scholarly journals Not in my backyard: a systematic review of clinicians' knowledge and beliefs about antibiotic resistance

2015 ◽  
Vol 70 (9) ◽  
pp. 2465-2473 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. McCullough ◽  
J. Rathbone ◽  
S. Parekh ◽  
T. C. Hoffmann ◽  
C. B. Del Mar
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Knowledge And Beliefs

scholarly journals A systematic review of the public's knowledge and beliefs about antibiotic resistance–authors' response

2016 ◽  
Vol 71 (8) ◽  
pp. 2366-2366 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. McCullough ◽  
S. Parekh ◽  
J. Rathbone ◽  
C. B. Del Mar ◽  
T. C. Hoffmann
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Knowledge And Beliefs

scholarly journals A systematic review of the public's knowledge and beliefs about antibiotic resistance

2015 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. McCullough ◽  
S. Parekh ◽  
J. Rathbone ◽  
C. B. Del Mar ◽  
T. C. Hoffmann
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Knowledge And Beliefs

scholarly journals Comment on: A systematic review of the public's knowledge and beliefs about antibiotic resistance: Table 1.

2016 ◽  
Vol 71 (8) ◽  
pp. 2364-2365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique L. Monnet ◽  
Nabil Safrany ◽  
Nicole Heine ◽  
Charles Price
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Knowledge And Beliefs

scholarly journals Risk factors for antibiotic resistance development in healthcare settings in China: A systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-30
Author(s):  
Qi Chen ◽  
Duguang Li ◽  
Claudia Beiersmann ◽  
Florian Neuhann ◽  
Babak Moazen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Resistance Development ◽  
Healthcare Settings

Comments on the published systematic review and meta-analysis on the increasing antibiotic resistance in Clostridioides difficile

Anaerobe ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 61 ◽  
pp. 102141
Author(s):  
Ebrahim Kouhsari ◽  
Sara Hayati Mehr ◽  
Mohammad Sholeh ◽  
Nima Mohammadzadeh
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile

scholarly journals A global perspective of antibiotic-resistant Listeria monocytogenes prevalence in assorted ready to eat foods: A systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. 2219-2229
Author(s):  
Prudence Mpundu ◽  
Allan Rabson Mbewe ◽  
John Bwalya Muma ◽  
Wizaso Mwasinga ◽  
Nawa Mukumbuta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Listeria Monocytogenes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Global Perspective ◽  
Valuable Insight ◽  
Resistance Profile ◽  
Antibiotic Resistance Profile ◽  
Pooled Prevalence ◽  
Insight Into

Background and Aim: Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat (RTE) foods remains consistently under-reported globally. Nevertheless, several independent studies conducted to investigate have elucidated the prevalence and antibiotic resistance profiles of L. monocytogenes in RTE-associated foods and their antibiotic resistance profiles. Given the rapid increase in consumption of RTE foods of both animal and plant origin, it is imperative to know the prevalence deductive data focusing on how much of L. monocytogenes is present in RTE foods, which is critical for food safety managers and retailers to assess the possible risk posed to end-users. In addition, valuable insight and another angle to the depth of the problem, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize available data regarding the prevalence of L. monocytogenes in RTE foods and antibiotic resistance profiles. Materials and Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis study of L. monocytogenes and antibiotic resistance to clinically relevant antibiotics to determine the extent of L. monocytogenes contamination in RTE foods and antibiotic resistance profiles. The primary search terms, also known as keywords used, were restricted to peer-reviewed and review articles, and databases, including Google Scholars, Science-Direct, and Scopus, were searched. The inclusion of articles meeting eligibility criteria published between 2010 and 2020 after title, abstract, and full article screening. Data analysis was performed at multiple stages using quantitative meta-analysis reviews. Results: L. monocytogenes pooled proportion/prevalence was highest in chicken products determined at (22%) followed by various but uncategorized RTE foods at 21%. Regarding antibiotic resistance, profiling's highest pooled prevalence resistance was observed in penicillin at 80% resistance, followed by cephalosporin at 47%. Conclusion: Within its limitations, this study has attempted to provide insight into the pooled proportion/prevalence of L. monocytogenes in RTE foods and the antibiotic resistance profile at the global level. Determining the proportion/ prevalence of L. monocytogenes in RTE foods across the globe and antibiotic resistance profile is essential for providing quality food and reducing public health problems due to unsuccessful treatment of foodborne illness. This study provides insight into the pooled prevalence of L. monocytogenes in RTE foods and the antibiotic resistance profile. The results of this study partly endeavored to help appropriate authorities strengthen their preventive measures on specific RTE foods that are most likely to be contaminated with L. monocytogenes and antibiotic resistance profiles.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document