scholarly journals A randomized trial of the effect of low dose epinephrine infusion in addition to tranexamic acid on blood loss during total hip arthroplasty

2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ø. Jans ◽  
U. Grevstad ◽  
H. Mandøe ◽  
H. Kehlet ◽  
P.I. Johansson
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Tranexamic Acid ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Epinephrine Infusion ◽  
Total Hip

scholarly journals Effects of Tranexamic Acid on Blood Loss during Total Hip Arthroplasty

2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 282-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jagwant Singh ◽  
Moez S Ballal ◽  
P Mitchell ◽  
PG Denn
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Tranexamic Acid ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Hip

Effect of Multiple Doses of Oral Tranexamic Acid on Haemostasis and Inflammatory Reaction in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 119 (01) ◽  
pp. 092-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duan Wang ◽  
Yang Yang ◽  
Chuan He ◽  
Ze-Yu Luo ◽  
Fu-Xing Pei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Inflammatory Response ◽  
Tranexamic Acid ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Multiple Dose ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Significant Difference

AbstractTranexamic acid (TXA) reduces surgical blood loss and alleviates inflammatory response in total hip arthroplasty. However, studies have not identified an optimal regimen. The objective of this study was to identify the most effective regimen of multiple-dose oral TXA in achieving maximum reduction of blood loss and inflammatory response based on pharmacokinetic recommendations. We prospectively studied four multiple-dose regimens (60 patients each) with control group (group A: matching placebo). The four multiple-dose regimens included: 2-g oral TXA 2 hours pre-operatively followed by 1-g oral TXA 3 hours post-operatively (group B), 2-g oral TXA followed by 1-g oral TXA 3 and 7 hours post-operatively (group C), 2-g oral TXA followed by 1-g oral TXA 3, 7 and 11 hours post-operatively (group D) and 2-g oral TXA followed by 1-g oral TXA 3, 7, 11 and 15 hours post-operatively (group E). The primary endpoint was estimated blood loss on post-operative day (POD) 3. Secondary endpoints were thromboelastographic parameters, inflammatory components, function recovery and adverse events. Groups D and E had significantly less blood loss on POD 3, with no significant difference between the two groups. Group E had the most prolonged haemostatic effect, and all thromboelastographic parameters remained within normal ranges. Group E had the lowest levels of inflammatory cytokines and the greatest range of motion. No thromboembolic complications were observed. The post-operative four-dose regimen brings about maximum efficacy in reducing blood loss, alleviating inflammatory response and improving analgaesia and immediate recovery.

scholarly journals Application of thromboelastography to evaluate the effect of different routes administration of tranexamic acid on coagulation function in total hip arthroplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xingming Xu ◽  
Jiang Jiang ◽  
Wei Liu ◽  
Xiaofeng Li ◽  
Huading Lu
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Tranexamic Acid ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Total Blood ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Coagulation Function ◽  
And Control

Abstract Background Tranexamic acid (TXA) is widely used to reduce blood loss and transfusion rates in total hip arthroplasty(THA). Thromboelastography, which can monitor coagulation changes from clotting to fibrinolysis dynamically. In this study, thromboelastography was used to assess the dynamic changes in the coagulation of patients who underwent THA with the administration of TXA. Methods This randomized controlled trial consisted of 207 consecutive patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty. Patients were randomized into three groups: topical-TXA group received a topical application of TXA, IV-TXA group received an intravenous injection of TXA, and control group. Thromboelastography was performed 1 day before surgery and first, fourth, seventh days after surgery. The primary outcomes were thromboelastography parameters, the rates of deep vein thrombosis(DVT), and pulmonary embolism(PE). Secondary outcomes included perioperative blood loss, transfusion rates, and other perioperative complications. Results The mean calculated total blood loss in the Topical-TXA group were 832.7 ± 279.84 ml and 834.8 ± 322.94 ml in the IV-TXA group, which were significantly reduced (p < 0.05) compared with control groups at 1093.3 ± 379.7 ml. There were no significant differences between topical-TXA and IV-TXA groups in total blood loss or transfusion rates. K and R have reached a nadir from preoperative levels to 4th day postoperatively and then began to increase.α angle and CI peaked from preoperative levels to the fourth day postoperatively and then began to decline.IV-TXA significantly (p < 0.05) promoted coagulation levels compared with topical-TXA and control groups in the early postoperative period. Almost no significant differences were observed between topical-TXA and control groups in thromboelastography parameters.No significant differences were observed in the incidence of thromboembolic complications and other perioperative complications. Conclusions The topical administration of TXA had the same hemostatic effect as intravenous injection tranexamic acid. Coagulation function peaked on 4th day postoperatively and then began to decline. IV-TXA was more enhanced coagulation functions compared with topical-TXA.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial on the efficacy of tranexamic acid combined with rivaroxaban thromboprophylaxis in reducing blood loss after primary cementless total hip arthroplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (2) ◽  
pp. 207-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Clavé ◽  
R. Gérard ◽  
J. Lacroix ◽  
C. Baynat ◽  
M. Danguy des Déserts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Tranexamic Acid ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Thromboembolic Complications ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Total Hip

Aims Cementless primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with risks of bleeding and thromboembolism. Anticoagulants are effective as venous thromboprophylaxis, but with an increased risk of bleeding. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an efficient antifibrinolytic agent, but the mode and timing of its administration remain controversial. This study aimed to determine whether two intravenous (IV) TXA regimens (a three-hour two-dose (short-TXA) and 11-hour four-dose (long-TXA)) were more effective than placebo in reducing perioperative real blood loss (RBL, between baseline and day 3 postoperatively) in patients undergoing THA who receive rivaroxaban as thromboprophylaxis. The secondary aim was to assess the non-inferiority of the reduction of blood loss of the short protocol versus the long protocol. Patients and Methods A multicentre, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was undertaken involving 229 patients undergoing primary cementless THA using a posterior approach, whose extended rivaroxaban thromboprophylaxis started on the day of surgery. There were 98 male and 131 female patients, with a mean age of 65.5 years (32 to 91). The primary outcome, perioperative RBL, was evaluated at 72 hours postoperatively. The efficacy of short- and long-TXA protocols in the reduction of perioperative RBL was compared with a placebo group. Results TXA significantly reduced perioperative blood loss compared with placebo (p < 0.001); the mean differences were 525.3 ml (short-TXA vs placebo) and 550.1 ml (long-TXA vs placebo). No venous or arterial thromboembolic complications were reported. The upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval, when comparing short and long protocols, was below the pre-specified margin of non-inferiority (p = 0.027). Conclusion In patients undergoing primary cementless THA, using a posterior approach, who are treated with rivaroxaban for thromboembolic prophylaxis, short- and long-TXA IV protocols are significantly more effective than placebo in reducing perioperative RBL, without any thromboembolic complications. Non-inferiority of a short- versus a long-TXA protocol in reducing perioperative RBL was supported in a secondary analysis.

Comparison of Oral and Intravenous Tranexamic Acid for Prevention of Perioperative Blood Loss in Total Knee and Total Hip Arthroplasty

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 246-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Alice Gortemoller ◽  
Bryan Allen ◽  
Rochelle Forsyth ◽  
Kimberly Theiss ◽  
Kristal Cunningham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Tranexamic Acid ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Perioperative Blood Loss ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Noninferiority Margin

Background: Tranexamic acid (TA) is an antifibrinolytic agent that prevents perioperative blood loss in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This benefit has been established with the intravenous (IV) dosage form, but there is limited evidence evaluating oral TA in this setting. Objective: To compare the effect of oral versus IV TA on perioperative blood loss in those undergoing TKA or THA. Methods: In this single-centered retrospective chart review, participants at least 18 years of age who received IV or oral TA from a single surgeon who performed their THA or TKA were included. The primary outcome evaluated hemoglobin (Hgb) reduction. Power analysis determined that 165 participants were required in each group to achieve 80% power, with a noninferiority margin of 0.3 mg/dL. Results: Both study groups included 165 participants. Oral TA was noninferior to IV TA (Hgb difference = −0.12 g/dL [95% CI = −0.28 to 0.05; P = 0.0250]). A subgroup analysis of THA and TKA revealed that oral TA was noninferior to IV TA in THA (Hgb difference = 0.24 g/dL [95% CI = −0.17 to 0.5]), but oral TA failed to meet the noninferiority margin in the TKA subgroup (Hgb difference = −0.20 [95% CI = −0.38 to −0.02]). Conclusion: This study provides evidence that oral TA is a clinically effective and cost-efficient alternative to IV TA in the setting of THA and TKA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document