scholarly journals Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance coexisting in patients undergoing kidney transplantation does not adversely influence post-graft clinical outcome

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta Clari ◽  
Corrado Tarella ◽  
Roberta Giraudi ◽  
Maria Cristina Torazza ◽  
Ester Gallo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Graft Survival ◽  
Monoclonal Gammopathy ◽  
Patient Survival ◽  
Diagnostic Procedures ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Patient Death ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage ◽  
Undetermined Significance

Abstract Background Management of patients with oncohaematological disorders such as monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is a frequent problem in pre-transplant work-up. Insights on disease progression and long-term functional outcomes are still lacking in this setting. Methods This was a retrospective analysis on all patients with MGUS who underwent kidney transplant (KT) at our centre between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2017 (cases, n = 65). Patients were matched with a control group (KTs with similar characteristics but without history of haematological disease, controls, n = 1079). Primary endpoints were graft and patient survival; secondary endpoints were causes of graft failure, patient death, occurrence of allograft rejection, post-transplant neoplasia (not correlated to previous disorder) and/or infectious episodes. Results The MGUS and control groups had a similar mean age [60 (29–79) versus 55.2 (19.3–79.5) years, respectively] and percentage of males (69.2% versus 64.6%, respectively). Median follow-up time since KT was 3.5 years (0–14) in cases and 8.3 years (0–14.9) in controls. All MGUS patients underwent KT following extensive multidiscliplinary investigations. No differences were found between cases and controls regarding patient and graft survival or post-transplant complications except for lower incidence of infections (58.7% versus 69.8%, P = 0.019) and increased use of mTOR inhbitors (30.3% versus 14.7%, P = 0.001) in MGUS. MGUS isotype did not influence graft and patient survival. The absence of difference in patients and graft survival was also confirmed in an adjunctive analysis where MGUS were compared with controls (ratio 1:2) matched for recipient age, gender, number of transplantations and transplant period. Conclusion Patients with MGUS may undergo KT without significantly increased risks of complications, provided that appropriate diagnostic procedures are carefully followed. Multidiscipline-based studies are crucial for establishing well designed pre- and post-transplant protocols for the best management of patients with coexisting MGUS and end-stage renal disease.

Kidney transplantation in the extremely elderly from extremely aged deceased donors: a kidney for each age

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 687-696
Author(s):  
Jimena Cabrera ◽  
Mario Fernández-Ruiz ◽  
Hernando Trujillo ◽  
Esther González ◽  
María Molina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Graft Survival ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Patient Survival ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Allocation Policy ◽  
Recipient Age ◽  
Deceased Donors ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

Abstract Background Advances in life expectancy have led to an increase in the number of elderly people with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Scarce information is available on the outcomes of kidney transplantation (KT) in extremely elderly patients based on an allocation policy prioritizing donor–recipient age matching. Methods We included recipients ≥75 years that underwent KT from similarly aged deceased donors at our institution between 2002 and 2015. Determinants of death-censored graft and patient survival were assessed by Cox regression. Results We included 138 recipients with a median follow-up of 38.8 months. Median (interquartile range) age of recipients and donors was 77.5 (76.3–79.7) and 77.0 years (74.7–79.0), with 22.5% of donors ≥80 years. Primary graft non-function occurred in 8.0% (11/138) of patients. Cumulative incidence rates for post-transplant infection and biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) were 70.3% (97/138) and 15.2% (21/138), respectively. One- and 5-year patient survival were 82.1 and 60.1%, respectively, whereas the corresponding rates for death-censored graft survival were 95.6 and 93.1%. Infection was the leading cause of death (46.0% of fatal cases). The occurrence of BPAR was associated with lower 1-year patient survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.64–10.82; P = 0.003]. Diabetic nephropathy was the only factor predicting 5-year death-censored graft survival (HR = 4.82, 95% CI 1.08–21.56; P = 0.040). Conclusions ESRD patients ≥75 years can access KT and remain dialysis free for their remaining lifespan by using grafts from extremely aged deceased donors, yielding encouraging results in terms of recipient and graft survival.

scholarly journals Risk-Adjusted Analysis of Relevant Outcome Drivers for Patients after More Than Two Kidney Transplants

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lampros Kousoulas ◽  
Florian W. R. Vondran ◽  
Paulina Syryca ◽  
Juergen Klempnauer ◽  
Harald Schrem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Transplantation ◽  
Graft Survival ◽  
Patient Survival ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Graft Loss ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Adjusted Analysis ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

Renal transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients suffering end-stage renal disease, but as the long-term renal allograft survival is limited, most transplant recipients will face graft loss and will be considered for a retransplantation. The goal of this study was to evaluate the patient and graft survival of the 61 renal transplant recipients after second or subsequent renal transplantation, transplanted in our institution between 1990 and 2010, and to identify risk factors related to inferior outcomes. Actuarial patient survival was 98.3%, 94.8%, and 88.2% after one, three, and five years, respectively. Actuarial graft survival was 86.8%, 80%, and 78.1% after one, three, and five years, respectively. Risk-adjusted analysis revealed that only age at the time of last transplantation had a significant influence on patient survival, whereas graft survival was influenced by multiple immunological and surgical factors, such as the number of HLA mismatches, the type of immunosuppression, the number of surgical complications, need of reoperation, primary graft nonfunction, and acute rejection episodes. In conclusion, third and subsequent renal transplantation constitute a valid therapeutic option, but inferior outcomes should be expected among elderly patients, hyperimmunized recipients, and recipients with multiple operations at the site of last renal transplantation.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Kidney Transplant Recipients with Sickle Cell Disease: An Analysis of the 2000–2019 UNOS/OPTN Database

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (14) ◽  
pp. 3063
Author(s):  
Napat Leeaphorn ◽  
Charat Thongprayoon ◽  
Pradeep Vaitla ◽  
Panupong Hansrivijit ◽  
Caroline C. Jadlowiec ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Survival ◽  
Patient Survival ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Cell Disease ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Allograft Survival ◽  
End Stage Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Recipients ◽  
End Stage

Background: Lower patient survival has been observed in sickle cell disease (SCD) patients who go on to receive a kidney transplant. This study aimed to assess the post-transplant outcomes of SCD kidney transplant recipients in the contemporary era. Methods: We used the OPTN/UNOS database to identify first-time kidney transplant recipients from 2010 through 2019. We compared patient and allograft survival between recipients with SCD (n = 105) vs. all other diagnoses (non-SCD, n = 146,325) as the reported cause of end-stage kidney disease. We examined whether post-transplant outcomes improved among SCD in the recent era (2010–2019), compared to the early era (2000–2009). Results: After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics, SCD was significantly associated with lower patient survival (HR 2.87; 95% CI 1.75–4.68) and death-censored graft survival (HR 1.98; 95% CI 1.30–3.01), compared to non-SCD recipients. The lower patient survival and death-censored graft survival in SCD recipients were consistently observed in comparison to outcomes of recipients with diabetes, glomerular disease, and hypertension as the cause of end-stage kidney disease. There was no significant difference in death censored graft survival (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.51–1.73, p = 0.98) and patient survival (HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.50–1.74, p = 0.82) of SCD recipients in the recent versus early era. Conclusions: Patient and allograft survival in SCD kidney recipients were worse than recipients with other diagnoses. Overall SCD patient and allograft outcomes in the recent era did not improve from the early era. The findings of our study should not discourage kidney transplantation for ESKD patients with SCD due to a known survival benefit of transplantation compared with remaining on dialysis. Urgent future studies are needed to identify strategies to improve patient and allograft survival in SCD kidney recipients. In addition, it may be reasonable to assign risk adjustment for SCD patients.

The role of VEGF rs699947 polymorphism in End-Stage Renal Disease: A preliminary study

2021 ◽  
pp. 19-23
Keyword(s):  
Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage Renal Disease ◽  
Protective Factor ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Turkish Population ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Case Group ◽  
Important Public Health Problem ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

Aim: End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) is an important public health problem worldwide with an increasing incidence and prevalence. There are many environmental and genetic factors which contribute to the development of ESRD. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been suggested to play an important role in renal pathophysiology. The aim of this study was to determine the probable relation between ESRD and VEGF gene rs699947 polymorphism in Turkish population. Material and Method: Genotyping of rs699947 was carried out in 50 ESRD patients on dialysis treatment and 30 healthy controls, using a Kompetitive Allelic-Specific PCR (KASP) method following DNA isolation. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were recorded. Results: The prevalance of rs699947 AA genotype was found to be higher in the control group, but it was not statistically significant (p>0.05) . Conclusion: Although statistically insignificant, the frequency of AA genotype was higher in the control group compared to the case group, therefore we concluded that AA genotype may be a protective factor for ESRD in Turkish population. However, this conclusion needs to be further verified by future studies performed in larger study groups.

Renal Transplantation in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Comparison of Graft Survival With Other Causes of End-stage Renal Disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 140-145
Author(s):  
Gabriel Horta-Baas ◽  
Adolfo Camargo-Coronel ◽  
Dafhne Guadalupe Miranda-Hernández ◽  
Leslie Gabriela Gónzalez-Parra ◽  
María del Socorro Romero-Figueroa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Renal Transplantation ◽  
Renal Disease ◽  
Graft Survival ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
End Stage Renal Disease ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

scholarly journals Hemodialysis-Related Lymphomononuclear Release of Interleukin-12 in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease

1999 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 2171-2176 ◽  
Author(s):  
BRUNO MEMOLI ◽  
LUIGI MARZANO ◽  
VINCENZO BISESTI ◽  
MICHELE ANDREUCCI ◽  
BRUNA GUIDA
Keyword(s):  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Interferon Γ ◽  
Interleukin 12 ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear ◽  
Mitogen Stimulation ◽  
Ifn Γ ◽  
Uremic Patients ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

Abstract. Interleukin-12 (IL-12) is a cytokine produced by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) that causes interferon-γ (IFN-γ) production and enhancement of cell-mediated cytotoxicity. To clarify the role of hemodialysis biocompatibility on IL-12 production and uremic immunodeficiency, we have studied the IL-12 and IFN-γ release by PBMC harvested from 12 patients dialyzed with cuprophan membrane (CU), eight patients dialyzed with polymethylmethacrylate membrane (PMMA), and eight nondialyzed uremic patients (UR). Ten healthy subjects constituted the control group (CON). PBMC were cultured for 48 h with and without nonspecific mitogen stimulation. In unstimulated conditions, CU showed an IL-12 PBMC production higher than CON, UR, and PMMA (46.67 ± 30.13versus2.56 ± 1.38, 6.16 ± 7.09, and 4.62 ± 4.76 pg/ml, respectively;P< 0.01). IL-12 production was correlated with C3a concentration measured at the outlet of hemodialyzer after 15 min of dialysis (r= 0.69,P< 0.01). IL-12 release in CU remained unchanged under mitogen stimulation (44.34 ± 23.86 pg/ml) and was lower than in CON, UR, and PMMA (66.0 ± 12.41, 68.37 ± 25.78, and 67.75 ± 22.61 pg/ml, respectively;P< 0.05). IFN-γ production was similar, in unstimulated conditions, in all groups. Under stimulation, IFN-γ release was lower in CU (13.42 ± 12.04 IU/ml) than in CON, UR, and PMMA (51.84 ± 30.74, 32.16 ± 13.86, and 32.16 ± 13.86 IU/ml, respectively;P< 0.01). These results demonstrate that hemodialysis with CU induces monocyte activation with an enhanced release of IL-12. On the contrary, stimulated PBMC production of both IL-12 and IFN-γ is lower in these patients than in CON, UR, and PMMA. The altered release of these cytokines could play a role in cell-mediated immunodeficiency of the uremic patients dialyzed with CU.

scholarly journals Analysis of Endocan Levels in Hypertensive Patients as Risk Factors of Chronic Kidney Disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suryani Jamal ◽  
Uleng Bahrun ◽  
Ibrahim Abdul Samad ◽  
Fitriani Mangarengi ◽  
Hasyim Kasim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage Renal Disease ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Elisa Method ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

This study aimed to analyze endocan levels as a marker of endothelial dysfunction in the control group, patients withstage I hypertension, stage II hypertension, and patients with end-stage renal disease. Endocan levels were measured withESM-1 (endocan) kit by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) method. This study used a cross-sectional methodand was conducted in Dr. Wahidin Sudirohusodo Hospital, Makassar and Hasanuddin University Hospital from Septemberto October 2017. There were 83 samples in this study, consisting of 12 samples in the control group, 22 samples of stage Ihypertension, 28 samples of stage II hypertension, and 21 samples of end-stage renal disease aged 20-90 years old. Thisstudy showed significantly higher endocan levels in patients with stage II hypertension and end-stage renal disease(p< 0.05). Endocan levels were significantly higher (p<0.05) in patients with end-stage renal disease compared with thecontrol group and patients with stage I hypertension; but not significantly higher (p > 0.05) compared to patients with stageII hypertension. Also, the median of endocan levels in patients with the end-stage renal disease was higher (309,850 ng/L)compared to patients with stage II hypertension (273,050 ng/L).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document