Bounded Rationality and Economic Diplomacy: The Politics of Investment Treaties in Developing Countries. By Lauge N. Skovgaard Poulsen

2017 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 295-297
Author(s):  
Mavluda Sattorova
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 237802312096934
Author(s):  
Nina Bandelj ◽  
Aaron Tester

Developing countries adopt global policies in their quest for economic development. Studies show that such policies are decoupled from their intended effects, or that over time, they become more effective. But what if the opposite happens and policies, which were initially efficacious, become increasingly decoupled with time? We recognize this phenomenon as amplified decoupling. Combining historical and quantitative analysis, we examine a case of bilateral investment treaties (BITs), established to protect and promote foreign direct investment (FDI). The influence of BITs on FDI is significant in the early periods but becomes weaker over time. Historical analysis reveals the unexpected role of (post)communist countries in using BITs for geopolitical purposes and highlight the impact of international organizations which broker treaty signing among pairs of developing countries engaged in economic diplomacy. We suggest that amplified decoupling can result because of institutional multivalence, whereby practical actors reframe and repurpose policies toward uses that were originally unintended.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Terence K. Teo ◽  

In contrast to the substantial scholarship on whether bilateral investment treaties (BITs) increase foreign direct investment (FDI), there is less work on what drives governments to sign these treaties in the first place. I develop a theory of treaty signing that emphasizes the domestic factors that motivate a government to sign BITs. Using a panel dataset of developing countries from 1960 to 2010, I find that governments scarce in natural resources are more likely to sign BITs compared to their richer counterparts. In addition, governments with middle levels of property rights are more likely to sign BITs compared to those with low or high levels. Finally, the most likely BIT signers are resource-scarce countries with middle levels of property rights. That strategic dynamics exist in BIT signing has implications for assessing the effects of these treaties in other issue areas such as trade, human rights, and the environment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document