scholarly journals Uterine peristalsis before embryo transfer affects the chance of clinical pregnancy in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1238-1243 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Zhu ◽  
H. S. Che ◽  
L. Xiao ◽  
Y. P. Li
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Uterine Peristalsis ◽  
Frozen Thawed Embryo Transfer ◽  
Thawed Embryo Transfer

scholarly journals Subcutaneous progesterone versus vaginal progesterone for luteal-phase support in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: A cross-sectional study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abbas Aflatoonian ◽  
Banafsheh Mohammadi
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Luteal Phase Support ◽  
Vaginal Progesterone ◽  
Frozen Thawed Embryo Transfer ◽  
Thawed Embryo Transfer

Background: Luteal-phase support is a complex and controversial issue in the field of reproductive management. Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of low-dose subcutaneous progesterone with the vaginal progesterone for luteal-phase support in patients undergoing rozenthawed embryo transfer. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, information related to 77 women that had frozen-thawed embryo transfer was reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups based on the route of progesterone administration used as a luteal-phase support. When the endometrial thickness reached ≥ 8 mm, in one group progesterone (Prolutex) 25 mg/ daily subcutaneous and in another group, vaginal progesterone (Cyclogest®) 400 mg twice or (Endometrin®) 100 mg thrice daily, were administrated and continued until menstruation or in case of clinical pregnancy for 8 wk after the embryo transfer when the fetal heart activity was detected by ultrasonography. Results: The patient’s characteristics were matched and there was no significant difference. The chemical and clinical pregnancy rate was higher in the vaginal progesterone group compared to the prolutex group, but statistically unnoticeable, (40% vs. 29.6%, p = 0.367) and (28% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.581), respectively. C Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrate that the new subcutaneous progesterone can be a good alternative for intramuscular progesterone in women that dislike and do not accept vaginal formulations as luteal-phase support in assisted reproductive technology. Key words: Progesterone, Subcutaneous, Vaginal, Pregnancy.

scholarly journals Does Estradiol Orally and Vaginally Administered Together Impact Live Birth and Neonatal Outcome in Artificial Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Liu ◽  
Yixia Yang ◽  
Xinting Zhou ◽  
Yanmei Hu ◽  
Yu Wu
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Preterm Delivery ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Delivery Rate ◽  
Serum Estradiol ◽  
Frozen Thawed Embryo Transfer ◽  
Thawed Embryo Transfer

Abstract Background: Previous studies have demonstrated that newborns from fresh embryo transfer are with higher risk of small for gestation (SGA) rate than those from frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET). It is suggested that supraphysiologic serum estradiol in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS)is one of reasons. Out study aims to investigate whether exogenous estradiol delivered regimens have an impact on live birth rate and singleton birthweight in hormone replacement (HRT)-FET cycles.Methods:This retrospective study involved patients undergoing their first FET with HRT endometrium preparation followed by two cleavage-staged embryos transfer, comparing orally and vaginal estradiol tablets (OVE) group versus oral estradiol tablets (OE) group from January 2015 to December 2018 at our center. A total of 792 patients fulfilled the criteria, including 282 live birth singletons. Live birth was the primary outcome. Secondary outcome included clinical pregnancy rate, singleton birthweight, large for gestational age (LGA) rate, SGA rate, preterm delivery rate. Results:Patients in OVE group achieved higher serum estradiol level with more days of estradiol treatment. No difference in live birth (Adjusted OR 1.327; 95%CI 0.982, 1.794, p=0.066) and clinical pregnancy rate (Adjusted OR 1.278; 95%CI 0.937, 1.743, p=0.121) was found between OVE and OE groups. Estradiol route did not affect birth weight (β=-30.962, SE=68.723, p=0.653), the odds of LGA (Adjusted OR 1.165; 95%CI 0.545, 2.490, p=0.694), the odds of SGA (Adjusted OR 0.569; 95%CI 0.096, 3.369, p=0.535) or the preterm delivery rate (Adjusted OR 0.969; 95%CI 0.292, 3.214, p=0.959).Conclusion:Estrogen orally and vaginally together did not have an impact on clinical outcomes and singleton birthweight compared to estrogen orally taken, but was accompanied with relative higher serum E2 level and potential maternal undesirable risks.

scholarly journals IVF/ICSI Outcomes of Euthyroid Infertile Women With TAI: Aspirin Plus Prednisone Treatment, Does It Matter?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping Zhou ◽  
QiuPing Yao ◽  
Lihua Yang ◽  
Ya Yu ◽  
Jilai Xie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Treated Group ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Reference Level ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Fresh Embryo Transfer ◽  
Infertile Women ◽  
Frozen Thawed Embryo Transfer ◽  
Ivf Et ◽  
Thawed Embryo Transfer

Abstract Objective Thyroid autoimmunity (TAI) per se has been demonstrated to be related to adverse pregnancy outcomes, including recurrent miscarriage and unexplained infertility. Although therapy of glucocorticoid to infertile remains controversial, aspirin combined with prednisone(P + A) are used frequently in antithyroid antibodies (ATA) positive infertile women in clinical practice. Methods A multicenter retrospective study was performed in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Ningbo Women and Children's Hospital and People's Hospital of Jinhua. We recruited 494 euthyroid infertile women positive for anti-thyroperoxidase antibody (TPOAb) and/or thyroglobulin antibody (TgAb) with thyroid stimulating hormone 0.35-4.0mIU/L, who undergoing first in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) cycle during the period of 2017 to 2020. 346 women were ultimately recruited, including 187 patients receiving fresh embryo transfer and 159 patients receiving frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Among them, infertile 150 women were treated with prednisone(10mg/d) and aspirin(100mg/d), while the other 196 infertile women were untreated as control group. The treatment commenced on the day of embryo transfer and continued until the clinical pregnancy was determined by ultrasonography around 30 days after embryo transfer. Results Clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) of the first fresh embryo transfer cycle was 57.5% vs. 63.5% in control vs. in treated group (P = 0.414) and CPR was 57.8% versus 61.8% in the two groups in the frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle(P = 0.606). Additionally, the prevalence of delivering a live birth at the fresh embryo transfer was 49.6% in the non-treatment group and 47.3% in the P + A treated group(P = 0.762). Cumulative CPR was similar in the groups at the fresh embryo transfer (control vs treated group: 56.9% vs 61.0%, P = 0.534). By conducting logistic regression, combined treatment of P + A appeared to have no influence on CPR or miscarriage rates (MR) at the first embryo transfer. Furthermore, the low but within the reference level of free triiodothyronine (FT3) was seen as a poor predictor of spontaneous abortion at the fresh embryo transfer. Conclusions To conclude, with regard to euthyroid women with TAI undergoing the first IVF-ET cycle, adjuvant treatment of P + A after the embryo transfer may be unnecessary irrespective of the fresh or frozen-thawed embryo transfer.

scholarly journals Effect of Intrauterine Administration of Seminal Plasma for Patients with Recurrent Implantation Failure Before FET: Study Protocol for a Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
ling CUI ◽  
Fang Wang ◽  
Yonghong Lin
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Study Protocol ◽  
Seminal Plasma ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Implantation Failure ◽  
Central Hospital ◽  
Recurrent Implantation Failure ◽  
Frozen Thawed Embryo Transfer ◽  
Thawed Embryo Transfer

Abstract Background: To assess the effect of intrauterine administration of seminal plasma for patients with recurrent implantation failure before frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Methods: Trial design: This is a parallel group, randomized (1:1 allocation ratio) controlled trial.Participants: All patients will be recruited from Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital. Inclusion criteria: 1. Women after IVF/ICSI treatment in Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital. 2.Infertile women with a history of recurrent implantation failure. 3.Infertile couples (both male and female) aged between 20 and 39 years;4. Couples who have at least 1 good quality embryos for transfer. 5. Males had negative in infectious disease test. 6. The males have semen. 7. Women who intend to undergo FET after IVF or ICSI or pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). 8. Competent and able to give informed consent. Intervention and comparator: Treatment group receiving intrauterine administration of seminal plasma before frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Main outcomes: Clinical pregnancy after frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Randomisation: Patients will be randomly allocated to either treatment or control group at 1:1 ratio. Random numbers will be generated by using software SPSS 25.0 performed by an independent statistician from Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital. Blinding (masking): Only the data analyst will be blinded to group assignment. Numbers to be randomised (sample size): To account for a 10% dropout rate, we will recruit 174 patients (87 in each group). Trial status: The date of approval is 31rd May 2021, version 2.0. Recruitment started on 1rd June and is expected to end in July 2022. Discussion: Intrauterine administration of seminal plasma before frozen-thawed embryo transfer of patients with recurrent implantation failure may improve clinical pregnancy rate, it has great Page 2 of 14 significance for assisted reproduction. Trial registration: The study protocol has been approved by the ethics committees at Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital. The trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100046803. Registered on 28 May 2021.

scholarly journals Twice vitrification-warming procedures has no effect on frozen-thawed embryo transfer outcomes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
xiaoyue Shen ◽  
Min Ding ◽  
Yuan Yan ◽  
Shanshan Wang ◽  
jianjun Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Miscarriage Rate ◽  
Frozen Thawed Embryo Transfer ◽  
Thawed Embryo Transfer

Abstract Background To evaluate the frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) outcomes of repeated cryopreservation by vitrification of blastocysts derived from vitrified-warmed day3 embryos in patients who experienced implantation failure previously. Methods We retrospect the files of patients who underwent single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles in our reproductive medical center from January 2013 to December 2019. 127 patients transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts derived from vitrified-warmed day3 embryos were defined as twice-cryopreserved group. 1567 patients who transfer blastocysts that had experienced once vitrified-warmed were used as once-cryopreserved group. None of them was pregnant at the previous FET. The outcomes were compared between two groups after a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Results The clinical pregnancy rate was 52.76%, live birth rate was 43.31% in twice-cryopreserved group. After PSM,108 pairs of patients were generated for comparison. The clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate or miscarriage rate was not significantly different between two groups. Logistic regression analysis indicated that double vitrification-warming procedures did not affect FET outcomes in terms of clinical pregnancy rate (OR 0.83, 95%CI 0.47-1.42), live birth rate (OR 0.93, 95%CI 0.54-1.59), miscarriage rate (OR 0.72 95%CI 0.28-1.85). Furthermore, the pregnancy complications rate, gestational age or neonatal abnormalities rate between two groups was also comparable, while twice vitrification-warming procedures might increase the macrosomia rate (19.6% vs. 6.3%, P = 0.05). Conclusion Transfer of double vitrified-warmed embryo at cleavage stage and subsequent blastocyst stage did not affect live birth rate and neonatal abnormalities rate, but there was a tendency to increase macrosomia rate, which needs further investigation.

scholarly journals Does estradiol orally and vaginally administered together impact live birth and neonatal outcomes in artificial frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Liu ◽  
Yixia Yang ◽  
Jian Sun ◽  
Xinting Zhou ◽  
Yanmei Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Neonatal Outcomes ◽  
Serum Estradiol ◽  
Frozen Thawed Embryo Transfer ◽  
Thawed Embryo Transfer

Abstract Background: Previous studies have demonstrated that newborns from fresh embryo transfer have higher risk of small for gestation (SGA) rate than those from frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET). It is suggested that supraphysiologic serum estradiol in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) is one of reasons. Our study aims to investigate whether exogenous estradiol delivered regimens have an impact on live birth rate and neonatal outcomes in hormone replacement (HRT)-FET cycles. Methods: This was a retrospective study involving patients undergoing their first FET with HRT endometrium preparation followed by the transfer of two cleavage-staged embryos, comparing estradiol administered orally and vaginally (OVE group) versus estradiol administered orally (OE group) from January 2015 to December 2018 at our center. A total of 792 patients fulfilled the criteria, including 228 live birth singletons. The live birth rate was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included clinical pregnancy rate, singleton birthweight, large for gestational age (LGA) rate, SGA rate, preterm delivery rate. Results: Patients in OVE group achieved higher serum estradiol level with more days of estradiol treatment. No difference in live birth (Adjusted OR 1.327; 95%CI 0.982, 1.794, p = 0.066) and clinical pregnancy rate (Adjusted OR 1.278; 95%CI 0.937, 1.743, p = 0.121) was found between OVE and OE groups. Estradiol route did not affect singletons birth weight (β = -30.962, SE = 68.723, p = 0.653), the odds of LGA (Adjusted OR 1.165; 95%CI 0.545, 2.490, p = 0.694), the odds of SGA (Adjusted OR 0.569; 95%CI 0.096, 3.369, p = 0.535) or the preterm delivery (Adjusted OR 0.969; 95%CI 0.292, 3.214, p = 0.959). Conclusion: Estrogen taken orally and vaginally together did not change live birth rate and singleton neonatal outcomes compared to estrogen taken orally, but was accompanied with relative higher serum E2 level and potential maternal undesirable risks.

scholarly journals Pretreatment With a Long-acting GnRH Agonist in Early Follicular Phase Increases Clinical Pregnancy Rate in Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin xu ◽  
Jing Zhao ◽  
Zhaojuan Hou ◽  
Nenghui Liu ◽  
Yanping Li
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Hormone Replacement ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Early Follicular Phase ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Frozen Thawed Embryo Transfer ◽  
Thawed Embryo Transfer

Abstract Background: It is controversial whether gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) pretreatment can benefit the pregnancy outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles. In most of studies, GnRHa was administered during the mid-luteal phase for pretreatment. Few studies focus on FET cycles with GnRHa administered in early follicle phase.Methods: The retrospective cohort study was conducted in a university-affiliated IVF center. 630 patients in the GnRHa FET group and 1141 patients in the hormone replacement treatment (HRT) FET without GnRHa group from October 2017 to March 2019 were included. The menstruation cycle of these patients was irregular. Results: There were no differences observed between the two groups in patient’s characteristics. However, the GnRHa FET group showed a higher percentage of endometrium with triple line pattern (94.8% vs 89.6%, p<0.001) on the day of progesterone administration, and an increased implantation rate (34.7% vs 30%, p<0.01), biochemical pregnancy rate (60.6% vs 54.3%, p = 0.009), and clinical pregnancy rate (49.8% vs 43.3%, p = 0.008), as compared to that in the HRT FET cycles with similar endometrial thickness, ectopic pregnancy rate, and early miscarriage rate. Binary logistic regression analysis showed the GnRHa FET group to be associated with an increased chance of clinical pregnancy rate compared with HRT FET without GnRHa group (P=0.014, odds ratio [OR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.61).Conclusions: Pretreatment with a long-acting GnRHa in early follicular phase can improve the clinical outcome of the FET cycles. However, further randomized control trials (RCTs) will be needed to verify these results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document