scholarly journals Identifying Best Practices Across Three Countries: Hospital Antimicrobial Stewardship in the United Kingdom, France, and the United States

2014 ◽  
Vol 59 (suppl_3) ◽  
pp. S170-S178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kavita K. Trivedi ◽  
Catherine Dumartin ◽  
Mark Gilchrist ◽  
Paul Wade ◽  
Philip Howard
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
The United States ◽  
The United Kingdom

Immigration Policy and the Global Competition for AI Talent

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tina Huang ◽  
Zachary Arnold
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Immigration Policy ◽  
The United States ◽  
Immigration Policies ◽  
Global Competition ◽  
The United Kingdom

Current immigration policies may undermine the historic strength of the United States in attracting and retaining international AI talent. This report examines the immigration policies of four U.S. economic competitor nations—the United Kingdom, Canada, France, and Australia—to offer best practices for ensuring future AI competitiveness.

scholarly journals A Comparative Discussion of the Judicial Disqualification of Directors under the South African Companies Act

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Rehana Cassim
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
South African ◽  
United States Of America ◽  
The United States ◽  
The South ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Locus Standi

Abstract Section 162 of the South African Companies Act 71 of 2008 empowers courts to declare directors delinquent and hence to disqualify them from office. This article compares the judicial disqualification of directors under this section with the equivalent provisions in the United Kingdom, Australia and the United States of America, which have all influenced the South African act. The article compares the classes of persons who have locus standi to apply to court to disqualify a director from holding office, as well as the grounds for the judicial disqualification of a director, the duration of the disqualification, the application of a prescription period and the discretion conferred on courts to disqualify directors from office. It contends that, in empowering courts to disqualify directors from holding office, section 162 of the South African Companies Act goes too far in certain respects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document