scholarly journals Corrigendum to: Computational annotation of miRNA transcription start sites

Author(s):  
Saidi Wang ◽  
Amlan Talukder ◽  
Mingyu Cha ◽  
Xiaoman Li ◽  
Haiyan Hu
Author(s):  
Saidi Wang ◽  
Amlan Talukder ◽  
Mingyu Cha ◽  
Xiaoman Li ◽  
Haiyan Hu

Abstract Motivation MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNAs that play important roles in gene regulation and phenotype development. The identification of miRNA transcription start sites (TSSs) is critical to understand the functional roles of miRNA genes and their transcriptional regulation. Unlike protein-coding genes, miRNA TSSs are not directly detectable from conventional RNA-Seq experiments due to miRNA-specific process of biogenesis. In the past decade, large-scale genome-wide TSS-Seq and transcription activation marker profiling data have become available, based on which, many computational methods have been developed. These methods have greatly advanced genome-wide miRNA TSS annotation. Results In this study, we summarized recent computational methods and their results on miRNA TSS annotation. We collected and performed a comparative analysis of miRNA TSS annotations from 14 representative studies. We further compiled a robust set of miRNA TSSs (RSmirT) that are supported by multiple studies. Integrative genomic and epigenomic data analysis on RSmirT revealed the genomic and epigenomic features of miRNA TSSs as well as their relations to protein-coding and long non-coding genes. Contact [email protected], [email protected]


PLoS ONE ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (10) ◽  
pp. e7526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfredo Mendoza-Vargas ◽  
Leticia Olvera ◽  
Maricela Olvera ◽  
Ricardo Grande ◽  
Leticia Vega-Alvarado ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward J Banigan ◽  
Wen Tang ◽  
Aafke A van den Berg ◽  
Roman R Stocsits ◽  
Gordana Wutz ◽  
...  

Cohesin organizes mammalian interphase chromosomes by reeling chromatin fibers into dynamic loops (Banigan and Mirny, 2020; Davidson et al., 2019; Kim et al., 2019; Yatskevich et al., 2019). "Loop extrusion" is obstructed when cohesin encounters a properly oriented CTCF protein (Busslinger et al., 2017; de Wit et al., 2015; Fudenberg et al., 2016; Nora et al., 2017; Sanborn et al., 2015; Wutz et al., 2017), and recent work indicates that other factors, such as the replicative helicase MCM (Dequeker et al., 2020), can also act as barriers to loop extrusion. It has been proposed that transcription relocalizes (Busslinger et al., 2017; Glynn et al., 2004; Lengronne et al., 2004) or interferes with cohesin (Heinz et al., 2018; Jeppsson et al., 2020; Valton et al., 2021; S. Zhang et al., 2021), and that active transcription start sites function as cohesin loading sites (Busslinger et al., 2017; Kagey et al., 2010; Zhu et al., 2021; Zuin et al., 2014), but how these effects, and transcription in general, shape chromatin is unknown. To determine whether transcription can modulate loop extrusion, we studied cells in which the primary extrusion barriers could be removed by CTCF depletion and cohesin's residence time and abundance on chromatin could be increased by Wapl knockout. We found evidence that transcription directly interacts with loop extrusion through a novel "moving barrier" mechanism, but not by loading cohesin at active promoters. Hi-C experiments showed intricate, cohesin-dependent genomic contact patterns near actively transcribed genes, and in CTCF-Wapl double knockout (DKO) cells (Busslinger et al., 2017), genomic contacts were enriched between sites of transcription-driven cohesin localization ("cohesin islands"). Similar patterns also emerged in polymer simulations in which transcribing RNA polymerases (RNAPs) acted as "moving barriers" by impeding, slowing, or pushing loop-extruding cohesins. The model predicts that cohesin does not load preferentially at promoters and instead accumulates at TSSs due to the barrier function of RNAPs. We tested this prediction by new ChIP-seq experiments, which revealed that the "cohesin loader" Nipbl (Ciosk et al., 2000) co-localizes with cohesin, but, unlike in previous reports (Busslinger et al., 2017; Kagey et al., 2010; Zhu et al., 2021; Zuin et al., 2014), Nipbl did not accumulate at active promoters. We propose that RNAP acts as a new type of barrier to loop extrusion that, unlike CTCF, is not stationary in its precise genomic position, but is itself dynamically translocating and relocalizes cohesin along DNA. In this way, loop extrusion could enable translocating RNAPs to maintain contacts with distal regulatory elements, allowing transcriptional activity to shape genomic functional organization.


2018 ◽  
Vol 293 (51) ◽  
pp. 19761-19770
Author(s):  
Marie-Elodie Cattin ◽  
Shelley A. Deeke ◽  
Sarah A. Dick ◽  
Zachary J. A. Verret-Borsos ◽  
Gayashan Tennakoon ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 282 (5) ◽  
pp. F898-F909 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christie P. Thomas ◽  
Randy W. Loftus ◽  
Kang Z. Liu ◽  
Omar A. Itani

The mRNA for the β-subunit of the epithelial Na+ channel (β-ENaC) is regulated developmentally and, in some tissues, in response to corticosteroids. To understand the mechanisms of transcriptional regulation of the human β-ENaC gene, we characterized the 5′ end of the gene and its 5′-flanking regions. Adaptor-ligated human kidney and lung cDNA were amplified by 5′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends, and transcription start sites of two 5′ variant transcripts were determined by nuclease protection or primer extension assays. Cosmid clones that contain the 5′ end of the gene were isolated, and analysis of these clones indicated that alternate first exons ∼1.5 kb apart and ∼ 45 kb upstream of a common second exon formed the basis of these transcripts. Genomic fragments that included the proximal 5′-flanking region of either transcript were able to direct expression of a reporter gene in lung epithelia and to bind Sp1 in nuclear extracts, confirming the presence of separate promoters that regulate β-ENaC expression.


2008 ◽  
Vol 190 (10) ◽  
pp. 3700-3711 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Stanley Kim ◽  
Hyojeong Yi ◽  
Jaehee Myung ◽  
Kevin R. Piper ◽  
Stephen K. Farrand

ABSTRACT Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain C58 can transform plant cells to produce and secrete the sugar-phosphate conjugate opines agrocinopines A and B. The bacterium then moves in response to the opines and utilizes them as exclusive sources of carbon, energy, and phosphate via the functions encoded by the acc operon. These privileged opine-involved activities contribute to the formation of agrobacterial niches in the environment. We found that the expression of the acc operon is induced by agrocinopines and also by limitation of phosphate. The main promoter is present in front of the first gene, accR, which codes for a repressor. This operon structure enables efficient repression when opine levels are low. The promoter contains two putative operators, one overlapping the −10 sequence and the other in the further upstream from it; two partly overlapped putative pho boxes between the two operators; and two consecutive transcription start sites. DNA fragments containing either of the operators bound purified repressor AccR in the absence of agrocinopines but not in the presence of the opines, demonstrating the on-off switch of the promoter. Induction of the acc operon can occur under low-phosphate conditions in the absence of agrocinopines and further increases when the opines also are present. Such opine-phosphate dual regulatory system of the operon may ensure maximum utilization of agrocinopines when available and thereby increase the chances of agrobacterial survival in the highly competitive environment with limited general food sources.


Author(s):  
Xi Wang ◽  
Sanghamitra Bandyopadhya ◽  
Zhenyu Xuan ◽  
Xiaoyue Zhao ◽  
Michael Q. Zhang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document