scholarly journals Systematic analysis of synchronized oscillatory neuronal networks reveals an enrichment for coupled direct and indirect feedback motifs

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (13) ◽  
pp. 1680-1685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao-Yi Dong ◽  
Jisoon Lim ◽  
Yoonkey Nam ◽  
Kwang-Hyun Cho
2014 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avella Gonzalez Oscar Javier ◽  
Aerde Karlijn ◽  
Mansvelder Huibert ◽  
Pelt Jaap ◽  
Van Ooyen Arjen

2008 ◽  
Vol 40 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 417-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Savtchenko

F1000Research ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana M. Anderson ◽  
Jan-Marino Ramirez

Breathing is vital for survival but also interesting from the perspective of rhythm generation. This rhythmic behavior is generated within the brainstem and is thought to emerge through the interaction between independent oscillatory neuronal networks. In mammals, breathing is composed of three phases – inspiration, post-inspiration, and active expiration – and this article discusses the concept that each phase is generated by anatomically distinct rhythm-generating networks: the preBötzinger complex (preBötC), the post-inspiratory complex (PiCo), and the lateral parafacial nucleus (pFL), respectively. The preBötC was first discovered 25 years ago and was shown to be both necessary and sufficient for the generation of inspiration. More recently, networks have been described that are responsible for post-inspiration and active expiration. Here, we attempt to collate the current knowledge and hypotheses regarding how respiratory rhythms are generated, the role that inhibition plays, and the interactions between the medullary networks. Our considerations may have implications for rhythm generation in general.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. e100899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar J. Avella Gonzalez ◽  
Karlijn I. van Aerde ◽  
Huibert D. Mansvelder ◽  
Jaap van Pelt ◽  
Arjen van Ooyen

Author(s):  
F.J. Sjostrand

In the 1940's and 1950's electron microscopy conferences were attended with everybody interested in learning about the latest technical developments for one very obvious reason. There was the electron microscope with its outstanding performance but nobody could make very much use of it because we were lacking proper techniques to prepare biological specimens. The development of the thin sectioning technique with its perfectioning in 1952 changed the situation and systematic analysis of the structure of cells could now be pursued. Since then electron microscopists have in general become satisfied with the level of resolution at which cellular structures can be analyzed when applying this technique. There has been little interest in trying to push the limit of resolution closer to that determined by the resolving power of the electron microscope.


2014 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 636-639
Author(s):  
Fernanda S. Matias ◽  
Pedro V. Carelli ◽  
Claudio R. Mirasso ◽  
Mauro Copelli

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1483-1484
Author(s):  
Masoumeh Hosseinpour ◽  
◽  
Ralf Terlutter ◽  
Holger Roschk

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document