scholarly journals Correlates of sleep-onset REM periods during the Multiple Sleep Latency Test in community adults

Brain ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 129 (6) ◽  
pp. 1609-1623 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Mignot
Keyword(s):  
Sleep Latency ◽  
Sleep Onset ◽  
Multiple Sleep Latency Test ◽  
Multiple Sleep Latency

scholarly journals 1253 Multiple sleep onset REM episodes in middle age woman with excessive daytime sleepiness – Is this automatically assumed narcolepsy?

SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A477-A477
Author(s):  
Kamal Patel ◽  
Bianca J Lang
Keyword(s):  
Daytime Sleepiness ◽  
Sleep Latency ◽  
Sleep Onset ◽  
Sleep Time ◽  
Multiple Sleep Latency Test ◽  
Sleep Onset Latency ◽  
Onset Latency ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Falling Asleep ◽  
Multiple Sleep Latency

Abstract Introduction Presence of sleep onset REM episodes often raises concerns of narcolepsy. However other conditions have shown to have presence of sleep on REM episodes which include but not limited to obstructive sleep apnea, sleep wake schedule disturbance, alcoholism, neurodegenerative disorders, depression and anxiety Report of Case Here we present a case of 30 year old female with history of asthma, patent foraman ovale, migraine headache, and anxiety who presented with daytime sleepiness, falling asleep while at work, occasional scheduled naps, non-restorative sleep, sleep paralysis, and hypnopompic hallucination. Pertinent physical exam included; mallampati score of 4/4, retrognathia, high arched hard palate, crowded posterior oropharynx. She had a score of 16 on Epworth sleepiness scale. Patient previously had multiple sleep latency test at outside facility which revealed 4/5 SOREM, with mean sleep onset latency of 11.5 minutes. She however was diagnosed with narcolepsy and tried on modafinil which she failed to tolerate. She was tried on sertraline as well which was discontinued due to lack of benefit. She had repeat multiple sleep latency test work up which revealed 2/5 SOREM, with mean sleep onset latency was 13.1 minutes. Her overnight polysomnogram prior to repeat MSLT showed SOREM with sleep onset latency of 10 minutes. Actigraphy showed consistent sleep pattern overall with sufficient sleep time but was taking hydroxyzine and herbal medication. Patient did not meet criteria for hypersomnolence disorder and sleep disordered breathing. Conclusion There is possibility her medication may have played pivotal role with her daytime symptoms. We also emphasize SOREMs can be present in other disorders such as anxiety in this case and not solely in narcolepsy

Validation of Multiple Sleep Latency Test for the diagnosis of pediatric narcolepsy type 1

Neurology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 93 (11) ◽  
pp. e1034-e1044 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Pizza ◽  
Lucie Barateau ◽  
Isabelle Jaussent ◽  
Stefano Vandi ◽  
Elena Antelmi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Roc Curve ◽  
Sleep Latency ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Sleep Onset ◽  
Biological Data ◽  
Multiple Sleep Latency Test ◽  
Roc Curve Analysis ◽  
Specificity And Sensitivity ◽  
Multiple Sleep Latency

ObjectiveTo validate polysomnographic markers (sleep latency and sleep-onset REM periods [SOREMPs] at the Multiple Sleep Latency Test [MSLT] and nocturnal polysomnography [PSG]) for pediatric narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) against CSF hypocretin-1 (hcrt-1) deficiency and presence of cataplexy, as no criteria are currently validated in children.MethodsClinical, neurophysiologic, and, when available, biological data (HLA-DQB1*06:02 positivity, CSF hcrt-1 levels) of 357 consecutive children below 18 years of age evaluated for suspected narcolepsy were collected. Best MSLT cutoffs were obtained by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis by contrasting among patients with available CSF hcrt-1 assay (n = 228) with vs without CSF hcrt-1 deficiency, and further validated in patients without available CSF hcrt-1 against cataplexy (n = 129).ResultsPatients with CSF hcrt-1 deficiency were best recognized using a mean MSLT sleep latency ≤8.2 minutes (area under the ROC curve of 0.985), or by at least 2 SOREMPs at the MSLT (area under the ROC curve of 0.975), or the combined PSG + MSLT (area under the ROC curve of 0.977). Although specificity and sensitivity of reference MSLT sleep latency ≤8 minutes and ≥2 SOREMPs (nocturnal SOREMP included) was 100% and 94.87%, the combination of MSLT sleep latency and SOREMP counts did not improve diagnostic accuracy. Age or sex also did not significantly influence these results in our pediatric population.ConclusionsAt least 2 SOREMPs or a mean sleep latency ≤8.2 minutes at the MSLT are valid and reliable markers for pediatric NT1 diagnosis, a result contrasting with adult NT1 criteria.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class III evidence that for children with suspected narcolepsy, polysomnographic and MSLT markers accurately identify those with narcolepsy type 1.

Two cases of HLA‐DR2‐negative hypersomnia manifesting sleep‐onset rapid eye movement periods in the multiple sleep latency test

1999 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 295-297
Author(s):  
Yasushi Yoshida ◽  
Kenji Kuroda ◽  
Masaharu Mandai ◽  
Seiji Satani ◽  
Narutsugu Emura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movement ◽  
Sleep Latency ◽  
Sleep Onset ◽  
Multiple Sleep Latency Test ◽  
Rapid Eye Movement ◽  
Multiple Sleep Latency

scholarly journals P003 The impact of forced wake from overnight polysomnography on multiple sleep latency test results

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A22-A23
Author(s):  
A Amaranayake ◽  
S Frenkel ◽  
P Lyell ◽  
A Southcott
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Sleep Latency ◽  
Total Sleep Time ◽  
Sleep Onset ◽  
Sleep Time ◽  
Multiple Sleep Latency Test ◽  
Test Results ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Multiple Sleep Latency ◽  
Overnight Polysomnography

Abstract Introduction The multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) is used to diagnose disorders of hypersomnolence. Although internationally-recognised protocols do not stipulate whether patients should be woken from the preceding overnight polysomnography (PSG), many labs wake their patients for logistic reasons. This study analyses the impact on PSG and MSLT parameters of forced wake (FW) from the overnight PSG compared with unrestricted sleep (US). Methods 400 consecutive patients (FW=200; US=200) undergoing PSG/MSLT were included and the following parameters were compared: Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire score (MEQ), PSG total sleep time (TST), wake-up time from the PSG, overall MSLT sleep latency (MSL), individual nap latencies (SLNap 1–4), number of MSLT naps with sleep-onset REM periods (#SOREMP), and percentage of MSLTs with overall MSL<8 minutes (%MSLT<8). Results The 2 groups were well-matched for ESS and MEQ. The FW group had more males (49% vs 39%). When compared to FW, patients with US had longer TST (+38 minutes; p=<0.0001), later wake-up time (+52 minutes; p<0.0001), longer MSL (+1.9 minutes; p=0.0049), 50% fewer #SOREMP (p=0.0224), and 16% fewer %MSLT<8 (p=0.0018). SLNap1 increased by 1.5 minutes (p=0.0623), SLNap2 increased by 2.0 minutes (p=0.0067), SLNap3 increased by 0.75minutes (p=0.0533) and SLNap4 increased by 2.5 minutes (p=0.0059). Discussion Allowing patients to have unrestricted sleep on the night prior to the MSLT resulted in significantly longer TST, longer sleep latencies during the MSLT, fewer SOREMP and fewer tests with MSL<8 minutes. International protocols should stipulate unrestricted sleep on the PSG prior to the MSLT to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Do you perform the multiple sleep latency test according to the guidelines? A case with multiple sleep onset REM periods

2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-55
Author(s):  
Akira USUI ◽  
Yuichi KITAHARA ◽  
Yutaka MATSUSHITA ◽  
Miyoko KITAJIMA ◽  
Reiko SAKAMOTO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sleep Latency ◽  
Sleep Onset ◽  
Multiple Sleep Latency Test ◽  
Multiple Sleep Latency
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document