scholarly journals Lack of agreement between pulmonary arterial thermodilution cardiac output and the pressure recording analytical method in postoperative cardiac surgery patients ‡

2011 ◽  
Vol 106 (4) ◽  
pp. 475-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Paarmann ◽  
H.V. Groesdonk ◽  
B. Sedemund-Adib ◽  
T. Hanke ◽  
H. Heinze ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Output ◽  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Analytical Method ◽  
Thermodilution Cardiac Output ◽  
Pressure Recording ◽  
Pressure Recording Analytical Method ◽  
Pulmonary Arterial

scholarly journals Pressure recording analytical method to measure cardiac output after cardiac surgery: some practical considerations

2011 ◽  
Vol 107 (5) ◽  
pp. 814-815 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Scolletta ◽  
F.S. Taccone ◽  
S. Romagnoli ◽  
G. Landoni ◽  
P. Giomarelli
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Output ◽  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Analytical Method ◽  
Pressure Recording ◽  
Pressure Recording Analytical Method

scholarly journals Comparison between Pressure Recording Analytical Method and Fick Method to Measure Cardiac Output in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-18
Author(s):  
Demetrio Pittarello ◽  
Vladimiro Vida ◽  
Guido Di Gregorio ◽  
Gianclaudio Falasco ◽  
Giovanni Stellin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Output ◽  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Analytical Method ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Pediatric Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Contour Method ◽  
Output Measurement ◽  
Pressure Recording ◽  
Pressure Recording Analytical Method

Background: There is an increased interest in methods of objective cardiac output measurement in pediatric cardiac surgery. Several techniques are available, but have limitations, among the new technologies pressure recording analytical method with MostCare (MostCare-PRAM), a minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring system, represents a novel arterial pulse contour method that does not require calibration. For this reason, we compared the MostCare-PRAM vs the Fick method for estimation of cardiac output. Methods: We studied prospectively 13 pediatric patients who underwent cardiac surgery and compared intraoperatively Cardiac Index (CI) measured with the MostCare-PRAM with the CI measured with the Fick method. We also measured Cardiac Cycle Efficiency (CCE) and maximal arterial pressure/time ratio (dp/dt max) and compared with Fick method. Results: The data showed good agreement between CI Fick and CI MostCare-PRAM (r = 0.93 and R2= 0.86; p < 0.0001) and also between CCE (r = 0.82 and R2 = 0.67; p < 0.001) and dp/dt (r = 0.84; R2 = 0.81; p < 0.001) with CI measured with Fick method. Conclusion: In pediatric patients submitted to cardiac surgery, the MostCare-PRAM seems to estimate CI with a good level of agreement with the Fick method measurements.

Measuring cardiac output in children undergoing cardiac catheterization: comparison between the Fick method and PRAM (pressure recording analytical method)

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 1097-1105 ◽  
Author(s):  
José M. Alonso-Iñigo ◽  
Francisco J. Escribá ◽  
José I. Carrasco ◽  
María J. Fas ◽  
Pilar Argente ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Output ◽  
Cardiac Catheterization ◽  
Analytical Method ◽  
Pressure Recording ◽  
Pressure Recording Analytical Method

Assessment of Modified Ultrafiltration Hemodynamic Impact by Pressure Recording Analytical Method During Pediatric Cardiac Surgery

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 390-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaccaria Ricci ◽  
Angelo Polito ◽  
Roberta Netto ◽  
Francesca De Razza ◽  
Isabella Favia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Analytical Method ◽  
Pediatric Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Pressure Recording ◽  
Pressure Recording Analytical Method
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document