scholarly journals Performance of a new pulse contour method for continuous cardiac output monitoring: validation in critically ill patients

2013 ◽  
Vol 111 (4) ◽  
pp. 573-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Bendjelid ◽  
G Marx ◽  
N Kiefer ◽  
T.P. Simon ◽  
M Geisen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Output ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Pulse Contour ◽  
Continuous Cardiac Output ◽  
Contour Method ◽  
Cardiac Output Monitoring ◽  
Output Monitoring ◽  
Pulse Contour Method

Comparison of estimation of cardiac output using an uncalibrated pulse contour method and echocardiography during veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Perfusion ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 397-401
Author(s):  
Ottavia Bond ◽  
Selene Pozzebon ◽  
Federico Franchi ◽  
Federica Zama Cavicchi ◽  
Jacques Creteur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Cardiac Output ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Pulse Contour ◽  
Contour Method ◽  
Cardiac Output Monitoring ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Output Monitoring ◽  
Pulse Contour Method

Introduction: During veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, cardiac output monitoring is essential to assess tissue oxygen delivery. Adequate arterial oxygenation depends on the ratio between the extracorporeal pump blood flow and the cardiac output. The aim of this study was to compare estimates of cardiac output and blood flow/cardiac output ratios made using an uncalibrated pulse contour method with those made using echocardiography in patients treated with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Methods: Cardiac output was estimated simultaneously using a pulse contour method (MostCareUp; Vygon, Encouen, France) and echocardiography in 17 hemodynamically stable patients treated with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Comparisons were made using Bland–Altman and linear regression analysis. Results: There were significant correlations between cardiac output estimated using pulse contour method and echocardiography and between blood flow/cardiac output estimated using pulse contour method and blood flow/cardiac output estimated using echocardiography (r = 0.84, p < 0.001 and r = 0.87, p < 0.001, respectively). Bland–Altman analysis showed a good agreement (bias −0.20 ± 0.50 L/min) and a low percentage of error (25%) for the cardiac output values estimated by the two methods. The bias between the blood flow/cardiac output ratios obtained with the two methods was 5.19% ± 12.3% (percentage of error = 28.1%). Conclusions: The pulse contour method is a valuable alternative to echocardiography for the assessment of cardiac output and the blood flow/cardiac output ratio in patients treated with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

FIRST EXPERIENCES WITH A NEW, PULSE-CONTOUR-BASED DEVICE FOR LESS INVASIVE, CONTINUOUS CARDIAC-OUTPUT MONITORING

1999 ◽  
Vol 27 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 119A
Author(s):  
O. Godje ◽  
K. Hoke ◽  
C. Thiel ◽  
M. Weinert ◽  
K. Dull ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Output ◽  
Pulse Contour ◽  
Continuous Cardiac Output ◽  
Cardiac Output Monitoring ◽  
Less Invasive ◽  
Output Monitoring

Validation of radial artery-based uncalibrated pulse contour method (PulsioFlex) in critically ill patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (11) ◽  
pp. 723-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörn Grensemann ◽  
Jerome M. Defosse ◽  
Meike Willms ◽  
Uwe Schiller ◽  
Frank Wappler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critically Ill ◽  
Radial Artery ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Pulse Contour ◽  
Contour Method ◽  
Pulse Contour Method
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document