01) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. Ross ◽  
B. K. Mellis ◽  
B. L. Beaty ◽  
L. M. Schilling ◽  
A. J. Davidson ◽  
...  

SummaryObjective: Assess the interest in and preferences of ambulatory practitioners in HIE.Background: Health information exchange (HIE) may improve the quality and efficiency of care. Identifying the value proposition for smaller ambulatory practices may help those practices engage in HIE.Methods: Survey of primary care and specialist practitioners in the State of Colorado.Results: Clinical data were commonly (always [2%], often [29%] or sometimes [49%]) missing during clinic visits. Of 12 data types proposed as available through HIE, ten were considered “extremely useful” by most practitioners. “Clinical notes/consultation reports,” “diagnosis or problem lists,” and “hospital discharge summaries” were considered the three most useful data types. Interest in EKG reports, diagnosis/problem lists, childhood immunizations, and discharge summaries differed among ambulatory practitioner groups (primary care, obstetrics-gynecology, and internal medicine subspecialties).Conclusion: Practitioners express strong interest in most of the data types, but opinions differed by specialties on what types were most important. All providers felt that a system that provided all data types would be useful. These results support the potential benefit of HIE in ambulatory practices.


2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 604-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang-il Lee ◽  
Hayoung Park ◽  
Jeong-Whun Kim ◽  
Hee Hwang ◽  
Eun-Young Cho ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document