scholarly journals Efficacy of amphotericin B and flucytosine against fluconazole-resistant Candida inconspicua clinical isolates

2005 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 253-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Majoros ◽  
G. Kardos ◽  
P. Feiszt ◽  
B. Szabó
Keyword(s):  
Amphotericin B ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
Fluconazole Resistant

Antifungal Resistance Trends of Candida auris Clinical Isolates, New York-New Jersey, 2016-2020

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon Kilburn ◽  
Gabriel Innes ◽  
Monica Quinn ◽  
Karen Southwick ◽  
Belinda Ostrowsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
New Jersey ◽  
Amphotericin B ◽  
Regional Differences ◽  
Antifungal Resistance ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
Candida Auris ◽  
Fluconazole Resistant ◽  
Echinocandin Resistance ◽  
Clinical Cases

About 55% of U.S. Candida auris clinical cases were reported from New York and New Jersey from 2016 through 2020. Nearly all New York-New Jersey clinical isolates (99.8%) were fluconazole resistant, and 50% were amphotericin B resistant. Echinocandin resistance increased from 0% to 4% and pan-resistance increased from 0 to <1% for New York C. auris clinical isolates but not for New Jersey, highlighting the regional differences.

scholarly journals In Vitro Comparative Efficacy of Voriconazole and Itraconazole against Fluconazole-Susceptible and -Resistant Cryptococcus neoformans Isolates

1998 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 471-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Hong Nguyen ◽  
Christine Y. Yu
Keyword(s):  
Cryptococcus Neoformans ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
Comparative Efficacy ◽  
In Vitro Susceptibility ◽  
In Vitro Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Fluconazole Resistant ◽  
Dose Dependent

ABSTRACT In vitro susceptibility testing for 50 clinical isolates of fluconazole-susceptible or -resistant Cryptococcus neoformans was performed with itraconazole and voriconazole. Voriconazole was more potent than itraconazole for fluconazole-susceptible isolates and as potent as itraconazole for fluconazole-susceptible dose-dependent isolates and for fluconazole-resistant isolates. For fluconazole-resistant isolates, the voriconazole and itraconazole MICs ranged from 1 to 2 μg/ml.

In vitro activity of olorofim against clinical isolates of Scedosporium species and Lomentospora prolificans using EUCAST and CLSI methodologies

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (12) ◽  
pp. 3582-3585
Author(s):  
Olga Rivero-Menendez ◽  
Manuel Cuenca-Estrella ◽  
Ana Alastruey-Izquierdo
Keyword(s):  
Amphotericin B ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Antifungal Susceptibility ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
Scedosporium Apiospermum ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Scedosporium Dehoogii ◽  
Scedosporium Species

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the in vitro activity of olorofim, a new broad-spectrum antifungal with a novel mechanism of action, against a collection of 123 Spanish clinical isolates belonging to five Scedosporium species and Lomentospora prolificans. Methods The activity of olorofim against Scedosporium apiospermum (n = 30), Scedosporium boydii (n = 30), Scedosporium ellipsoideum (n = 10), Scedosporium aurantiacum (n = 20), Scedosporium dehoogii (n = 3) and Lomentospora prolificans (n = 30) was compared with that of amphotericin B, voriconazole, isavuconazole and micafungin by performing EUCAST and CLSI reference methods for antifungal susceptibility testing. Results Amphotericin B and isavuconazole showed MICs ≥2 mg/L for all the species evaluated and voriconazole was moderately active (GM, MIC50 and MIC90 values ≤2 mg/L) against all of them except L. prolificans. Micafungin was effective against S. apiospermum complex strains, but exhibited elevated MECs for S. dehoogii and S. aurantiacum. Olorofim showed low MICs for all the Scedosporium strains tested (GM values were lower than 0.130 and 0.339 by the EUCAST method and the CLSI method, respectively, for all of the species), including those belonging to the MDR species L. prolificans, for which GM values were 0.115 and 0.225 mg/L by the EUCAST method and the CLSI method, respectively, while the GMs for the rest of the antifungals evaluated were higher than 3.732 mg/L using both methodologies. Conclusions Olorofim displayed promising in vitro activity against the Scedosporium and L. prolificans strains tested, some of which have reduced susceptibility to the antifungals that are currently in use.

scholarly journals In Vitro Activities of Isavuconazole and Other Antifungal Agents against Candida Bloodstream Isolates

2007 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 1818-1821 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Seifert ◽  
U. Aurbach ◽  
D. Stefanik ◽  
O. Cornely
Keyword(s):  
Amphotericin B ◽  
Antifungal Agents ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Common Species ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Highly Active ◽  
Fluconazole Resistant ◽  
Resistant Strains

ABSTRACT Isavuconazole is the active component of the new azole antifungal agent BAL8557, which is entering phase III clinical development. This study was conducted to compare the in vitro activities of isavuconazole and five other antifungal agents against 296 Candida isolates that were recovered consecutively from blood cultures between 1995 and 2004 at a tertiary care university hospital. Microdilution testing was done in accordance with CLSI (formerly NCCLS) guideline M27-A2 in RPMI-1640 MOPS (morpholinepropanesulfonic acid) broth. The antifungal agents tested were amphotericin B, flucytosine, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and isavuconazole. C. albicans was the most common species, representing 57.1% of all isolates. There was no trend found in favor of non-Candida albicans species over time. In terms of MIC50s, isavuconazole was more active (0.004 mg/liter) than amphotericin B (0.5 mg/liter), itraconazole (0.008 mg/liter), voriconazole (0.03 mg/liter), flucytosine (0.125 mg/liter), and fluconazole (8 mg/liter). For isavuconazole, MIC50s/MIC90s ranged from 000.2/0.004 mg/liter for C. albicans to 0.25/0.5 mg/liter for C. glabrata. Two percent of isolates (C. glabrata and C. krusei) were resistant to fluconazole; C. albicans strains resistant to fluconazole were not detected. There were only two isolates with MICs for isavuconazole that were >0.5 mg/liter: both were C. glabrata isolates, and the MICs were 2 and 4 mg/liter, respectively. In conclusion, isavuconazole is highly active against Candida bloodstream isolates, including fluconazole-resistant strains. It was more active than itraconazole and voriconazole against C. albicans and C. glabrata and appears to be a promising agent against systemic Candida infections.

scholarly journals In Vitro Interaction of Posaconazole and Caspofungin against Clinical Isolates of Candida glabrata

2005 ◽  
Vol 49 (8) ◽  
pp. 3544-3545 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. R. Oliveira ◽  
A. W. Fothergill ◽  
W. R. Kirkpatrick ◽  
B. J. Coco ◽  
T. F. Patterson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Candida Glabrata ◽  
Concentration Index ◽  
Inhibitory Concentration ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
Fractional Inhibitory Concentration ◽  
Fractional Inhibitory Concentration Index ◽  
Fluconazole Resistant ◽  
In Vitro Interaction

ABSTRACT Combinations of caspofungin and posaconazole were evaluated by fractional inhibitory concentration index against 119 Candida glabrata isolates. Synergy was seen in 18% of all isolates and in 4% of fluconazole-resistant isolates at 48 h without evidence of antagonism. This antifungal combination may have utility against this organism.

Effect of antifungals on itraconazole resistant Candida glabrata

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 318-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soňa Kucharíková ◽  
Patrick Dijck ◽  
Magdaléna Lisalová ◽  
Helena Bujdáková
Keyword(s):  
Amphotericin B ◽  
Biofilm Formation ◽  
Candida Glabrata ◽  
Antifungal Agents ◽  
Inhibitory Concentration ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
Azole Resistance ◽  
Low Concentrations ◽  
Reduction Assay ◽  
Very High

AbstractIn the last decade, infections caused by Candida glabrata have become more serious, particularly due to its decreased susceptibility to azole derivatives and its ability to form biofilm. Here we studied the resistance profile of 42 C. glabrata clinical isolates to different azoles, amphotericin B and echinocandins. This work was also focused on the ability to form biofilm which plays a role in the development of antifungal resistance. The minimal inhibitory concentration testing to antifungal agents was performed according to the CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) M27-A3 protocol. Quantification of biofilm was done by XTT reduction assay. All C. glabrata clinical isolates were resistant to itraconazole and sixteen also showed resistance to fluconazole. All isolates remained susceptible to voriconazole. Amphotericin B was efficient in a concentration range of 0.125–1 mg/L. The most effective antifungal agents were micafungin and caspofungin with the MIC100 values of ≤0.0313–0.125 mg/L. Low concentrations of these agents reduced biofilm formation as well. Our results show that resistance of different C. glabrata strains is azole specific and therefore a single azole resistance cannot be assumed to indicate general azole resistance. Echinocandins proved to have very high efficacy against clinical C. glabrata strains including those with ability to form biofilm.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document