scholarly journals Infectious Diseases Careers in Healthcare Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Stewardship

2017 ◽  
Vol 216 (suppl_5) ◽  
pp. S620-S621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ebbing Lautenbach
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Healthcare Epidemiology

scholarly journals Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Guidelines for Developing an Institutional Program to Enhance Antimicrobial Stewardship

2007 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy H. Dellit ◽  
Robert C. Owens ◽  
John E. McGowan ◽  
Dale N. Gerding ◽  
Robert A. Weinstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Healthcare Epidemiology

scholarly journals Policy Statement on Antimicrobial Stewardship by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA), the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), and the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS)

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 322-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Fishman ◽  
◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Safety Issue ◽  
The United States ◽  
Position Statement ◽  
Policy Statement ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Patient Safety Issue ◽  
Healthcare Epidemiology

Antimicrobial resistance has emerged as a significant healthcare quality and patient safety issue in the twenty-first century that, combined with a rapidly dwindling antimicrobial armamentarium, has resulted in a critical threat to the public health of the United States. Antimicrobial stewardship programs optimize antimicrobial use to achieve the best clinical outcomes while minimizing adverse events and limiting selective pressures that drive the emergence of resistance and may also reduce excessive costs attributable to suboptimal antimicrobial use. Therefore, antimicrobial stewardship must be a fiduciary responsibility for all healthcare institutions across the continuum of care. This position statement of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society of America outlines recommendations for the mandatory implementation of antimicrobial stewardship throughout health care, suggests process and outcome measures to monitor these interventions, and addresses deficiencies in education and research in this field as well as the lack of accurate data on antimicrobial use in the United States.

scholarly journals 157. A Multidisciplinary Approach to Carbapenem Stewardship at a Large Community Hospital in Brooklyn, New York

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S88-S88
Author(s):  
Samuel Simon ◽  
Rosanna Li ◽  
Yu Shia Lin ◽  
Suri Mayer ◽  
Edward Chapnick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Klebsiella Pneumoniae ◽  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback

Abstract Background Carbapenem-resistant gram-negative organisms are a continuously mounting threat, underscoring the need for effective antimicrobial stewardship interventions to improve the use of carbapenems. We sought to implement several multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship interventions beginning in January 2019 in an effort to reduce unnecessary meropenem use and the incidence of carbapenem-resistant gram-negatives. Methods Prospective audit and feedback was utilized daily in combination with weekly stewardship rounds between an Infectious Diseases pharmacist and physician in the Intensive Care Units. A second Infectious Diseases physician attended weekly interdisciplinary rounds on meropenem high-use units. Meropenem Days of Therapy (DOT) per 1,000 patient days and the incidence of meropenem resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae were compared by the chi-square test of proportions. Results Between 2018 and 2019 the institution’s meropenem DOT per 1,000 patient days decreased 33%, from 57 to 38 days per 1,000 patient days (difference, 19 days per 1,000 patient days; p< 0.001). In the hospital antibiogram, the meropenem susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa over the same time period increased from 71% to 77% of isolates (difference, 6%; p = 0.009). A non-significant decrease in the susceptibility of meropenem to Klebsiella pneumoniae was also observed from 92 to 90% (difference, 2%: p = 0.1658). Conclusion These data support the need for antimicrobial stewardship efforts targeting broad-spectrum antimicrobials such as meropenem. In the setting of a sustained decrease in meropenem use over 12 months, we observed a significant improvement in the percent susceptibility rate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to meropenem for the first time in five years. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

2018 Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapya

2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne H Norris ◽  
Nabin K Shrestha ◽  
Genève M Allison ◽  
Sara C Keller ◽  
Kavita P Bhavan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Clinical Practice Guideline ◽  
Practice Guideline ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Infusion Catheter

Abstract A panel of experts was convened by the Infectious Diseases Society of America to update the 2004 clinical practice guideline on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) [1]. This guideline is intended to provide insight for healthcare professionals who prescribe and oversee the provision of OPAT. It considers various patient features, infusion catheter issues, monitoring questions, and antimicrobial stewardship concerns. It does not offer recommendations on the treatment of specific infections. The reader is referred to disease- or organism-specific guidelines for such support.

scholarly journals 42. A Pharmacist-Led Intervention to Decrease Anaerobic Coverage for Hospitalized Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S44-S45
Author(s):  
Maxx O Enzmann ◽  
Courtney M Pagels ◽  
Emily J Perry ◽  
Justin Jones ◽  
Paul Carson
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Lung Abscess ◽  
American Thoracic Society ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Guidance Document ◽  
Antibiotic Exposure ◽  
Antibiotic Regimen ◽  
Days Of Therapy

Abstract Background Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is frequently mis-categorized as aspiration pneumonia, prompting the addition of anaerobic coverage to the antibiotic regimen. In our institution, this usually takes the form of adding metronidazole to ceftriaxone. The 2019 American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America CAP guidelines recommend anaerobic coverage only for hospitalized patients with a suspected lung abscess or empyema. The objective of this study was to determine if a pharmacist-led workflow could increase adherence to the 2019 CAP guideline recommendations by limiting anaerobic coverage to those rare occasions. Methods The hospital antimicrobial stewardship committee approved a pharmacist workflow and guidance document which outlines criteria to evaluate appropriateness of anaerobic coverage for hospitalized patients with CAP and no other indications for antibiotics. If anaerobic coverage is not indicated, the pharmacist submits a standardized message to the treating provider via the electronic medical record, recommending discontinuation of metronidazole. This workflow was implemented on October 3, 2019. Metronidazole days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient days in quarters 1 through 4 of 2019 and quarter 1 of 2020 were collected as well as percent acceptance of documented pharmacist interventions from October 3, 2019 until March 31, 2020. Results Between October 3, 2019 and March 31, 2020, a total of 221 interventions were made by pharmacists to discontinue metronidazole in hospitalized CAP patients where anaerobic coverage was not indicated. Out of those 221 interventions, 164 (74%) were accepted by providers and only 57 (26%) were rejected. The DOT per 1000 patient days of metronidazole was assessed for the three quarters prior to our intervention and the two quarters after the intervention. Compared to the three quarters prior, metronidazole DOT per 1000 patient days decreased by 26.6% for the two quarters following implementation of the pharmacist-led intervention (Figure 1). Figure 1: Metronidazole DOT per 1000 patient days from January 1, 2019 through March 31, 2020. Vertical line indicates when pharmacist workflow was implemented. Conclusion A pharmacist antimicrobial stewardship intervention at our institution increased adherence to CAP guidelines and decreased unnecessary antibiotic exposure in hospitalized CAP patients when anaerobic coverage was not indicated. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Taking on Clostridioides difficile

2021 ◽  
pp. 141-157
Author(s):  
Jennifer Meddings ◽  
Vineet Chopra ◽  
Sanjay Saint
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract Infection ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Tract Infection ◽  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Broad Spectrum ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Hospital Staff ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile

The adaptive approach used in the previous chapters to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is applied to an initiative to prevent Clostridioides difficile (formerly Clostridium difficile) infection. These two initiatives differ regarding their scope, the members of their teams, and the elements of their bundles. For preventing C. difficile, for example, the most important bundle item is antimicrobial stewardship since the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics vastly increases a person’s risk of becoming infected. Infectious diseases physicians or clinical pharmacists are to examine the circumstances of antimicrobial prescriptions they have filled to see whether they meet infection prevention standards; if not, the prescribing physician will receive prompt feedback. Differences aside, the basic elements of the CAUTI framework apply, from the C-suite’s decision to go ahead with the initiative to the tactics used to sell the C. difficile bundle to the hospital staff.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document