Set-Off Defences in International Commercial Arbitration - A Comparative Analysis by Christiana Fountoulakis

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 669-672
Author(s):  
U. Lohmann
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Commercial Arbitration ◽  
International Commercial Arbitration

scholarly journals ARBITRŲ ATSAKOMYBĖ IR IMUNITETAS NUO ATSAKOMYBĖS

Teisė ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
pp. 48-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beata Kozubovska ◽  
Rimantas Daujotas
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Legal Systems ◽  
Commercial Arbitration ◽  
International Commercial Arbitration

Straipsnyje analizuojamas arbitrų imuniteto institutas tarptautiniame komerciniame arbitraže. Tarptautiniame komerciniame arbitraže nėra bendros pozicijos dėl atsakomybės arbitrams taikymo ir jos ribojimo. Šio straipsnio tikslas, remiantis lyginamąja valstybių teisinių sistemų analize, suformuluoti mokslines rekomendacijas, susijusias su atsakomybės taikymu ir jos apribojimu arbitrams tarptautiniame komerciniame arbitraže. This article discusses arguable aspects of the application of the liability of arbitrators in international commercial arbitration. There is no uniform practice applicable to the immunity of arbitrators in the field. By means of comparative analysis of various countries legal systems, this article aims to construct recommendation regarding the arbitrator‘s immunity and liability issue in international commercial arbitration.

International Commercial Arbitration

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Greenberg ◽  
Christopher Kee ◽  
J. Romesh Weeramantry
Keyword(s):  
Commercial Arbitration ◽  
International Commercial Arbitration

Non-Signatories in International Commercial Arbitration: Contesting the Myth of Consent

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-84
Author(s):  
Slavomír Halla
Keyword(s):  
Case Law ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Mutual Understanding ◽  
Commercial Arbitration ◽  
International Commercial Arbitration ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Professional Audience

Abstract Consent, the final frontier. International commercial arbitration is a dis­pute resolution mechanism embedded in consent of the parties involved. Presentation of such a mutual understanding is done through an arbitration agreement. However, the aim of this paper is to analyse whether its contractual, indeed consensual, nature is the only element which the courts use to identify the subjects who may compel or must be compelled to arbitrate disputes, or whether they employ other considerations as well. The paper will focus on extension doctrines which might be less known even to a professional audience: piercing of the corporate veil, estoppel & group of companies. A review of selected case law leads to a conclusion that consent-finding analysis is defi­nitely a starting point of any analysis. However, at the same time courts and arbitrators do indeed use tools of contract interpretation and the ones based on equity or good faith considerations to establish, and exceptionally force, the implication of consent far beyond what is obvious.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document