scholarly journals Proactive Vs Reactive Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab in Crohn’s Disease: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in a Simulated Cohort

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana M Negoescu ◽  
Eva A Enns ◽  
Brooke Swanhorst ◽  
Bonnie Baumgartner ◽  
James P Campbell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crohn’S Disease ◽  
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring ◽  
Crohn's Disease ◽  
Drug Monitoring ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Effective Strategy ◽  
Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Simulated Cohort

Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab is a marginally cost-effective strategy for Crohn’s disease, whereas reactive therapeutic drug monitoring is cost-effective. As the cost of infliximab decreases, a proactive strategy of dosing infliximab becomes more cost-effective.

scholarly journals P346 Single-centre experience of ustekinumab: Therapeutic drug monitoring in Crohn’s disease patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S331-S333
Author(s):  
C Liefferinckx ◽  
M Fassin ◽  
D Thomas ◽  
C Minsart ◽  
A Cremer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crohn’S Disease ◽  
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring ◽  
Crohn's Disease ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Real World ◽  
Drug Monitoring ◽  
Drug Exposure ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Loss Of Response

Abstract Background Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a diagnostic tool in the monitoring of anti-TNF therapies. Yet, the benefit for TDM of new biologics such as ustekinumab (USK) is still controversial in real-world experiences. Methods This monocentric retrospective study aims to correlate USK trough levels (TLs) with clinical and endoscopic data. All patients have given written consent to the Biobank (B2011/005). Endoscopic disease was defined as quiescent in absence of endoscopic lesions, mild disease in presence of few superficial ulcerations, moderate in presence of several ulcers and severe in presence of numerous deep ulcers and/or inflammatory stenosis. 313 serum USK samples from 67 Crohn’s disease patients were used to measure USK TL (USK ELISA, apDia) while 88 samples (at week 16, and before and after optimisation) were used to measure anti-drug antibody (ADA), using a drug-tolerant affinity capture elution anti-ustekinumab assay Results Demographic and baseline data of our population are presented in Table 1. The median follow-up was 73 weeks (IQR 39–92). An optimisation due to loss of response was required in 44.8% of patients (n = 30) after a median time of 38 weeks (IQR 24–55). To evaluate the drug efficacy, an endoscopy was performed in 61% of cases at a median time of 35 weeks (IQR 27–47). TLs were 5.2 µg/ml (IQR 2.1–8.8), 1.7 µg/ml (IQR 0.3–4.3) and 2.6 µg/ml (IQR 0.6–4.1) at week 8, 16 and 24, respectively. TLs at week 8 were correlated to the induction IV dose administrated (r = 0.3, p = 0.03). At week 16, low TLs were associated with higher endoscopic activity in the follow-up (p = 0.02), although this was not the case at week 8 (p = 0.5) (Figure 1). Patients not requiring an optimisation had higher TLs in maintenance than patients requiring optimisation (2.45 µg/ml (IQR 1.3–4.4) vs. 1.15 µg/ml (IQR 0.1–2.24), p = 0.008). Obviously, optimisation significantly increased TLs (1.15 µg/ml (IQR 0.1–2.24) vs. 6.6 µg/ml (IQR 2.3–11.3), p < 0.001). ADA were undetectable in all the measured samples in maintenance. Conclusion This real-world experience confirms a drug exposure-endoscopic response relationship. Week 16 seems to be an appropriate time point to monitor drug exposure. Earlier USK TLs, at week 8, appear less valuable to be monitored due to the influence of initial IV dose. The absence of immunogenicity suggests that it is not a key driver in the loss of response.

scholarly journals P465 Therapeutic drug monitoring in Crohn’s disease patients, a comparison between homogeneous mobility shift assay and point of care method

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S412-S412
Author(s):  
G Bodini ◽  
M G Demarzo ◽  
A Djahandideh ◽  
I Baldissarro ◽  
E Savarino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crohn’S Disease ◽  
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring ◽  
Crohn's Disease ◽  
Drug Concentration ◽  
Drug Monitoring ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Serum Drug Concentration ◽  
Disease Relapse

Abstract Background Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) is a useful tool to help physicians managing patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease treated with anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) drugs. Different techniques are available to evaluate serum drug concentration (TL), However, these techniques are time-consuming. A point-of-care (POC) method has been proposed to evaluate drug TL and overcome the limitations inherent to other methodologies. Our aim was to evaluate the capability of POC to discriminate between IBD relapse and remission and to evaluate the concordance of drug TL measured with POC and HMSA Methods We analysed with Quantum BlueÒ (Buhlmann Laboratories AG, Schonenbuch, Switzerland) (POC) 200 Adalimumab (ADA) and 200 Infliximab serum samples of 46 Crohn’s disease (CD) patients previously assessed with HMSA. Blood samples were drawn at standardised time points during anti-TNF treatment (2, 6, and every 8 weeks), before anti-TNF administration. Disease activity was assessed by the Harvey–Bradshaw Index (HBI, remission defined by HBI<5). Results We evaluated 46 CD patients responders to anti-TNF induction with ADA (n = 25, 54.3%) and IFX (n = 21, 45.6%) with a median follow-up of 83 weeks (range 16–144 weeks). At week 16, median ADA TL of patients in remission were significantly higher as compared with patients in disease relapse using both HMSA [12.7 μg/ml (range, 8.9–23.6 μg/ml) vs. 6.6 μg/ml (range, 0.7–9.6 μg/ml), p = 0.0001] and POC [17.8 μg/ml (range 7.6–35.0 μg/ml) vs. 9.8 μg/ml (range 5.8–11.4 μg/ml), p = 0.0003]. The concordance between the two different techniques has been assessed as 0.76 by Choen Kappa. Considering IFX TL, patients in remission had higher serum drug concentration using both HMSA [7.0 μg/ml (range, 0.0–21.8 μg/ml)] and POC [6.2 μg/ml (range 0.4–14.3 μg/ml)] as compared with patients who experienced disease relapse [HMSA, 0.1 μg/ml (range, 0.0–4.1 μg/ml), p = 0.019; POC, 0.45 μg/ml (range 0.4–3.3 μg/ml), p = 0.0072]. The concordance between the two different test for IFX TL was 0.81. We obtained similar results at the end of follow-up: median ADA TL was higher in remission than in disease relapse patients using both HMSA and POC [p = 0.001 and p = 0.0012] with a concordance of 0.75. Median IFX TL was higher in remission than in disease relapse patients using both HMSA and POC (p = 0.13 and p = 0.25) with a concordance of 0.70. Conclusion Both POC and HMSA are TL tests able to differentiate relapse and remission in IBD patients. The association between anti-TNF TL and disease status (remission/relapse) was better in ADA-treated patients rather than patients treated with IFX. Finally, we demonstrated a good concordance between HMSA and POC. Anti-drug antibody concentrations while available on HMSA were not available on POC

Therapeutic drug monitoring in Crohn’s disease patients treated with anti-TNF

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgia Bodini ◽  
Maria Giulia Demarzo ◽  
Afscin Djahandideh ◽  
Sebastiano Ziola ◽  
Paolo Risso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crohn’S Disease ◽  
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring ◽  
Crohn's Disease ◽  
Drug Monitoring ◽  
Therapeutic Drug
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document