scholarly journals P36 Consent for Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery during the COVID-19 Pandemic

BJS Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Walker ◽  
A Davies ◽  
T Heaton ◽  
S Sabharwal ◽  
M Fertleman ◽  
...  

Abstract Surgical services have been hugely disrupted by COVID-19 and have had to evolve rapidly in response. The best practice for consent mandates that risks associated with surgical treatment during a pandemic be discussed. This study aimed to assess whether patients undergoing orthopaedic operations were being consented for the risk of contacting COVID-19 and ITU care. All orthopaedic consent forms from four-week periods in March, June and July were reviewed. Measures such as staff education were implemented after the second cycle. Of consent forms for 37 operations performed in March, only 1 mentioned the risk of contracting COVID-19 and zero mentioned ITU. During June, 89 consent forms were reviewed, 32 mentioned COVID-19 and 10 discussed ITU admission. Following educational measures, the third cycle showed a significant improvement as of 100 consent form records available for review, 73 included risk of COVID-19 whilst 26 mentioned ITU. The results show that earlier in the pandemic, surgeons at our centre were not counselling patients regarding COVID-19. This improved slightly between the first and second cycles, likely reflecting increased awareness of the nosocomial transmission of COVID-19. Educational measures contributed to a significant improvement in the third cycle. Planned interventions include use of electronic consent forms which incorporate COVID-19 infection and associated risks.

ISRN Surgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amin Kheiran ◽  
Purnajyoti Banerjee ◽  
Philip Stott

Guidelines exist to obtain informed consent before any operative procedure. We completed an audit cycle starting with retrospective review of 50 orthopaedic trauma procedures (Phase 1 over three months to determine the quality of consenting documentation). The results were conveyed and adequate training of the staff was arranged according to guidelines from BOA, DoH, and GMC. Compliance in filling consent forms was then prospectively assessed on 50 consecutive trauma surgeries over further three months (Phase 2). Use of abbreviations was significantly reduced (P=0.03) in Phase 2 (none) compared to 10 (20%) in Phase 1 with odds ratio of 0.04. Initially, allocation of patient’s copy was dispensed in three (6% in Phase 1) cases compared to 100% in Phase 2, when appropriate. Senior doctors (registrars or consultant) filled most consent forms. However, 7 (14%) consent forms in Phase 1 and eleven (22%) in Phase 2 were signed by Core Surgical Trainees year 2, which reflects the difference in seniority amongst junior doctors. The requirement for blood transfusion was addressed in 40% of cases where relevant and 100% cases in Phase 2. Consenting patients for trauma surgery improved in Phase 2. Regular audit is essential to maintain expected national standards.


Author(s):  
Caitlin Geier ◽  
Robyn B. Adams ◽  
Katharine M. Mitchell ◽  
Bree E. Holtz

Informed consent is an important part of the research process; however, some participants either do not read or skim the consent form. When participants do not read or comprehend informed consent, then they may not understand the potential benefits, risks, or details of the study before participating. This study used previous research to develop experimentally manipulated online consent forms utilizing various presentations of the consent form and interactive elements. Participants ( n = 576) were randomly exposed to one of six form variations. Results found that the highly interactive condition was significantly better for comprehension than any of the other conditions. The highly interactive condition also performed better for readability, though not significantly. Further research should explore the effects of interactive elements to combat habituation and to engage participants with the parts of the consent form unique to the study.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Evans ◽  
C Ng

Abstract Aim COVID19 pandemic has significantly affected surgical services. We aim to review its effects on our theatre output and risk of encountering COVID 19 cases. Method Serial record of operations performed locally were reviewed from start of UK COVID19 pandemic lockdown on 23rd March 2020 to 13th July 2020 after it was lifted. A weekly average by month of operations and the percentage of COVID19 cases diagnosed within 30 days of the procedure were noted. Results 733 operations performed through this period. In March, 33 operations/week performed, 88.4% emergency and 7% diagnosed with COVID19. April, 31 operations /week performed, 95.9% emergency and 10.6% diagnosed with COVID19. May 46 operations /week performed, 94.5% emergency and 3.3% diagnosed with COVID19. June 56 operations /week, 80.9% emergency and less than 0.01% diagnosed with COVID19. By July 80 operations/week, 59.4% emergency and none diagnosed with COVID 19. Since testing capacity increased, only 6 of the 27 operated were diagnosed with COVID19. Conclusions There was initial reduction to non-emergency workload. However, this has gradually shifted as protocols are in place improve public confidence to return for surgical treatment. Mandatory admission testing allows early identification and remains essential for planning of services and protecting the workforce.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A M Hussein ◽  
C J Callaghan

Abstract Introduction The 2015 Montgomery case changed the remit of risk discussions required during the consent process. This audit reviewed single kidney transplant (SKT) consent forms to establish which risks are documented, and whether this legal case affected discussions. Following the audit, we introduced a pre-printed consent form and closed the audit loop by assessing its uptake. Method Trust paper consent forms for all patients aged 50+ who received a deceased donor SKT in our centre in 2014 (n = 58; pre-Montgomery) and 2017 (n = 70; post-Montgomery) were reviewed to see if 20 perceived ‘gold standard’ risks were documented. A pre-printed procedure-specific consent form including all gold standard risks was then introduced in July 2019. A re-audit reviewed the case-notes of every alternate recipient aged 50+ of a deceased donor SKT from 01/08/19 to 29/02/20 to check if the pre-printed form was used. Results Overall, 53% of the 20 ‘gold standard’ risks were documented in 2014 versus 59% in 2017 (p = 0.55). There was a 91% uptake of the pre-printed consent form. Discussion This audit established the importance of using a pre-printed consent form to standardise risk discussions We propose that pre-printed procedure-specific forms should be encouraged throughout the NHS to support ‘Montgomery-appropriate’ consent discussions.


1997 ◽  
Vol 90 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S162
Author(s):  
Merrill W. Reuter ◽  
Clyde S. Meckstroth ◽  
Diane M. Anger

1989 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Lipskeir ◽  
M. Weizenbluth

We report a series of 12 patients (19 hands) with clasped thumb who underwent surgical treatment. The series is divided into three groups. In the first group, the prominent pathological feature was hypoplasia of the extensor tendons which was treated by tendon transfer. The second group, the arthrogryphotic type, had contracture of the intrinsic muscles of the thumb and shortening of the skin; these needed mainly release operations. In only three hands out of nine was tendon transfer performed. The third group was defined by a combination of skeletal, muscular and tendon hypoplasia. Instability of the M.P. joint and adduction contracture of the first ray were found in all hands of this group. The adduction deformity was corrected by skin-plasty of the first web and the extension was improved by tendon transfers. Only one case needed stabilisation of the M.P. joint. The final results were related to the extent of the contractures and to the age of the patient when treatment started.


Injury ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. S1-S2
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Giordano ◽  
Tito Rocha ◽  
William Dias Belangero

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document