scholarly journals A systematic review of comprehensive geriatric assessment to improve outcomes for frail older people being rapidly discharged from acute hospital: 'interface geriatrics'

2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 436-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. P. Conroy ◽  
T. Stevens ◽  
S. G. Parker ◽  
J. R. F. Gladman
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Older People ◽  
Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Acute Hospital ◽  
Frail Older People

scholarly journals 17 Improving Frailty Identification and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) Completion on the Wards

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i1-i8
Author(s):  
D Verma ◽  
F Bonora ◽  
R Walker ◽  
M Kaneshamoorthy ◽  
L Bafadhel
Keyword(s):  
Older People ◽  
Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Elderly Care ◽  
Frail Older People ◽  
Clinical Frailty Scale ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Qualitative Feedback ◽  
Complicated Course ◽  
User Friendly

Abstract Introduction The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is known to deliver substantial and measurable health improvements to frail older people, including increased independence and a reduction in mortality.1 The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) can detect older adults at higher risk of complicated course and longer hospital stay.2 Despite the known benefits, previous audits has shown poor documentation on geriatric wards at Southend Hospital. Therefore, we devised a Quality Improvement Project to improve the uptake of both these. Methods A total of two Plan Do Study Act (PDSA) cycles were completed where CGA completion and CFS documentation was audited. Each cycle lasted two weeks (25 patients). Qualitative feedback was obtained from the members of multidisciplinary team to aid improvements. The baseline audit was based on the introduction of a 2-page ward proforma for all new patients. The first intervention was an improved 2-page ward-proforma. The second intervention was a single page ward-proforma. Results Originally, 40% of new patients admitted onto the ward had a CGA assessment and CFS score. After the first intervention, 79% (19) patients had a CFS score and a CGA assessment. 21% had a full CGA completed and 58% had partial CGA. Feedback included wanting a single page proforma to increase uptake. Questions needed to be more unambiguous and more tick boxes. After the second intervention 100% (25) patients had a CFS score and a CGA assessment. 40% (10) had a full CGA completed and 60% (15) had a partial CGA. Feedback include incorporating the ward round documentation to avoid repetition. Conclusions The results show that by using a focused, concise and user-friendly proforma, uptake of the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and Clinical Frailty Scale can be significantly increased, bringing substantial and measurable health improvements to frail older people admitted to elderly care wards. References 1. Welsh TJ, Gordon AL, Gladman JR. Int J Clin Pract. 2014;68(3):290–293. 2. Juma S, Taabazuing MM, Montero-Odasso M. Can Geriatr J. 2016;19(2):34–39.

scholarly journals Comprehensive geriatric assessment of frail older people: ideals and reality

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 728-734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Synneve Dahlin Ivanoff ◽  
Anna Duner ◽  
Kajsa Eklund ◽  
Katarina Wilhelmson ◽  
Eva Lidén ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older People ◽  
Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Frail Older People

scholarly journals Comprehensive geriatric assessment in integrated care for older people living at home: a systematic review

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (s2) ◽  
pp. 277
Author(s):  
Annerieke Stoop ◽  
Manon Lette ◽  
Paul Van Gils ◽  
Giel Nijpels ◽  
Caroline Baan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Older People ◽  
Integrated Care ◽  
Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Care For Older People ◽  
At Home

scholarly journals Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for Frail Older People in Swedish Acute Care Settings (CGA-Swed): A Randomised Controlled Study

Geriatrics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarina Wilhelmson ◽  
Isabelle Andersson Hammar ◽  
Anna Ehrenberg ◽  
Johan Niklasson ◽  
Jeanette Eckerblad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older People ◽  
Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Frail Older People ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Randomised Controlled

The aim of the study is to evaluate the effects of the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) for frail older people in Swedish acute hospital settings – the CGA-Swed study. In this study protocol, we present the study design, the intervention and the outcome measures as well as the baseline characteristics of the study participants. The study is a randomised controlled trial with an intervention group receiving the CGA and a control group receiving medical assessment without the CGA. Follow-ups were conducted after 1, 6 and 12 months, with dependence in activities of daily living (ADL) as the primary outcome measure. The study group consisted of frail older people (75 years and older) in need of acute medical hospital care. The study design, randomisation and process evaluation carried out were intended to ensure the quality of the study. Baseline data show that the randomisation was successful and that the sample included frail older people with high dependence in ADL and with a high comorbidity. The CGA contributed to early recognition of frail older people’s needs and ensured a care plan and follow-up. This study is expected to show positive effects on frail older people’s dependence in ADL, life satisfaction and satisfaction with health and social care.

scholarly journals Comprehensive geriatric assessment for frail older people in acute hospitals: the HoW-CGA mixed-methods study

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (15) ◽  
pp. 1-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Paul Conroy ◽  
Martin Bardsley ◽  
Paul Smith ◽  
Jenny Neuburger ◽  
Eilís Keeble ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Older People ◽  
Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Frailty Index ◽  
Large Data ◽  
Acute Hospital ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Acute Hospitals ◽  
The Uk

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to provide high-quality evidence on delivering hospital-wide Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA).Objective(s)(1) To define CGA, its processes, outcomes and costs in the published literature, (2) to identify the processes, outcomes and costs of CGA in existing hospital settings in the UK, (3) to identify the characteristics of the recipients and beneficiaries of CGA in existing hospital settings in the UK and (4) to develop tools that will assist in the implementation of hospital-wide CGA.DesignMixed-methods study combining a mapping review, national survey, large data analysis and qualitative methods.ParticipantsPeople aged ≥ 65 years in acute hospital settings.Data sourcesLiterature review – Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, MEDLINE and EMBASE. Survey – acute hospital trusts. Large data analyses – (1) people aged ≥ 75 years in 2008 living in Leicester, Nottingham or Southampton (development cohort,n = 22,139); (2) older people admitted for short stay (Nottingham/Leicester,n = 825) to a geriatric ward (Southampton,n = 246) or based in the community (Newcastle,n = 754); (3) people aged ≥ 75 years admitted to acute hospitals in England in 2014–15 (validation study,n = 1,013,590). Toolkit development – multidisciplinary national stakeholder group (co-production); field-testing with cancer/surgical teams in Newcastle/Leicester.ResultsLiterature search – common outcomes included clinical, operational and destinational, but not patient-reported, outcome measures. Survey – highly variable provision of multidisciplinary assessment and care across hospitals. Quantitative analyses – in the development cohort, older people with frailty diagnoses formed a distinct group and had higher non-elective hospital use than older people without a frailty diagnosis. Patients with the highest 20% of hospital frailty risk scores had increased odds of 30-day mortality [odds ratio (OR) 1.7], long length of stay (OR 6.0) and 30-day re-admission (OR 1.5). The score had moderate agreement with the Fried and Rockwood scales. Pilot toolkit evaluation – participants across sites were still at the beginning of their work to identify patients and plan change. In particular, competing definitions of the role of geriatricians were evident.LimitationsThe survey was limited by an incomplete response rate but it still provides the largest description of acute hospital care for older people to date. The risk stratification tool is not contemporaneous, although it remains a powerful predictor of patient harms. The toolkit evaluation is still rather nascent and could have meaningfully continued for another year or more.ConclusionsCGA remains the gold standard approach to improving a range of outcomes for older people in acute hospitals. Older people at risk can be identified using routine hospital data. Toolkits aimed at enhancing the delivery of CGA by non-specialists can be useful but require prolonged geriatrician support and implementation phases. Future work could involve comparing the hospital-based frailty index with the electronic Frailty Index and further testing of the clinical toolkits in specialist services.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.

scholarly journals Effect of in-hospital comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in older people with hip fracture. The protocol of the Trondheim Hip Fracture Trial

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Olav Sletvold ◽  
Jorunn L Helbostad ◽  
Pernille Thingstad ◽  
Kristin Taraldsen ◽  
Anders Prestmo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Older People ◽  
Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document