The Causes of Deindustrialization: The Migration of the Cotton Textile Industry from New England to the South

2002 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 482-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Koistinen
1968 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 624-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars G. Sandberg

The September 1966 issue of this Journal contains a study by Professor Irwin Feller on the rate of adoption of the Draper Automatic Loom in the New England cotton textile industry. I have no quarrel with his central conclusions concerning the economic rationality of the New England cotton manufacturers. I do, however, have some comments on his analysis of the relative costs of producing cloth on plain (power) as opposed to automatic looms.


1932 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 645
Author(s):  
Jonathan Thayer Lincoln ◽  
J. Herbert Burgy

1932 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 321
Author(s):  
W. Elmer Ekblaw ◽  
J. Herbert Burgy

1932 ◽  
Vol 27 (179) ◽  
pp. 346
Author(s):  
George Sinclair Mitchell ◽  
J. Herbert Burgy

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 229-240
Author(s):  
Charles B. Quirk

Summary This article is only a short extract from an interesting study on the employment problems of Rhode Island from 1935-1950; it has as objective to make known to the reader the historical and economic evolution of the textile industry in Rhode Island. The author describes the competition which arose between the North and the South; very unimportant at the beginning, it increased afterwards to take on disastrous proportions and bring about fatal consequences: decrease in productivity, migration of the mills to the South and general unemployment. The history of the textile industry of New England furnishes an example of a system conforming to the "laissez-faire" of free capitalism: the seeking of the highest possible profit without worrying about social responsibility. This system must be subjected to the ethics of business or destroy itself.


1979 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 889-910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela J. Nickless

The analysis of labor and capital productivity in the New England cotton textile industry has been extensive in recent years. The well-preserved records of the early textile firms have provided the basis for major studies by Layer, McGouldrick, Davis and Stettler, Zevin, David, and Williamson. Although these studies vary in approach and focus, they are alike in using measures of labor input that are primarily based on data for mill operatives. The labor productivity indices thus constructed have indicated increasing labor productivity prior to the Civil War. These estimates not only have substantially revised traditional historians' often implied beliefs of falling labor productivity due to declining labor quality in this period, but also have led to a variety of explanations of the relationship between labor productivity, capital productivity, and technological innovation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document