scholarly journals Safety of Ustekinumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pooled Safety Analysis of Results from Phase 2/3 Studies

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J Sandborn ◽  
Brian G Feagan ◽  
Silvio Danese ◽  
Christopher D O’Brien ◽  
Elyssa Ott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Serious Infections ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Abstract Background Ustekinumab is currently approved globally in Crohn’s disease (CD) and psoriatic diseases. Recent phase 3 data demonstrate safety/efficacy in ulcerative colitis (UC). Crohn’s disease and UC phase 3 programs had similar study designs, facilitating integrated safety analyses. Methods Data from 6 ustekinumab phase 2/3 CD and UC studies were pooled, and safety was evaluated through 1 year. Patients received 1 placebo or ustekinumab (generally 130 mg or ~6 mg/kg) intravenous induction, then subcutaneous (90 mg) maintenance every 8/12 weeks. Analyses incorporated all patients who received ≥1 ustekinumab dose. Safety outcomes are presented as percentages of patients (induction) and as number of patients with events per 100 patient-years of follow-up (through 1 year). For key safety events, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are provided, as appropriate. Hazard ratios with 95% CIs from time-to-event analyses for serious adverse events and serious infections were also performed. Results Through 1 year, 2574 patients received ustekinumab (1733 patient-years of follow-up). The number of patients with adverse events per 100 patient-years (placebo 165.99 [95% CI, 155.81–176.67] vs ustekinumab 118.32 [95% CI, 113.25–123.55]), serious AEs (27.50 [95% CI, 23.45–32.04] vs 21.23 [95% CI, 19.12–23.51]), infections (80.31 [95% CI, 73.28–87.84] vs 64.32 [95% CI, 60.60–68.21]), serious infections (5.53 [95% CI, 3.81–7.77] vs 5.02 [95% CI, 4.02–6.19]), and malignancies excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer (0.17 [95% CI, 0.00–0.93] vs 0.40 [95% CI, 0.16–0.83]) were similar between placebo and ustekinumab. Conclusions The safety profile of ustekinumab across the pooled inflammatory bowel disease population through 1 year was favorable and generally comparable to placebo. These data are consistent with the established safety profile of ustekinumab across indications. ClinicalTrials.gov numbers NCT00265122; NCT00771667; NCT01369329; NCT01369342; NCT01369355; NCT02407236.

scholarly journals Diagnostic Radiation Exposure in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Langevin ◽  
Lysanne Normandeau ◽  
Mickael Bouin
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Indeterminate Colitis ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Effects Of Radiation ◽  
And Control

Background. Because of the chronic and relapsing nature of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which often requires characterization with CT scan, IBD patients might be exposed to a large amount of radiation. As a cumulative effective dose (CED) ≥ 100 mSv is considered significant for stochastic risks of cancer, it is important to monitor and control the radiation exposure of the IBD patients. In the present work, we aimed to quantify the mean CED in IBD patients to assess any harmful effects of radiation. Methods. This study includes 200 IBD patients, identified retrospectively, from the outpatient clinics of the Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal between January 1, 2010, and February 15, 2017, from the gastroenterologists’ patients lists. The number and type of each radiology test performed were listed for each patient during the study period and the CED was calculated using our institution’s dose index when available and standardized tables. Results. Among the 200 IBD patients, 157 patients had Crohn’s disease (CD), 41 had ulcerative colitis (UC), and 2 had indeterminate colitis. The mean CED for IBD patients was 23.1 ± 45.2 mSv during a mean follow-up duration of 4.3 years. CED was higher among patients with CD than with UC (27.5 ± 49.5 versus 6.8 ± 14.8 mSv; p<0.01). Six patients were exposed to a high CED (>100 mSv) and all had CD. Conclusion. While potentially harmful levels of radiation exposure are of concern in only a small number of patients, strategies to limit such exposure are encouraged when clinically appropriate.

Su1421 Effectiveness and Adverse Events of Azathioprine in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: 9-Year Follow-Up Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 146 (5) ◽  
pp. S-465
Author(s):  
Iván Guerra ◽  
Alicia Algaba ◽  
Ángel Serrano ◽  
Carolina Aulló ◽  
Daniel Alcalde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Follow Up Study ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

scholarly journals P290 Impact of concomitant 5-aminosalicylic acid therapy on vedolizumab efficacy and safety in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S321-S321
Author(s):  
R Ungaro ◽  
H Kadali ◽  
W Zhang ◽  
S Adsul ◽  
W Reinisch
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Enteric Infections ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Post Hoc

Abstract Background Vedolizumab (VDZ), a gut-selective anti-lymphocyte trafficking monoclonal anti-a4β7-integrin antibody, has showed efficacy in multiple phase 3 clinical trials in patients (pts) with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Decreased likelihood of response to adalimumab was previously observed with concomitant 5-ASA.1 This post-hoc analysis assessed the impact of concomitant 5-ASA on efficacy and safety in VDZ-treated pts with IBD. Methods Pts with IBD treated with VDZ intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous (SC) in phase 3 trials who continued 5-ASA (at any dose) at the time of starting VDZ were compared with those who received no concomitant 5-ASA. Pts were also stratified by ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn’s disease (CD). Efficacy outcomes were the proportion of pts achieving clinical response, clinical remission and corticosteroid (CS)-free clinical remission at Wk 6 (end of induction phase) and Wk 52 (end of maintenance phase). Safety outcomes were the proportion of pts experiencing any infection and enteric infections. Studies included: GEMINI 1 and 2, and VISIBLE 1 and 2 in efficacy analyses; GEMINI 1, 2, 3 and long-term safety for VDZ IV, and VISIBLE 1, 2, and open-label extension (data cut-off 17 May 2019) for VDZ SC in safety analyses. Results At Wk 6, clinical response was achieved by 191 (70.0%) and 69 (61.6%) VDZ-treated pts with UC with and without 5-ASA, respectively, and by 139 (64.4%) and 161 (57.7%) pts with CD, respectively (Table 1). At week 52, clinical remission was achieved by 134 (46.0%) and 45 (38.8%) VDZ-treated pts with UC with or without 5-ASA, and by 116 (50.2%) and 132 (37.5%) pts with CD, respectively. CS-free clinical remission at Wk 52 was achieved by 55 (34.8%) and 19 (37.3%) VDZ-treated pts with UC with and without 5-ASA, respectively, and by 46 (41.4%) and 46 (31.5%) pts with CD, respectively. Multivariate analysis in general showed no differences in VDZ efficacy with or without 5-ASA. No new safety issues or signals were identified. A tendency towards lower incidence of all infections and enteric infections was observed in pts receiving VDZ (IV or SC) with versus without 5-ASA (Table 2). Conclusion In this post-hoc analysis of VDZ pivotal trial data, concomitant 5-ASA does not appear to significantly impact the efficacy of VDZ in pts with IBD. No new safety signals were identified. The safety profile of VDZ IV and SC, with and without 5-ASA was consistent with the known safety profile of VDZ. Although there was limited data in some subgroups, there was no evidence to suggest that concomitant 5-ASA usage was associated with higher infection rates. These data will be useful to inform risk-benefit assessments of continued 5-ASA in VDZ-treated pts. Reference

scholarly journals P481 Effectiveness and safety profile of biological therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: real life data from an active pharmacovigilance project

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S470-S471
Author(s):  
A Viola ◽  
M A Barbieri ◽  
V Pisana ◽  
P M Cutroneo ◽  
W Fries ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Index Date ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Biologic Agent ◽  
Skin Reactions ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Abstract Background Biological therapies are now the mainstay for the treatment of Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Post-marketing activities become crucial for monitoring the long-term safety. Aim of this project was to evaluate the effectiveness and the safety profile of biologics for the treatment of IBD patients during a prospective pharmacovigilance study. Methods From January 2017 to December 2020, all patients with Crohn’s Disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC) treated with at least one biologic agent at the start of the study or commenced a biologic during the study period were enrolled. Demographic, clinical, and disease-related data were collected. A descriptive analysis of patients’ characteristics at the index date was performed. Moreover, an analysis of all adverse events (AEs) and all primary/secondary failures expressed as number of AEs or failures/10 treatment years was carried out taking into account the total years of treatment for each biologic including all patients treated with a biologic at least once during the follow-up period. Results A total of 654 patients were enrolled, 58.4% with CD and 41.6% with UC. Mean age (±SD) was 44 ± 17 years and 59.0% were males. At the index date, the following treatments were used: 40.8% adalimumab (ADA), 33.3% infliximab (IFX), 21.3% vedolizumab (VED), 2.4% ustekinumab (UST), and 2.1% golimumab (GOL). Patients naïve for biologic therapy were 79.1%. The total years of treatment were 887 yrs for ADA, 663 yrs for IFX, 309 yrs for VED, 89 yrs for UST, and 51 yrs for GOL. Data for AEs and failures were the following: IFX – 1.1 AEs and 0.8 failures, ADA – 0.8 and 0.9, VED – 1.1 and 1.8, GOL – 1.2 and 3.4, and UST - 1.4 and 0.9, respectively (Tab.1). During follow-up, 196 AEs were reported. Infections mainly occurred in patients treated with GOL and ADA (8.7% and 7.6%, respectively), skin reactions in patients treated with ADA (7.6%), while infusion related reactions with IFX (12.6%). A higher frequency of malignancies was observed in patients on treatment with VED (3.4%). Conclusion There were no major differences for AEs between the different treatments, but a higher frequency of failures with GOL and VED, both rarely used as first line therapies. Nevertheless, the acquisition of data from clinical practice should be endorsed to better define the safety and efficacy profile of new biologic agents in IBD.

Azathioprine in the therapy of paediatric inflammatory bowel disease – part I: treatment indications, dosing and thiopurine-related adverse events

2021 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. 500-507
Author(s):  
Kristýna Pospíšilová ◽  
Jiří Bronský
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Maintenance Phase ◽  
Treatment Indications ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Bowel Diseases ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Keywords Crohn's Disease ◽  
Available Information

Background: Thiopurines (in Europe mainly azathioprine) are widely used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases in children. Due to a prolonged time until the onset of therapeutic effect, those drugs are aimed to be used in the maintenance phase of the therapy rather than for induction of remission. Thiopurines are sometimes used in combination therapy (with aminosalicylates or biological treatment agents). The adverse events of these drugs occur as often as in 15–40% cases and may lead to treatment cessation in a significant number of patients. Aims: To overview available information on (mainly) children suffering from inflammatory bowel disease. Conclusion: Genetic examination accompanied with laboratory monitoring of blood count parameters (specifically at the beginning of therapy) and biochemistry can help prevent some of the severe adverse events. Keywords Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, pediatrie, merkaptopurin, thiopuriny

P082 ANTI-TNF EFFICACY AFTER PRIMARY VEDOLIZUMAB FAILURE IN PEDIATRIC INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S71-S72
Author(s):  
Michael Dolinger ◽  
Priya Rolfes ◽  
Becky Phan ◽  
Stephanie Pan ◽  
Marla Dubinsky
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Secondary Loss ◽  
Loss Of Response ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Pediatric Ibd

Abstract Background Vedolizumab (VDZ) is less effective in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) when used in anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) failures as compared to anti-TNF naïve patients. However, the outcomes of sequencing anti-TNF after VDZ failure remain unknown. We report on the effectiveness and safety of anti-TNF as a second-line biologic after VDZ failure in pediatric IBD patients. Methods Data was collected as part of an ongoing pediatric IBD observational treatment registry and included demographics, disease behavior, location, disease activity (Harvey Bradshaw index (HBI) for Crohn’s disease (CD) or partial Mayo score (pMS) for ulcerative colitis (UC) and IBD-unspecified (IBD-U)), adverse events, treatment and surgical history. Primary outcome was steroid-free clinical remission at last follow up. Secondary outcomes were CRP normalization and adverse events including infusion reactions, infections, hospitalizations, and IBD related surgeries. Descriptive statistics summarized the data (median [interquartile range (IQR)]) and univariate analyses tested associations. Results A total of 21 children and young adults (6 CD:14 UC:1 IBD-U; 19/21 colonic only disease) were treated with VDZ for a median [IQR] duration of 25 [11–59] weeks. VDZ was discontinued due to primary non-response (57%), secondary loss of response (38%), or an adverse event (5%). Nineteen (90%) patients were induced with infliximab (IFX), 1 with adalimumab, and 1 with golimumab and were followed for a median of 100 [35–148] weeks after anti-TNF induction (Table 1). Fifteen (71%) patients remained on anti-TNF therapy at last follow up for a median duration of 53 [34–112] weeks. All 15 patients achieved steroid-free clinical remission, and 9 (60%) patients also had a normal CRP (Figure 1). Remission rates were numerically higher in UC/IBD-U vs. CD (80% vs. 50% P = 0.27). All 6 (28%) patients (3 CD and 3 UC) who discontinued anti-TNF therapy after a median duration of 15 [7–24] weeks initially had a primary non-response to VDZ. Three patents had a primary non-response to anti-TNF, 2 had a secondary loss of response, and 1 had an anaphylactic infusion reaction. No serious adverse events, hospitalizations or serious infections attributable to anti-TNF therapy occurred. Conclusions Our results suggest that anti-TNF therapy is efficacious and safe after primary failure with VDZ in pediatric IBD patients and this was particularly so in patients with colonic disease location, regardless of IBD classification.

scholarly journals P512 Safety of reduced clinical monitoring in patients with stable Inflammatory Bowel Disease on maintenance thiopurine therapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S492-S492
Author(s):  
F M Jansen ◽  
L S Smits ◽  
P W A Thomas ◽  
N den Broeder ◽  
D J de Jong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Patient Preferences ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Clinical Monitoring ◽  
Multiple Infections ◽  
Monitoring Strategy ◽  
Thiopurine Therapy ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Abstract Background Thiopurine-treated inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are monitored every 3 to 4 months with outpatient visits and laboratory assessments to evaluate disease activity and safety of therapy. However, the risk of thiopurine-related adverse events decreases after the initiation phase. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of reduced clinical monitoring in steroid-free quiescent IBD patients on stable maintenance thiopurine monotherapy. Methods This single-centre prospective cohort study evaluated a reduced monitoring strategy that involved 6-monthly laboratory assessment combined with alternating outpatient and phone appointments, during 104 weeks. We enrolled IBD patients who were in steroid-free remission &gt; 6 months on thiopurine monotherapy including azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine or tioguanine. The primary outcome was thiopurine-related adverse events (AE) requiring change or discontinuation of thiopurine therapy after 104 weeks of follow-up. Secondary outcomes were assessed at week 52 and included other thiopurine-related AEs and laboratory abnormalities. Results We included 85 patients (42 years median age, 61.2% Crohn’s disease, 62% female) with a median disease duration of 12.5 years. At baseline, 47 patients were treated with azathioprine (55.3%), 25 with 6-mercaptopurine (29.4%) and 13 with tioguanine (15.3%) for a median duration of 6.7 years. During 104 weeks of follow-up, thiopurine therapy was ceased in two patients because of multiple infections (n=1) and gastrointestinal complaints (n=1). Other reasons for thiopurine cessation (n=37) were stable remission (n=26), patient preferences (n=9) and high 6-TGN levels (n=2). In total, 20 patients underwent thiopurine dose adjustments due to high metabolite levels (n=9), remission (n=3), disease flare (n=3), patient preferences (n=3), and low metabolite levels (n=2). At 52 weeks, 27 laboratory abnormalities were observed, yet none required therapy adjustments. In 13 patients (15.3%) myelotoxicity was detected, including mild leukopenia (n=11), mild and moderate thrombopenia (n=2). In 16.5%, hepatoxicity was observed (n=14) including mild (n=9) and moderate (n=1) elevated aspartate aminotransferase and mild elevated alkaline phosphatase (n=4). Conclusion A reduced monitoring strategy appeared relatively safe in a strictly selected cohort of stable thiopurine-treated IBD patients. Overall, two patients had to cease thiopurine therapy due to thiopurine-related AEs independent of monitoring frequency. No laboratory abnormalities required therapy adjustments and 57.1% of patients continued therapy throughout 104 weeks of follow-up. This strategy may contribute to safe reduction of time and health care costs for both IBD patients and physicians in daily IBD practice.

scholarly journals P477 Italian real-life study evaluating the long-term effectiveness of vedolizumab for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: the elderly cohort

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S419-S422
Author(s):  
D Pugliese ◽  
G Privitera ◽  
A Armuzzi
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Treatment Persistence ◽  
Diagnosis Of Cancer ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
New Diagnosis

Abstract Background Vedolizumab (VDZ) is the first biological therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) tested, in pivotal trials, on patients up to 80 years old and has usually been presented as a safer choice in frail patients. However, real-world data on the effectiveness and safety of VDZ in elderly (≥ 65 years) are scarce. The aim of this study is to explore the effectiveness and safety of VDZ in a large real-life cohort of elderly IBD patients, with a 2 years follow-up. Methods The Long-term Italian Vedolizumab Effectiveness (LIVE) study included CD and UC patients started on VDZ from April 2016 to June 2017 at 40 centres of the Italian Group for the study of inflammatory bowel disease (IG-IBD). Patients were prospectively followed-up to June 2019. Co-primary endpoints were to evaluate cumulative VDZ treatment persistence and safety. Results Of 966 patients, 174 (18%; 81 CD, 93 UC) were ≥ 65 years old at enrolment. Mean disease duration at baseline was 10.9 years ± SD10 (CD 12.5 ± 11, UC 9.6 ± 9). VDZ was used as a first biologic therapy in 78 patients (44.8%). 25 patients (14.4%) had a history of previous cancer. The majority of CD patients had a stricturing behaviour (45, 55.6%) and had already undergone surgery (41, 49.4%). 48 UC patients (51.6%) had extensive colitis. Moderate-to-severe endoscopic activity was present in 80% of CD and in 92% of UC, according to SES-CD and endoscopic Mayo score, respectively. Cumulative VDZ treatment persistence at 12 and 24 months was 71.8% (71.6% CD and 72.0% UC) and 54% (54.2% CD and 53.8%% UC), respectively. 52.9% (40 CD; 52 UC), 4.0%, 3.5%% and 2.9% of patients were on concomitant steroids at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Clinical remission at 12 and 24 months was achieved in 28.7% (31 CD and 29 UC) and in 31.6% (25 CD and 30 UC) of patients. Mean C-reactive protein was 15.6 mg/l ± SD 20 (CD 15.9 ± 21; UC 15.2 ± 19) at baseline and dropped to 8.4 mg/l ± 10 (CD 8.0 ± 8, UC 8.9 ± 11) at 12 months and to 5.9 mg/l ± 6 (CD 5.8 ± 5, UC 6 ± 7) at 24 months. Dose escalation was necessary for 20.3% and 24.7% of patients within the first 12 and 24 months. 44 adverse events were reported: 16 infections.,6 new diagnosis of cancer/dysplasia (2 colon, 1 kidney, 1 prostate, 1 lung, 1 melanoma), 4 arthritis, 3 skin rash, 2 drug-induced cholestasis,11 miscellaneous. 11 patients (6.3%) underwent VDZ withdrawal because of adverse events (6 new diagnosis of cancer/dysplasia; 4 infections; 1 cholestasis). One patient died for pneumonia complications. Conclusion In this preliminary analysis of the largest reported real-world cohorts of elderly IBD patients treated with VDZ, up to 55% of patients persisted on therapy after two years; an acceptable safety profile was observed throughout the entire follow-up period.

scholarly journals P548 Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics after switching from infliximab originator to biosimilar SB2 in inflammatory bowel disease patients: A long-term observational, prospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S466-S467
Author(s):  
S Fischer ◽  
S Mesfin ◽  
E Klenske ◽  
H Schmitt ◽  
F Vitali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Patient Visit ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Abstract Background SB2 is a biosimilar infliximab approved for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. These are the first prospective data investigating long-term efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics after switching from infliximab originator to biosimilar SB2 in IBD patients. Methods This is a prospective, observational cohort study of patients that underwent a switch from infliximab originator to biosimilar SB2 in 2017 as part of routine care at the outpatient Clinic for IBD at the University Hospital of Erlangen, Germany. Long-term safety and clinical effectiveness were recorded over a follow-up period of 18-months. Clinical disease activity was assessed by the Harvey–Bradshaw Index (HBI) in Crohn’s disease (CD) and the partial Mayo Score (pMS) in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. C-reactive protein (CRP) was analyzed at every patient visit, and IFX trough-level (TL) and anti-IFX antibodies (ADA) were measured prior to every SB2 administration, using the Promonitor® tests. The occurrence of adverse events was registered at every patient visit. Results A total of 148 IBD patients (96 CD, 52 UC) was enrolled. The median duration of previous infliximab treatment before the switch was 29 months (range 1.0–110.0). Median disease activity in CD was an HBI of 3 (0–16) at switch (baseline), 2 (0–13) at month 6, 3 (0–15) at month 12 and 2.5 (0–11) at month 18. Median disease activity in UC was a pMS of 0 (0–6) at baseline, 1 (0–4) at month 6, 1 (0–4) at month 12 and 1 (0–5) at month 18. The median TL for all IBD patients was 6.3 mg/ml (0.1–33.7) at baseline, 5.0 mg/ml (0.1–34.3) at month 6, 6.3 mg/ml (0.1–35.8) at month 12 and 5.1 mg/ml (0.1–35.4) at month 18. CRP for all IBD patients was 2.2 mg/l (0.1–45.6) at baseline, 2.2 mg/l (0.1–90.4) at month 6, 2.3 mg/l (0.1–169.5) at month 12 and 2.7 mg/l (0.1–19.8) at month 18. In the 18-month follow-up period, 12/103 (11.7%) of patients who were ADA-negative at baseline developed ADA post-switch. Altogether, 40 (27%) IBD patients discontinued SB2 treatment during the 18-month follow-up period (4 anaphylaxis, 20 loss of response, 7 non-serious and 9 serious adverse events), 2 paused during pregnancy, 1 discontinued in clinical remission, 10 were lost to follow-up (7 change of physician, 3 unknown). Serious adverse events comprised 3 malignancies (breast and prostate carcinoma, neuroendocrine malignancy), 1 liver abscess and 5 intestinal surgical procedures (1 perforation, 1 ileus, and 3 stenoses). Conclusion Switching from IFX originator to biosimilar SB2 was not associated with an increase in disease activity. No clinically meaningful changes in IFX trough levels or immunogenicity were identified. Altogether, SB2 was well tolerated in a real-life setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document