scholarly journals Transcutaneous electric acupoint stimulation reduces intra-operative remifentanil consumption and alleviates postoperative side-effects in patients undergoing sinusotomy: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

2014 ◽  
Vol 112 (6) ◽  
pp. 1075-1082 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Wang ◽  
Y. Xie ◽  
Q. Zhang ◽  
N. Xu ◽  
H. Zhong ◽  
...  
2001 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. A. Ahmadi-Abhari ◽  
S. Akhondzadeh ◽  
S. M. Assadi ◽  
O. L. Shabestari ◽  
Z. M. Farzanehgan ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 146
Author(s):  
Mateusz Szmit ◽  
Siddarth Agrawal ◽  
Waldemar Goździk ◽  
Andrzej Kübler ◽  
Anil Agrawal ◽  
...  

Given the rising rate of opioid-related adverse drug events during postsurgical pain management, a nonpharmacologic therapy that could decrease analgesic medication requirements would be of immense value. We designed a prospective, placebo-and-randomized controlled trial to assess the clinical effect of transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation (TEAS) on the postoperative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) requirement for morphine, as well as side effects and recovery profile after inguinal hernia repair. Seventy-one subjects undergoing inguinal hernia repair with a standardized anesthetic technique were randomly assigned to one of three analgesic treatment regimens: PCA + TEAS (n = 24); PCA + sham-TEAS (no electrical stimulation) (n = 24), and PCA only (n = 23). The postoperative PCA requirement, pain scores, opioid-related side effects, and blood cortisol levels were recorded. TEAS treatment resulted in a twofold decrease in the analgesic requirement and decreased pain level reported by the patients. In addition, a significant reduction of cortisol level was reported in the TEAS group at 24 h postoperatively compared to the sham and control groups. We conclude that TEAS is a safe and effective option for reducing analgesic consumption and postoperative pain following inguinal hernia repair.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mona Dietrichkeit ◽  
Marion Hagemann-Goebel ◽  
Yvonne Nestoriuc ◽  
Steffen Moritz ◽  
Lena Jelinek

AbstractAlthough awareness of side effects over the course of psychotherapy is growing, side effects are still not always reported. The purpose of the present study was to examine side effects in a randomized controlled trial comparing Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT) and a cognitive remediation training in patients with depression. 84 patients were randomized to receive either D-MCT or cognitive remediation training (MyBrainTraining) for 8 weeks. Side effects were assessed after the completion of each intervention (post) using the Short Inventory of the Assessment of Negative Effects (SIAN) and again 6 months later (follow-up) using the Negative Effects Questionnaire (NEQ). D-MCT and MyBrainTraining did not differ significantly in the number of side effects. At post assessment, 50% of the D-MCT group and 59% of the MyBrainTraining group reported at least one side effect in the SIAN. The most frequently reported side effect was disappointment in subjective benefit of study treatment. At follow-up, 52% reported at least one side effect related to MyBrainTraining, while 34% reported at least one side effect related to the D-MCT in the NEQ. The most frequently reported side effects fell into the categories of “symptoms” and “quality”. Our NEQ version was missing one item due to a technical error. Also, allegiance effects should be considered. The sample size resulted in low statistical power. The relatively tolerable number of side effects suggests D-MCT and MyBrainTraining are safe and well-received treatment options for people with depression. Future studies should also measure negative effects to corroborate our results.


2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (10) ◽  
pp. 1626-1631

Objective: To compare the complete abortion rate, the induction-to-abortion time, and side effects between 600 mcg and 800 mcg misoprostol sublingually. Materials and Methods: Total, of 108 pregnant women with gestational age less than 12 weeks with early pregnancy loss from March 2020 to February 2021 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, were included. For group 1 (n=54), 600 mcg misoprostol was administrated sublingually. For group 2 (n=54), 800 mcg misoprostol was administrated sublingually. If the abortion did not occur, the repeated misoprostol in the same dose would be administrated sublingually every 6 hours for a maximum of three doses. Results: There was no significant difference in the complete abortion rate between the two groups (55.6% in the 600 mcg misoprostol group, 64.7% in the 800 mcg misoprostol group, p=0.339, and 95% CI 0.082 to 1.862). The induction-to-abortion time was 9.5 hours (IQR 6.75 to 48.00) in the 600 mcg misoprostol group and 10 hours (IQR 6.00 to 60.00) in the 800 mcg misoprostol group. The side effects of both groups were similar, included abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, fever, heavy bleeding, and headache. Conclusion: The efficacy of the 600 mcg misoprostol was noninferior to 800 mcg misoprostol. The adverse effects were similar in both groups. Mean induction-to-abortion time was also similar in both groups. Keywords: Early pregnancy loss; Misoprostol; Medical abortion


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document