scholarly journals QuASAR-MPRA: accurate allele-specific analysis for massively parallel reporter assays

2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 787-794 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia A Kalita ◽  
Gregory A Moyerbrailean ◽  
Christopher Brown ◽  
Xiaoquan Wen ◽  
Francesca Luca ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia A. Kalita ◽  
Gregory A. Moyerbrailean ◽  
Christopher Brown ◽  
Xiaoquan Wen ◽  
Francesca Luca ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTMotivationThe majority of the human genome is composed of non-coding regions containing regulatory elements such as enhancers, which are crucial for controlling gene expression. Many variants associated with complex traits are in these regions, and may disrupt gene regulatory sequences. Consequently, it is important to not only identify true enhancers but also to test if a variant within an enhancer affects gene regulation. Recently, allele-specific analysis in high-throughput reporter assays, such as massively parallel reporter assays (MPRA), have been used to functionally validate non-coding variants. However, we are still missing high-quality and robust data analysis tools for these datasets.ResultsWe have further developed our method for allele-specific analysis QuASAR (quantitative allele-specific analysis of reads) to analyze allele-specific signals in barcoded read counts data from MPRA. Using this approach, we can take into account the uncertainty on the original plasmid proportions, over-dispersion, and sequencing errors. The provided allelic skew estimate and its standard error also simplifies meta-analysis of replicate experiments. Additionally, we show that a beta-binomial distribution better models the variability present in the allelic imbalance of these synthetic reporters and results in a test that is statistically well calibrated under the null. Applying this approach to the MPRA data by Tewheyet al.(2016), we found 602 SNPs with significant (FDR 10%) allele-specific regulatory function in LCLs. We also show that we can combine MPRA with QuASAR estimates to validate existing experimental and computational annotations of regulatory variants. Our study shows that with appropriate data analysis tools, we can improve the power to detect allelic effects in high throughput reporter assays.Availabilityhttp://github.com/piquelab/QuASAR/tree/master/[email protected];[email protected]


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (24) ◽  
pp. 5351-5353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhishek Niroula ◽  
Ram Ajore ◽  
Björn Nilsson

Abstract Motivation Massively parallel reporter assays (MPRA) enable systematic screening of DNA sequence variants for effects on transcriptional activity. However, convenient analysis tools are still needed. Results We introduce MPRAscore, a novel tool to infer allele-specific effects on transcription from MPRA data. MPRAscore uses a weighted, variance-regularized method to calculate variant effect sizes robustly, and a permutation approach to test for significance without assuming normality or independence. Availability and implementation Source code (C++), precompiled binaries and data used in the paper at https://github.com/abhisheknrl/MPRAscore and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA554195. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Asia Mendelevich ◽  
Svetlana Vinogradova ◽  
Saumya Gupta ◽  
Andrey A. Mironov ◽  
Shamil R. Sunyaev ◽  
...  

AbstractA sensitive approach to quantitative analysis of transcriptional regulation in diploid organisms is analysis of allelic imbalance (AI) in RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data. A near-universal practice in such studies is to prepare and sequence only one library per RNA sample. We present theoretical and experimental evidence that data from a single RNA-seq library is insufficient for reliable quantification of the contribution of technical noise to the observed AI signal; consequently, reliance on one-replicate experimental design can lead to unaccounted-for variation in error rates in allele-specific analysis. We develop a computational approach, Qllelic, that accurately accounts for technical noise by making use of replicate RNA-seq libraries. Testing on new and existing datasets shows that application of Qllelic greatly decreases false positive rate in allele-specific analysis while conserving appropriate signal, and thus greatly improves reproducibility of AI estimates. We explore sources of technical overdispersion in observed AI signal and conclude by discussing design of RNA-seq studies addressing two biologically important questions: quantification of transcriptome-wide AI in one sample, and differential analysis of allele-specific expression between samples.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kousuke Mouri ◽  
Michael H. Guo ◽  
Carl G. de Boer ◽  
Greg A. Newby ◽  
Matteo Gentili ◽  
...  

Genome-wide association studies have uncovered hundreds of autoimmune disease-associated loci; however, the causal genetic variant(s) within each locus are mostly unknown. Here, we perform high-throughput allele-specific reporter assays to prioritize disease-associated variants for five autoimmune diseases. By examining variants that both promote allele-specific reporter expression and are located in accessible chromatin, we identify 60 putatively causal variants that enrich for statistically fine-mapped variants by up to 57.8-fold. We introduced the risk allele of a prioritized variant (rs72928038) into a human T cell line and deleted the orthologous sequence in mice, both resulting in reduced BACH2 expression. Naive CD8 T cells from mice containing the deletion had reduced expression of genes that suppress activation and maintain stemness. Our results represent an example of an effective approach for prioritizing variants and studying their physiologically relevant effects.


2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Cantone ◽  
Gopuraja Dharmalingam ◽  
Yi-Wah Chan ◽  
Anne-Celine Kohler ◽  
Boris Lenhard ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. e0218073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajiv Movva ◽  
Peyton Greenside ◽  
Georgi K. Marinov ◽  
Surag Nair ◽  
Avanti Shrikumar ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 201-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. McCarthy ◽  
Thomas B. Barrett ◽  
Stephanie Nissen ◽  
John R. Kelsoe ◽  
Eric E. Turner

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 1299-1313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anat Kreimer ◽  
Zhongxia Yan ◽  
Nadav Ahituv ◽  
Nir Yosef

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document