scholarly journals White Paper: Bridging the gap between surveillance data and antimicrobial stewardship in long-term care facilities—practical guidance from the JPIAMR ARCH and COMBACTE-MAGNET EPI-Net networks

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii33-ii41
Author(s):  
Marcella Sibani ◽  
Fulvia Mazzaferri ◽  
Elena Carrara ◽  
Maria Diletta Pezzani ◽  
Fabiana Arieti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Surveillance Data ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Practical Guidance

Abstract Background In long-term care facilities (LTCFs) residents often receive inappropriate antibiotic treatment and infection prevention and control practices are frequently inadequate, thus favouring acquisition of MDR organisms. There is increasing evidence in the literature describing antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) activities in LTCFs, but practical guidance on how surveillance data should be linked with AMS activities in this setting is lacking. To bridge this gap, the JPIAMR ARCH and COMBACTE-MAGNET EPI-Net networks joined their efforts to provide practical guidance for linking surveillance data with AMS activities. Materials and methods Considering the three main topics [AMS leadership and accountability, antimicrobial usage (AMU) and AMS, and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and AMS], a literature review was performed and a list of target actions was developed. Consensus on target actions was reached through a RAND-modified Delphi process involving 40 experts from 18 countries and different professional backgrounds adopting a One Health approach. Results From the 25 documents identified, 25 target actions were retrieved and proposed for expert evaluation. The consensus process produced a practical checklist including 23 target actions, differentiating between essential and desirable targets according to clinical relevance and feasibility. Flexible proposals for AMS team composition and leadership were provided, with a strong emphasis on the need for well-defined and adequately supported roles and responsibilities. Specific antimicrobial classes, AMU metrics, pathogens and resistance patterns to be monitored are addressed. Effective reporting strategies are described. Conclusions The proposed checklist represents a practical tool to support local AMS teams across a wide range of care delivery organization and availability of resources.

Implementation of antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention and control practices in long-term care facilities—Pennsylvania, 2017

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 713-716
Author(s):  
Nkuchia M. M’ikanatha ◽  
Sameh W. Boktor ◽  
Arlene Seid ◽  
Allen R Kunselman ◽  
Jennifer H. Han
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Program Implementation ◽  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
And Control

AbstractIn 2017, we surveyed long-term care facilities in Pennsylvania regarding antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention and control (IPC) practices. Among 244 responding facilities, 93% had IPC programs and 47% had antimicrobial stewardship programs. There was significant variation in practices across facilities, and a number of program implementation challenges were identified.

scholarly journals Antimicrobial prescribing and infections in long-term care facilities (LTCF): a multilevel analysis of the HALT 2016 study, Ireland, 2017

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (46) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Tandan ◽  
K Burns ◽  
H Murphy ◽  
S Hennessy ◽  
M Cormican ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Multilevel Modelling ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Prevalence Survey ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Aggregated Data ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Care Facilities

Background The 2016 point prevalence survey (PPS) of healthcare-associated infections (HAI) and antimicrobial use (AMU) in Irish long-term care facilities (LTCF) (HALT) showed a 9.8% AMU and 4.4% HAI prevalence, based on aggregated data analysis. Aim Our aim was to identify institutional and resident risk factors of AMU and HAI. Methods HALT 2016 gathered information using institutional and resident questionnaires, for residents who met the surveillance definition of active HAI and/or AMU, limiting analysis to the aggregated institutional level. In January 2017, we requested additional data on age, sex, urinary catheter use and disorientation of current residents from HALT 2016 LTCF and matched to 2016 HALT data. Results Of 224 HALT 2016 LTCF, 80 provided additional information on 3,816 residents; prevalence of AMU was 10.6% and HAI was 4.7%. Presence of a coordinating physician (Odds ratio (OR): 0.3; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.2–0.6), antimicrobial stewardship committee (OR: 0.2; 95%; CI: 0.1–0.6), healthcare assistants (OR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.9–1.0), antimicrobial consumption feedback (OR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1–0.6) and medical care by personal general practitioner (OR: 0.6; 95% CI: 0.7–1.0) were associated with less AMU and feedback on surveillance of infection prevention and control (IPC) practices (OR: 0.6; 95% CI: 0.3–1.0) with less HAI. AMU and HAI varied significantly between LTCF. Conclusions Multilevel modelling identified significant inter-facility variation, as well as institutional factors associated with AMU and HAI. An antimicrobial stewardship committee linked with feedback on IPC and prescribing was associated with reduced AMU and HAI.

Infection prevention and control and antimicrobial stewardship in European long-term care, 2016-2017

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Kinross ◽  
K Latour ◽  
E Ricchizzi ◽  
T Kärki ◽  
C Suetens
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Prevalence Survey ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
And Control

Abstract Background Europe's population is ageing. Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) for this vulnerable population are often relatively homelike with low staff-to-resident ratios. In 2016-2017, ECDC coordinated its third point prevalence survey (PPS) of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and antimicrobial use in European long-term care facilities (LTCFs). It included collection of data on structure and process indicators (SPIs) of infection prevention and control (IPC) and antimicrobial stewardship, to support countries' identification of national and local interventions in LTCFs. Methods In each country, national contacts recruited a convenience sample of LTCFs. National/LTCF PPS teams used a standard protocol that included case definition algorithms (adapted US CDC/SHEA definitions) applied to each resident with signs/symptoms of infection on the PPS day, and questions for LTCF staff on SPIs of IPC and antimicrobial stewardship activities. Denominators indicate the number of responses available for analysis. Results 3,052 LTCFs in 24 EU/EEA countries were recruited, with 102,301 residents included. The prevalence of HAIs (residents with ≥1 HAI) was 3.7%. Although 1,524/1,623 (94%) LTFS had a hand hygiene (HH) protocol, only 1,046/1,585 (66%) LTCFs had organised ≥1 HH training session for care professionals during the previous year. 1,185/1,561 (76%) LTCFs reported IPC training of nursing and paramedical staff. Only 340/1,639 (21%) of LTCFs reported training on appropriate prescribing and 493/1,623 (30%) LTCFs had provided feedback to GPs on antimicrobial consumption. On the PPS day, annual antimicrobial consumption data were available to only 530/1,623 (32%) LTCFs. Conclusions Even in LTCFs with the capacity to perform this PPS, IPC training was non-ubiquitous and antimicrobial stewardship activities, including training, were rarely reported. ECDC encourages EU/EEA countries to recruit LTCFs to participate in future PPSs, to allow them to benchmark HAI rates and practices. Key messages The prevalence of healthcare-associated infections in European long-term care facilities (LTCFs) highlights their requirement for infection prevention and control (IPC) and antimicrobial stewardship. This multi-national point prevalence survey (PPS) indicates that European countries can consider reinforcing IPC, antimicrobial stewardship practices and participation in PPSs in LTCFs.

scholarly journals Characterization and evolution of infection control practices among SARS-CoV-2 infected healthcare workers of acute care hospitals and long-term care facilities in Quebec, Canada, Spring 2020

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-37
Author(s):  
Sara Carazo ◽  
Denis Laliberté ◽  
Jasmin Villeneuve ◽  
Richard Martin ◽  
Pierre Deshaies ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Attack Rate ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Exposure Period ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities

ABSTRACT Objectives: To estimate the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate and the secondary attack rate among healthcare workers (HCWs) in Quebec, the most affected province of Canada during the first wave; to describe the evolution of work-related exposures and infection prevention and control (IPC) practices in infected HCWs; and to compare the exposures and practices between acute care hospitals (ACHs) and long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Design: Survey of cases Participants: Quebec HCWs from private and public institutions with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosed between 1st March and 14th June 2020. HCWs ≥18 years old, having worked during the exposure period and survived their illness were eligible for the survey. Methods: After obtaining consent, 4542 HCWs completed a standardized questionnaire. COVID-19 rates and proportions of exposures and practices were estimated and compared between ACHs and LTCFs. Results: HCWs represented 25% (13,726/54,005) of all reported COVID-19 cases in Quebec and had an 11-times greater rate than non-HCWs. Their secondary household attack rate was 30%. Most affected occupations were healthcare support workers, nurses and nurse assistants, working in LTCFs (45%) and ACHs (30%). Compared to ACHs, HCWs of LTCFs had less training, higher staff mobility between working sites, similar PPE use but better self-reported compliance with at-work physical distancing. Sub-optimal IPC practices declined over time but were still present at the end of the first wave. Conclusion: Quebec HCWs and their families were severely affected during the first wave of COVID-19. Insufficient pandemic preparedness and suboptimal IPC practices likely contributed to high transmission in both LTCFs and ACHs.

scholarly journals The Impact of Enhanced Antimicrobial Stewardship Support on Antibiotic Starts in Long-Term Care Facilities

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s527-s527
Author(s):  
Gabriela Andujar-Vazquez ◽  
Kirthana Beaulac ◽  
Shira Doron ◽  
David R Snydman
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
The Impact

Background: The Tufts Medical Center Antimicrobial Stewardship (ASP) Team has partnered with the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH) to provide broad-based educational programs (BBEP) to long-term care facilities (LTCFs) in an effort to improve ASP and infection control practices. LTCFs have consistently expressed interest in individualized and hands-on involvement by ASP experts, yet they lack resources. The goal of this study was to determine whether “enhanced” individualized guidance provided by an ASP expert would lead to antibiotic start decreases in LTCFs participating in our pilot study. Methods: A pilot study was conducted to test the feasibility and efficacy of providing enhanced ASP and infection control practices to LTCFs. In total, 10 facilities already participating in MDPH BBEP and submitting monthly antibiotic start data were enrolled, were stratified by bed size and presence of dementia unit, and were randomized 1:1 to the “enhanced” group (defined as reviewing protocols and antibiotic start cases, providing lectures and feedback to staff and answering questions) versus the “nonenhanced” group. Antibiotic start data were validated and collected prospectively from January 2018 to July 2019, and the interventions began in April 2019. Due to staff turnover and lack of engagement, intervention was not possible in 2 of the 5 LTCFs randomized to the enhanced group, which were therefore analyzed as a nonenhanced group. An incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% CIs were calculated comparing the antibiotic start rate per 1,000 resident days between periods in the pilot groups. Results: The average bed sizes for enhanced groups versus nonenhanced groups were 121 (±71.0) versus 108 (±32.8); the average resident days per facility per month were 3,415.7 (±2,131.2) versus 2,911.4 (±964.3). Comparatively, 3 facilities in the enhanced group had dementia unit versus 4 in the nonenhanced group. In the per protocol analysis, the antibiotic start rate in the enhanced group before versus after the intervention was 11.35 versus 9.41 starts per 1,000 resident days (IRR, 0.829; 95% CI, 0.794–0.865). The antibiotic start rate in the nonenhanced group before versus after the intervention was 7.90 versus 8.23 antibiotic starts per 1,000 resident days (IRR, 1.048; 95% CI, 1.007–1.089). Physician hours required for ASP for the enhanced group totaled 8.9 (±2.2) per facility per month. Conclusions: Although the number of hours required for intervention by an expert was not onerous, maintaining engagement proved difficult and in 2 facilities could not be achieved. A statistically significant 20% decrease in the antibiotic start rate was achieved in the enhanced group after interventions, potentially reflecting the benefit of enhanced ASP support by an expert.Funding: This study was funded by the Leadership in Epidemiology, Antimicrobial Stewardship, and Public Health (LEAP) fellowship training grant award from the CDC.Disclosures: None

Combating Coronavirus Disease-2019 Outbreak in Long-Term Care Facilities for Frail Older Adults: Preventive Measures and Palliative Care Go Hand-in-Hand

2021 ◽  
pp. 082585972110393
Author(s):  
Hon Wai Benjamin Cheng
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Respiratory Illness ◽  
Term Care ◽  
The People ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Novel Coronavirus

While the whole population is at risk from infection with the coronavirus, older people—often frail and subject to multimorbidity—are at the highest risk for the severe and fatal disease. Despite strict infection control and social distancing measures, frail adults in long-term care facilities may be at particular risk of transmission of respiratory illness. Treatment decisions are often complex attributed to the heterogeneity of this population with regards to different geriatric domains such as functional status, comorbidity, and poly-pharmacy. While measures must be taken to prevent the novel coronavirus from spreading through these facilities, it is also essential that residents with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have access to the symptom management and support they want and deserve. What most nursing home residents want during the course of their illness is to be able to stay in their facilities, to be surrounded by the people they love most, and to feel relief from their physical and emotional pain. By addressing the limited access to hospice and palliative care delivery in nursing homes, we can prevent unnecessary suffering and pain from COVID-19 as well as lay the groundwork for improving care for all residents moving forward.

scholarly journals 2044. An Assessment and Feedback Model Bringing Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Expertise to Long-Term Care Facilities

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S687-S687
Author(s):  
Philip Chung ◽  
Kate Tyner ◽  
Scott Bergman ◽  
Teresa Micheels ◽  
Mark E Rupp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Care Facilities

Abstract Background Long-term care facilities (LTCF) often struggle with implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) that meet all CDC core elements (CE). The CDC recommends partnership with infectious diseases (ID)/ASP experts to guide ASP implementation. The Nebraska Antimicrobial Stewardship Assessment and Promotion Program (ASAP) is an initiative funded by NE DHHS via a CDC grant to assist healthcare facilities with ASP implementation. Methods ASAP performed on-site baseline evaluation of ASP in 5 LTCF (42–293 beds) in the spring of 2017 using a 64-item questionnaire based on CDC CE. After interviewing ASP members, ASAP provided prioritized facility-specific recommendations for ASP implementation. LTCF were periodically contacted in the next 12 months to provide implementation support and evaluate progress. The number of CE met, recommendations implemented, antibiotic starts (AS) and days of therapy (DOT)/1000 resident-days (RD), and incidence of facility-onset Clostridioides difficile infections (FO-CDI) were compared 6 to 12 months before and after on-site visits. Paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed rank test were used for statistical analyses. Results Multidisciplinary ASP existed in all 5 facilities at baseline with medical directors (n = 2) or directors of nursing (n = 3) designated as team leads. Median CE implemented increased from 3 at baseline to 6 at the end of follow-up (P = 0.06). No LTCF had all 7 CE at baseline. By the end of one year, 2 facilities implemented all 7 CE with the remaining implementing 6 CE. LTCF not meeting all CE were only deficient in reporting ASP metrics to providers and staff. Among the 38 recommendations provided by ASAP, 82% were partially or fully implemented. Mean AS/1000 RD reduced by 19% from 10.1 at baseline to 8.2 post-intervention (P = 0.37) and DOT/1000 RD decreased by 21% from 91.7 to 72.5 (P = 0.20). The average incidence of FO-CDI decreased by 75% from 0.53 to 0.13 cases/10,000 RD (P = 0.25). Conclusion Assessment of LTCF ASP along with feedback for improvement by ID/ASP experts resulted in more programs meeting all 7 CE. Favorable reductions in antimicrobial use and CDI rates were also observed. Moving forward, the availability of these services should be expanded to all LTCFs struggling with ASP implementation. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals 2055. Action: A Year in the Lives of Consultant Pharmacists Working on Antimicrobial Stewardship in Long-Term Care Facilities

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S692-S693
Author(s):  
Philip Chung ◽  
Alex Neukirch ◽  
Rebecca J Ortmeier ◽  
Scott Bergman ◽  
Mark E Rupp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
First Generation ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Drug Regimen ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Tract Infections

Abstract Background The CDC recommends consultant pharmacists (CP) support antimicrobial stewardship (AS) activities in long-term care facilities (LTCF) by reviewing antimicrobial appropriateness. We initiated a project training CP from a regional long-term care pharmacy to support AS implementation in LTCF. Methods CP were trained to evaluate the appropriateness of all systemic antimicrobial therapy (AT) and provide prescriber feedback during their monthly drug regimen review (DRR). An electronic database was developed to facilitate data reporting. Antimicrobial use (AU) and adverse events (AE) from 32 LTCF were analyzed for 2018 using descriptive statistics. Results A total of 5327 courses of AT with a median duration of 7 days (IQR 5–10) were reviewed. The majority of AT was started in the LTCF (55%) but was also initiated in hospitals (24%), clinics (11%) and emergency departments (2%). Of 2926 AT started in LTCF, 36% were based on nurse evaluation (NE) while 33% began after prescriber evaluation (PE). Fluoroquinolones (FQ) and first-generation cephalosporins were the most commonly prescribed agents (Table 1). Treatment or prophylaxis of urinary tract infections accounted for 40% of AU (Figure 1). Diagnostic testing was associated with 37% of AT courses. Urine cultures were the most frequent test performed (81%). Overall, 41% of AT was determined to be inappropriate resulting in > 800 feedback letters sent to prescribers. Unnecessary antibiotic starts (based on revised Mc Geer or Loeb’s criteria) were identified as the most common reason (Figure 2). AT appropriateness varied depending on the setting in which it was initiated. A majority (87%) of AT initiated in hospitals was found to be appropriate with 56% and 46% appropriate for ED and clinic starts. Appropriateness of LTCF initiated AT was 49% (59% after PE and 42% after NE). AE were associated with 3% of AT with allergic reactions and Clostridioides difficile infections occurring with 0.4% and 0.7% of AT, respectively. AE were most frequently associated with folate antagonists (5%) and FQ (3%). Conclusion This study demonstrates many AU improvement opportunities exist in LTCF and CP can play an important role in identifying them if trained in AS principles. CP should review all AU for appropriateness and provide data to inform AS efforts in LTCF. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document