scholarly journals A comparative analysis of assisted reproductive technology cycles in Australia and New Zealand 2004-2007

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 2281-2289 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. M. Farquhar ◽  
Y. A. Wang ◽  
E. A. Sullivan
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Assisted Reproductive Technology ◽  
Reproductive Technology ◽  
Technology Cycles

scholarly journals Does the Human Assisted Reproductive Technology Act 2004 need a review?

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Legge ◽  
Ruth Fitzgerald
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Assisted Reproductive Technology ◽  
Assisted Reproductive Technologies ◽  
Reproductive Technologies ◽  
Reproductive Technology ◽  
Good Coverage

The use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in New Zealand is governed by the Human Assisted Reproductive Technology Act 2004 (the HART Act), which provides for all procedures currently undertaken by fertility clinics and other centres involved with ART. Although the Act has provided good coverage for the use of ART over the last 16 years, it did not have a revision clause. Here, we explore whether the HART Act should be reviewed, and outline the important considerations that need to be taken into account to ensure that the legislation is up to date with current issues and technologies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document