scholarly journals HOP1: a yeast meiotic pairing gene.

Genetics ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 121 (3) ◽  
pp. 445-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
N M Hollingsworth ◽  
B Byers
Keyword(s):  
Synaptonemal Complex ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
Recessive Mutation ◽  
Intragenic Recombination ◽  
Meiotic Pairing ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Homolog Pairing ◽  
Chromosomal Pairing ◽  
Chromosome Iii ◽  
Cloned Gene

Abstract The recessive mutation, hop1-1, was isolated by use of a screen designed to detect mutations defective in homologous chromosomal pairing during meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutants in HOP1 displayed decreased levels of meiotic crossing over and intragenic recombination between markers on homologous chromosomes. In contrast, assays of the hop1-1 mutation in a spo13-1 haploid disomic for chromosome III demonstrated that intrachromosomal recombination between directly duplicated sequences was unaffected. The spores produced by SPO13 diploids homozygous for hop1 were largely inviable, as expected for a defect in interhomolog recombination that results in high levels of nondisjunction. HOP1 was cloned by complementation of the spore lethality phenotype and the cloned gene was used to map HOP1 to the LYS11-HIS6 interval on the left arm of chromosome IX. Electron microscopy revealed that diploids homozygous for hop1 fail to form synaptonemal complex, which normally provides the structural basis for homolog pairing. We propose that HOP1 acts in meiosis primarily to promote chromosomal pairing, perhaps by encoding a component of the synaptonemal complex.

scholarly journals Live imaging and biophysical modeling support a button-based mechanism of somatic homolog pairing in Drosophila

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myron Child ◽  
Jack R. Bateman ◽  
Amir Jahangiri ◽  
Armando Reimer ◽  
Nicholas C. Lammers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Configuration ◽  
Live Imaging ◽  
Biophysical Model ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
Biophysical Modeling ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
3D Genome ◽  
Homolog Pairing ◽  
Rna Labeling ◽  
Regulated Gene Expression

AbstractThe spatial configuration of the eukaryotic genome is organized and dynamic, providing the structural basis for regulated gene expression in living cells. In Drosophila melanogaster, 3D genome organization is characterized by somatic homolog pairing, where homologous chromosomes are intimately paired from end to end; however, the process by which homologs identify one another and pair has remained mysterious. A recent model proposed that specifically interacting “buttons” encoded along the lengths of homologous chromosomes drive somatic homolog pairing. Here, we turned this hypothesis into a precise biophysical model to demonstrate that a button-based mechanism can lead to chromosome-wide pairing. We tested our model and constrained its free parameters using live-imaging measurements of chromosomal loci tagged with the MS2 and PP7 nascent RNA labeling systems. Our analysis showed strong agreement between model predictions and experiments in the separation dynamics of tagged homologous loci as they transition from unpaired to paired states, and in the percentage of nuclei that become paired as embryonic development proceeds. In sum, as a result of this dialogue between theory and experiment, our data strongly support a button-based mechanism of somatic homolog pairing in Drosophila and provide a theoretical framework for revealing the molecular identity and regulation of buttons.

Complete meiotic pairing of crested newt chromosomes

Genome ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1105-1111 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Wallace ◽  
B. M. N. Wallace
Keyword(s):  
Synaptonemal Complex ◽  
Genome Size ◽  
Chromosome Pairing ◽  
Meiotic Pairing ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Direct Observations ◽  
Crested Newt ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Complex Length ◽  
Complex Genome

The longest chromosome (number 1) of Trituturus cristatus carries a heteromorphic segment, a heterozygosity perpetuated by a balanced lethal system. The heteromorphic segment is regarded as achiasmate and has been claimed to be asynaptic. Direct observations of chromosome pairing in spermatocytes and oocytes yield some cases where all homologous chromosomes appear to be completely paired, but the individual bivalents could not be identified as pachytene is not particularly clear in this species. The long arms of bivalent 1 usually remain attached by a terminal chiasma in spermatocytes of T. c. cristatus but the corresponding chiasma is only rarely present in T. c. carnifex spermatocytes. Synaptonemal complexes have been measured in both spermatocytes and oocytes of T. c. cristatus. A karyotype constructed from these measurements matches the main features of somatic and lampbrush chromosome karyotypes, indicating that all chromosomes must be completely paired and proportionately represented as synaptonemal complex. The total length of synaptonemal complex is much the same in spermatocytes and oocytes and is similar to the length in spermatocytes of Xenopus laevis. These two amphibian examples supplement a recent survey of other vertebrate classes to reinforce its conclusion that synaptonemal complex length is not related to genome size in vertebrates.Key words: chromosome pairing, synaptonemal complex, genome size, amphibia.

scholarly journals Live imaging and biophysical modeling support a button-based mechanism of somatic homolog pairing in Drosophila

eLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myron Barber Child ◽  
Jack R Bateman ◽  
Amir Jahangiri ◽  
Armando Reimer ◽  
Nicholas C Lammers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Live Imaging ◽  
Biophysical Model ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
Biophysical Modeling ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Homolog Pairing ◽  
Molecular Identity ◽  
Rna Labeling ◽  
Model Predictions ◽  
Chromosomal Loci

3D eukaryotic genome organization provides the structural basis for gene regulation. In Drosophila melanogaster, genome folding is characterized by somatic homolog pairing, where homologous chromosomes are intimately paired from end to end; however, how homologs identify one another and pair has remained mysterious. Recently, this process has been proposed to be driven by specifically interacting 'buttons' encoded along chromosomes. Here, we turned this hypothesis into a quantitative biophysical model to demonstrate that a button-based mechanism can lead to chromosome-wide pairing. We tested our model using live-imaging measurements of chromosomal loci tagged with the MS2 and PP7 nascent RNA labeling systems. We show solid agreement between model predictions and experiments in the pairing dynamics of individual homologous loci. Our results strongly support a button-based mechanism of somatic homolog pairing in Drosophila and provide a theoretical framework for revealing the molecular identity and regulation of buttons.

scholarly journals Synaptonemal complex components are required for meiotic checkpoint function in C. elegans

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tisha Bohr ◽  
Guinevere Ashley ◽  
Evan Eggleston ◽  
Kyra Firestone ◽  
Needhi Bhalla
Keyword(s):  
Synaptonemal Complex ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Meiotic Chromosome ◽  
Checkpoint Response ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Homolog Pairing ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Complex Components

AbstractSynapsis involves the assembly of a proteinaceous structure, the synaptonemal complex (SC), between paired homologous chromosomes and is essential for proper meiotic chromosome segregation. In C. elegans, the synapsis checkpoint selectively removes nuclei with unsynapsed chromosomes by inducing apoptosis. This checkpoint depends on Pairing Centers (PCs), cis-acting sites that promote pairing and synapsis. We have hypothesized that the stability of homolog pairing at PCs is monitored by this checkpoint. Here, we report that SC components SYP-3, HTP-3, HIM-3 and HTP-1 are required for a functional synapsis checkpoint. Mutation of these components does not abolish PC function, demonstrating they are bonafide checkpoint components. Further, we identify mutant backgrounds in which the instability of homolog pairing at PCs does not correlate with the synapsis checkpoint response. Altogether, these data suggest that, in addition to homolog pairing, SC assembly may be monitored by the synapsis checkpoint.

THE EFFECT OF GENES CONTROLLING DIFFERENT DEGREES OF HOMOEOLOGOUS PAIRING ON QUADRIVALENT FREQUENCY IN INDUCED AUTOTETRAPLOID LINES OF TRITICUM LONGISSIMUM

1976 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 357-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydia Avivi
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Pairing ◽  
Chiasma Frequency ◽  
Spatial Separation ◽  
Meiotic Pairing ◽  
Homoeologous Pairing ◽  
Homologous Pairing ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Chromosomal Pairing ◽  
Per Se ◽  
Quadrivalent Frequency

Different genotypes of Triticum longissimum are known to either promote or suppress chromosome pairing in crosses with polyploid wheats. Lines that promote homoeologous pairing are here designated as intermediate pairing lines, while those which have no such effect or suppress pairing are known as low pairing lines. To determine a possible effect of these genotypes on homologous pairing, tetraploidy was induced in both lines and chromosomal pairing was studied at first metaphase of meiosis. While the two induced autotetraploids did not differ in chiasma frequency or in the number of paired chromosomal arms, they differed significantly in multivalent frequency; the intermediate-pairing autotetraploid exhibited the same multivalent frequency as that expected on the basis of two telomeric initiation sites, while the low pairing autotetraploid exhibited a significantly lower frequency. It is assumed that in the autotetraploid the low pairing genotype does not affect meiotic pairing per se, but modifies the pattern of homologous association in a similar manner to that known in polyploids and caused by diploidization genes. It is speculated that the tendency for bivalent pairing in the low pairing autotetraploid is due to spatial separation of the four homologous chromosomes in somatic and premeiotic cells into two groups of two.

The initiation of meiotic chromosome pairing: the cytological view

Genome ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 759-778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josef Loidl
Keyword(s):  
Synaptonemal Complex ◽  
Chromosome Pairing ◽  
Meiotic Chromosome ◽  
Meiotic Pairing ◽  
Cytological Evidence ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Synaptonemal Complex Formation ◽  
Meiotic Synapsis ◽  
The One ◽  
First Contact

Opposing views are held with respect to the time when and the mechanisms whereby homologous chromosomes find each other for meiotic synapsis. On the one hand, some evidence has been presented for somatic homologous associations or some other kind of relationship between chromosomes in somatic cells as a preliminary to meiotic pairing. On the other hand, it is argued by many that homologous contacts are first established at meiotic prophase prior to, or in the course of, synaptonemal complex formation. The present paper reviews the controversial cytological evidence, hypotheses, and ideas on how the first contact between homologous chromosomes comes about.Key words: synapsis, meiosis, presynaptic alignment, homologous recognition, synaptonemal complex, chromosome pairing.

scholarly journals Control of meiotic pairing and recombination by chromosomally tethered 26S proteasome

Science ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 355 (6323) ◽  
pp. 408-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasvinder S. Ahuja ◽  
Rima Sandhu ◽  
Rana Mainpal ◽  
Crystal Lawson ◽  
Hanna Henley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Synaptonemal Complex ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
26S Proteasome ◽  
Strand Exchange ◽  
Crossing Over ◽  
Meiotic Pairing ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Meiotic Chromosomes ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved

During meiosis, paired homologous chromosomes (homologs) become linked via the synaptonemal complex (SC) and crossovers. Crossovers mediate homolog segregation and arise from self-inflicted double-strand breaks (DSBs). Here, we identified a role for the proteasome, the multisubunit protease that degrades proteins in the nucleus and cytoplasm, in homolog juxtaposition and crossing over. Without proteasome function, homologs failed to pair and instead remained associated with nonhomologous chromosomes. Although dispensable for noncrossover formation, a functional proteasome was required for a coordinated transition that entails SC assembly between longitudinally organized chromosome axes and stable strand exchange of crossover-designated DSBs. Notably, proteolytic core and regulatory proteasome particles were recruited to chromosomes by Zip3, the ortholog of mammalian E3 ligase RNF212, and SC protein Zip1 . We conclude that proteasome functions along meiotic chromosomes are evolutionarily conserved.

Ultrastructure of primary spermatocyte in fish (Tilapia: Oreochromis niloticus): The synaptonemal complex

1986 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 288-289
Author(s):  
T. Guha ◽  
A. Q. Siddiqui ◽  
P. F. Prentis
Keyword(s):  
Fine Structure ◽  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Synaptonemal Complex ◽  
Oreochromis Niloticus ◽  
Short Communication ◽  
Primary Spermatocyte ◽  
Mitotic Division ◽  
Meiotic Cell ◽  
Electron Microscope Level ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes

The Primary Spermatocytes represent a stage in spermatogenesis when the first meiotic cell division occurs. They are derived from Spermatogonium or Stem cell through mitotic division. At the zygotene phase of meiotic prophase the Synaptonemal complex appears in these cells in the space between the paired homologous chromosomes. Spermatogenesis and sperm structure in fish have been studied at the electron microscope level in a few species? However, no work has yet been reported on ultrastructure of tilapia, O. niloticus, spermatozoa and spermatogenetic process. In this short communication we are reporting the Ultrastructure of Primary Spermatocytes in tilapia, O. niloticus, and the fine structure of synaptonemal complexes seen in the spermatocyte nuclei.

scholarly journals Lateral Elements Inside Synaptonemal Complex-Like Polycomplexes in ndt80 Mutants of Yeast Bind DNA

Genetics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 163 (2) ◽  
pp. 539-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasanuzzaman Bhuiyan ◽  
Gunilla Dahlfors ◽  
Karin Schmekel
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Synaptonemal Complex ◽  
Immunoelectron Microscopy ◽  
Meiotic Prophase ◽  
Lateral Element ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Meiotic Prophase I ◽  
Dna Antibodies

Abstract The synaptonemal complex (SC) keeps the synapsed homologous chromosomes together during pachytene in meiotic prophase I. Structures that resemble stacks of SCs, polycomplexes, are sometimes found before or after pachytene. We have investigated ndt80 mutants of yeast, which arrest in pachytene. SCs appear normal in spread chromosome preparations, but are only occasionally found in intact nuclei examined in the electron microscope. Instead, large polycomplexes occur in almost every ndt80 mutant nucleus. Immunoelectron microscopy using DNA antibodies show strong preferential labeling to the lateral element parts of the polycomplexes. In situ hybridization using chromosome-specific probes confirms that the chromosomes in ndt80 mutants are paired and attached to the SCs. Our results suggest that polycomplexes can be involved in binding of chromosomes and possibly also in synapsis.

Effect of the Pairing Gene Ph1 and Premeiotic Colchicine Treatment on Intra- and Interchromosome Pairing of Isochromosomes in Common Wheat

Genetics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 150 (3) ◽  
pp. 1199-1208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan M Vega ◽  
Moshe Feldman
Keyword(s):  
Common Wheat ◽  
Homologous Chromosome ◽  
Colchicine Treatment ◽  
Crossing Over ◽  
Meiotic Pairing ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Polyploid Wheat ◽  
Main Gene ◽  
Ph1 Gene

Abstract The analysis of the pattern of isochromosome pairing allows one to distinguish factors affecting presynaptic alignment of homologous chromosomes from those affecting synapsis and crossing-over. Because the two homologous arms in an isochromosome are invariably associated by a common centromere, the suppression of pairing between these arms (intrachromosome pairing) would indicate that synaptic or postsynaptic events were impaired. In contrast, the suppression of pairing between an isochromosome and its homologous chromosome (interchromosome pairing), without affecting intrachromosome pairing, would suggest that homologous presynaptic alignment was impaired. We used such an isochromosome system to determine which of the processes associated with chromosome pairing was affected by the Ph1 gene of common wheat—the main gene that restricts pairing to homologues. Ph1 reduced the frequency of interchromosome pairing without affecting intrachromosome pairing. In contrast, intrachromosome pairing was strongly reduced in the absence of the synaptic gene Syn-B1. Premeiotic colchicine treatment, which drastically decreased pairing of conventional chromosomes, reduced interchromosome but not intrachromosome pairing. The results support the hypothesis that premeiotic alignment is a necessary stage for the regularity of meiotic pairing and that Ph1 relaxes this alignment. We suggest that Ph1 acts on premeiotic alignment of homologues and homeologues as a means of ensuring diploid-like meiotic behavior in polyploid wheat.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document