scholarly journals Results of aortic valve repair using decellularized bovine pericardium in congenital surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 986-992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Nordmeyer ◽  
Peter Murin ◽  
Antonia Schulz ◽  
Friederike Danne ◽  
Johannes Nordmeyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Bovine Pericardium ◽  
Aortic Valve Repair ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Congenital Surgery

scholarly journals Aortic Valve Repair Using Decellularized Bovine Pericardium Show Poor Results in Congenital Surgery

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Nordmeyer ◽  
P. Murin ◽  
J. Nordmeyer ◽  
K. Schmitt ◽  
O. Miera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Bovine Pericardium ◽  
Aortic Valve Repair ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Congenital Surgery

scholarly journals Aortic valve repair using bovine pericardium for cusp extension

1988 ◽  
Vol 96 (5) ◽  
pp. 760-764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed R. Al Fagih ◽  
Saad M. Al Kasab ◽  
Abdullah Ashmeg
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Bovine Pericardium ◽  
Aortic Valve Repair ◽  
Valve Repair

Calcification Causing Failure of Tissue Engineered Bovine Pericardium After Aortic Valve Repair

2021 ◽  
pp. 215013512110364
Author(s):  
Aditya A Patukale ◽  
Janene Davies ◽  
Supreet Marathe ◽  
Nelson Alphonso ◽  
Prem Venugopal
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Bovine Pericardium ◽  
Aortic Valve Repair ◽  
Engineering Process ◽  
Valve Repair

CardioCel® is bovine pericardium which is subjected to a novel tissue engineering process (ADAPT®) to reduce cytotoxicity and retard calcification while maintaining strength and elasticity. We present a case where CardioCel® showed rapid degeneration and calcification after repair of an aortic valve.

Aortic Valve Repair of Congenital Stenosis With Bovine Pericardium

1997 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 465-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J Tolan, FRCS(I) ◽  
Piers E Daubeney, MB, BS ◽  
Zdenek Slavik, MD ◽  
Barry R Keeton, FRCP ◽  
Anthony P Salmon, FRCP ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Bovine Pericardium ◽  
Aortic Valve Repair ◽  
Valve Repair

Prevalence of Leaflet Defects during Aortic Valve Repair with Normal and Aneurysmal Aortic Morphology

2015 ◽  
Vol 63 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Weber ◽  
S. Pfeiffer ◽  
D. Mazzitelli ◽  
J. Rankin ◽  
C. Stamm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Repair ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Aortic Morphology

Quadricuspid Aortic Valve Repair Facilitated by Geometric Ring Annuloplasty

2021 ◽  
pp. 155698452110030
Author(s):  
Joseph A. McGuire ◽  
Heather K. Hayanga ◽  
Jeremiah W. Hayanga ◽  
Daniel Sloyer ◽  
Matthew Ellison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Systematic Approach ◽  
Aortic Insufficiency ◽  
Aortic Valve Repair ◽  
Autologous Reconstruction ◽  
Quadricuspid Aortic Valve ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Ring Annuloplasty ◽  
Annular Geometry

Quadricuspid aortic valve (QAV) is a rare congenital anomaly often associated with aortic insufficiency. The exact anatomy of QAV is variable, and most cases have undergone aortic valve replacement. With the recognition that aortic valve repair achieves superior patient outcomes as compared to replacement, a systematic approach to autologous reconstruction of QAV is needed. This article reports 2 cases having successful repair utilizing geometric aortic annuloplasty rings, and describes a proposed scheme for repairing most QAV defects, based on relative leaflet and commissural characteristics. Using either tri-leaflet or bicuspid ring annuloplasty, the normal sub-commissural triangles can be remodeled into a 120° or 180° configuration, respectively, and then the leaflets can be sutured and plicated to fit annular geometry. With this approach, most quadricuspid valves potentially could undergo autologous reconstruction.

scholarly journals Comparison of bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve repair

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Radosław Gocoł ◽  
Jarosław Bis ◽  
Marcin Malinowski ◽  
Joanna Ciosek ◽  
Damian Hudziak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Aortic Valve Repair ◽  
Pericardial Patch ◽  
Valve Regurgitation ◽  
Aortic Valve Regurgitation ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Tricuspid Aortic Valve ◽  
Valve Annulus ◽  
Annulus Diameter

Abstract   OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) and bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) repair. METHODS We assessed mortality, freedom from reoperation and the rate of aortic valve regurgitation recurrence. Mortality in both groups was compared with expected survival, and risk factors for reoperation were identified. RESULTS From January 2010 to April 2020, a total of 368 elective aortic valve repair procedures were performed, including 223 (60.6%) in patients with TAV. The perioperative mortality was 0.7% in the BAV group and 3.6% in the TAV group (P = 0.079). Estimated survival at 5 years in the BAV versus TAV group was 97 ± 3% vs 80 ± 6%, respectively (P < 0.001). Freedom from reoperation at 5 years in the TAV versus BAV group was 96 ± 3% vs 93 ± 4%, respectively (P = 0.28). Grade 2 or more aortic valve regurgitation was noted in 9.9% of BAV patients and 11% of TAV patients (P = 0.66). Reoperation was predicted by cusp perforation [hazard ratio 15.86 (4.44–56.61); P < 0.001], the use of pericardial patch [hazard ratio 8.58 (1.96–37.53); P = 0.004] and aortic valve annulus diameter >27.5 mm [hazard ratio 3.07 (0.99–9.58); P = 0.053]. CONCLUSIONS BAV repair is as durable as TAV repair. BAV is not a predictor of a higher rate of reoperations. BAV repair yields survival comparable to expected. Cusp perforation, aortic valve annulus diameter >27.5 mm and the use of pericardial patch adversely impact long-term outcome of aortic valve repair.

Aortic Valve Repair in Annular Dilatation: External Versus Internal Suture Annuloplasty

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresa Holst ◽  
Johannes Petersen ◽  
Christoph Sinning ◽  
Hermann Reichenspurner ◽  
Evaldas Girdauskas
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Repair ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Annular Dilatation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document