scholarly journals Only a minority of sex chromosome abnormalities are detected by a national prenatal screening program for Down syndrome

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 2419-2426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mette Hansen Viuff ◽  
Kirstine Stochholm ◽  
Niels Uldbjerg ◽  
Birgitte Bruun Nielsen ◽  
Claus Højbjerg Gravholt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Sex Chromosome ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Chromosome Abnormalities ◽  
Sex Chromosome Abnormalities

The epidemiology of sex chromosome abnormalities

2020 ◽  
Vol 184 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-215
Author(s):  
Agnethe Berglund ◽  
Kirstine Stochholm ◽  
Claus Højbjerg Gravholt
Keyword(s):  
Sex Chromosome ◽  
Chromosome Abnormalities ◽  
Sex Chromosome Abnormalities

scholarly journals Routinization of prenatal screening with the non-invasive prenatal test: pregnant women’s perspectives

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karuna R. M. van der Meij ◽  
Annabel Njio ◽  
Linda Martin ◽  
Janneke T. Gitsels-van der Wal ◽  
Mireille N. Bekker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Informed Choice ◽  
Aneuploidy Screening ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Fetal Aneuploidy ◽  
Societal Pressure ◽  
Prenatal Test

AbstractDue to the favorable test characteristics of the non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) in the screening of fetal aneuploidy, there has been a strong and growing demand for implementation. In the Netherlands, NIPT is offered within a governmentally supported screening program as a first-tier screening test for all pregnant women (TRIDENT-2 study). However, concerns have been raised that the test’s favorable characteristics might lead to uncritical use, also referred to as routinization. This study addresses women’s perspectives on prenatal screening with NIPT by evaluating three aspects related to routinization: informed choice, freedom to choose and (personal and societal) perspectives on Down syndrome. Nationwide, a questionnaire was completed by 751 pregnant women after receiving counseling for prenatal screening. Of the respondents, the majority (75.5%) made an informed choice for prenatal screening as measured by the multidimensional measure of informed choice (MMIC). Education level and religious affiliation were significant predictors of informed choice. The main reason to accept screening was “seeking reassurance” (25.5%), and the main reason to decline was “every child is welcome” (30.6%). The majority of respondents (87.7%) did not perceive societal pressure to test. Differences between test-acceptors and test-decliners in personal and societal perspectives on Down syndrome were found. Our study revealed high rates of informed decision-making and perceived freedom to choose regarding fetal aneuploidy screening, suggesting that there is little reason for concern about routinization of NIPT based on the perspectives of Dutch pregnant women. Our findings highlight the importance of responsible implementation of NIPT within a national screening program.

Efficiency of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Yunfang Shi ◽  
Xiaozhou Li ◽  
Duan Ju ◽  
Yan Li ◽  
Xiuling Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Screening Tool ◽  
Sex Chromosome ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Maternal Plasma ◽  
Chromosome Abnormalities ◽  
Noninvasive Prenatal Testing ◽  
Sex Chromosome Abnormalities ◽  
Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies ◽  
Mosaic Karyotype

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> This study was designed to investigate the efficiency of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for screening fetal sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) through sequencing of cell-free DNA in maternal plasma. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is a retrospective study on the positive NIPT results for SCAs collected from our hospital between January 2012 and December 2018. Samples with positive NIPT results for SCAs were then confirmed by prenatal or postnatal karyotyping analysis. <b><i>Results:</i></b> After cytogenetic analysis, abnormal karyotypes were confirmed in 104 cases and the overall positive predictive value (PPV) of NIPT for SCAs was 43.40% (102/235). The most frequently detected karyotypes included 47,XXY (<i>n</i> = 42), 47,XXX (<i>n</i> = 20), 47,XYY (<i>n</i> = 16), and 45,X (<i>n</i> = 2). Meanwhile, 10 cases were confirmed with mosaic karyotype 45,X/46,XX and 14 cases with numerical or structural chromosome abnormalities, including a double trisomy 48,XXX,+18. Cytogenetic results from the other 131 cases showed normal XX or XY, which were discordant with NIPT results. Upon analysis of parental karyotypes, 29 (12.34%) showed false positivity in NIPT results that were caused by maternal sex chromosome abnormalities. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> NIPT is an effective screening tool for SCA with a PPV of 43.40%. Maternal karyotype abnormalities occurred in 12.34% of the cases with abnormal NIPT. Diagnostic testing of the fetus and the mother are recommended.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document