scholarly journals Passive acoustic monitoring effectively detects Northern Spotted Owls and Barred Owls over a range of forest conditions

The Condor ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 122 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leila S Duchac ◽  
Damon B Lesmeister ◽  
Katie M Dugger ◽  
Zachary J Ruff ◽  
Raymond J Davis

Abstract Passive acoustic monitoring using autonomous recording units (ARUs) is a fast-growing area of wildlife research especially for rare, cryptic species that vocalize. Northern Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) populations have been monitored since the mid-1980s using mark–recapture methods. To evaluate an alternative survey method, we used ARUs to detect calls of Northern Spotted Owls and Barred Owls (S. varia), a congener that has expanded its range into the Pacific Northwest and threatens Northern Spotted Owl persistence. We set ARUs at 30 500-ha hexagons (150 ARU stations) with recent Northern Spotted Owl activity and high Barred Owl density within Northern Spotted Owl demographic study areas in Oregon and Washington, and set ARUs to record continuously each night from March to July, 2017. We reviewed spectrograms (visual representations of sound) and tagged target vocalizations to extract calls from ~160,000 hr of recordings. Even in a study area with low occupancy rates on historical territories (Washington’s Olympic Peninsula), the probability of detecting a Northern Spotted Owl when it was present in a hexagon exceeded 0.95 after 3 weeks of recording. Environmental noise, mainly from rain, wind, and streams, decreased detection probabilities for both species over all study areas. Using demographic information about known Northern Spotted Owls, we found that weekly detection probabilities of Northern Spotted Owls were higher when ARUs were closer to known nests and activity centers and when owls were paired, suggesting passive acoustic data alone could help locate Northern Spotted Owl pairs on the landscape. These results demonstrate that ARUs can effectively detect Northern Spotted Owls when they are present, even in a landscape with high Barred Owl density, thereby facilitating the use of passive, occupancy-based study designs to monitor Northern Spotted Owl populations.

The Condor ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 121 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna O Mangan ◽  
Tara Chestnut ◽  
Jody C Vogeler ◽  
Ian K Breckheimer ◽  
Wendy M King ◽  
...  

Abstract Protected lands like national parks are important refuges for threatened and endangered species as environmental pressures on wildlife and their habitats increase. The Northern Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis caurina), a species designated as threatened under the Endangered Species Act, occurs on public lands throughout the western United States including Mount Rainier National Park (MRNP), Washington. With virtually no history of timber harvest or large forest disturbance within MRNP boundaries since the park’s creation in 1899, MRNP provides an ideal place to evaluate potential impacts of climate change and invasive Barred Owls (Strix varia) on the Northern Spotted Owl. We used a multi-state, multi-season occupancy model to investigate how Northern Spotted Owl occupancy dynamics and breeding propensity are related to the presence of Barred Owls, local and regional weather, and habitat characteristics at MRNP from 1997 to 2016. Historical occupancy of Northern Spotted Owl breeding territories in MRNP has declined by 50% in the last 20 yr, and territory occupancy by breeding Northern Spotted Owls also decreased, reaching a low of 25% in 2016. Occupancy rates were higher on territories with steeper terrain and breeding rates were lower when Barred Owls were detected within historical territories. Our results also indicated that breeding propensity was higher when early nesting season temperatures during March and April were higher. In addition, the ability to detect breeding Northern Spotted Owls decreased when Barred Owls were present in the territory. Habitat variables from LiDAR were not correlated with Northern Spotted Owl occupancy dynamics, likely reflecting the dominance of old-growth forest in this protected park. This study illustrates the strong relationship between Barred Owls and Northern Spotted Owl demographics and breeding site selection in a landscape where habitat loss by timber harvest and fire has not occurred.


The Condor ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (4) ◽  
pp. 760-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle L. Crozier ◽  
Mark E. Seamans ◽  
R. J. GutiÉRrez ◽  
Peter J. Loschl ◽  
Robert B. Horn ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract Barred Owls (Strix varia) have expanded their range throughout the ranges of Northern (Strix occidentalis caurina) and California Spotted Owls (S. o. occidentalis). Field observations have suggested that Barred Owls may be behaviorally dominant to Spotted Owls. Therefore, we conducted a test of behavioral dominance by assessing responsiveness of Spotted Owls to conspecific calls when they were in the simulated presence (i.e., imitation of Barred Owl vocalizations) of a Barred Owl. We hypothesized that Spotted Owls would be less likely to respond to conspecific calls in areas where Barred Owls were common. We used a binary 2 × 2 crossover experimental design to examine male Spotted Owl responses at 10 territories randomly selected within two study areas that differed in abundance of Barred Owls. We also conducted a quasi experiment at four study areas using response data from any Spotted Owl (male or female) detected following exposure to Barred Owl calls. We inferred from the crossover experiment that the simulated presence of a Barred Owl might negatively affect Spotted Owl responsiveness. Both subspecies of Spotted Owl responded less to Spotted Owl calls after exposure to Barred Owl calls, Northern Spotted Owls responded less frequently in areas having higher numbers of Barred Owls, and California Spotted Owls responded less frequently than Northern Spotted Owls overall.


Author(s):  
Alexander Bruckner ◽  
Lisa Greis

Detectors for the passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) of bats have become invaluable research tools, especially for surveys, monitoring programs and environmental impact assessments. However, little is known about the small-scale (within-site) variability of PAM recordings and especially about the influence of detector identity and distance, and of microphone orientation on the statistical confidence of activity estimates and species detection probabilities. We recorded vocalizations in a homogeneous meadow with no trees, bushes or tall ground vegetation. Eight detector pairs were arranged in an octagon, the two detectors of a pair facing in opposite directions. The call sequences of eight species were analyzed. The deviations of individual detectors from the overall mean were generally small, but large outliers occurred both at the file (temporal resolution: five seconds) and the night (resolution: one night) scale. All devices detected the main temporal patterns of calling activity in the study period, but three devices deviated systematically from the others and the sensitivity of two devices deteriorated over time. Detector orientation and distance were significant, yet small, sources of variability. The probability of detecting the presence of species correlated with species’ activity and ranged on average from 100 % for bats in total to only 18.8 % for the least active Myotis myotis. The sample sizes necessary to achieve 90 % statistical confidence of activity estimates ranged from 7 to 16 detectors and from 5 to 12 nights, depending on taxon. Increasing the number of nights resulted in much higher confidence than increasing the number of detectors. We recommend PAM studies of bats to frequently calibrate detector sensitivity; deploying at least three detectors per study site; sampling longer periods instead of deploying more detectors; randomly assigning and swapping detectors among sites, treatments, strata, etc.; and statistically scrutinizing the sample data, especially for outliers.


The Auk ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 121 (3) ◽  
pp. 806-810
Author(s):  
Elizabeth G. Kelly ◽  
Eric D. Forsman

Abstract We summarized records of hybridization between Barred Owls (Strix varia) and Northern Spotted Owls (S. occidentalis caurina) in Washington and Oregon through 1999. A total of 47 hybrids were observed, including 17 F1s that were first detected as adults, 4 F1s that were banded as juveniles and subsequently recaptured as adults, 10 F1 juveniles, and 16 F2 juveniles. All confirmed cases of hybridization between Barred and Spotted owls involved male Spotted Owls paired with female Barred Owls. Ten F1 hybrids that backcrossed with Barred Owls produced a total of 15 young; 6 F1 hybrids that backcrossed with Spotted Owls produced only 1 young. Those differences may indicate that some combinations of sex and species are more compatible or more fertile than others, but more documentation is needed. Because F2 hybrids and subsequent generations are difficult to distinguish in the field from Barred or Spotted owls, genetic comparisons of blood or tissue samples may be needed to identify hybrids beyond the first generation. The small number of F1 hybrids detected during many years of extensive banding studies of Spotted Owls suggests that the isolating mechanisms that separate Barred and Spotted owls are normally sufficient to avoid hybridization between them. Direct competition between the two species for food and space is probably a much more serious threat to the Spotted Owl than hybridization.


2021 ◽  
pp. e01710
Author(s):  
Dana S. Reid ◽  
Connor M. Wood ◽  
Sheila A. Whitmore ◽  
William J. Berigan ◽  
John J. Keane ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document