scholarly journals Transcriptomes of Mouse Olfactory Epithelium Reveal Sexual Differences in Odorant Detection

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 703-712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meng-Shin Shiao ◽  
Andrew Ying-Fei Chang ◽  
Ben-Yang Liao ◽  
Yung-Hao Ching ◽  
Mei-Yeh Jade Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Olfactory Epithelium ◽  
Sexual Differences ◽  
Odorant Detection

scholarly journals Daily oscillation of odorant detection in rat olfactory epithelium

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (12) ◽  
pp. 1613-1622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrien Francois ◽  
Vincent Bombail ◽  
David Jarriault ◽  
Adrien Acquistapace ◽  
Denise Grebert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Olfactory Epithelium ◽  
Daily Oscillation ◽  
Odorant Detection

scholarly journals First step of odorant detection in the olfactory epithelium and olfactory preferences differ according to the microbiota profile in mice

2020 ◽  
Vol 384 ◽  
pp. 112549
Author(s):  
Laurent Naudon ◽  
Adrien François ◽  
Mahendra Mariadassou ◽  
Magali Monnoye ◽  
Catherine Philippe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Olfactory Epithelium ◽  
Olfactory Preferences ◽  
Odorant Detection

Methods for making stereoslides and -prints, with freeze-etched olfactory epithelium as example

1984 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 704-705
Author(s):  
Bert Ph. M. Menco ◽  
Ido F. Menco ◽  
Frans L.T. Verdonk
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Olfactory Epithelium ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Supporting Cell ◽  
Structural Features ◽  
Extensive Study ◽  
Sprague Dawley ◽  
Freezing Method ◽  
Respiratory Epithelia ◽  
Three Dimensional Presentation

Previously we presented an extensive study of the distributions of intramembranous particles of structures in apical surfaces of nasal olfactory and respiratory epithelia of the Sprague-Dawley rat. For the same structures these distributions were compared in samples which were i) chemically fixed and cryo-protected with glycerol before cryo-fixation, after excision, and ii)ultra-rapidly frozen by means of the slam-freezing method. Since a three-dimensional presentation markedly improves visualization of structural features micrographs were presented as stereopairs. Two exposures were made by tiling the sample stage of the electron microscope 6° in either direction with an eucentric goniometer. The negatives (Agfa Pan 25 Professional) were reversed with Kodak Technical Pan Film 2415 developed in D76 1:1. The prints were made from these reversed negatives. As an example tight-junctional features of an olfactory supporting cell in a region where this cell conjoined with two other cells are presented (Fig. 1).

Bilateral Nasoseptal Rescue Flap with Olfactory Epithelium Preservation: A Prospective Study Analyzing Postoperative Olfaction and Epistaxis

2015 ◽  
Vol 76 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chester Griffiths ◽  
Garni Barkhoudarian ◽  
Aaron Cutler ◽  
Huy Duong ◽  
Bjorn Lobo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Olfactory Epithelium ◽  
A Prospective Study

Lineage analysis of the olfactory epithelium using a replication-incompetent retrovirus

1994 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 683-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dale D. Hunter ◽  
Mary Caggiano ◽  
John S. Kauer
Keyword(s):  
Olfactory Epithelium ◽  
Lineage Analysis

Olfactory mucosal and neural responses in the frog

1962 ◽  
Vol 203 (2) ◽  
pp. 353-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxwell Mark Mozell
Keyword(s):  
Stimulus Intensity ◽  
Olfactory Epithelium ◽  
Flow Rate ◽  
Olfactory Nerve ◽  
Neural Responses ◽  
Criterion Measure ◽  
Repeated Stimulation ◽  
Two Measures ◽  
Electrophysiological Technique

A comparatively recent electrophysiological technique for studying peripheral olfactory events is to record sustained negative potentials from the olfactory epithelium. This method is rapidly replacing the older technique of recording multifiber discharges from the olfactory nerve or bulb. Therefore, the extent to which the results from the two methods correlate with each other was studied by simultaneously recording from the nerve and from the mucosa under several conditions. Although most often parallel, some differences between the two measures were found. Their response maxima did not always temporally coincide. Their amplitudes did not always correlate. Certain stimuli reduced subsequent mucosal responses but not the neural. Repeated stimulation sometimes produced similar differences. Finally, the two responses were not linearly related as a function of stimulus intensity or flow rate. However, for reasons discussed, it is difficult to conclude that these discrepancies necessarily reflect unfavorably upon the reliability of the mucosal potential as the criterion measure of peripheral olfactory activity. Nevertheless, the mucosal potential should not be accepted unequivocally as such a criterion measure until it is more thoroughly understood.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document