Three-year study of pre-existing drug resistance substitutions and efficacy of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in HIV-1 treatment-naive participants

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rima K Acosta ◽  
Grace Q Chen ◽  
Silvia Chang ◽  
Ross Martin ◽  
Xinxin Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Resistance Testing ◽  
Strand Transfer ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Primary Drug Resistance ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Tenofovir Alafenamide ◽  
Hiv 1

Abstract Objectives Two Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled studies of initial HIV-1 treatment demonstrated that bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) was non-inferior to dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine (DTG/ABC/3TC; Study 1489) or to DTG+F/TAF (Study 1490) through 144 weeks. In both studies, there was no emergent resistance to study drugs. Here, the 3 year resistance analysis and impact of baseline resistance substitutions on treatment response are described. Methods Population sequencing of HIV-1 protease and reverse transcriptase (RT) was performed at screening. Retrospective baseline next generation sequencing of protease, RT and integrase (IN) was analysed at a ≥15% cutoff. Resistance analyses were performed on participants with confirmed viral rebound of HIV-1 RNA ≥200 copies/mL through Week 144 or last visit who did not resuppress to <50 copies/mL while on study drug. Results Transmitted primary drug resistance substitutions were present in the following proportions of participants: integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) resistance (-R) in 1.3% (17/1270) of participants; NRTI-R in 2.7% (35/1274); NNRTI-R in 14.1% (179/1274); and PI-R in 3.5% (44/1274). These pre-existing resistance substitutions not associated with study drug did not affect treatment outcomes. One participant in the B/F/TAF group had pre-existing bictegravir and dolutegravir resistance substitutions (Q148H+G140S in integrase) at baseline and suppressed and maintained HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL through Week 144. In total, 21 participants qualified for resistance testing [1.3% (8/634) B/F/TAF; 1.9% (6/315) DTG/ABC/3TC; 2.2% (7/325) DTG+F/TAF]; none had emergent resistance to study drugs. Conclusions Treatment with B/F/TAF, DTG/ABC/3TC, or DTG+F/TAF achieved high, durable rates of virological suppression in HIV-1 treatment-naive participants. The presence of pre-existing resistance substitutions did not affect treatment outcomes, and there was no treatment-emergent resistance.

scholarly journals Analysis of HIV-1 diversity, primary drug resistance and transmission networks in Croatia

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maja Oroz ◽  
Josip Begovac ◽  
Ana Planinić ◽  
Filip Rokić ◽  
Maja M. Lunar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Resistance Testing ◽  
Transmitted Drug Resistance ◽  
Strand Transfer ◽  
Primary Drug Resistance ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
Hiv 1

AbstractMolecular epidemiology of HIV-1 infection in treatment-naive HIV-1 infected persons from Croatia was investigated. We included 403 persons, representing 92.4% of all HIV-positive individuals entering clinical care in Croatia in 2014–2017. Overall prevalence of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) was estimated at 16.4%. Resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleoside RTI (NNRTIs) and protease inhibitors (PIs) was found in 11.4%, 6.7% and 2.5% of persons, respectively. Triple-class resistance was determined in 2.2% of individuals. In addition, a single case (1.0%) of resistance to integrase strand-transfer inhibitors (InSTIs) was found. Deep sequencing was performed on 48 randomly selected samples and detected additional TDR mutations in 6 cases. Phylogenetic inference showed that 347/403 sequences (86.1%) were part of transmission clusters and identified forward transmission of resistance in Croatia, even that of triple-class resistance. The largest TDR cluster of 53 persons with T215S was estimated to originate in the year 1992. Our data show a continuing need for pre-treatment HIV resistance testing in Croatia. Even though a low prevalence of resistance to InSTI was observed, surveillance of TDR to InSTI should be continued.

scholarly journals Zero prevalence of primary drug resistance-associated mutations to protease inhibitors in HIV-1 drug-naive patients in and around Aligarh, India

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (01) ◽  
pp. 079-085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohd Azam ◽  
Abida Malik ◽  
Meher Rizvi ◽  
Arvind Rai
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Protease Inhibitors ◽  
Resistance Testing ◽  
Protease Gene ◽  
Resistance Mutations ◽  
Subtype C ◽  
Primary Resistance ◽  
Primary Drug Resistance ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Hiv 1

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of resistance mutations in the protease gene of HIV-1 strains isolated from north Indian antiretroviral (ARV) treatment-naive patients and to assess the phylogenetic relatedness of these strains with known HIV-1 strains. Methodology: Fifty-four HIV-1 strains isolated from treatment-naive patients (n = 54) were included in this study. Resistance genotyping for the protease gene was performed using semi-nested PCR and DNA sequencing. The sequences were aligned (ClustalW) and a phylogenetic tree was built (MEGA 4 software). Drug resistance (DR) pattern was analyzed using the Stanford HIV-DR database and the IAS-USA mutation list. For subtyping purposes, all the nucleotide sequences were submitted to the REGA HIV-1 subtyping tool version 2.0l. Results: All the strains (100%) were found to belong to the C subtype and to harbor at least two secondary mutations in the protease gene. The most frequent mutations were H69K and I93L (52 of 52 strains), followed by I15V (80.7%), L19I (69.2%), M36I (67.3%), R41K (94.2%), L63P (61.5%), and L89M (82.7%). Conclusion: This study confirms that HIV-1 subtype C predominates in northern India. Protease secondary mutations associated with drug resistance to protease inhibitors (PIs) were present with high frequency in the HIV-1 C subtype strains isolated from north Indian ARV treatment-naive patients, but no primary resistance mutations were found in this region. We suggest that resistance testing in HIV-1 infected patients should ideally be performed before the initiation of therapy to tailor the treatment for the individual to achieve the optimal therapeutic outcome

scholarly journals Resistance Analysis of Bictegravir-Emtricitabine-Tenofovir Alafenamide in HIV-1 Treatment-Naive Patients through 48 Weeks

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rima K. Acosta ◽  
Madeleine Willkom ◽  
Ross Martin ◽  
Silvia Chang ◽  
Xuelian Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reverse Transcriptase ◽  
Transcriptase Inhibitor ◽  
Virologic Suppression ◽  
Strand Transfer ◽  
Primary Drug Resistance ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Tenofovir Alafenamide ◽  
Inhibitor Resistance ◽  
Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor ◽  
Hiv 1

ABSTRACT In clinical studies GS-US-380-1489 (study 1489) and GS-US-380-1490 (study 1490), bictegravir-emtricitabine-tenofovir alafenamide (B-F-TAF), dolutegravir-abacavir-lamivudine (DTG-ABC-3TC), and dolutegravir plus emtricitabine-tenofovir alafenamide (DTG+F-TAF) treatment achieved high rates of virologic suppression in HIV-1 treatment-naive participants through week 48. Preexisting primary drug resistance was present at levels of 1.3% integrase strand transfer inhibitor resistance (INSTI-R), 2.7% nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance (NRTI-R), 14.1% nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance (NNRTI-R), and 3.5% protease inhibitor resistance (PI-R) in the 1,274 participants from these studies. These mutations did not affect treatment outcomes. Resistance analyses in 13 virologic failures found no emergent resistance to study drugs.

scholarly journals 2509. Pooled Resistance Analyses of Darunavir (DRV) Once Daily (QD) Regimens and Formulations Across 10 Clinical Studies of Treatment-Naïve (TN) and Treatment-Experienced (TE) Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 Infection

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S870-S871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erkki Lathouwers ◽  
Sareh Seyedkazemi ◽  
Donghan Luo ◽  
Kimberley Brown ◽  
Sandra De Meyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Virologic Failure ◽  
Transcriptase Inhibitor ◽  
Resistance Testing ◽  
Resistance Development ◽  
Single Tablet Regimen ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Tenofovir Alafenamide ◽  
Hiv 1 ◽  
Phenotypic Susceptibility

Abstract Background DRV has demonstrated high efficacy and barrier to resistance development across diverse populations, from TN to heavily TE patients. We evaluated resistance data from 10 clinical studies of different DRV 800 mg QD–based antiretroviral regimens and formulations. Methods The analysis included patients from 10 phase 2/3 studies (48–192 weeks in duration) of ritonavir- and cobicistat-boosted DRV 800 mg QD–based regimens in TN and virologically failing or suppressed TE patients with HIV-1 (table). Three were phase 3 studies of the DRV/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) 800/150/200/10 mg single-tablet regimen (STR). Post-baseline resistance was evaluated in patients experiencing protocol-defined virologic failure (PDVF); definitions and criteria for resistance testing varied slightly among studies. Resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) were based on respective International Antiviral Society–USA mutation lists over time. Results Of the 3,635 patients evaluated, 250 met PDVF criteria and 205 had post-baseline genotypes/phenotypes. Overall, 4 (0.1%) patients developed (or had identified [switch studies]) ≥1 DRV and/or primary protease inhibitor (PI) RAM (table), and only 1 (< 0.1%, ODIN) patient lost DRV phenotypic susceptibility; this TE patient had prior VF with lopinavir. Among those who used a nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) backbone (mostly emtricitabine [FTC] + tenofovir [TFV]), 12 (0.4%) patients had ≥1 NRTI RAM, including 10 with M184I/V associated with FTC resistance. No TFV RAMs were observed. Among patients receiving D/C/F/TAF (n = 1,949), none had post-baseline DRV, primary PI, or TFV RAMs; only 2 (0.1%) patients developed an FTC RAM. Conclusion Across a large, diverse population using DRV 800 mg QD–based regimens and formulations, resistance development remains rare; 0.1% of patients had ≥1 DRV and/or primary PI RAM post-baseline. Among 3 trials of the D/C/F/TAF STR, no patients developed a DRV or primary PI RAM. After > 10 years of investigating DRV 800 mg QD–based regimens in clinical trials, loss of phenotypic susceptibility to DRV has never been observed in TN or TE virologically suppressed patients and was only once observed in a TE patient with prior VF on multiple antiretrovirals, including a PI. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the HIV-1 drug resistance to elsulfavirine and the effectiveness of it among Russian treatment-naïve patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 29-39
Author(s):  
A. A. Kirichenko ◽  
D. E. Kireev ◽  
A. V. Kravchenko ◽  
A. V. Pokrovskaya ◽  
U. A. Kuimova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Antiretroviral Therapy ◽  
Virological Failure ◽  
Resistance Testing ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Resistance Mutations ◽  
Drug Resistance Testing ◽  
The Third ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Hiv 1

The aim of the study: to analyze the prevalence of resistance mutations to elsulfavirine and to evaluate the effectiveness of it among HIV-infected treatment-naïve patients in real clinical practice.Materials and methods. The study included 578 patients with HIV infection, which divided into 3 groups. The first group is 354 HIV-infected treatment-naïve patients for whom HIV-1 nucleotide sequences were obtained as part of routine drug resistance testing. The second study group included 111 HIV-infected treatment-naïve patients, tested for drug resistance before the antiretroviral therapy containing elsulfavirine. The third study group included 113 HIV-infected treatment-naïve patients, each of whom was assigned a treatment regimen containing elsulfavirine without prior drug resistance testing. The observation period for patients of the second and third groups who received treatment was 24 weeks. To assess the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy in patients, viral load, CD4+ T-cell counts, and adherence to therapy were assessed. HIV-1 subtypes and drug resistance mutations were determined using the Stanford HIV Resistance Database (v. 8.9-1). To clarify the results of subtyping, phylogenetic analysis of nucleotide sequences was carried out using the MEGA program (v. 6.0).Results. The prevalence of mutations associated with decreased susceptibility to elsulfavirine among HIV-infected treatment-naïve patients was 1.7% and 4.5% for the first and second groups of patients, respectively. All of the patients have only single resistance mutations which, according to the results of preclinical studies, cannot cause drug resistance. The use of elsulfavirine in real clinical practice among treatment-naïve patients has demonstrated good virological and immunological efficacy of the drug. As a result of 24 weeks of therapy in patients of the second group, no treatment ineffectiveness, and the development of drug resistance were observed. Among the patients of the third group, 6 patients (5.3%) have the virological failure of therapy associated with the resistance to the used drugs. All patients with virological failure had a resistance mutation profile associated with a high level of drug resistance to one of the drugs in the treatment regimen, lamivudine. Additionally, 1 patient had a combination of mutations that reduce susceptibility to elsulfavirine, and 4 patients had mutations that can reduce susceptibility to elsulfavirine in combination with other mutations.Conclusion. The low prevalence of mutations associated with a decrease in susceptibility to elsulfavirine and the absence of combinations of mutations make it possible to predict the successful use of this drug for Russian treatment-naïve patients. Reported cases of virological failure of antiretroviral therapy are difficult to interpret in the context of elsulfavirine due to the lack of an exact list of mutations and their combinations, and associations with the degree of resistance to it. This study describes for the first time the mutation profiles in patients with virological failure of therapy containing elsulfavirine and demonstrates the necessity of the further study of drug resistance profile to drug in vitro and in vivo.

scholarly journals Transmitted Drug Resistance in Treatment-naïve HIV-Infected VCT clients in Taiwan, 2007–2016

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S423-S424
Author(s):  
Hung-Chin Tsai ◽  
I-Tzu Chen ◽  
Susan Shin-Jung Lee ◽  
Yao-Shen Chen
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Antiretroviral Therapy ◽  
Resistance Mutation ◽  
Resistance Testing ◽  
Transmitted Drug Resistance ◽  
Drug Resistance Testing ◽  
Subtype B ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Hiv 1 ◽  
Level Resistance

Abstract Background The transmission of drug-resistant HIV-1 strains might compromise the efficacy of antiretroviral treatment. The aim of this study was to monitor the prevalence of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) in Taiwan, where free highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) was provided since 1997. Methods A cohort study on TDR was conducted in antiretroviral therapy -naïve HIV-1 ¡Vinfected voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) clients from 2007 to 2016 in southern Taiwan. Genotypic drug resistance testing to PR/RT (pol gene) were determined by ViroSeqTM system and drug resistance testing to integrase inhibitors (INSTI) was done by in house PCR. Antiretroviral resistance was interpreted using the HIVdb program of the Stanford University HIV Drug Resistance Database. The patients classified as having low-level resistance, intermediate resistance and high-level resistance were defined as having drug resistance. Resistance-associated mutations were defined by the presence of at least one mutation included in the 2017 drug resistance mutation list of the International AIDS Society-USA consensus guidelines. Results A total of 29384 individuals received a free HIV anonymously screening test during 2007 to 2016. The positive rate for HIV-1 infection was 2%. Sequences were obtained from 407 individuals, of whom 90% were infected by MSM, and 10% were infected by heterosexually. Subtype B HIV-1 strains were found in 97%, subtype C in 0.3% and subtype CRF01_AE in 2.7%. A total of 6% was found to harbor drug resistance strains. The most common NRTI resistance associated mutation was D67N, M184V, K219N, Y118I and T215S/P. The most common NNRTI resistance associated mutation was Y181C, K103N, V179D and Y318F. No any one harbored resistance to INSTI inhibitors (n = 188). Conclusion The resistance prevalence (6%) in this study supported the WHO guideline to prescribe pol resistance testing before initiation of HAART therapy in the treatment naïve patients. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Rare emergence of drug resistance in HIV-1 treatment -naïve patients after 48 weeks of treatment with elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas A. Margot ◽  
Kathryn M. Kitrinos ◽  
Marshall Fordyce ◽  
Scott McCallister ◽  
Michael D. Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Tenofovir Alafenamide ◽  
Hiv 1
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document