The Impact of Antibiotic Stewardship Program Resources on Infection Prevention Programs

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 552-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan C Bleasdale ◽  
Marsha Barnden ◽  
Sue Barnes
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Professional Organizations ◽  
Physician Leadership ◽  
Regulatory Requirements ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Resource Requirements ◽  
Leadership Structure ◽  
Similar Resource ◽  
The Impact

AbstractDoernberg and colleagues describe the role and resourcing of the infectious disease (ID) physician for an effective hospital-based antibiotic stewardship program (ASP). There are similar resource requirements for the ID physician leader in an effective infection prevention (IP) program. This ID physician partnership is supported by professional organizations and predates the imperative of ID physician leadership in ASP. There are regulatory requirements for established IP programs, but they do not specify leadership structure to the same degree as ASP regulations. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid and The Joint Commission have specified the inclusion of an ID-trained physician leader in ASP, and this has led to the development of curriculum to train more ASP physicians. More robust advocacy may ensure a similar regulatory mandate supporting the participation of ID-trained physicians in IP programs. This may encourage the development of a curriculum to meet the workforce.

scholarly journals Effect of Removing Contact Precautions for Multidrug-Resistant Organisms on Hospital Infections in a Pediatric Health System

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s199-s200
Author(s):  
Matthew Linam ◽  
Dorian Hoskins ◽  
Preeti Jaggi ◽  
Mark Gonzalez ◽  
Renee Watson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Contact Precautions ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
The Impact

Background: Discontinuation of contact precautions for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) have failed to show an increase in associated transmission or infections in adult healthcare settings. Pediatric experience is limited. Objective: We evaluated the impact of discontinuing contact precautions for MRSA, VRE, and extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing gram-negative bacilli (ESBLs) on device-associated healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Methods: In October 2018, contact precautions were discontinued for children with MRSA, VRE, and ESBLs in a large, tertiary-care pediatric healthcare system comprising 2 hospitals and 620 beds. Coincident interventions that potentially reduced HAIs included blood culture diagnostic stewardship (June 2018), a hand hygiene education initiative (July 2018), a handshake antibiotic stewardship program (December 2018) and multidisciplinary infection prevention rounding in the intensive care units (November 2018). Compliance with hand hygiene and HAI prevention bundles were monitored. Device-associated HAIs were identified using standard definitions. Annotated run charts were used to track the impact of interventions on changes in device-associated HAIs over time. Results: Average hand hygiene compliance was 91%. Compliance with HAI prevention bundles was 81% for ventilator-associated pneumonias, 90% for catheter-associated urinary tract infections, and 97% for central-line–associated bloodstream infections. Overall, device-associated HAIs decreased from 6.04 per 10,000 patient days to 3.25 per 10,000 patient days after October 2018 (Fig. 1). Prior to October 2018, MRSA, VRE and ESBLs accounted for 10% of device-associated HAIs. This rate decreased to 5% after October 2018. The decrease in HAIs was likely related to interventions such as infection prevention rounds and handshake stewardship. Conclusions: Discontinuation of contact precautions for children with MRSA, VRE, and ESBLs were not associated with increased device-associated HAIs, and such discontinuation is likely safe in the setting of robust infection prevention and antibiotic stewardship programs.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

The impact of a multimodel approach to designing a new orthopedic department

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Elad Keren ◽  
Abraham Borer ◽  
Lior Nesher ◽  
Tali Shafat ◽  
Rivka Yosipovich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Prevention Measures ◽  
Orthopedic Department ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Objective: To determine whether a multifaceted approach effectively influenced antibiotic use in an orthopedics department. Design: Retrospective cohort study comparing the readmission rate and antibiotic use before and after an intervention. Setting: A 1,000-bed, tertiary-care, university hospital. Patients: Adult patients admitted to the orthopedics department between January 2015 and December 2018. Methods: During the preintervention period (2015–2016), 1 general orthopedic department was in operation. In the postintervention period (2017–2018), 2 separate departments were created: one designated for elective “clean” surgeries and another that included a “complicated wound” unit. A multifaceted strategy including infection prevention measures and introducing antibiotic stewardship practices was implemented. Admission rates, hand hygiene practice compliance, surgical site infections, and antibiotic treatment before versus after the intervention were analyzed. Results: The number of admissions and hospitalization days in the 2 periods did not change. Seven-day readmissions per annual quarter decreased significantly from the preintervention period (median, 7 days; interquartile range [IQR], 6–9) to the postintervention period (median, 4 days; IQR, 2–7; P = .038). Hand hygiene compliance increased and surgical site infections decreased in the postintervention period. Although total antibiotic use was not reduced, there was a significant change in the breakdown of the different antibiotic classes used before and after the intervention: increased use of narrow-spectrum β-lactams (P < .001) and decreased use of β-lactamase inhibitors (P < .001), third-generation cephalosporins (P = .044), and clindamycin (P < .001). Conclusions: Restructuring the orthopedics department facilitated better infection prevention measures accompanied by antibiotic stewardship implementation, resulting in a decreased use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and a significant reduction in readmission rates.

scholarly journals Impact of an Antibiotic Stewardship Program in Long-term Care Facilities: A Nursing Home Network Experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S63-S63
Author(s):  
Fabian Andres Romero ◽  
Evette Mathews ◽  
Ara Flores ◽  
Susan Seo
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) implementation is paramount across the healthcare spectrum. Nursing homes represent a challenge due to limited resources, complexity of medical conditions, and less controlled environments. National statistics on ASP for long-term care facilities (LTCF) are sparse. Methods A pilot ASP was launched in August 2016 at a 270-bed nursing home with a 50-bed chronic ventilator-dependent unit. The program entailed a bundle of interventions including leadership engagement, a tracking and reporting system for intravenous antibiotics, education for caregivers, Infectious Disease (ID) consultant availability, and implementation of nursing protocols. Data were collected from pharmacy and medical records between January 2016 and March 2017, establishing pre-intervention and post-intervention periods. Collected data included days of therapy (DOT), antibiotic costs, resident-days, hospital transfers, and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) rates. Variables were adjusted to 1,000 resident-days (RD) and findings between periods were compared by Mann–Whitney U test. Results A total of 47,423 resident-days and 1,959 DOT were analyzed for this study. Antibiotic use decreased from 54.5 DOT/1000 RD pre-intervention to 27.6 DOT/1000 RD post-intervention (P = 0.017). Antibiotic costs were reduced from a monthly median of US $17,113 to US $7,073 but was not statistically significant (P = 0.39). Analysis stratified by individual antibiotic was done for the five most commonly used antibiotics and found statistically significant reduction in vancomycin use (14.4 vs. 6.5; P = 0.023). Reduction was also found for cefepime/ceftazidime (6.9 vs. 1.3; P = 0.07), ertapenem (6.8 vs. 3.6; P = 0.45), and piperacillin/tazobactam (1.8 vs. 0.6; P = 0.38). Meropenem use increased (1.3 vs. 3.2; P = 0.042). Hospital transfers slightly trended up (6.73 vs. 7.77; P = 0.065), and there was no change in CDI (1.1 s 0.94; P = 0.32). Conclusion A bundle of standardized interventions tailored for LTCF can achieve successful reduction of antibiotic utilization and costs. Subsequent studies are needed to further determine the impact on clinical outcomes such as transfers to hospitals and CDI in these settings. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Leading from the top: Evaluation and impact of an educational programme for Directors of Infection Prevention and Control (DIPC) within the Independent Healthcare Sector (IS)

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 302-309
Author(s):  
Sue Millward
Keyword(s):  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Educational Programme ◽  
Healthcare Sector ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Healthcare Organisation ◽  
Regulatory Requirements ◽  
The Uk ◽  
And Control ◽  
The Impact

Background: The Director of Infection Prevention and Control (DIPC) role was introduced into the UK in 2003 to address the need for effective leadership within Infection Prevention (IP). The role was embedded in English legislation in 2008. In one Independent healthcare organisation (with 31 acute hospitals spread geographically across the UK), the DIPC role is held by the hospital matron (known as Director of Nursing in the NHS), who influence resource allocation and ensure infection prevention is prioritised. A knowledge gap in microbiology, standard precautions and infection prevention regulatory requirements was identified and as there was no educational provision for this role, an accredited programme was developed. Twenty-five matrons completed the DIPC programme. Aims: Evaluate the impact of a DIPC educational programme on the delivery of IP services. Methodology: A post-course qualitative retrospective survey using open-ended questions was used to collect data from DIPCs who had completed the programme. Inductive thematic and content analysis methods were used to identify key themes from survey responses. Results: Out of 20 DIPCs, 16 completed the survey. Key findings included improvements in knowledge related to microbiology, IP and regulatory requirements of the DIPC role. DIPCs reported changes to service delivery including appointment of six IP nurses, improved surveillance processes, reduced infections and improved cleanliness standards. This small study demonstrates the impact of an educational programme for DIPCs who felt more empowered to manage the IP services effectively, resulting in improved patient safety through reduced infections.

scholarly journals 50. Impact of Antibiotic Stewardship Interventions on Colistin Use and Acinetobacter Resistance

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S145-S145
Author(s):  
Khalid Eljaaly
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Antibiotic Consumption ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Consultant Physician ◽  
Acinetobacter Spp ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Before And After Study

Abstract Background Our hospital had a widespread use of colistin and tigecycline, and very high resistance of Acinetobacter Spp. to colistin. The hospital did not have any infectious disease (ID) pharmacist and had only one ID consultant physician. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of our intervention on the utilization of colistin and tigecycline and resistance of Acinetobacter Spp. Methods This was a before an observational before-and-after study at a tertiary medical center. An ID pharmacist trained in antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) was invited by a tertiary hospital to help create an ASP. The hospital also hired four ID assistant consultants to help the primary ID consultant and pharmacists. The ASP started by restriction of colistin and tigecycline. The study outcomes were antibiotic consumption and resistance of Acinetobacter spp. Results Colistin utilization decreased by 60%, and the resistance of Acinetobacter spp. to colistin significantly decreased from 31% to 3% in a year. In addition, tigecycline utilization decreased by 46%. On the other hand, there were no significant changes in carbapenem utilization and resistance, which could be explained by switching from colistin and tigecycline to carbapenems. Conclusion Adding an ID pharmacist and ID assistant consultants to the ASP team, and the strict restriction of colistin use was associated with significant reduction in colistin use and Acinetobacter resistance. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Current infection prevention and antibiotic stewardship program practices: A survey of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) Research Network (SRN)

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 1046-1049
Author(s):  
Kathleen Chiotos ◽  
Clare Rock ◽  
Marin L. Schweizer ◽  
Valerie M. Deloney ◽  
Daniel J. Morgan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Current Infection ◽  
Healthcare Epidemiology ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

AbstractWe used a survey to characterize contemporary infection prevention and antibiotic stewardship program practices across 64 healthcare facilities, and we compared these findings to those of a similar 2013 survey. Notable findings include decreased frequency of active surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, frequent active surveillance for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, and increased support for antibiotic stewardship programs.

scholarly journals Impact of a Multimodal Antimicrobial Stewardship Program onPseudomonas aeruginosaSusceptibility and Antimicrobial Use in the Intensive Care Unit Setting

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas Slain ◽  
Arif R. Sarwari ◽  
Karen O. Petros ◽  
Richard L. McKnight ◽  
Renee B. Sager ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Resistance Rate ◽  
Defined Daily Doses ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Resistance Patterns ◽  
The Impact

Objective. To study the impact of our multimodal antibiotic stewardship program onPseudomonas aeruginosasusceptibility and antibiotic use in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting.Methods. Our stewardship program employed the key tenants of published antimicrobial stewardship guidelines. These included prospective audits with intervention and feedback, formulary restriction with preauthorization, educational conferences, guidelines for use, antimicrobial cycling, and de-escalation of therapy. ICU antibiotic use was measured and expressed as defined daily doses (DDD) per 1,000 patient-days.Results. Certain temporal relationships between antibiotic use and ICU resistance patterns appeared to be affected by our antibiotic stewardship program. In particular, the ICU use of intravenous ciprofloxacin and ceftazidime declined from 148 and 62.5 DDD/1,000 patient-days to 40.0 and 24.5, respectively, during 2004 to 2007. An increase in the use of these agents and resistance to these agents was witnessed during 2008–2010. Despite variability in antibiotic usage from the stewardship efforts, we were overall unable to show statistical relationships withP. aeruginosaresistance rate.Conclusion. Antibiotic resistance in the ICU setting is complex. Multimodal stewardship efforts attempt to prevent resistance, but such programs clearly have their limits.

Regulatory and sustainability initiatives lead to improved polyaminopolyamide epichlorohydrin (PAE) wet-strength resins and paper products

TAPPI Journal ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (09) ◽  
pp. 519-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Crisp ◽  
Richard Riehle
Keyword(s):  
Health And Safety ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Worker Safety ◽  
Regulatory Requirements ◽  
Wet Strength ◽  
The Past ◽  
Consumer Safety ◽  
Federal Institute ◽  
Sustainability Initiatives ◽  
The Impact

Polyaminopolyamide-epichlorohydrin (PAE) resins are the predominant commercial products used to manufacture wet-strengthened paper products for grades requiring wet-strength permanence. Since their development in the late 1950s, the first generation (G1) resins have proven to be one of the most cost-effective technologies available to provide wet strength to paper. Throughout the past three decades, regulatory directives and sustainability initiatives from various organizations have driven the development of cleaner and safer PAE resins and paper products. Early efforts in this area focused on improving worker safety and reducing the impact of PAE resins on the environment. These efforts led to the development of resins containing significantly reduced levels of 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol (1,3-DCP) and 3-monochloropropane-1,2-diol (3-MCPD), potentially carcinogenic byproducts formed during the manufacturing process of PAE resins. As the levels of these byproducts decreased, the environmental, health, and safety (EH&S) profile of PAE resins and paper products improved. Recent initiatives from major retailers are focusing on product ingredient transparency and quality, thus encouraging the development of safer product formulations while maintaining performance. PAE resin research over the past 20 years has been directed toward regulatory requirements to improve consumer safety and minimize exposure to potentially carcinogenic materials found in various paper products. One of the best known regulatory requirements is the recommendations of the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), which defines the levels of 1,3-DCP and 3-MCPD that can be extracted by water from various food contact grades of paper. These criteria led to the development of third generation (G3) products that contain very low levels of 1,3-DCP (typically <10 parts per million in the as-received/delivered resin). This paper outlines the PAE resin chemical contributors to adsorbable organic halogens and 3-MCPD in paper and provides recommendations for the use of each PAE resin product generation (G1, G1.5, G2, G2.5, and G3).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document