Hopeless practical deliberation – reply to Bobier
Abstract Bobier (2017) argued that hope is necessary for practical deliberation. I will demonstrate that Bobier’s argument for this thesis fails. The problem is that one of its main premisses rests on a sufficient condition for hoping that is subject to counterexamples. I consider two ways to save the argument, but show that they are unsuccessful in doing so.
1972 ◽
Vol 30
◽
pp. 132-133
2017 ◽
Vol E100.A
(12)
◽
pp. 2764-2775
◽
2018 ◽
Vol 58
(11)
◽
pp. 1780-1793
2018 ◽
Keyword(s):