scholarly journals A cross-sectional survey of the perspectives of older people in the Scottish Highlands on the management of their chronic pain

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 432-438
Author(s):  
Derek Stewart ◽  
Gordon Rushworth ◽  
Nicola Bailey ◽  
Sharon Pfleger ◽  
Tesnime Jebara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Older People ◽  
Chronic Pain Management ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Scottish Highlands ◽  
Pain Disability ◽  
Disability Questionnaire ◽  
Tampa Scale For Kinesiophobia

Abstract Background Although there is evidence of suboptimal outcomes in older people with chronic pain, little emphasis has been placed on those in remote and rural settings. Objective To describe the perspectives of older people in the Scottish Highlands on their chronic pain management. Design Cross-sectional survey. Setting NHS Highland, the most remote and rural geographical health board in Scotland. Subjects Home-dwelling members of the public aged ≥70 years. Methods Anonymised questionnaires were mailed to a random sample of 1800 older people. Questionnaire items were demographics, nature of any chronic pain, management regimens and perceived effectiveness. Validated scales were the Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. Results Adjusted response rate was 39.3% (709/1755). One-quarter (25.0%, n = 177) were experiencing chronic pain, being more likely to live in deprived areas (P < 0.05). Median pain intensity was 6 (IQR 4–7, 10 high), causing distress (median 5, IQR 3–7). Respondents largely consulted GPs (66.1%, n = 117) with a minority (16.4%, n = 29) referred to a specialist pain clinic and few consulting other health professionals. Over three quarters (78.0%, n = 138) were receiving prescribed medicines, most commonly paracetamol, alone (35.6%, n = 63) or in combination with opioids (16.4%, n = 29). One-third (31.6%, n = 56) expressed a desire for more effective medicines; few reported using any non-pharmacological therapies. The median scores for the Pain Disability Questionnaire and Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia were 74 (IQR 34–104.5, 150 high) and 40 (IQR 35–45, 68 high). Conclusions Evidence of provision of appropriate integrated and person-centred chronic pain care is lacking.

scholarly journals Online paediatric chronic pain management: assessing the needs of UK adolescents and parents, using a cross-sectional survey

2020 ◽  
pp. 204946372094034
Author(s):  
Anna Hurley-Wallace ◽  
Daniel E Schoth ◽  
Suzanne Lilley ◽  
Glyn Williams ◽  
Christina Liossi
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Interdisciplinary Treatment ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Chronic Pain Management ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Social Media Platforms

Background: Adolescent chronic pain is prevalent, and interdisciplinary treatment is recommended. Although it is well known that technology is a key part of adolescents’ daily lives, there have not been any online, interdisciplinary interventions developed for adolescents with chronic pain in a UK healthcare context. Little is known about how adolescents currently use online resources to manage chronic pain, or what guidance they seek. Methods: Ninety-five participants from the community answered this mixed-methods, online survey (adolescent n = 54, parent n = 41), which assessed the needs of UK-based adolescents for a new online chronic pain management resource. Results: Findings indicated that, at the time of the survey, adolescents frequently used social media platforms, such as Instagram, for chronic pain management. Desired techniques for a new interdisciplinary resource for adolescents included ‘advice on explaining chronic pain to others’ (86.7% of adolescents) and sleep hygiene (82.2% of adolescents), though access to a range of pain management techniques was desired. Qualitative results indicated endorsement of a new programme by adolescents and parents. Conclusions: Adolescents and parents had a positive outlook towards the development of a UK-specific online resource to help manage chronic pain. Such an intervention should aim to be made accessible via the National Health Service. Adolescent use of social media platforms to seek support for chronic pain requires further exploration in future research.

scholarly journals Gabapentinoids for treatment of neuropathic pain: a medicines usage evaluation at the Groote Schuur Hospital Chronic Pain Management Clinic

2019 ◽  
pp. 21-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
MLA Moabelo ◽  
R Parker
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Somatosensory System ◽  
Tricyclic Antidepressant ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Chronic Pain Management ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Chronic Postsurgical Pain ◽  
Usage Evaluation

Background: Neuropathic pain (NP), defined as pain caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory system, affects 6.9–10% of people worldwide. Pregabalin is currently recommended as a first line drug for NP in South Africa. Methods: A cross-sectional, retrospective, descriptive medicines usage evaluation (MUE) of pregabalin at Groote Schuur Hospital (GSH) Chronic Pain Management Clinic for the year 2017 was conducted. A MUE using a standardised data collection form was performed on 100 randomly selected patient folders. Data was summarised using descriptive statistics. Results: The majority of cases were women (76) with a mean age of 55.9 years (SD12.49). A diagnosis of NP was recorded in 58 folders and a “possible” diagnosis recorded in 7 folders. In 79 cases there was no mention of a tool/method used to diagnose NP. The most common condition diagnosed was chronic postsurgical pain with a neuropathic component (n = 16), followed by NP (n = 15). The most common initiating and current dose of pregabalin was 75 mg twice daily. In 56 patients, pregabalin was prescribed in conjunction with a tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) or selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI). Patient education was documented as having taken place in 76 of cases. Conclusions: Based on this MUE we recommend the use of screening tools for the diagnosis of neuropathic pain, and a focus on the initiating dose of pregabalin. The use of a standardised assessment document and the interdisciplinary team input at this clinic appears to optimise prescribing of pregabalin in line with practice guidelines.

scholarly journals Diurnal Profiles of Locomotive and Household Activities Using an Accelerometer in Community-Dwelling Older Adults with Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Survey

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (15) ◽  
pp. 5337
Author(s):  
Harutoshi Sakakima ◽  
Seiya Takada ◽  
Kosuke Norimatsu ◽  
Shotaro Otsuka ◽  
Kazuki Nakanishi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Older People ◽  
Musculoskeletal Disorders ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Household Activity ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Healthy Older Adults ◽  
Severe Chronic Pain ◽  
Household Activities

The present study investigates the diurnal profiles of locomotive and household activities in older adults with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) using an accelerometer. Furthermore, we examined the effect of chronic pain on their diurnal profiles in both activities. Seventy-one older adults with MSDs (73–89 years) were included in this cross-sectional survey, and 25 age-matched older adults (75–86 years) were selected as healthy older adults. The daily physical activities, including steps walked and locomotive and household activity intensities, were recorded using a triaxial accelerometer in terms of metabolic equivalent task-hours per week (MET-h/week). The diurnal profiles of steps and locomotive activities in older adults with MSDs were considerably lower than those of healthy older adults. In contrast, there was no significant decline in household activity. However, the locomotive and household activities were reduced by severe chronic pain. This survey demonstrated that the diurnal profiles of household activity in older people with MSDs as well as those in age-matched healthy older adults were maintained. Furthermore, severe chronic pain influenced both activities. Therefore, the maintenance of household activity throughout the day, as well as the management of chronic pain, may be important strategies for the promotion of physical activity in older people with MSDs.

scholarly journals Levels of physical activity in people with chronic pain

2017 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Romy Parker ◽  
Emma Bergman ◽  
Anelisiwe Mntambo ◽  
Shannon Stubbs ◽  
Matthew Wills
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Brief Pain Inventory ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Chronic Pain Management ◽  
Pain Group ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Management Intervention

Background: People who suffer from chronic pain are thought to have lower levels of physical activity compared to healthy individuals. However, there is a lack of evidence concerning levels of physical activity in South Africans with chronic pain. Objectives: To compare levels of physical activity in a South African sample of people with chronic pain compared to matched controls. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 24 participants (12 with chronic pain and 12 in the control group matched for age, gender and residential area). Convenience sampling was used. The participants with chronic pain (12) were identified from the Groote Schuur Hospital, Chronic Pain Management Clinic (CPMC) waiting list and had not yet received any chronic pain management intervention. Healthy matched controls were selected from volunteers in the community. With the desired alpha level set at 0.05 and the power at 0.9, 45 participants were required to detect a minimum of a 50 per cent difference between groups in levels of physical activity as measured in steps per day using pedometers. The international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) and the brief pain inventory (BPI) were used as measures of physical activity and pain. Objective indicators of physical activity that were used included the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), repeated sit-to-stand test (RSST), 7 days of pedometry and body mass index (BMI). Results: The chronic pain group performed significantly worse on the 6MWT (335 m [30–430] vs 680 m [430–795]; U = 0.5; p < 0.01) and on the RSST (17.9 s [11.83–105] vs 7.85 s [5.5–11.5]; U = 0; p < 0.01). The chronic pain group also had significantly lower scores on pedometry (mean daily: 2985.1 [32.8–13785.4] vs 6409.4 [4207.1–15313.6]; U = 35; p < 0.03). The BMI for the chronic pain group was significantly higher than matched controls (29.36 kg/m2 [18.94–34.63] vs 22.16 kg/m2 [17.1–30.86]; U = 34; p < 0.03). Conclusion: Participants with chronic pain had a reduced capacity for physical activity. The pedometry results illustrate a range of maladaptive strategies adopted by those with chronic pain. The majority of people with chronic pain appear to avoid physical activity leading to greater disability as a result of immobility and muscle atrophy. However, a small subgroup appears to ignore their pain and push themselves physically despite their pain. This perseverance behaviour leads to further pain as a consequence of muscle and joint overuse. Both maladaptive behavioural responses result in further sensitisation of the central nervous system. The method used to target physical activity in these patients should be considered in treatment planning, specifically for physiotherapy.

scholarly journals Survey of physician comfort and attitudes on perioperative opioid prescription in patients with chronic pain

2021 ◽  
pp. 201010582110081
Author(s):  
Pei Yu Tan ◽  
Diana Xin Hui Chan ◽  
Denise Desiree Bi Si Quah
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Singapore General Hospital ◽  
Chronic Pain Patients ◽  
Pain Patients

Objective: This study examines current practices, experiences, beliefs, concerns regarding negative outcomes and confidence of non-pain specialty anaesthetists regarding prescribing opioids to chronic pain patients. Design: An electronic cross-sectional survey was conducted by physicians from the Division of Anaesthesiology, excluding pain specialists, at the Singapore General Hospital. Methods: An online survey was conducted, investigating: (a) sociodemographic and practice characteristics; (b) current opioid prescribing practices; (c) experiences and beliefs towards prescribing opioid analgesics for chronic non-malignant pain; (d) confidence and comfort when prescribing opioids; and (e) educational and training needs in chronic pain management. Results: A total of 123 anaesthetists (80.9%) responded to the survey. It was noted that only 38.2% of respondents were comfortable managing patients with chronic pain. The majority (86.2%) felt that anaesthetists should be the primary doctors in the management of postoperative pain in chronic pain patients, and 61% believed that chronic pain trained specialist anaesthetists should be responsible; 92.7% of respondents agreed that patients who are educated about their pain tend to do better. Most importantly, 96.7% of respondents feel that they will benefit from more education regarding pain management in chronic pain patients. Conclusions: The majority of non-pain specialist anaesthetists recognise the importance of education regarding pain management for non-malignant chronic pain patients. Many feel that they are not confident in managing these patients and will benefit from continuing medical education and self-assessment courses to improve their confidence. These results could be used to enrich current pain management courses.

scholarly journals Pain experience and social support of endometriosis patients during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany – results of a web-based cross-sectional survey

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. e0256433
Author(s):  
Roxana Schwab ◽  
Katharina Anić ◽  
Kathrin Stewen ◽  
Mona W. Schmidt ◽  
Stefanie R. Kalb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Support ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Pain Perception ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Online Questionnaire ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Pain Experience ◽  
Social Distancing ◽  
Pain Disability

Background Endometriosis is a chronic pain condition in premenopausal women. Pain is mainly characterized by pain intensity and may induce disability in all areas of daily life. Nevertheless, pain is influenced by emotional and social factors as well. Social distancing measures or quarantine, as reaction to rapidly rising infections with the COVID-19 virus due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, were implemented across Europe to prevent the spread of the virus and social distancing measures were imposed by the German government by beginning of March 2020 with initiation of the lockdown by the end of March 2020. The objective of this study was to assess, how social distancing measures during the lockdown impacted the various aspects of pain perception in a group of chronic pain patients, such as women suffering from endometriosis. Methods Between 6th to 27th April 2020, an online questionnaire was activated at internet platforms of endometriosis patients support groups. Participants were asked retrospectively at one time point about their visual pain intensity measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS) and pain disability via pain disability index (PDI) prior to initiation of social distancing measures in Germany (VASP, PDIP), as well as the pain intensity and pain disability since implementation of social distancing measures (VASI, PDII). Differences of VAS and PDI previous and after implementation of social distancing measures were displayed as ΔVAS and ΔPDI. Pain experience and social support were assessed by a 5-point Likert scale. Results 285 participants completed at least one question regarding pain intensity, disability, pain experience or social support. Dysmenorrhea, the symptom with the highest level of pain assessed by VAS, decreased significantly during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic compared to the time period prior to social isolation (45.30% respondents experienced improvemenet vs 40.50% who experienced worsening; p = 0.025). The global physical impairment improved significantly (improvement of pain induced disability in 48.20% vs 40.90% with worsening of pain symptoms; p = 0.032) after the implementation of social distancing measures. Pain experience was negatively affected by social distancing measures, since frequency of pain awareness increased in 43.6% (p<0.001) of participants and 30.0% (p<0.001) more participants experienced pain as a threat. Verbalization of pain experience was reduced in 36.6% (p = 0.001) of participants and 14.6% (p = 0.91), 21.9% (p<0.001) and 31.5% (p<0.001) of participants reported less social support from their partner, family and friends. Conclusions Physical pain and disability on one hand and emotional and social pain experience on the other were differentially affected by the emerged emotional, social and health care constraints related to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of systematic reviews focused on analgesic opioids for non-cancer chronic pain management: A cross sectional analysis (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Analise Claassen ◽  
Jonathan Staheli ◽  
Ryan Ottwell ◽  
Wade Arthur ◽  
Will Roberts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Chronic Pain Management ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Study Characteristics ◽  
Analgesic Opioids

BACKGROUND Patients with chronic, non-cancer pain are frequently prescribed opioids, often due to favourable results from systematic reviews. However, even studies with high-quality evidence can suffer from spin, which includes misleading reporting, interpretation, and extrapolation of study results. OBJECTIVE This study evaluated spin in systematic review abstracts concerning analgesic opioids for non-cancer, chronic pain management and the relationship between its presence and study characteristics. METHODS We searched MEDLINE and Embase for systematic reviews pertaining to analgesic opioids for non-cancer, chronic pain management. Screening and data extraction were done in a masked, duplicate fashion. Abstracts were evaluated for the presence of the nine most-severe types of spin. RESULTS Our search returned 1,109 articles; of which, 53 systematic reviews met our eligibility criteria. We found at least one type of spin in 30.2% of the included systematic review abstracts. Spin type 5 was the most common type of spin in our sample and occurred in 17% of abstracts. Spin types 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 were not detected. Abstracts of systematic reviews published in journals that recommend PRISMA adherence were 9.33 times more likely to contain spin compared to those published in journals without specific PRISMA guidelines. The remaining study characteristics were not significantly associated with spin. CONCLUSIONS Our results showed that nearly one-third of the 53 included systematic reviews contained at least one type of spin in their abstract. Based on our results, systematic reviews about managing chronic, non-cancer pain with opioids require improvements in their abstract reporting.

Chronic Pain Management and Being Vulnerable in Older People: A Qualitative Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Human Manoochehri ◽  
Manouchehr Shirazi ◽  
Mansoreh Zagheri Tafreshi ◽  
Farid Zayeri
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Older People ◽  
Chronic Pain Management
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document