scholarly journals Mandatory infectious diseases approval of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT): clinical and economic outcomes of averted cases

2014 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 1695-1700 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Conant ◽  
S. M. Erdman ◽  
D. Osterholzer
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Economic Outcomes ◽  
Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy

2018 Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapya

2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne H Norris ◽  
Nabin K Shrestha ◽  
Genève M Allison ◽  
Sara C Keller ◽  
Kavita P Bhavan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Clinical Practice Guideline ◽  
Practice Guideline ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Infusion Catheter

Abstract A panel of experts was convened by the Infectious Diseases Society of America to update the 2004 clinical practice guideline on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) [1]. This guideline is intended to provide insight for healthcare professionals who prescribe and oversee the provision of OPAT. It considers various patient features, infusion catheter issues, monitoring questions, and antimicrobial stewardship concerns. It does not offer recommendations on the treatment of specific infections. The reader is referred to disease- or organism-specific guidelines for such support.

scholarly journals Patient Characteristics and Outcomes of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy: A Retrospective Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Yan ◽  
Marion Elligsen ◽  
Andrew E. Simor ◽  
Nick Daneman
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Health Care Encounters ◽  
One Year ◽  
Alternative To Hospitalization

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is a safe and effective alternative to hospitalization for many patients with infectious diseases. The objective of this study was to describe the OPAT experience at a Canadian tertiary academic centre in the absence of a formal OPAT program. This was achieved through a retrospective chart review of OPAT patients discharged from Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre within a one-year period. Between June 2012 and May 2013, 104 patients (median age 63 years) were discharged home with parenteral antimicrobials. The most commonly treated syndromes included surgical site infections (33%), osteoarticular infections (28%), and bacteremia (21%). The most frequently prescribed antimicrobials were ceftriaxone (21%) and cefazolin (20%). Only 56% of the patients received follow-up care from an infectious diseases specialist. In the 60 days following discharge, 43% of the patients returned to the emergency department, while 26% required readmission. Forty-eight percent of the return visits were due to infection relapse or treatment failure, and 23% could be attributed to OPAT-related complications. These results suggest that many OPAT patients have unplanned health care encounters because of issues related to their infection or treatment, and the creation of a formal OPAT clinic may help improve outcomes.

scholarly journals 609. Implementation and Post-implementation Analysis of a Pilot Program for Inpatient Review of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy Prior to Discharge

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S365-S366
Author(s):  
Delaney Hart ◽  
Hailey McCoy ◽  
Krista Gens ◽  
Michael Wankum ◽  
Andrew Tarleton
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Time Frame ◽  
Blood Stream ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Chi Squared

Abstract Background The Infectious Diseases Society of America OPAT (outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy) guidelines state that effective OPAT programs require a multidisciplinary team1. Currently within the health system, there is no formal OPAT program in place, and OPAT prescribing is not limited to any specialty. This project aimed to pilot a pharmacist-driven program across five hospitals. Methods Adult patients with OPAT ordered between February 1 and May 1, 2020 were included. Patients were excluded if the OPAT was prescribed by infectious diseases (ID) providers or if patients were on OPAT prior to hospital admission. An alert was generated in the electronic health record (EHR) when an order for an intravenous catheter was placed for patients with concomitant antimicrobials. Follow up was performed and documented via a progress note in the EHR as appropriate. Data was collected via retrospective chart review and statistical analysis was performed using Chi-squared test with Yates’ correction. Results 101 pre- and 7 patients post-implementation were included in this study. There were a total of 51 patients pre-implementation that received inappropriate OPAT care per the IDSA OPAT guidelines, and post-implementation 2 patients (50.5% vs 28.6%, p=0.47). The secondary outcomes of 30-day readmission rates were 17% and 0% (p=0.52); and complications related to OPAT (e.g. central-line associated blood stream infections) were 12% and 0% (p=0.73), respectively. 2 midline catheters were recommended by the OPAT team, and a cost savings of up to $6,796 was calculated. Conclusion This pilot showed a trend towards decreased inappropriate OPAT prescribing and cost avoidance of an ID pharmacist-driven review of OPAT prior to patient hospital discharge. Limitations to this pilot included being underpowered due to the limited time-frame of the post-implementation period, and an inability for follow up with patients discharged utilizing an alternative home infusion service. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 54. Effectiveness of a Venous Catheter Stewardship Intervention Targeting Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy at Hospital Discharge

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S49-S49
Author(s):  
Vasilios Athans ◽  
Keith W Hamilton ◽  
Anne Norris ◽  
Lauren Dutcher ◽  
Kathleen Degnan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
High Yield ◽  
Prospective Audit ◽  
Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback

Abstract Background Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and midlines are often used in hospitalized patients who require outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) upon discharge. PICCs/midlines offer ease of insertion but still carry the risks of venous thrombosis, phlebitis, and catheter-associated infection. We report the results of a prospective audit and feedback (PAF) intervention targeting the placement of PICCs/midlines for OPAT at our institution. Methods We prospectively identified a cohort of patients identified by a real-time PICC/midline alert from 5/20/2019 through 5/29/2020 at two large academic medical centers. Alerts were generated by a third-party interface with the electronic health record and identified new line orders with an antimicrobial indication selected. Patients without infectious diseases (ID) consult underwent PAF by the antimicrobial stewardship team. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize patients, interventions, and outcomes. Results During the study period, 1267 PICC/midline alerts were identified. Most were excluded due to ID consult (85.4%). After exclusions, 113 alerts underwent full review. Median patient age was 64 years with female predominance (54.2%). Reviewable alerts most commonly originated from Pulmonary (36.5%) and Hospitalist (26.0%) services. The most frequent antimicrobial indications were pneumonia (37.5%) and bloodstream infection (28.1%), and the most frequently ordered antimicrobials were cefepime (27.1%) and piperacillin-tazobactam (17.7%). Median time from line order to insertion was 22 hours and from line insertion to discharge was 48 hours. Of 113 alerts reviewed by the stewardship team, 26 (23.0%) resulted in a recommendation to avoid line placement and 45 (39.8%) resulted in at least one specific stewardship recommendation (Table 1). Recommendations were fully or partially accepted in 58.3% of instances. TABLE 1. Interventions Resulting from Prospective Venous Catheter Stewardship Conclusion Prospective audit of PICC/midline orders for OPAT identified a line-sparing opportunity in nearly 1 in 4 cases. Where line avoidance was not possible, other opportunities for antimicrobial optimization were common. This high-yield intervention should be considered for institutions that do not mandate infectious diseases consult for all OPAT discharges. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Evaluation of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy at a Veterans Affairs Hospital

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 1103-1105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Sydnor Spivak ◽  
Brian Kendall ◽  
Patricia Orlando ◽  
Christian Perez ◽  
Marina De Amorim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Veterans Affairs ◽  
Infect Control Hosp ◽  
Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Infectious Diseases Consultation

We reviewed outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center to identify opportunities for antimicrobial stewardship intervention. A definite or possible modification would have been recommended in 60% of courses. Forty-one percent of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy courses were potentially avoidable, including 22% involving infectious diseases consultation.Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2015;36(9):1103–1105

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document