513 THE INFLUENCE OF FRAILTY ON OUTCOMES FOR OLDER ADULTS ADMITTED TO HOSPITAL WITH BENIGN BILIARY AND PANCREATIC DISEASE

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii14-ii18
Author(s):  
M Thomas ◽  
M Baltatzis ◽  
A Price ◽  
L Pearce ◽  
J Fox ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Acute Cholangitis ◽  
Pancreatic Disease ◽  
Biliary Disease ◽  
Clinical Frailty Scale ◽  
Care Level ◽  
Frail Patients ◽  
Common Diagnosis ◽  
Endoscopic Cholangiopancreatography ◽  
Observational Cohort

Abstract Introduction The prevalence and complications of biliary disease increase with age. We describe the prevalence of frailty in older patients hospitalised with benign biliary and pancreatic disease and establish its association with mortality and duration of hospital stay. Methods Prospective observational cohort study of patients aged 75 years and over admitted with a diagnosis of acute biliary disease to a surgical hospital unit between 17/09/2014 and 20/03/2017. Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score was recorded on admission. Results We included 200 patients with a median age of 82 (75–99), 60% females, 89% lived in their homes, 154 (77%) were independent for personal and 99 (49.5%) for instrumental ADLs, 95% mobilised independently, 17.5% had memory impairment and 8% low mood. Acute cholecystitis was the most common diagnosis (43%) followed by acute cholangitis (36%) and acute pancreatitis (21%). 99 patients were non-frail (NF = CFS 1–4) and 101 were frail (F = CFS ≥5). 104 patients received medical treatment only. Surgery was more common in non-frail (F 2% vs. NF 11%), percutaneous drainage more frequently carried out in frail patients (15% vs. NF 5%) and endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was similar in both groups (F 32%vs. NF 31%). Frailty was associated with worse clinical outcomes in F vs. NF: functional deconditioning (34% vs. 11%), increased care level (19% vs 3%), length of stay (12 vs. 7 days), 90-day (8% vs. 3%) and 1 year-mortality (48% vs. 24%). Conclusion Half of patients in our cohort of older adults hospitalised with acute biliary disease were frail. Higher scores of frailty are associated with increased mortality. Compared with non-frail patients, individuals living with frailty were less likely to undergo surgical treatment, spent longer in hospital and were less likely to remain alive at 12 months after hospital discharge.

scholarly journals SP3.1.2 The influence of frailty on outcomes for older adults admitted to hospital with benign biliary and pancreatic disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Thomas ◽  
Minas Baltatzis ◽  
Angeline Price ◽  
Lyndsay Pearce ◽  
Jenny Fox ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Daily Living ◽  
Acute Cholangitis ◽  
Pancreatic Disease ◽  
Biliary Disease ◽  
Clinical Frailty Scale ◽  
Care Level ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Common Diagnosis ◽  
Endoscopic Cholangiopancreatography ◽  
Observational Cohort

Abstract Aims To study the prevalence and complications of biliary disease with increasing age. We describe the prevalence of frailty in older patients hospitalised with benign biliary and pancreatic disease and establish its association with mortality and duration of hospital stay. Methods Prospective observational cohort study of patients aged 75 years and over admitted with acute biliary disease between 17/09/2014 and 20/03/2017. Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score was recorded on admission. Results 200 patients with a median age of 82 (75-99), 60% females, 154 (77%) were independent for personal and 99 (49.5%) for instrumental activities of daily living. Acute cholecystitis was the most common diagnosis (43%), acute cholangitis (36%) and acute pancreatitis (21%). 99 patients were non-frail (NF = CFS 1-4) and 101 were frail (F= CFS ≥5). 104 patients received medical treatment only. Surgery was more common in non-frail (F 2% vs. NF 11%), percutaneous drainage more frequently carried out in frail patients (15% vs. NF 5%) and endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was similar in both groups (F 32%vs. NF 31%). Frailty was associated with worse clinical outcomes. F vs. NF: functional deconditioning (34% vs. 11%), increased care level (19% vs 3%), length of stay (12 vs. 7 days), 90-day (8% vs. 3%) and 1 year-mortality (48% vs. 24%). Conclusions : Higher frailty scoring is associated with increased mortality in acute biliary disease. Individuals living with frailty were less likely to undergo surgical treatment, spent longer in hospital and were less likely to remain alive at 12 months after hospital discharge.

scholarly journals 261 Sleep and Frailty: Examining the Effects of Frailty on Sleep Disturbance in Hospitalised Older Adults

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii1-iii16
Author(s):  
Helen Mannion ◽  
Rónán O'Caoimh
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Sleep Quality ◽  
Sleep Disturbance ◽  
Cognitive Status ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Charlson Comorbidity Index Score ◽  
Night Time ◽  
Clinical Frailty Scale ◽  
Prolonged Length ◽  
Frail Patients

Abstract Background Sleep disturbance is common in hospital, potentially resulting in poor clinical outcomes. Frailty is similarly prevalent and associated with multiple adverse events. Despite this, little is known about the interaction between frailty and sleep among older hospital inpatients. Methods Consecutive, non-critically ill patients aged ≥70, admitted medically through a large university hospital emergency department (ED) during the preceding 24 hours, were evaluated with measures assessing overnight sleep quality (Richards Campbell Sleep Questionnaire/RCSQ), baseline sleep (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index/PSQI) and insomnia (Insomnia Severity Index/ISI). Additional variables included medications, frailty (PRISMA-7 scores ≥3 and Clinical Frailty Scale/CFS scores ≥5), functional and cognitive status, and night-time noise levels. Patients were reassessed 48 hours later. Results Over four weeks, 152 patients, mean age 80 (±6.8) years were included; 61% were male (n=92). In all, 43% were frail (mean CFS score 4.23±1.6), median PRISMA-7 score 4±4; a further 24% were pre-frail. The median Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 6±2. The majority, 72% (110/152), reported impaired baseline sleep quality (PSQI ≥5) and 13% (20/152) had clinical insomnia (ISI ≥15). The median time spent in ED was 23±13 hours, median duration asleep was only one hour (range 0-8). After adjusting for possible confounders, frailty status was significantly associated with lower PSQI (p<0.001) but not ISI (p=0.07) and RCSQ (p=0.07) scores. Frail patients were twice as likely to report poor baseline sleep OR 2, (95% CI:1.3-3.2). Baseline and overnight sleep disturbance were not associated with prolonged length of stay (LOS) or 30-day readmission rates. Conclusion The prevalence of sleep disturbance and clinical insomnia among older adults admitted through ED is high and overnight sleep quality low, although these did not impact on LOS or 30-day re-admission rates. Frail patients reported significantly poorer baseline sleep but did not have higher rates of insomnia or experience worse overnight sleep.

scholarly journals The FRAIL-FIT 30 Study – Factors influencing 30-day mortality in frail patients admitted to ICU: A retrospective observational cohort study

2021 ◽  
pp. 175114372098516
Author(s):  
David Hewitt ◽  
Michael Ratcliffe ◽  
Malcolm G Booth
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Single Point ◽  
Observational Cohort Study ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Royal Infirmary ◽  
Clinical Frailty Scale ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
Frail Patients ◽  
Observational Cohort ◽  
Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

Background Frailty is a multi-dimensional syndrome of reduced reserve, resulting from overlapping physiological decrements across multiple systems. The contributing factors, temporality and magnitude of frailty’s effect on mortality after ICU admission are unclear. This study assessed frailty’s impact on mortality and life sustaining therapy (LST) use, following ICU admission. Methods This single-centre retrospective observational cohort study analysed data collected prospectively in Glasgow Royal Infirmary ICU. Of 684 eligible patients, 171 were frail and 513 were non-frail. Frailty was quantified using the Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). All patients were followed up 1-year after ICU admission. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 30-days post-ICU admission. Key secondary outcomes included mortality at 1-year and LST use. Results Frail patients were significantly less likely to survive 30-days post-ICU admission (61.4% vs 81.1%, p < 0.001). This continued to 1-year (48.5% vs 68.2%, p < 0.001). Frailty significantly increased mortality hazards in covariate-adjusted analyses at 30-days (HR 1.56; 95%CI 1.14–2.15; p = 0.006), and 1-year (HR 1.35; 95%CI 1.03–1.76; p = 0.028). Single-point CFS increases were associated with a 30-day mortality hazard of 1.23 (95%CI 1.13–1.34; p < 0.001) in unadjusted analyses, and 1.11 (95%CI 1.01–1.22; p = 0.026) after covariate adjustment. Frail patients received significantly more days of LST (median[IQR]: 5[3,11] vs 4[2,9], p = 0.008). Conclusion Frailty was significantly associated with greater mortality at all time points studied, but most notably in the first 30-days post-ICU admission. This was despite greater LST use. The accrual effect of frailty increased adverse outcomes. Point-by-point use of frailty scoring could allow for more informed decision making in ICU.

scholarly journals The FRAIL-FIT study: Frailty’s relationship with adverse-event incidence in the longer term, at one year following intensive care unit treatment – A retrospective observational cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Hewitt ◽  
Malcolm G Booth
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Observational Cohort Study ◽  
Clinical Frailty Scale ◽  
Frail Patients ◽  
Observational Cohort ◽  
One Year ◽  
Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

Introduction Frailty is a syndrome of decreased reserve and heightened vulnerability. Frailty scoring has potential to facilitate more informed decisions in the intensive care unit. To validate this, its relationship with outcomes must be tested extensively. This study aimed to investigate frailty’s impact on adverse outcomes after intensive care unit admission, primarily one-year mortality. Methods This single-centre retrospective observational cohort study examined prospectively collected data from 400 intensive care unit patients. Frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale and defined as Clinical Frailty Scale ≥ 5. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses tested the relationships of frailty, covariates and outcomes. Results Of 400 eligible patients, 111 (27.8%) were frail and 289 (72.3%) were non-frail. Compared to non-frail patients, frail patients were older (62 vs. 56, p < 0.001) and had higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores (22 vs. 19, p < 0.001). Females were more likely to be frail than males (34.1% vs. 22.9% frail, p = 0.018). Frail patients were less likely to survive the intensive care unit (p = 0.03), hospital (p = 0.003) or to one year (p < 0.001). Frailty significantly increased one-year mortality hazards in unadjusted analyses (hazard ratio 1.96; 95% confidence interval 1.41–2.72; p < 0.001) and covariate adjusted analyses (hazard ratio 1.41; 95% confidence interval 1.00–1.98; p = 0.0497). Frail patients had more hospital admissions (p = 0.014) and longer hospital stays within both one year before (p = 0.002) and one year after intensive care unit admission (p = 0.012). Conclusions Frailty was common and associated with greater age, female gender, higher sickness severity and more healthcare use. Frailty was significantly associated with greater risks of mortality in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. Frailty scoring is a promising tool which could improve decision making in intensive care.

DISCORDANCE ABOUT FRAILTY DIAGNOSIS BETWEEN SURROGATES AND PHYSICIANS AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO HOSPITAL MORTALITY IN CRITICALLY ILL OLDER ADULTS

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
A.A. Hope ◽  
M. Ng Gong
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Clinical Frailty Scale ◽  
Observational Cohort ◽  
Critically Ill Adults ◽  
Prolonged Hospital

Abstract: The preponderance of studies on frailty assessment in critically ill adults have used the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) to quantify frailty and previous research suggests that surrogates were more likely to be optimistic than physicians in their CFS scores. Whether discordance between surrogates and physicians was relevant to prognosis has been underexplored. Therefore, in a prospective observational cohort of 298 critically ill older adults, we aimed 1) to describe factors related to discordance and 2) to estimate the relationship between such discordance and hospital mortality and other short-term outcomes. Discordance between surrogates and physician was present in 89/298 (29.9%) and independently associated with a higher risk of hospital mortality. Discordance was not associated with markers of intensity of treatment such as intubation, blood transfusion, incident dialysis for acute renal failure and prolonged hospital length of stay. Understanding factors relevant to discordance between physicians and surrogates may lend further insights into short-term prognosis for older adults with critical illness.

scholarly journals Clinical Features, Inpatient Trajectories and Frailty in Older Inpatients With COVID-19: A Retrospective Observational Study.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher N Osuafor ◽  
Catriona Davidson ◽  
Alistair J Mackett ◽  
Marie Goujon ◽  
Lelane Van Der Poel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Retrospective Observational Study ◽  
Clinical Frailty Scale ◽  
Frail Patients

Introduction: We describe the clinical features and inpatient trajectories of older adults hospitalized with COVID-19, and explore relationships with frailty. Methods: This retrospective observational study included older adults admitted as an emergency to a University Hospital who were diagnosed with COVID-19. Patient characteristics and hospital outcomes, primarily inpatient death or death within 14 days of discharge, were described for the whole cohort and by frailty status. Associations with mortality were further evaluated using Cox Proportional Hazards Regression (Hazard Ratio [HR], 95% Confidence Interval). Results: 214 patients (94 women) were included of whom 142 (66.4%) were frail with a median Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score of 6. Frail compared to non-frail patients were more likely to present with atypical symptoms including new or worsening confusion (45.1% vs 20.8%, p&lt;0.001) and were more likely to die (66% vs 16%, p=0.001). Older age, being male, presenting with high illness acuity and high frailty were independent predictors of death and a dose-response association between frailty and mortality was observed (CFS 1-4: reference; CFS 5-6: HR 1.78, 95% CI 0.90, 3.53; CFS 7-8: HR 2.57, 95% CI 1.26, 5.24). Conclusions: Clinicians should have a low threshold for testing for COVID-19 in older and frail patients during periods of community viral transmission and diagnosis should prompt early advanced care planning.

scholarly journals Clinical features and inpatient trajectories of older inpatients with COVID-19: a retrospective observational study.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher N Osuafor ◽  
Catriona Davidson ◽  
Alistair J Mackett ◽  
Marie Goujon ◽  
Lelane Van Der Poel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Retrospective Observational Study ◽  
Clinical Frailty Scale ◽  
Atypical Symptoms ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Frail Patients ◽  
Older Inpatients

Abstract Background: A comprehensive description of the clinical characteristics, inpatient trajectory and relationship with frailty of older inpatients admitted with COVID-19 is essential in the management of older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical features and inpatient trajectory of older inpatients with confirmed COVID -19.Methods: This was a retrospective observational study of hospitalised older adults. Subjects include unscheduled medical admissions of older inpatients to a University Hospital with laboratory and clinically confirmed COVID-19. The primary outcome was death during the inpatient stay or within 14 days of discharge after a maximum follow up time of 45 days. The characteristics of the cohort were described in detail as a whole and by frailty status.Results: 214 patients were included in this study with a mean length of stay of 11 days (Range 6 to 18 days), of whom 140 (65.4%) patients were discharged and 74 (34.6%) patients died in hospital. 142 (66.4%) patients were frail with median Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score of 6. Frail patients were more likely to present with atypical symptoms including new or worsening confusion compared to non-frail patients (20.8% vs 45.1%, p<0.001) and were more likely to die in hospital or within 14 days of discharge (66% vs 16%, p=0.001). Older age, being male, presenting with high illness acuity and high frailty were all independently associated with higher risk of death and a dose response association between higher frailty and higher mortality was observed.Conclusions: Older adult inpatients with COVID-19 infection are likely to present with atypical symptoms, experience delirium and have a high mortality, especially if they are also living with frailty. Clinicians should have a low threshold for testing for COVID-19 in older and frail patients presenting to hospital as an emergency during periods when there is community transmission of COVID-19 and, when diagnosed, this should prompt early advanced care planning with the patient and family.

137 Does the Clinical Frailty Scale Predict Rehabilitation Potential in Older Patients?

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii17-iii65
Author(s):  
Maeve D'Alton ◽  
Joanne Larkin ◽  
Avril McKeag ◽  
Grace Coakley ◽  
Emma Nolan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Discharge Planning ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Discharge Destination ◽  
Clinical Frailty Scale ◽  
Common Diagnosis ◽  
Rehabilitation Potential ◽  
Surgical Admission

Abstract Background The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is widely used to assess frailty in older adults and reflects functional independence. We examined its use as an outcome measure in an offsite rehabilitation unit for patients over 65 transferred from an acute hospital following medical/surgical admission. Methods Patients were given a CFS score by consensus opinion from the multidisciplinary team on admission and on completion of rehabilitation. We included data on diagnosis, length of stay and discharge destination Results Thirty patients, with a mean age of 80, completed rehabilitation over a four-month period. The most common diagnosis was fracture of hip or pelvis (53%). Median CFS was 6 on admission and 5 on discharge (range 3-8). Twenty-one (70%) patients saw an improvement in CFS of an average of one point on the scale irrespective of admission score. Of those that improved, 81% were discharged directly home with no need for increased support services, compared with 11% of those who did not improve. Mean length of stay was significantly less in those with mild/moderate frailty (CFS 5-6) at admission versus severe frailty (31 vs 53.8 days, p<0.01). Conclusion Frailty score improved in the majority of patients undergoing rehabilitation, regardless of admission score; CFS alone did not predict rehabilitation potential, emphasising the importance of offering rehabilitation to frail older adults – better judged by experienced clinical assessment. CFS is a broad 9-point tool that can miss small improvements in physical function based on other objective scores e.g. FIM+FAM. Severe frailty was associated with longer length of stay in rehabilitation, possibly reflecting more complex discharge planning as well as rehabilitation progress in this group.

scholarly journals Older adults with SARS‐CoV2 infection: Utility of the Clinical Frailty Scale to predict mortality

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marine Gilis ◽  
Ninon Chagrot ◽  
Severine Koeberle ◽  
Thomas Tannou ◽  
Anne‐Sophie Brunel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Clinical Frailty Scale

scholarly journals Bedside Ultrasound Measures of Muscle Mass and Frailty Measures in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 269-269
Author(s):  
Kenneth Madden ◽  
Boris Feldman ◽  
Shane Arishenkoff ◽  
Graydon Meneilly
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Muscle Mass ◽  
Frailty Index ◽  
Geriatric Medicine ◽  
Muscle Thickness ◽  
Vancouver General Hospital ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Clinical Frailty Scale ◽  
Community Dwelling Older Adults

Abstract The age-associated loss of muscle mass and strength in older adults is called sarcopenia, and it is associated with increased rates of falls, fractures, hospitalizations and death. Sarcopenia is one of the most common physical etiologies for increased frailty in older adults, and some recent work has suggested the use of Point-of care ultrasound (PoCUS) measures as a potential measure of muscle mass. The objective of this study was to examine the association of PoCUS measures of muscle thickness (MT) with measures of frailty in community-dwelling older adults. We recruited 150 older adults (age &gt;= 65; mean age 80.0±0.5 years, 66 women, 84 men) sequentially from 5 geriatric medicine clinics (Vancouver General Hospital). We measured lean muscle mass (LMM, by bioimpedance assay) and an ultrasonic measure of muscle quantity (MT, vastus medialis muscle thickness) in all subjects, as well as two outcome measures of frailty (FFI, Fried Frailty Index; RCFS, Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale). In our models, MT showed an inverse correlation with the FFI (Standardized β=-0.2320±0.107, p=0.032) but no significant correlation with the RCFS (Standardized β = -0.025±0.086, p=0.776). LMM showed no significant association with either FFI (Standardized β=-0.232±0.120, p=0.055) or RCFS (Standardized β = -0.043±0.119, p=0.719). Our findings indicate that PoCUS measures show potential as a way to screen for physical manifestations of frailty and might be superior to other bedside methods such as bioimpedance assay. However, PoCUS measures of muscle thickness will likely miss patients showing frailty in the much broader context captured by the RCFS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document