scholarly journals THE PREOPERATIVE CHEST X-RAY

1974 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 558-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
I.H. KERR
Keyword(s):  
X Ray ◽  
PEDIATRICS ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 859-860
Author(s):  
David H. Baker ◽  
Walter E. Berdon

In reference to the article by Sane et al. entitled "Value of Preoperative Chest X-ray Examinations in Children" (Pediatrics 60:669, November 1977), we would like to know if the authors broke down the abnormalities by age group—for instance, five-year segments. If so, did a preponderance of abnormalities of any variety occur at any particular age? We believe that should be stated, as it would strengthen their thesis if there was no difference between 0 and 19 years of age.


2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (04) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rasha Nadeem Ahmed ◽  
Bassam Khaleel Al-abbasi ◽  
Nashwan M-Al Hafidh

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 460
Author(s):  
Swati Jindal ◽  
Satinder Gombar ◽  
Kompal Jain

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 669-672
Author(s):  
Shashikant M. Sane ◽  
Robert A. Worsing ◽  
Cornelius W. Wiens ◽  
Rajiv K. Sharma

To assess the value of routine preoperative chest x-ray films in pediatric patients, a prospective study of 1,500 patients, ages newborn to 19 years, was undertaken. Of all the patients, 7.5% demonstrated at least one roentgenographic abnormality, with 4.7% of the patients demonstrating a totally unsuspected significant roentgenographic anomaly. In 3.8% of the patients, surgery was either postponed or cancelled or the anesthetic technique was altered as a result of the roentgenographic finding. It is believed that the routine preoperative chest film is justified if the film is evaluated before surgery and the results clinically followed up.


Author(s):  
Jorge Vicente-Guijarro ◽  
José Valencia-Martín ◽  
Paloma Moreno-Nunez ◽  
Pedro Ruiz-López ◽  
José Mira-Solves ◽  
...  

Background: Overuse reduces the efficiency of healthcare systems and compromises patient safety. Different institutions have issued recommendations on the indication of preoperative chest X-rays, but the degree of compliance with these recommendations is unknown. This study investigates the frequency and characteristics of the inappropriateness of this practice. Methods: This is a descriptive observational study with analytical components, performed in a tertiary hospital in the Community of Madrid (Spain) between July 2018 and June 2019. The inappropriateness of preoperative chest X-ray tests was analyzed according to “Choosing Wisely”, “No Hacer” and “Essencial” initiatives and the cost associated with this practice was estimated in Relative Value and Monetary Units. Results: A total of 3449 preoperative chest X-ray tests were performed during the period of study. In total, 5.4% of them were unjustified according to the “No Hacer” recommendation and 73.3% according to “Choosing Wisely” and “Essencial” criteria, which would be equivalent to 5.6% and 11.8% of the interventions in which this test was unnecessary, respectively. One or more preoperative chest X-ray(s) were indicated in more than 20% of the interventions in which another chest X-ray had already been performed in the previous 3 months. A higher inappropriateness score was also recorded for interventions with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade ≥ III (16.5%). The Anesthesiology service obtained a lower inappropriateness score than other Petitioning Surgical Services (57.5% according to “Choosing Wisely” and “Essencial”; 4.1% according to “No Hacer”). Inappropriate indication of chest X-rays represents an annual cost of EUR 52,122.69 (170.1 Relative Value Units) according to “No Hacer” and EUR 3895.29 (2276.1 Relative Value Units) according to “Choosing Wisely” or “Essencial” criteria. Conclusions: There was wide variability between the recommendations that directly affected the degree of inappropriateness found, with the main reasons for inappropriateness being duplication of preoperative chest X-rays and the lack of consideration of the particularities of thoracic interventions. This inappropriateness implies a significant expense according to the applicable recommendations and therefore a high opportunity cost.


2014 ◽  
Vol 112 (6) ◽  
pp. 1117-1118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Suzuki ◽  
Y. Nishikawa ◽  
D. Horiuchi ◽  
K. Semba ◽  
T. Fujii ◽  
...  

1978 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 814
Author(s):  
Eugene H. Courtiss ◽  
S. M. Sane
Keyword(s):  
X Ray ◽  

1998 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 488
Author(s):  
Kwang Ho Lee ◽  
Hyun Kyo Lim ◽  
Kyung Bong Yoon ◽  
Kyoung Min Lee ◽  
Hee Uk Kwon

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document