In vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam alone and in combination with amikacin against MDR/XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Greece

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Galani ◽  
Vassiliki Papoutsaki ◽  
Irene Karantani ◽  
Ilias Karaiskos ◽  
Lamprini Galani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Peak Plasma ◽  
Peak Plasma Concentration ◽  
Active Agent ◽  
Synergistic Interaction ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Time Kill ◽  
Synergy Testing

Abstract Objectives We evaluated the in vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and comparator agents against MDR non-MBL Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected from nine Greek hospitals and we assessed the potential synergistic interaction between ceftolozane/tazobactam and amikacin. Methods A total of 160 non-MBL P. aeruginosa isolates collected in 2016 were tested for susceptibility to ceftolozane/tazobactam and seven comparator agents including ceftazidime/avibactam. Time–kill assays were performed for synergy testing using ceftolozane/tazobactam 60 or 7.5 mg/L, corresponding to the peak and trough concentrations of a 1.5 g q8h dose, respectively, in combination with 69 mg/L amikacin, corresponding to the free peak plasma concentration. Synergy was defined as a ≥2 log10 cfu/mL reduction compared with the most active agent. Results Overall, ceftolozane/tazobactam inhibited 64.4% of the P. aeruginosa strains at ≤4 mg/L. Colistin was the most active agent (MIC50/90, 0.5/2 mg/L; 96.3% susceptible) followed by ceftazidime/avibactam (MIC50/90, 4/16 mg/L; 80.6% susceptible). GES-type enzymes were predominantly responsible for ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance; 81.6% of the non-producers were susceptible. MICs for the P. aeruginosa isolates selected for synergy testing were 2–32 mg/L ceftolozane/tazobactam and 2–128 mg/L amikacin. The combination of ceftolozane/tazobactam with amikacin was synergistic against 85.0% of all the isolates tested and against 75.0% of the GES producers. No antagonistic interactions were observed. Conclusions Ceftolozane/tazobactam demonstrated good in vitro activity against MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa clinical isolates, including strains with co-resistance to other antipseudomonal drugs. In combination with amikacin, a synergistic interaction at 24 h was observed against 85.0% of P. aeruginosa strains tested, including isolates with ceftolozane/tazobactam MICs of 32 mg/L or GES producers.

scholarly journals In Vitro Activity of Pentamidine Alone and in Combination with Antibiotics against Multidrug-Resistant Clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains

Antibiotics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 885
Author(s):  
Soraya Herrera-Espejo ◽  
Tania Cebrero-Cangueiro ◽  
Gema Labrador-Herrera ◽  
Jerónimo Pachón ◽  
María Eugenia Pachón-Ibáñez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Hospital Acquired Infections ◽  
Time Kill ◽  
Hospital Acquired

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a public health problem causing both community and hospital-acquired infections, and thus the development of new therapies for these infections is critical. The objective of this study was to analyze in vitro the activity of pentamidine as adjuvant in combinations to antibiotics against seven clinical P. aeruginosa strains. The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) was determined following standard protocols, and the results were interpreted according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints; however, the gentamicin activity was interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations. The bactericidal in vitro activity was studied at 1×MIC concentrations by time–kill curves, and also performed in three selected strains at 1/2×MIC of pentamidine. All studies were performed in triplicate. The pentamidine MIC range was 400–1600 μg/mL. Four of the strains were MDR, and the other three were resistant to two antibiotic families. The combinations of pentamidine at 1×MIC showed synergistic activity against all the tested strains, except for pentamidine plus colistin. Pentamidine plus imipenem and meropenem were the combinations that showed synergistic activity against the most strains. At 1/2×MIC, pentamidine plus antibiotics were synergistic with all three analyzed strains. In summary, pentamidine in combination with antibiotics showed in vitro synergy against multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa clinical strains, which suggests its possible use as adjuvant to antibiotics for the therapy of infections from MDR P. aeruginosa.

scholarly journals Antistaphylococcal Activity of DX-619 Alone and in Combination with Vancomycin, Teicoplanin, and Linezolid Assessed by Time-Kill Synergy Testing

2007 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 1508-1511
Author(s):  
Kim Credito ◽  
Genrong Lin ◽  
Peter C. Appelbaum
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Antistaphylococcal Activity ◽  
Time Kill ◽  
Synergy Testing

ABSTRACT Time-kill synergy studies testing in vitro activity of DX-619 alone and with added vancomycin, teicoplanin, or linezolid against 101 Staphylococcus aureus strains showed synergy between DX-619 and teicoplanin at 12 to 24 h in 72 strains and between DX-619 and vancomycin in 28 strains. No synergy was found with linezolid, and no antagonism was observed with any combination.

scholarly journals In Vitro Activity of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam against Multidrug-Resistant Nonfermenting Gram-Negative Bacilli Isolated from Patients with Cystic Fibrosis

2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Grohs ◽  
Gary Taieb ◽  
Philippe Morand ◽  
Iheb Kaibi ◽  
Isabelle Podglajen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cystic Fibrosis ◽  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Stenotrophomonas Maltophilia ◽  
Active Agent ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Time Kill

ABSTRACT Ceftolozane-tazobactam was tested against 58 multidrug-resistant nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli (35 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 11 Achromobacter xylosoxydans, and 12 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates) isolated from cystic fibrosis patients and was compared to ceftolozane alone, ceftazidime, meropenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam. Ceftolozane-tazobactam was the most active agent against P. aeruginosa but was inactive against A. xylosoxydans and S. maltophilia. In time-kill experiments, ceftolozane-tazobactam had complete bactericidal activity against 2/6 clinical isolates (33%).

scholarly journals 203. Activity of Cefepime in Combination with Taniborbactam (formerly VNRX-5133) Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa from a Global 2018-2020 Surveillance Collection

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S124-S124
Author(s):  
Meredith Hackel ◽  
Mark G G Wise ◽  
Daniel F Sahm
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Efflux Pump ◽  
Active Agent ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Independent Contractor ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
New Treatment

Abstract Background Taniborbactam is a novel cyclic boronate-based broad-spectrum β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) with potent and selective inhibitory activity against both serine- and metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs). Taniborbactam restores the activity of cefepime (FEP) against many multidrug resistant organisms, including cephalosporin- and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA). We evaluated the in vitro activity of the investigational combination cefepime-taniborbactam and comparators against clinical isolates of PA collected during a 2018-2020 surveillance. Methods MICs of FEP with taniborbactam fixed at 4 µg/mL (FTB) and comparators were determined against 3,219 PA collected from 221 sites in 52 countries in 2018-2020. Resistant phenotypes were based on 2021 CLSI breakpoints. Acquired β-lactamase (BL) genes were identified via PCR/Sanger sequencing or whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for 516 isolates with meropenem (MEM) MIC ≥8 µg/mL, and for 94 randomly selected isolates with FEP or ceftazidime MIC ≥16 µg/mL. 186 isolates with FTB MIC ≥16 µg/mL, 16 with FTB MIC=8 µg/mL and one with FTB MIC=4 µg/mL were subjected to WGS. Results Overall, 28.7%, 26.2% and 20.3% of PA isolates were nonsusceptible (NS) to piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP), MEM or FEP, respectively (Table). FTB demonstrated potent activity (MIC50/90, 2/8 µg/mL; 94.2% inhibited at ≤8 µg/mL) against PA overall and inhibited between 63.4% (ceftazidime-avibactam [CZA] NS) and 82.1% (TZP NS) of isolates in the NS subsets compared to 0% to 69.1% S for comparators. Against the 111 strains carrying VIM or NDM MBL genes, 67.6% had FTB MICs ≤8 µg/mL, with 11.7% having FTB MICs of 16 µg/mL. Plausible explanations for elevated FTB MICs included IMP MBL genes, penicillin binding protein 3 variations, and/or possible efflux pump up-regulation. Conclusion FTB demonstrated potent in vitro activity against PA with different resistance profiles, including NS to FEP, MEM, and TZP, and to the BL/BLI combinations CZA, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam. FTB was the most active agent tested against PA harboring VIM and NDM MBLs. These findings support the continued development of FTB as a potential new treatment option for challenging infections due to MDR PA. Disclosures Meredith Hackel, PhD MPH, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Independent Contractor) Mark G G. Wise, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Independent Contractor) Daniel F. Sahm, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Independent Contractor)

scholarly journals In Vitro Activity of Ceftaroline Alone and in Combination against Clinical Isolates of Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens, Including β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

2009 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 2360-2366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Céline Vidaillac ◽  
Steve N. Leonard ◽  
Helio S. Sader ◽  
Ronald N. Jones ◽  
Michael J. Rybak
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Clinical Value ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Time Kill

ABSTRACT Ceftaroline is a novel broad-spectrum cephalosporin that exhibits bactericidal activity against many gram-positive and -negative pathogens. However, the activity of ceftaroline cannot be solely relied upon for eradication of multidrug-resistant gram-negative isolates, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae, which represent a current clinical concern. As drug combinations might be beneficial by potential synergy, we evaluated the in vitro activity of ceftaroline combined with meropenem, aztreonam, cefepime, tazobactam, amikacin, levofloxacin, and tigecycline. Susceptibility testing was performed for 20 clinical P. aeruginosa isolates, 10 ESBL-producing Escherichia coli isolates, 10 ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, and 10 AmpC-derepressed Enterobacter cloacae isolates. Time-kill experiments were performed for 10 isolates using antimicrobials at one-fourth the MIC. Ceftaroline exhibited a MIC range of 0.125 to 1,024 μg/ml and was reduced 2- to 512-fold by combination with tazobactam (4 μg/ml) for ESBL-producing strains. In time-kill experiments, ceftaroline plus amikacin was synergistic against 90% of the isolates (and indifferent for one P. aeruginosa isolate). Ceftaroline plus tazobactam was indifferent for E. cloacae and P. aeruginosa strains but synergistic against 100% of E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates. Combinations of ceftaroline plus meropenem or aztreonam were also synergistic for all E. coli and E. cloacae isolates, respectively, but indifferent against 90% of the other isolates. Finally, combinations of ceftaroline plus either tigecycline, levofloxacin, or cefepime were indifferent for 100% of the isolates. No antagonism was observed with any combination. Ceftaroline plus amikacin appeared as the most likely synergistic combination. This represents a promising therapeutic option, and further studies are warranted to elucidate the clinical value of ceftaroline combinations against resistant gram-negative pathogens.

Synergy Testing of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium against Quinupristin-Dalfopristin in Combination with Other Antimicrobial Agents

1999 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 2776-2779 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. O. Matsumura ◽  
L. Louie ◽  
M. Louie ◽  
A. E. Simor
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Enterococcus Faecium ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant ◽  
Time Kill ◽  
Synergy Testing

ABSTRACT Using checkerboard and time-kill assays, we evaluated the in vitro activity of quinupristin-dalfopristin (RP 59500) alone and in combination with five other antimicrobial agents against 12 clinical strains of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium(VREF). In time-kill studies, six VREF strains exhibited synergism with the combination of quinupristin-dalfopristin and doxycycline and three exhibited synergism with quinupristin-dalfopristin plus ampicillin-sulbactam. Combinations of quinupristin-dalfopristin with these and other agents warrant further clinical evaluation for the treatment of serious VREF infections.

scholarly journals 1592. Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Comparator Agents Against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa With Overexpression of AmpC β-Lactamase From Phase 3 Clinical Trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S792-S793
Author(s):  
Lynn-Yao Lin ◽  
Dmitri Debabov ◽  
William Chang ◽  
Urania Rappo
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Active Agent ◽  
Complicated Urinary Tract Infection ◽  
Carbapenem Resistance ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
In Vitro Susceptibility ◽  
Intra Abdominal Infection

Abstract Background AmpC overproduction is a main mechanism of carbapenem resistance, in the absence of acquired carbapenemases. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) has potent in vitro activity against AmpC-producing P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales that are resistant to carbapenems and other β-lactams. Methods Activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators was evaluated against AmpC-overproducing Enterobacterales (n=77) and P. aeruginosa (n=53) collected from 4 CAZ-AVI clinical trials: RECLAIM (complicated intra-abdominal infection [cIAI]), REPRISE (cIAI/complicated urinary tract infection [cUTI]), RECAPTURE (cUTI) and REPROVE (hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator associated pneumonia). In vitro susceptibility of CAZ-AVI and comparators was performed by broth microdilution using ThermoFisher custom panels. CLSI breakpoints were used to determine susceptibility. Quantitative PCR and microarray data were used to characterize presence and expression of AmpC. Clinical response at test of cure was assessed. Results Against 77 AmpC-overproducing Enterobacterales isolates, meropenem-vaborbactam (MVB) (98.7% susceptible [S]), CAZ-AVI (96.1% S), and meropenem (MEM) (96.1% S) had similar in vitro activity (Table), with greater in vitro activity than amikacin (AMK) (84.4% S), gentamicin (61.0% S), and ceftolozane-tazobactam (TZC) (35.1% S). Clinical cures in patients with baseline AmpC-overproducing Enterobacterales were 21/26 (81%) in CAZ-AVI group vs 17/20 (85%) in control groups. Against 53 AmpC-overproducing P. aeruginosa isolates, CAZ-AVI (73.6% S) showed greater in vitro activity than AMK (69.8% S), TZC (58.5% S), and MEM (37.7% S). Clinical cures in patients with baseline AmpC-overproducing P. aeruginosa were 12/14 (86%) in CAZ-AVI group vs 9/12 (75%) in control groups. MIC distributions against the same P aeruginosa isolates were CAZ-AVI (MIC50/90, 4/ >64 µg/mL), MVB (MIC50/90, 8/32 µg/mL), and MEM (MIC50/90, 8/32 µg/mL). Table Conclusion CAZ-AVI was the most active agent against AmpC-overproducing P. aeruginosa with higher proportion of clinical cure than controls. CAZ-AVI was also among the most active agents against AmpC-overproducing Enterobacterales, with >96% isolates susceptible. Disclosures Lynn-Yao Lin, MS, AbbVie (Employee) Dmitri Debabov, PhD, AbbVie (Employee) William Chang, BS, AbbVie (Employee) Urania Rappo, MD, MS, PharmD, Allergan (before its acquisition by AbbVie) (Employee)

scholarly journals 1375. In vitro Activity of Cefiderocol and Comparator Agents against Gram-Negative Isolates from Cancer Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S421-S422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth V I Rolston ◽  
Bahgat Gerges ◽  
Issam Raad ◽  
Samuel L Aitken ◽  
Ruth Reitzel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Active Agent ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Research Grant

Abstract Background Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) are now the predominant cause of bacterial infection in cancer patients (CP). Many GNB are problematic because they have become resistant to commonly used antibiotics. Cefiderocol (CFDC), a novel siderophore cephalosporin, is active against a wide spectrum of GNB. We evaluated its in vitro activity and that of eleven comparator agents against GNB isolated from CP. Methods A total of 341 recent GNB blood isolates from CP were tested using CLSI approved methods for MIC determination by broth microdilution. Comparator agents were amikacin (A), aztreonam (AZ), ceftazidime (CZ), ceftazidime/avibactam (CAV), cefepime (CEF), ciprofloxacin (CIP), colistin (CL), meropenem (MR), ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), tigecycline (TG), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (T/S). Results CFDC MIC90s as mg/L were: S. maltophilia [50 isolates] 0.25, E. coli (ESBL−) [50 isolates] 0.5, E. coli (ESBL+) [51 isolates] 2.0, K. pneumoniae (ESBL− and +) [60 isolates] 0.5; K. pneumoniae (CRE) [22 isolates] 2.0; P. aeruginosa (MDR) [32 isolates] 1.0; E. cloacae [27 isolates] 4.0; Achromobacter spp. [15 isolates] 0.12. CFDC inhibited P. agglomerans, Burkholderia spp., Sphingomonas spp., Ochrobactrum spp. at ≤1 mg/L [23 total isolates] and Elizabethkingia spp. and R. radiobacter at ≤8 mg/L [11 total isolates]. Among comparator agents, only T/S had consistent activity against S. maltophilia. For E. coli (ESBL− and +) MR, TG, CAV, CL were most active. For K. pneumoniae (ESBL–and +) MR, CAV were most active. For K. pneumoniae (CRE) and P. aeruginosa (MDR), none of the comparators had significant activity. For E. cloacae, MR, A, CAV, TG were most active. Among the uncommon organisms, MR and TG had the greatest activity. Conclusion Although susceptibility breakpoints have yet to be determined, CFDC has significant activity (≤4 mg/L) against most problematic Gram-negative organisms causing infections in CP based on available pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data. In particular, its activity against S. maltophilia was superior to the comparators. Also, it was the most active agent against P. aeruginosa (MDR) and K. pneumoniae (CRE). Based on our results, CFDC warrants clinical evaluation for the treatment of blood stream infections caused by GNB in CP. Disclosures K. V. I. Rolston, Merck: Investigator, Research grant; JMI Laboratories: Investigator, Research grant; Shionogi (Japan): Investigator, Research grant. B. Gerges, Shionogi: Collaborator, Research support. S. L. Aitken, Shionogi: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee; Merck: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee; Medicines Co: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee; Achaogen: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee; Zavante: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee; R. Prince, Shionogi: Investigator, Research support. Merck: Investigator, Research support.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document