Factors influencing the clinical outcome of preimplantation genetic testing for polycystic kidney disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 949-958 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Berckmoes ◽  
P Verdyck ◽  
P De Becker ◽  
A De Vos ◽  
G Verheyen ◽  
...  
Genes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 692
Author(s):  
Pere Mir Pardo ◽  
José Antonio Martínez-Conejero ◽  
Julio Martín ◽  
Carlos Simón ◽  
Ana Cervero

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common hereditary kidney disease and presents with genetic and clinical heterogeneity. ADPKD can also manifest extra-renally, and seminal cysts have been associated with male infertility in some cases. ADPKD-linked male infertility, along with female age, have been proposed as factors that may influence the clinical outcomes of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for monogenic disorders (PGT-M). Large PGT for aneuploidy assessment (PGT-A) studies link embryo aneuploidy to increasing female age; other studies suggest that embryo aneuploidy is also linked to severe male-factor infertility. We aimed to assess the number of aneuploid embryos and the number of cycles with transferable embryos in ADPKD patients after combined-PGT. The combined-PGT protocol, involving PGT-M by PCR and PGT-A by next-generation sequencing, was performed in single trophectoderm biopsies from 289 embryos in 83 PGT cycles. Transferable embryos were obtained in 69.9% of cycles. The number of aneuploid embryos and cycles with transferable embryos did not differ when the male or female had the ADPKD mutation. However, a significantly higher proportion of aneuploid embryos was found in the advanced maternal age (AMA) group, but not in the male factor (MF) group, when compared to non-AMA and non-MF groups, respectively. Additionally, no significant differences in the percentage of cycles with transferable embryos were found in any of the groups. Our results indicate that AMA couples among ADPKD patients have an increased risk of aneuploid embryos, but ADPKD-linked male infertility does not promote an increased aneuploidy rate.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 1279-1286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rozemarijn Snoek ◽  
Marijn F. Stokman ◽  
Klaske D. Lichtenbelt ◽  
Theodora C. van Tilborg ◽  
Cindy E. Simcox ◽  
...  

Background and objectivesA genetic cause can be identified for an increasing number of pediatric and adult-onset kidney diseases. Preimplantation genetic testing (formerly known as preimplantation genetic diagnostics) is a reproductive technology that helps prospective parents to prevent passing on (a) disease-causing mutation(s) to their offspring. Here, we provide a clinical overview of 25 years of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic kidney disease in The Netherlands.Design, setting, participants, & measurements This is a retrospective cohort study of couples counseled on preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic kidney disease in the national preimplantation genetic testing expert center (Maastricht University Medical Center+) from January 1995 to June 2019. Statistical analysis was performed through chi-squared tests.ResultsIn total, 98 couples were counseled regarding preimplantation genetic testing, of whom 53% opted for preimplantation genetic testing. The most frequent indications for referral were autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (38%), Alport syndrome (26%), and autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (9%). Of couples with at least one preimplantation genetic testing cycle with oocyte retrieval, 65% experienced one or more live births of an unaffected child. Of couples counseled, 38% declined preimplantation genetic testing for various personal and technical reasons.ConclusionsReferrals, including for adult-onset disease, have increased steadily over the past decade. Though some couples decline preimplantation genetic testing, in the couples who proceed with at least one preimplantation genetic testing cycle, almost two thirds experienced at least one live birth rate.


Nephron ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 141 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Suwabe ◽  
Yoshifumi Ubara ◽  
Noriko Hayami ◽  
Masayuki Yamanouchi ◽  
Rikako Hiramatsu ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Prasad Devarajan ◽  
Geoffrey Block ◽  
Keisha Gibson ◽  
Jim McKay ◽  
Colin Meyer ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims Knowledge about genetic causes of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is one of the key gaps in global kidney research and recent International Society of Nephrology recommendations encourage the adoption of genetic testing to enable a goal of providing precision medicine based on individual risk (1). A recent whole-exome sequencing study showed that genetic inheritance may be responsible for up to 10% of CKD diagnoses, many of which may be previously undiagnosed or mis-diagnosed (2). Continued advances in DNA sequencing technology have made genetic testing, even whole-exome sequencing, applicable to routine clinical diagnoses. In order to test the hypothesis that genetic testing can provide valuable information to increase the accuracy and precision of diagnosis in CKD, we designed a gene panel to prospectively provide genetic testing in a subset of patients with CKD defined by a specific set of inclusion criteria. Method Reata Pharmaceuticals is partnering with Invitae on a program called KidneyCode, which provides no-charge genetic testing to enable diagnosis of three specific rare monogenic causes of CKD: Alport syndrome (AS), autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) due to PKD2 mutations, and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), as well as detection of variants in one of the autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease gene, PKHD1. Invitae’s renal disease panel includes 17 genes (ACTN4, ANLN, CD2AP, COL4A3, COL4A4, COL4A5, CRB2, HNF1A, INF2, LMX1B, MYO1E, NPHS1, NPHS2, PAX2, PKD2, PKHD1, and TRPC6), and its assay includes both full-gene sequencing and intragenic deletion/duplication analysis using next-generation sequencing (NGS). The assay targets the coding exons and flanking 10bp of intronic sequences. Invitae’s method of variant classification uses a systematic process for assessing evidence based on guidelines published by the American College of Medical Genetics (3). Patients in the US at risk for hereditary CKD (eGFR ≤ 90 mL/min/1.73m2 plus hematuria or a family history of CKD) or with a known diagnosis of AS or FSGS are eligible. Family members of those with suspected or known AS or FSGS are also eligible. All participants in the KidneyCode program have access to genetic counseling follow-up at no additional charge. Results In the first five months of the KidneyCode program, 152 genetic tests have been completed. A genetic variant was reported in 87 patients. Of those 87 patients, 67 patients had 75 variants in COL4A3, 4, or 5 genes (34 Pathogenic/Likely Pathogenic (P/LP), 41 Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS)), 20 patients had 24 variants in genes associated with FSGS (3 P/LP, 21 VUS), 15 patients had 20 variants in PKHD1 (1 P/LP, 19 VUS), and 2 patients had variants in PKD2 (1 P/LP, 1 VUS). Of the 34 patients with Pathogenic or Likely Pathogenic COL4A variants, 19 reported a previous diagnosis of Alport syndrome. Other diagnoses in patients with COL4A mutations included FSGS, thin basement membrane disease, and familial hematuria. Extra-renal manifestations such as hearing loss and eye disease were reported in 7 of the 34 patients with COL4A variants. Conclusion Initial results with the KidneyCode panel demonstrate the utility of NGS and support the hypothesis that combining genetic testing with clinical presentation and medical history can significantly improve accuracy and precision of diagnosis in patients with hereditary CKD.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 1316-1319
Author(s):  
Grace E. VanNoy ◽  
Monica H. Wojcik ◽  
Casie A. Genetti ◽  
Thomas E. Mullen ◽  
Pankaj B. Agrawal ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (9) ◽  
pp. 1453-1460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew B Lanktree ◽  
Ioan-Andrei Iliuta ◽  
Amirreza Haghighi ◽  
Xuewen Song ◽  
York Pei

Abstract Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is caused primarily by mutations of two genes, PKD1 and PKD2. In the presence of a positive family history of ADPKD, genetic testing is currently seldom indicated as the diagnosis is mostly based on imaging studies using well-established criteria. Moreover, PKD1 mutation screening is technically challenging due to its large size, complexity (i.e. presence of six pseudogenes with high levels of DNA sequence similarity) and extensive allelic heterogeneity. Despite these limitations, recent studies have delineated a strong genotype–phenotype correlation in ADPKD and begun to unravel the role of genetics underlying cases with atypical phenotypes. Furthermore, adaptation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) to clinical PKD genetic testing will provide a high-throughput, accurate and comprehensive screen of multiple cystic disease and modifier genes at a reduced cost. In this review, we discuss the evolving indications of genetic testing in ADPKD and how NGS-based screening promises to yield clinically important prognostic information for both typical as well as unusual genetic (e.g. allelic or genic interactions, somatic mosaicism, cystic kidney disease modifiers) cases to advance personalized medicine in the era of novel therapeutics for ADPKD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document