603 CHALLENGES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE ORTHOSTATIC HYPOTENSION ASSOCIATED WITH SUPINE HYPERTENSION IN A PATIENT WITH AUTONOMIC DYSFUNCTION ON BACKGROUND OF NASOPHARYNGEAL CARCINOMA AND TYPE II DIABETES MELLITUS

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii14-ii18
Author(s):  
Q M N Rachel ◽  
K Mamun ◽  
M H Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Orthostatic Hypotension ◽  
Carotid Sinus ◽  
Blood Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Pharmacological Interventions ◽  
Supine Hypertension ◽  
Neck Irradiation ◽  
Baroreflex Failure

Abstract Introduction Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy increases long term survival in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, radiotherapy of the carotid sinus or brain stem can evolve labile hypertension and orthostatic intolerance from chronic baroreflex failure. Diabetes would also cause this neuropathy. Management of patients with Supine hypertension-Orthostatic hypotension can be very challenging. Methods A case report was done on a 71-year-old man with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma status post radiation therapy who was admitted with severe supine hypertension-orthostatic hypotension. Patient was managed with both non-pharmacological and pharmacological methods, and monitored for postural symptoms, complications of severe supine hypertension—which has been linked to left ventricular hypertrophy and kidney dysfunction, and placed on 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to aid in management so as to prevent hypertension induced organ damage. Results This review outlines the pathophysiology of Supine hypertension-Orthostatic hypotension, treatment complications and potential management strategies recommendations for this group of patients. It revealed the benefit of having a 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, which provides insight on the timing and magnitude of an individual’s blood pressure fluctuations throughout the day so as to further guide management. Conclusion Chronic baroreflex failure is a late sequela of neck irradiation for naso-pharyngeal carcinoma due to accelerated atherosclerosis in the region of the carotid sinus baroreceptor. Treatment goal is achieved with adequate control of pre-syncopal symptoms and prevention of long term complications. Non-pharmacological interventions remain the first line of therapy, followed by pharmacological interventions as necessary. Nonetheless, management of blood pressure in these elderly patients with baroreflex dysfunction remains challenging and should be individualized. Moving forward, a prospective study on the incidence of late onset, iatrogenic baroreflex failure as a late complication of neck irradiation and its particular relationship to carotid arterial rigidity should be conducted to increase awareness, timely diagnosis and management of the condition among physicians.

ABPM Comparison of the Anti-Hypertensive Profiles of Telmisartan and Enalapril in Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Essential Hypertension

2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 543-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Amerena ◽  
S Pappas ◽  
J-P Ouellet ◽  
L Williams ◽  
D O'Shaughnessy
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Essential Hypertension ◽  
Blood Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Pressure Control ◽  
Moderate Essential Hypertension ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Night Time ◽  
Once Daily

In this multicentre, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE) study, the efficacy of 12 weeks' treatment with once-daily telmisartan 40–80 mg and enalapril 10–20 mg was evaluated using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in 522 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Patients were titrated to the higher dose of study drug at week 6 if mean seated diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was ≥ 90 mmHg. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in ambulatory DBP in the last 6 h of the 24-h dosing interval after 12 weeks' treatment. Telmisartan and enalapril produced similar reductions from baseline in DBP and systolic blood pressure (SBP) over all ABPM periods evaluated (last 6 h, 24-h, daytime and night-time). Telmisartan produced a significantly greater reduction in mean seated trough DBP, measured unblinded with an automated ABPM device in the clinic, amounting to a difference of −2.02 mmHg ( P < 0.01). A significantly greater proportion of patients achieved a seated diastolic response with telmisartan than enalapril (59% versus 50%; P < 0.05), also measured with the same ABPM device. Both treatments were well tolerated. Compared with telmisartan, enalapril was associated with a higher incidence of cough (8.9% versus 0.8%) and hypotension (3.9% versus 1.1%). Therefore, telmisartan may provide better long-term compliance and, consequently, better blood pressure control than enalapril.

Standardized Autonomic Testing in Patients With Probable Radiation-Induced Afferent Baroreflex Failure

Hypertension ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Lamotte ◽  
Elizabeth A. Coon ◽  
Mariana D. Suarez ◽  
Paola Sandroni ◽  
Eduardo Benarroch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Blood Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Sweat Test ◽  
Plasma Norepinephrine ◽  
Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Autonomic Testing ◽  
Baroreflex Failure ◽  
Radiation Induced ◽  
Thermoregulatory Sweat Test ◽  
Blood Pressure Lability

Injury of the afferent limb of the baroreflex from neck radiation causes radiation-induced afferent baroreflex failure (R-ABF). Identification and management of R-ABF is challenging. We aimed to investigate the pattern of autonomic dysfunction on standardized autonomic testing in patients with probable R-ABF. We retrospectively analyzed all autonomic reflex screens performed at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN, between 2000 and 2020 in patients with probable R-ABF. Additional tests reviewed included ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, plasma norepinephrine, and thermoregulatory sweat test. We identified 90 patients with probable R-ABF. Median total composite autonomic severity score (range, 0–10) was 7 (interquartile range, 6–7). Cardiovascular adrenergic impairment was seen in 85 patients (94.4%), increased blood pressure recovery time after Valsalva maneuver in 71 patients (78.9%; median 17.4 seconds), and orthostatic hypotension in 68 patients (75.6%). Cardiovagal impairment was demonstrated by abnormal heart rate responses to deep breathing (79.5%), Valsalva ratio (87.2%), and vagal baroreflex sensitivity (57.9%). Plasma norepinephrine was elevated and rose appropriately upon standing (722–1207 pg/mL). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring revealed hypertension, postural hypotension, hypertensive surges, tachycardia, and absence of nocturnal dipping. Blood pressure lability correlated with impaired vagal baroreflex function. Postganglionic sympathetic sudomotor function was normal in most cases; the most frequent thermoregulatory sweat test finding was focal neck anhidrosis (78.9%). Standardized autonomic testing in R-ABF demonstrates cardiovascular adrenergic impairment with orthostatic hypotension, blood pressure lability, and elevated plasma norepinephrine. Cardiovagal impairment is common, while sudomotor deficits are limited to direct radiation effects.

Standing and Supine Blood Pressure Outcomes Associated With Droxidopa and Midodrine in Patients With Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension: A Bayesian Meta-analysis and Mixed Treatment Comparison of Randomized Trials

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (12) ◽  
pp. 1182-1194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack J. Chen ◽  
Yi Han ◽  
Jonathan Tang ◽  
Ivan Portillo ◽  
Robert A. Hauser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Orthostatic Hypotension ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mixed Treatment Comparison ◽  
Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension ◽  
Supine Hypertension ◽  
Treatment Comparison ◽  
Mixed Treatment

Background: The comparative effects of droxidopa and midodrine on standing systolic blood pressure (sSBP) and risk of supine hypertension in patients with neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (NOH) are unknown. Objective: To perform a Bayesian mixed-treatment comparison meta-analysis of droxidopa and midodrine in the treatment of NOH. Methods: The PubMed, CENTRAL, and EMBASE databases were searched up to November 16, 2016. Study selection consisted of randomized trials comparing droxidopa or midodrine with placebo and reporting on changes in sSBP and supine hypertension events. Data were pooled to perform a comparison among interventions in a Bayesian fixed-effects model using vague priors and Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation with Gibbs sampling, calculating pooled mean changes in sSBP and risk ratios (RRs) for supine hypertension with associated 95% credible intervals (CrIs). Results: Six studies (4 administering droxidopa and 2 administering midodrine) enrolling a total of 783 patients were included for analysis. The mean change from baseline in sSBP was significantly greater for both drugs when compared with placebo (droxidopa 6.2 mm Hg [95% CrI = 2.4-10] and midodrine 17 mm Hg [95% CrI = 11.4-23]). Comparative analysis revealed a significant credible difference between droxidopa and midodrine. The RR for supine hypertension was significantly greater for midodrine, but not droxidopa, when compared with placebo (droxidopa RR = 1.4 [95% CrI = 0.7-2.7] and midodrine RR = 5.1 [95% CrI = 1.6-24]). Conclusion and Relevance: In patients with NOH, both droxidopa and midodrine significantly increase sSBP, the latter to a greater extent. However, midodrine, but not droxidopa, significantly increases risk of supine hypertension.

scholarly journals The Importance of Home Versus 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring and Assessment of Blood Pressure Variability in Hypertension

2016 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-242
Author(s):  
Annamária Magdás ◽  
Boglárka Belényi ◽  
Adina Gaburoi ◽  
Alexandru Incze
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Ambulatory Blood Pressure ◽  
Blood Pressure Variability ◽  
Blood Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Home Blood Pressure ◽  
Home Blood Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Hypertensive Patients ◽  
Variability Index

AbstractBackground: A number of studies reveal that home blood pressure variability is associated with cardiovascular risk factors. However, we do not have a consensus regarding the variability index and the frequency of measurements.Objective: The aim of the study was to assess home blood pressure variability for a period of 7 consecutive days and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure variability using the average real variability index and to test whether home blood pressure variability represents a suitable parameter for long-term monitoring of the hypertensive patients.Material and methods: A number of 31 hypertensive patients were included in the study, 8 male, 23 female, mean age 60.19±7.35 years. At the inclusion ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed, home blood pressure monitoring was carried out for 7 consecutive days with 2 measurements daily. We compared ambulatory blood pressure values, variability using paired t-test. We were looking for correlations between HBP values and cardiovascular risk factors.Results: Ambulatory versus home blood pressure derived mean blood pressure was 131.38±15.2 versus 131.93±8.25, p=0.81. Ambulatory derived variability was 10.65±2.05 versus home variability 10.56±4.83, p=0.91. Home versus ambulatory pulse pressure was 51.8± 9.06 mmHg vs. 54.9±11.9 mmHg, p=0.046. We found positive correlation between HBPV and home BP values, p=0.027, r2=0.1577, (CI: 0.04967 to 0.6588). Home, as well as ambulatory derived variability were positively correlated to age p=0.043, r2=0.1377 (CI: 0.01234 to 0.6451) versus p<0.0001, CI: 0.3870 to 0.8220, r2=0.4302.Conclusion: Assessment of home blood pressure monitoring and variability could represent a well-tolerated alternative for long-term follow-up of hypertension management.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document