High-level resistance to bictegravir and cabotegravir in subtype A- and D-infected HIV-1 patients failing raltegravir with multiple resistance mutations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Ndashimye ◽  
Yue Li ◽  
Paul S Reyes ◽  
Mariano Avino ◽  
Abayomi S Olabode ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cross Resistance ◽  
Strand Transfer ◽  
Resistance Mutations ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Recombinant Viruses ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
High Level ◽  
Subtype A ◽  
Hiv 1

Abstract Objectives The second-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) bictegravir is becoming accessible in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and another INSTI, cabotegravir, has recently been approved as a long-acting injectable. Data on bictegravir and cabotegravir susceptibility in raltegravir-experienced HIV-1 subtype A- and D-infected patients carrying drug resistance mutations (DRMs) remain very scarce in LMICs. Patients and methods HIV-1 integrase (IN)-recombinant viruses from eight patients failing raltegravir-based third-line therapy in Uganda were genotypically and phenotypically tested for susceptibility to bictegravir and cabotegravir. Ability of these viruses to integrate into human genomes was assessed in MT-4 cells. Results HIV-1 IN-recombinant viruses harbouring single primary mutations (N155H or Y143R/S) or in combination with secondary INSTI mutations (T97A, M50I, L74IM, E157Q, G163R or V151I) were susceptible to both bictegravir and cabotegravir. However, combinations of primary INSTI-resistance mutations such as E138A/G140A/G163R/Q148R or E138K/G140A/S147G/Q148K led to decreased susceptibility to both cabotegravir (fold change in EC50 values from 429 to 1000×) and bictegravir (60 to 100×), exhibiting a high degree of cross-resistance. However, these same IN-recombinant viruses showed impaired integration capacity (14% to 48%) relative to the WT HIV-1 NL4-3 strain in the absence of drug. Conclusions Though not currently widely accessible in most LMICs, bictegravir and cabotegravir offer a valid alternative to HIV-infected individuals harbouring subtype A and D HIV-1 variants with reduced susceptibility to first-generation INSTIs but previous exposure to raltegravir may reduce efficacy, more so with cabotegravir.

scholarly journals Accumulation of integrase strand transfer inhibitor resistance mutations confers high-level resistance to dolutegravir in non-B subtype HIV-1 strains from patients failing raltegravir in Uganda

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (12) ◽  
pp. 3525-3533
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Ndashimye ◽  
Mariano Avino ◽  
Abayomi S Olabode ◽  
Art F Y Poon ◽  
Richard M Gibson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prolonged Exposure ◽  
Cross Resistance ◽  
Strand Transfer ◽  
Hiv Integrase ◽  
Resistance Mutations ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Subtype B ◽  
High Level ◽  
Hiv 1 ◽  
Level Resistance

Abstract Background Increasing first-line treatment failures in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have led to increased use of integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) such as dolutegravir. However, HIV-1 susceptibility to INSTIs in LMICs, especially with previous raltegravir exposure, is poorly understood due to infrequent reporting of INSTI failures and testing for INSTI drug resistance mutations (DRMs). Methods A total of 51 non-subtype B HIV-1 infected patients failing third-line (raltegravir-based) therapy in Uganda were initially selected for the study. DRMs were detected using Sanger and deep sequencing. HIV integrase genes of 13 patients were cloned and replication capacities (RCs) and phenotypic susceptibilities to dolutegravir, raltegravir and elvitegravir were determined with TZM-bl cells. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to determine cross-resistance between INSTIs. Results INSTI DRMs were detected in 47% of patients. HIV integrase-recombinant virus carrying one primary INSTI DRM (N155H or Y143R/S) was susceptible to dolutegravir but highly resistant to raltegravir and elvitegravir (>50-fold change). Two patients, one with E138A/G140A/Q148R/G163R and one with E138K/G140A/S147G/Q148K, displayed the highest reported resistance to raltegravir, elvitegravir and even dolutegravir. The former multi-DRM virus had WT RC whereas the latter had lower RCs than WT. Conclusions In HIV-1 subtype A- and D-infected patients failing raltegravir and harbouring INSTI DRMs, there is high-level resistance to elvitegravir and raltegravir. More routine monitoring of INSTI treatment may be advised in LMICs, considering that multiple INSTI DRMs may have accumulated during prolonged exposure to raltegravir during virological failure, leading to high-level INSTI resistance, including dolutegravir resistance.

Impact of genotypic diversity on selection of subtype-specific drug resistance profiles during raltegravir-based therapy in individuals infected with B and BF recombinant HIV-1 strains

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. 1567-1574
Author(s):  
Daniela Sánchez ◽  
Solange Arazi Caillaud ◽  
Ines Zapiola ◽  
Silvina Fernandez Giuliano ◽  
Rosa Bologna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Phylogenetic Analyses ◽  
Genotypic Diversity ◽  
Resistance Testing ◽  
Cross Resistance ◽  
Resistance Mutations ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Subtype B ◽  
Hiv 1

Abstract Background Current knowledge on HIV-1 resistance to integrase inhibitors (INIs) is based mostly on subtype B strains. This contrasts with the increasing use of INIs in low- and middle-income countries, where non-B subtypes predominate. Materials and methods HIV-1 drug resistance genotyping was performed in 30 HIV-1-infected individuals undergoing virological failure to raltegravir. Drug resistance mutations (DRMs) and HIV-1 subtype were characterized using Stanford HIVdb and phylogenetic analyses. Results Of the 30 integrase (IN) sequences, 14 were characterized as subtype F (47%), 8 as subtype B (27%), 7 as BF recombinants (23%) and 1 as a putative CRF05_DF (3%). In 25 cases (83%), protease and reverse transcriptase (PR-RT) sequences from the same individuals confirmed the presence of different BF recombinants. Stanford HIVdb genotyping was concordant with phylogenetic inference in 70% of IN and 60% of PR-RT sequences. INI DRMs differed between B and F IN subtypes, with Q148K/R/H, G140S and E138K/A being more prevalent in subtype B (63% versus 0%, P = 0.0021; 50% versus 0%, P = 0.0096; and 50% versus 0%, P = 0.0096, respectively). These differences were independent of the time on raltegravir therapy or viral load at the time of genotyping. INI DRMs in subtype F IN genomes predicted a lower level of resistance to raltegravir and no cross-resistance to second-generation INIs. Conclusions Alternative resistance pathways to raltegravir develop in subtypes B and F IN genomes, with implications for clinical practice. Evaluating the role of HIV-1 subtype in development and persistence of mutations that confer resistance to INIs will be important to improve algorithms for resistance testing and optimize the use of INIs.

scholarly journals Resistance in Patients Failing Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors: A Call to Replace Raltegravir With Dolutegravir in Third-Line Treatment in South Africa

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim Steegen ◽  
Gert Van Zyl ◽  
Esrom Letsoalo ◽  
Mathilda Claassen ◽  
Lucia Hans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Cross Resistance ◽  
Strand Transfer ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors ◽  
Resistance Patterns ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Third Line Treatment

Abstract Data on integrase resistance patterns in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is scarce. We assessed genotypic drug resistance in 43 patients with virological failure on integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) containing regimens as part of the third-line treatment program in South Africa. Of the raltegravir (RAL)-exposed patients 20 of 34 (59%) had ≥1 major INSTI mutation, including 2 (6%) with dolutegravir (DTG) cross-resistance. Dolutegravir resistance was detected in 1 of 4 DTG-exposed patients. Replacing RAL with DTG may reduce the risk of INSTI mutations. We recommend DTG drug resistance monitoring when DTG is introduced at a larger scale in LMICs.

scholarly journals Impact of Primary Elvitegravir Resistance-Associated Mutations in HIV-1 Integrase on Drug Susceptibility and Viral Replication Fitness

2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 2654-2663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E. Abram ◽  
Rebecca M. Hluhanich ◽  
Derrick D. Goodman ◽  
Kristen N. Andreatta ◽  
Nicolas A. Margot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Replication ◽  
Drug Susceptibility ◽  
Viral Fitness ◽  
Cross Resistance ◽  
Replication Capacity ◽  
Strand Transfer ◽  
Recombinant Viruses ◽  
Transfer Inhibitor ◽  
Replication Fitness ◽  
Hiv 1

ABSTRACTElvitegravir (EVG) is an effective HIV-1 integrase (IN) strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) in advanced clinical development. Primary INSTI resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) at six IN positions have been identified in HIV-1-infected patients failing EVG-containing regimens in clinical studies: T66I/A/K, E92Q/G, T97A, S147G, Q148R/H/K, and N155H. In this study, the effect of these primary IN mutations, alone and in combination, on susceptibility to the INSTIs EVG, raltegravir (RAL), and dolutegravir (DTG); IN enzyme activities; and viral replication fitness was characterized. Recombinant viruses containing the six most common mutations exhibited a range of reduced EVG susceptibility: 92-fold for Q148R, 30-fold for N155H, 26-fold for E92Q, 10-fold for T66I, 4-fold for S147G, and 2-fold for T97A. Less commonly observed primary IN mutations also showed a range of reduced EVG susceptibilities: 40- to 94-fold for T66K and Q148K and 5- to 10-fold for T66A, E92G, and Q148H. Some primary IN mutations exhibited broad cross-resistance between EVG and RAL (T66K, E92Q, Q148R/H/K, and N155H), while others retained susceptibility to RAL (T66I/A, E92G, T97A, and S147G). Dual combinations of primary IN mutations further reduced INSTI susceptibility, replication capacity, and viral fitness relative to either mutation alone. Susceptibility to DTG was retained by single primary IN mutations but reduced by dual mutation combinations with Q148R. Primary EVG RAMs also diminished IN enzymatic activities, concordant with their structural proximity to the active site. Greater reductions in viral fitness of dual mutation combinations may explain why some primary INSTI RAMs do not readily coexist on the same HIV-1 genome but rather establish independent pathways of resistance to EVG.

scholarly journals Dihydroxythiophenes Are Novel Potent Inhibitors of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Integrase with a Diketo Acid-Like Pharmacophore

2006 ◽  
Vol 80 (14) ◽  
pp. 6883-6894 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Kehlenbeck ◽  
U. Betz ◽  
A. Birkmann ◽  
B. Fast ◽  
A. H. Göller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Retroviral Vectors ◽  
Cross Resistance ◽  
Binding Motif ◽  
Strand Transfer ◽  
Resistance Mutations ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Viral Cdna ◽  
Hiv 1

ABSTRACT We have identified dihydroxythiophenes (DHT) as a novel series of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) integrase inhibitors with broad antiviral activities against different HIV isolates in vitro. DHT were discovered in a biochemical integrase high-throughput screen searching for inhibitors of the strand transfer reaction of HIV-1 integrase. DHT are selective inhibitors of integrase that do not interfere with virus entry, as shown by the inhibition of a vesicular stomatitis virus G-pseudotyped retroviral system. Moreover, in quantitative real-time PCR experiments, no effect on the synthesis of viral cDNA could be detected but rather an increase in the accumulation of 2-long-terminal-repeat cycles was detected. This suggests that the integration of viral cDNA is blocked. Molecular modeling and the structure activity relationship of DHT demonstrate that our compound fits into a two-metal-binding motif that has been suggested as the essential pharmacophore for diketo acid (DKA)-like strand transfer inhibitors (Grobler et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:6661-6666, 2002.). This notion is supported by the profiling of DHT on retroviral vectors carrying published resistance mutations for DKA-like inhibitors where DHT showed partial cross-resistance. This suggests that DHT bind to a common site in the catalytic center of integrase, albeit with an altered binding mode. Taken together, our findings indicate that DHT are novel selective strand transfer inhibitors of integrase with a pharmacophore homologous to DKA-like inhibitors.

scholarly journals Consensus Integrase of a New HIV-1 Genetic Variant CRF63_02A1

Acta Naturae ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-22
Author(s):  
Yu. Yu. Agapkina ◽  
M. A. Pustovarova ◽  
S. P. Korolev ◽  
D. P. Zyryanova ◽  
V. V. Ivlev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Consensus Sequence ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Strand Transfer ◽  
Resistance Mutations ◽  
Double Mutation ◽  
Transfer Inhibitor ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Subtype A ◽  
Dna Substrate ◽  
Hiv 1

The high genetic variability of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) leads to a constant emergence of new genetic variants, including the recombinant virus CRF63_02A1, which is widespread in the Siberian Federal District of Russia. We studied HIV-1 CRF63_02A1 integrase (IN_CRF) catalyzing the incorporation of viral DNA into the genome of an infected cell. The consensus sequence was designed, recombinant integrase was obtained, and its DNA-binding and catalytic activities were characterized. The stability of the IN_CRF complex with the DNA substrate did not differ from the complex stability for subtype A and B integrases; however, the rate of complex formation was significantly higher. The rates and efficiencies of 3-processing and strand transfer reactions catalyzed by IN_CRF were found to be higher, too. Apparently, all these distinctive features of IN_CRF may result from specific amino acid substitutions in its N-terminal domain, which plays an important role in enzyme multimerization and binding to the DNA substrate. It was also found that the drug resistance mutations Q148K/G140S and G118R/E138K significantly reduce the catalytic activity of IN_CRF and its sensitivity to the strand transfer inhibitor raltegravir. Reduction in sensitivity to raltegravir was found to be much stronger in the case of double-mutation Q148K/G140S.

scholarly journals Comparable In Vitro Activities of Second-Generation HIV-1 Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors (INSTIs) on HIV-1 Clinical Isolates with INSTI Resistance Mutations

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Saladini ◽  
Alessia Giannini ◽  
Adele Boccuto ◽  
Filippo Dragoni ◽  
Alice Appendino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
First Generation ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Cross Resistance ◽  
Strand Transfer ◽  
Resistance Mutations ◽  
Genetic Barrier ◽  
Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors ◽  
Comparable Activity ◽  
Hiv 1

ABSTRACT Second-generation HIV-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) dolutegravir (DTG), bictegravir (BIC), and cabotegravir (CAB) showed a high genetic barrier to resistance and limited cross-resistance with first-generation INSTIs raltegravir (RAL) and elvitegravir (EVG). In this study, DTG, BIC, and CAB demonstrated a comparable activity on a panel of INSTI-resistant strains isolated from patients exposed to RAL, EVG, and/or DTG, with a significantly reduced susceptibility only with the pathway Q148H/K/R plus one to two additional INSTI mutations.

scholarly journals In vitro cross-resistance to doravirine in a panel of HIV-1 clones harbouring multiple NNRTI resistance mutations

2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 130-134
Author(s):  
Francesco Saladini ◽  
Federica Giammarino ◽  
Behnaz A Hosseini ◽  
Alessia Giannini ◽  
Adele Boccuto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Cross Resistance ◽  
Reference List ◽  
Resistance Mutations ◽  
Nnrti Resistance ◽  
Infectious Clones ◽  
High Level ◽  
Reduced Activity ◽  
Hiv 1

Abstract Objectives Doravirine is a recently licensed HIV-1 NNRTI with improved efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety profile compared with efavirenz and limited cross-resistance with rilpivirine and etravirine. In this in vitro study, cross-resistance to doravirine was analysed in a representative panel of NNRTI-resistant clones. Methods In vitro phenotypic susceptibility to doravirine was assessed in 10 clinically derived infectious clones with intermediate- to high-level resistance to rilpivirine, etravirine, efavirenz and nevirapine, and in NL4-3 site-directed mutants harbouring K103N, Y181C, M230L or K103N/Y181C NNRTI mutations. Results Although none of the infectious clones harboured any of the major doravirine resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) included in the IAS-USA reference list, doravirine fold change (FC) values were comparable to or higher than those calculated for other NNRTIs, particularly etravirine and rilpivirine. As expected, single NNRTI mutations K103N and Y181C did not impair doravirine susceptibility (FC 1.4 and 1.8, respectively), while reduced activity was observed with the single M230L or double K103N/Y181C mutations (FC 7.6 and 4.9, respectively). Median FC values increased significantly with increasing numbers of NNRTI RAMs (P = 0.005) and were >10 in 4/4 and 1/4 clones harbouring four and three NNRTI RAMs, respectively. FC values correlated well with predicted susceptibility as inferred by Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database (HIVdb) and ANRS algorithms (both P < 0.001). Conclusions Substantial cross-resistance to doravirine was detected in NNRTI-resistant viruses harbouring complex mutational patterns, even in the absence of major IAS-USA doravirine RAMs. Therefore, based on the simple IAS-USA reference list, doravirine resistance may be underestimated in viruses harbouring multiple NNRTI mutations.

scholarly journals Genetic Features of HIV-1 Integrase Sub-Subtype A6 Predominant in Russia and Predicted Susceptibility to INSTIs

Viruses ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 838
Author(s):  
Alina Kirichenko ◽  
Ilya Lapovok ◽  
Pavel Baryshev ◽  
David A. M. C. van de Vijver ◽  
Jeroen J. A. van Kampen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Strand Transfer ◽  
Resistance Mutations ◽  
Genetic Barrier ◽  
Subtype B ◽  
Genetic Barriers ◽  
Genetic Features ◽  
Subtype A ◽  
Hiv 1

The increasing use of the integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) class for the treatment of HIV-infection has pointed to the importance of analyzing the features of HIV-1 subtypes for an improved understanding of viral genetic variability in the occurrence of drug resistance (DR). In this study, we have described the prevalence of INSTI DR in a Russian cohort and the genetic features of HIV-1 integrase sub-subtype A6. We included 408 HIV infected patients who were not exposed to INSTI. Drug resistance mutations (DRMs) were detected among 1.3% of ART-naïve patients and among 2.7% of INSTI-naïve patients. The prevalence of 12 polymorphic mutations was significantly different between sub-subtypes A6 and A1. Analysis of the genetic barriers determined two positions in which subtype A (A1 and A6) showed a higher genetic barrier (G140C and V151I) compared with subtype B, and one position in which subtypes A1 and B displayed a higher genetic barrier (L74M and L74I) than sub-subtype A6. Additionally, we confirmed that the L74I mutation was selected at the early stage of the epidemic and subsequently spread as a founder effect in Russia. Our data have added to the overall understanding of the genetic features of sub-subtype A6 in the context of drug resistance.

scholarly journals The Combination of the R263K and T66I Resistance Substitutions in HIV-1 Integrase Is Incompatible with High-Level Viral Replication and the Development of High-Level Drug Resistance

2015 ◽  
Vol 89 (22) ◽  
pp. 11269-11274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaming Liang ◽  
Thibault Mesplède ◽  
Maureen Oliveira ◽  
Kaitlin Anstett ◽  
Mark A. Wainberg
Keyword(s):  
Strand Transfer ◽  
Replicative Capacity ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Resistance Mutations ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Primary Resistance ◽  
Transfer Activity ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
High Level ◽  
Hiv 1

ABSTRACTThe R263K substitution in integrase has been selected in tissue culture with dolutegravir (DTG) and has been reported for several treatment-experienced individuals receiving DTG as part of salvage therapy. The R263K substitution seems to be incompatible with the presence of common resistance mutations associated with raltegravir (RAL), a different integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI). T66I is a substitution that is common in individuals who have developed resistance against a different INSTI termed elvitegravir (EVG), but it is not known whether these two mutations might be compatible in the context of resistance against DTG or what impact the combination of these substitutions might have on resistance against INSTIs. E138K is a common secondary substitution observed with various primary resistance substitutions in RAL- and EVG-treated individuals. Viral infectivity, replicative capacity, and resistance against INSTIs were measured in cell-based assays. Strand transfer and 3′ processing activities were measured biochemically. The combination of the R263K and T66I substitutions decreased HIV-1 infectivity, replicative capacity, and strand transfer activity. The addition of the E138K substitution partially compensated for these deficits and resulted in high levels of resistance against EVG but not against DTG or RAL. These findings suggest that the presence of the T66I substitution will not compromise the activity of DTG and may also help to prevent the additional generation of the R263K mutation. Our observations support the use of DTG in second-line therapy for individuals who experience treatment failure with EVG due to the T66I substitution.IMPORTANCEThe integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) elvitegravir and dolutegravir are newly developed inhibitors against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). HIV drug-resistant mutations in integrase that can arise in individuals treated with elvitegravir commonly include the T66I substitution, whereas R263K is a signature resistance substitution against dolutegravir. In order to determine how different combinations of integrase resistance mutations can influence the outcome of therapy, we report here the effects of the T66I, E138K, and R263K substitutions, alone and in combination, on viral replicative capacity and resistance to integrase inhibitors. Our results show that the addition of R263K to the T66I substitution diminishes viral replicative capacity and strand transfer activity while not compromising susceptibility to dolutegravir. This supports the use of dolutegravir in second-line therapy for patients failing elvitegravir therapy who harbor the T66I resistance substitution.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document