Improvements in the school environment—results of a Swedish school project 2005–2011

Author(s):  
Louise Persson ◽  
Curt Hagquist

Summary To examine whether a public health project to reduce problem behavior in schools and improve the classroom climate, undertaken among eight secondary schools in a municipality in Sweden, was accompanied by favorable changes in the school environment over time. Data were collected from ninth grade students (aged 15–16 years) at three different time points: the year before the project began (2005), during the project (2008) and when the project finished (2011). Changes in the school environment, measured as damage, littering, noise and classroom disorder, were compared between the project municipality and a comparison group of other municipalities in the same county, using multinomial logistic regression analysis. Descriptive comparisons were made between the schools within the project municipality. The school environment improved significantly from 2005 to 2011 in the project municipality compared with the other municipalities. The school environment was improved in all schools within the project municipality. The biggest improvements took place in two schools which systematically worked with one program incorporated into the school schedule. This study demonstrates that it may be possible to improve the school environment by implementing health programs. Further studies based on experimental designs are required in order to confirm the potential and efficiency of school health programs.

2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-49
Author(s):  
Megan A Quinn ◽  
Jodi L Southerland ◽  
Kasie Richards ◽  
Deborah L Slawson ◽  
Bruce Behringer ◽  
...  

Purpose – Coordinated school health programs (CSHPs), a type of health promoting school (HPS) program adopted by Canada and the USA, were developed to provide a comprehensive approach to school health in the USA. Community partnerships are central to CSHP and HPS efforts, yet the quality of collaboration efforts is rarely assessed. The purpose of this paper is to use Himmelman’s strategies for working together to assess the types of partnerships that are being formed by CSHPs and to explore the methodological usefulness of this framework. The Himmelman methodology describes four degrees of partnering interaction: networking, coordinating, cooperating, and collaborating, with each degree of interaction signifying a different level of partnership between organizations. Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected as part of the 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 CSHP annual Requests for Proposal from all 131 public school systems in Tennessee. Thematic analysis methods were used to assess partnerships in school systems. Descriptive analyses were completed to calculate individual collaboration scores for each of the eight CSHP components (comprehensive health education, physical education/activity, nutrition services, health services, mental health services, student, family, and community involvement, healthy school environment, and health promotion of staff) during the two data collection periods. The level of collaboration was assessed based on Himmelman’s methodology, with higher scores indicating a greater degree of collaboration. Scores were averaged to obtain a mean score and individual component scores were then averaged to obtain statewide collaboration index scores (CISs) for each CSHP component. Findings – The majority of CSHPs partnering activities can be described as coordination, level two in partnering interaction. The physical activity component had the highest CISs and scored in between coordinating and cooperating (2.42), while healthy school environment had the lowest score, scoring between networking and coordinating (1.93), CISs increased from Year 1 to Year 2 for all of the CSHP components. Applying the theoretical framework of Himmelman’s methodology provided a novel way to quantify levels of collaboration among school partners. This approach offered an opportunity to use qualitative and quantitative methods to explore levels of collaboration, determine current levels of collaboration, and assess changes in levels of collaboration over the study period. Research limitations/implications – This study provides a framework for using the Himmelman methodology to quantify partnerships in a HPS program in the USA. However, the case study nature of the enquiry means that changes may have been influenced by a range of contextual factors, and quantitative analyses are solely descriptive and therefore do not provide an opportunity for statistical comparisons. Practical implications – Quantifying collaboration efforts is useful for HPS programs. Community activities that link back to the classroom are important to the success of any HPS program. Himmelman’s methodology may be useful when applied to HPSs to assess the quality of existing partnerships and guide program implementation efforts. Originality/value – This research is the first of its kind and uses a theoretical framework to quantify partnership levels in school health programs. In the future, using this methodology could provide an opportunity to develop more effective partnerships in school health programs, health education, and public health.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Hermien Nugraheni ◽  
Aryadiva N Prayoga ◽  
Wanda Nur Aida

Background: Primary school-aged children are at risk of having health problems. One of the health problems that can cause disruption of growth and development is obesity. School is one of the parties who play an important role in providing health education for children which aims to improve healthy living habits of children. The role of school primarily teacher was very important to prevent children obesity. The purpose of this study was to identify the role of teachers in health promotion activities in elementary schools for prevent obesity Method: This study was conducted using descriptive analytical design with cross sectional approach, complemented with qualitative data. The population in this study were teachers in elementary schools who appointed as health school teachers in the working area of Kedungmundu Health Center, Semarang City. Sample of this study was selected purposively by the criteria of active and inactive school health programs. The total sample was 14 teachers for each group, therefore totally 28 teachers involved in this study. Data was collected using face to face interview with trained enumerator and participants signed informed consent before interviewed.   Results: level of Knowledge and attitudes of teachers about health promotion schools for preventing student’s obesity were higher between active and non-active school health program. Teacher's age and education were significantly associated with active school programs with p value 0.039 and 0.040 respectively. Teachers from active school health programs were younger (<30 years old) and have higher education (bachelor) than those who are not active school. Teachers from active school health programs are more initiative to run activities which support nutritional behavior such as provision healthy canteens and physical activities outside the class course rather than only waiting for activities from the health center.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document