scholarly journals Global patient outcomes after elective surgery: prospective cohort study in 27 low-, middle- and high-income countries

2016 ◽  
Vol 117 (5) ◽  
pp. 601-609 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul S Myles ◽  
Sophie Wallace ◽  
David A Story ◽  
Wendy Brown ◽  
Allen C Cheng ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan Webster ◽  
Karen New ◽  
Mary Fenn ◽  
Mary Batch ◽  
Alyson Eastgate ◽  
...  

Objective The aim of the present study was to investigate the incidence of and patient outcomes associated with frequent patient moves. Methods In a prospective cohort study, any bed move and the reason for the move were documented. Patients were assessed on admission for anxiety, social support and delirium. Adverse events, length of stay and satisfaction were recorded. Patients moved three or more times were compared with those moved less than three times. Results In all, 566 patients admitted to a tertiary referral hospital were included in the study. Of these, 156 patients (27.6%) were moved once, 46 (8.1%) were moved twice and 28 (4.9%) were moved at least three times. Those moved three or more times were almost threefold more likely to have an adverse event recorded compared with those moved fewer times (relative risk (RR) 2.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18, 6.42; P = 0.02) and to have a hospital stay twice as long (RR 7.10; 95% CI 2.60, 11.60; P = 0.002). Levels of satisfaction and anxiety were not affected by frequent moves and there was no effect on delirium. Conclusion Frequent bed moves affect patient safety and prolong length of stay. What is known about the topic? Retrospective and qualitative studies suggest that patient safety and costs may be affected by frequent patient moves. What does this paper add? The present study is the first prospective study to assess the negative effects of frequent patient moves on specific patient outcomes, such as adverse events, length of stay and satisfaction with care. What are the implications for practitioners? Within- and between-ward moves may affect patient safety. Patients should be moved only when there is a clear and unavoidable reason for doing so.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
F A Burns ◽  

Abstract Introduction Acutely symptomatic abdominal wall and groin hernias (ASH) are a common presentation, accounting for approximately 25% of acute surgical admissions in the UK. There is limited data to guide the treatment of such presentations. This study aimed to assess outcomes of emergency hernia surgery, and identify common management strategies, to improve care for these high-risk patients. Method A 12 week, UK-based, multi-centre, collaborative, prospective cohort study (NCT04197271) recruited adults with ASH. Data on inpatient management, specific surgical intervention, in-hospital morbidity and mortality and quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) was measured. 30 and 90-day follow-up phone calls collected complications and quality of life. Descriptive analyses were performed to describe population and outcomes. Results Twenty-three acute trusts recruited 264 patients. Inguinal (37.9%) and umbilical (37.1%) hernias were most common. 17% were awaiting elective surgery and 17% had been previously declined intervention. 46% were incarcerated at presentation, and 31% symptomatic (painful/irreducible). 82% of patients had operations within 48 hours, with 95% performed open. Mesh was used in 55%, the majority (86%) being synthetic non-absorbable. Sutures used for suture repair varied widely. Complications were infrequent; 2% developed pneumonia or delirium. Surgical site infection occurred in 3% and mortality was 1.2%. Quality of life improved between baseline and 30-days following repair. Conclusions There is variation in the management of ASH in the UK, particularly with repair techniques, use of mesh and laparoscopy. One in five patients was awaiting repair; this might indicate a need for expedited pathways and reprioritising elective hernia repair.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document