scholarly journals Freedom from paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after successful pulmonary vein isolation with pulmonary vein ablation catheter-phased radiofrequency energy: 2-year follow-up and predictors of failure

EP Europace ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 818-825 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. W. Mulder ◽  
M. C. E. F. Wijffels ◽  
E. F. D. Wever ◽  
L. V. A. Boersma
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Radiofrequency Energy ◽  
Ablation Catheter ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Ablation ◽  
Phased Radiofrequency ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Ablation Catheter

scholarly journals Comparison between superior vena cava ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation and standard pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with the cryoballoon technique

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Overeinder ◽  
Thiago Guimarães Osório ◽  
Paul-Adrian Călburean ◽  
Antonio Bisignani ◽  
Gezim Bala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Superior Vena Cava ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Radiofrequency Energy

Abstract Background Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) can be triggered by non-pulmonary vein foci, like the superior vena cava (SVC). The latter is correlated with improved result in terms of freedom from atrial tachycardias (ATs), when electrical isolation of this vessel utilizing radiofrequency energy (RF) is achieved. Objectives Evaluate the clinical impact, in patients with PAF, of the SVC isolation (SVCi) in addition to ordinary pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by means of the second-generation cryoballoon (CB) Methods A total of 100 consecutive patients that underwent CB ablation for PAF were retrospectively selected. Fifty consecutive patients received PVI followed by SVCi by CB application, and the following 50 consecutive patients received standard PVI. All patients were followed 12 months. Results The mean time to SVCi was 36.7 ± 29.0 s and temperature at SVC isolation was − 35 (− 18 to − 40) °C. Real-time recording (RTR) during SVCi was observed in 42 (84.0%) patients. At the end of 12 months of follow-up, freedom from ATs was achieved in 36 (72%) patients in the PVI only group and in 45 (90%) patients of the SVC and PV isolation group (Fisher’s exact test p = 0.039, binary logistic regression: p = 0.027, OR = 0.28, 95%CI = 0.09–0.86). In survival analysis, SVC and PV isolation group was also associated with improved freedom from ATs (log-rank test: p = 0.017, Cox regression: p = 0.026, HR = 0.31, 95%CI = 0.11–0.87). Conclusion Superior vena cava isolation with the CB in addition to PVI might improve freedom from ATs if compared to PVI alone at 1-year follow-up.

P2846Focal impulse and rotor modulation ablation versus pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (FIRMAP AF study)

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Tilz ◽  
C L Lenz ◽  
P S Sommer ◽  
N Sawan ◽  
R Meyer-Saraei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Artery Aneurysm ◽  
Rf Ablation ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
Number Of Patients

Abstract Background Based on the assumption of trigger elimination, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) currently presents the gold standard of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Recently, rapidly spinning rotors or focal impulse formation has been raised as a crucial sustaining mechanism of AF. Ablation of these rotors may potentially obviate the need for trigger elimination with PVI. Purpose This study sought to compare the safety and effectiveness of Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation (FIRM) guided catheter ablation only with the gold standard of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with paroxysmal AF. Methods This was a post-market, prospective, single-blinded, randomized, multi-center trial. Patients were enrolled at three centers and equally (1:1) randomized between those undergoing conventional RF ablation with PVI (PVI group) vs. those treated with FIRM-guided RF ablation without PVI (FIRM group). Data was collected at enrollment, procedure, and at 7-day, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up visits. The study was closed early by the sponsor. At the time of study closure, any pending follow-up visits were waived. Results From February 2016 until February 2018, a total of 51 (out of a planned 170) patients (mean age 63±10.6 years, 57% male) were enrolled and randomized. Four patients withdrew from the study prior to treatment, resulting in 23 patients allocated to the FIRM group and 24 in the PVI group. Only 13 patients in the FIRM group and 11 patients in the PVI group completed the 12-month follow-up. Statistical analysis was not completed given the small number of patients. Single-procedure effectiveness (freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia recurrence after blanking period) was 52.9% (9/17) in the FIRM group and 85.7% (12/14) in the PVI group at 6 months; and 31.3% (5/16) in the FIRM group and 80% (8/10) in the PVI group at 12 months. Repeat procedures were performed in 45.8% (11/24) patients in the FIRM group and 7.4% (2/27) in the PVI group. The acute safety endpoint [freedom from procedure-related serious adverse events (SAE)] was achieved in 87% (20/23) of FIRM group patients and 100% (24/24) of PVI group patients. Procedure related SAEs occurred in three patients in the FIRM group: 1 femoral artery aneurysm and 2 injection site hematomas. No additional procedure-related SAEs were reported >7 days post-procedure. Conclusions These partial study effectiveness results reinforce the importance of PVI in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients and suggest that FIRM-guided ablation alone (without PVI) is not an effective strategy for treatment of paroxysmal AF in most patients. Further study is needed to understand the effectiveness of adding FIRM-guided ablation as an adjunct to PVI in this patient group. Acknowledgement/Funding Abbot

Initial Experience with Robotic Epicardial Off-Pump Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

2006 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 247-250
Author(s):  
Filip Casselman ◽  
Ihsan Bakir ◽  
Pedro Brugada ◽  
Peter Geelen ◽  
Francis Wellens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Pulmonary Veins ◽  
Median Sternotomy ◽  
Transverse Sinus ◽  
Right Atrial ◽  
Off Pump

Objective To evaluate the feasibility and results of isolated endoscopic pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using robotics. Methods Between November 2004 and December 2005, 13 patients (38.5% female) underwent robotic pulmonary vein isolation at our institution. Mean age was 46.8 ± 8.4 years and mean preoperative duration of atrial fibrillation was 52.7 ±31.5 months. Indication for surgery was symptomatic drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or recurrence after percutaneous treatment (n = 3). Mean preoperative left atrial dimension was 38.5 ± 6.9 mm. The surgical procedure was performed off-pump as an isolated right chest approach. All procedures were performed using the Flex 10 microwave ablator (Guidant, Indianapolis, IN), which was positioned from the right side through the transverse sinus and around the 4 pulmonary veins. Postoperative drug regimen included sotalol and Coumadin. Mean follow-up was 8.5 ± 3.4 months. Results The procedure was successful in 11 patients. One patient needed conversion to median sternotomy for right pulmonary artery bleeding and a second patient had severe transverse sinus adhesions requiring conversion to a bilateral video-assisted small thoracotomy approach. No other morbidity occurred. Mean procedure time in successful cases was 2.7 ± 0.8 hours (range 1.7 to 4 hours). Permanent sinus rhythm was successfully restored in 10 of 13 patients (76.9% beyond 6 months). Nonsuccessful patients had markedly reduced symptoms and frequency of events. One patient required a left and another a right atrial flutter ablation during follow-up. Conclusions Robotic pulmonary vein isolation is a feasible procedure that has the potential to become a valid option in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

scholarly journals Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of Wide Area Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Ablation versus Segmental Pulmonary Vein Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation as a Treatment for Short-Duration Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sapan Bhuta ◽  
Gustaf Sverin ◽  
Hiro Kawata ◽  
Malek Bashti ◽  
Jessica Hunter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Short Duration ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Pulmonary Veins ◽  
Wide Area ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Ablation ◽  
Total Procedure Time

Background: Previous studies suggest that wide area circumferential pulmonary vein ablation (WACA) is more effective than segmental pulmonary vein ablation (SPVA) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for treatment of atrial fibrillation. Whether this is true in patients (pts) with very short duration paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is unknown. Objective: To compare WACA to SPVA in pts with PAF lasting <48 hours. Methods: One hundred pts with PAF <48 hours were randomized to either WACA vs SPVA (45 and 53 pts respectively, with 2 withdrawals), and followed up for 24 months with 14-day ECGs every 6 months. Results: Among 97 pts at an average of 22.1±4.8 months followup, 26 (57.8%) remained free of any atrial arrhythmias after WACA versus 29 (55.86%) after SPVA (p=0.64). Sixteen pts (35.6%) had recurrent PAF after WACA versus 20 pts (38.5%) after SPVA (p=0.79). Seven pts (15.6%) had atrial flutter after WACA versus 5 pts (9.64%) after SPVA (p=0.376) and 1 pt (2.2%) had atrial tachycardia after WACA vs 1 pt (1.9%) after SPVA (p=0.918). Total procedure time was lower for SPVA vs WACA (242.9 vs 271.1 minutes, p= 0.047), and fluoroscopy time similar for WACA vs SPVA (50.8 vs 53.4 minutes, p=0.555). Conclusions: As an initial ablation approach in pts with PAF <48 hours, SPVA was similarly effective to WACA with respect to arrhythmia recurrence, supporting the central role of the pulmonary veins for maintaining AF in these pts. Future therapies using alternative ablation energies may incorporate these insights to reduce risk to gastroesophageal structures.

scholarly journals Cryoballoon Versus High-Power, Short-Duration Radiofrequency Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui-Nam Pak ◽  
Je-Wook Park ◽  
Song-Yi Yang ◽  
Tae-Hoon Kim ◽  
Jae-Sun Uhm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Heart Rate Variability ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
High Power ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Antiarrhythmic Drugs ◽  
Procedure Time

Background: The efficacy of cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (Cryo-PVI) is equivalent to that of radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety profile of Cryo-PVI and high-power, short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in patients with AF. Methods: We prospectively randomized 314 patients with paroxysmal AF (men, 71.3%; 59.9±10.9 years old) to either the Cryo-PVI group (n=156) or HPSD-RFCA group (n=158). Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation and linear ablation from the superior vena cava to the right atrial septum in addition to pulmonary vein isolation were carried out in the majority of patients in the HPSD-RFCA group. The primary end point was AF recurrence after a single procedure; secondary end points were the recurrence pattern, cardioversion rate, follow-up heart rate variability, and response to antiarrhythmic drugs. Results: After a mean follow-up of 9.8±5.1 months, the clinical recurrence rate did not significantly differ between the two groups (log-rank P =0.840). The rate of recurrence as atrial tachycardia ( P >0.999), cardioversion ( P =0.999), and 3-month heart rate variability (high frequency; P =0.506) did not significantly differ. During the final follow-up, sinus rhythm was maintained without antiarrhythmic drugs in 70.5% of the Cryo-PVI group and 73.4% of the HPSD-RFCA group ( P =0.567). No significant difference was found in the major complication rate between the two groups (3.8% versus 0.6%; P =0.066), but total procedure time was significantly shorter in the Cryo-PVI group (78.5±20.2 versus 124.5±37.1 minutes; P <0.001). Conclusions: In patients with paroxysmal AF, the Cryo-PVI is an effective rhythm-control strategy with a shorter procedure time compared with the HPSD-RFCA. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03920917.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document