462 COUNSELLING IN CARE HOMES

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii1-ii4
Author(s):  
J Pybis ◽  
N Chigariro ◽  
J Bacon
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Service Delivery ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Poor Mental Health ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Home Setting ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Mental Health Foundation

Abstract Introduction Although many people live well within care homes, it is estimated that 60% of those living in residential care have poor mental health (Age Concern & Mental Health Foundation, 2006) and 40% suffer from depression (The Royal College of General Practitioners, 2014). Antidepressant prescribing has been reported to be nearly four times greater in care homes than for older people living in the community (Harris, Carey, Shah, Dewilde & Cook, 2012). However, antidepressants have been found to be ineffective for people with dementia (Dudas, Malouf, McCleery & Dening, 2018). With two-thirds of care home residents having some form of dementia, there is a need to find alternative interventions. Talking therapies, such as counselling, may be a useful alternative. Method Adopting a qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews and focus groups with counsellors (N = 12) who have experience of working in this context and with care home managers (N = 3) and care teams (N = 6), this study aimed to explore the feasibility of implementing counselling in a care home setting. We explored the views of care home staff towards counselling and identify barriers to service implementation, alongside the experience of counsellors who have delivered counselling in care homes to understand what service delivery models are currently adopted. Data were analysed thematically. Results Findings fell under the following key themes: The funding and referral process for counselling in a care home; skills and competences required; training needs; adaptations to practice; barriers to implementing counselling in a care home. Conclusions It is timely to consider the role of psychological therapy in supporting the mental health of care home residents. There is a need for further research to explore a service delivery model of counselling in care homes.

scholarly journals Restraints and Restrictive Interventions during Essential Personal Care in Elderly People Living with Dementia in Care Homes

2021 ◽  
pp. 26-38
Author(s):  
Matthew Crooks ◽  
Katherine Wakenshaw ◽  
Julie Young ◽  
Kayleigh Purvis ◽  
Karin Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Care Home ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Personal Care ◽  
Personal Assistance ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Training Materials ◽  
Materials Used

Care home staff are frequently required to provide invasive personal care for their residents, and on occasions need to use restraint and restrictive practices with people with dementia. This often occurs in situations where the residents no longer have the insight that they require help and may misperceive the personal assistance as an assault. On a practical level, a significant number of people with dementia are currently being admitted to inpatient units due to their level of resistance around essential personal care. Often these same people are settled at all other times. This paper provides practical advice on how to support residents and their caregivers, and gives clinical, legal and ethical guidance. Previous work undertaken by the present authors have shown that care staff require supervision and coaching on this topic. The paper includes training materials used by the authors.  This includes a composite, fictitious case example that illustrates approaches that are compliant with UK guidelines.  It addresses the training of staff working in care homes. As such this paper provides a review and practical example of the appropriate use of restraint for residents unable to consent to the ‘intimate’ care they are receiving. It describes a method delivered in a person-centred manner and within a legal framework.  Having read this paper, care home staff should feel more confident, competent and secure in the assistance they are providing in this contentious area.

scholarly journals Residents transitioning between hospital and care homes: protocol for codesigning a systems-level response to safety issues (SafeST study)

BMJ Open ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. e050665
Author(s):  
Jason Scott ◽  
Katie Brittain ◽  
Kate Byrnes ◽  
Pam Dawson ◽  
Stephanie Mulrine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Extraction ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Incident Reporting ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Framework Analysis ◽  
Safety Issues ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
Service Specification ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionThe aim of this study is to develop a better understanding of incident reporting in relation to transitions in care between hospital and care home, and to codesign a systems-level response to safety issues for patients transitioning between hospital and care home.Methods and analysisTwo workstreams (W) will run in parallel. W1 will aim to develop a taxonomy of incident reporting in care homes, underpinned by structured interviews (N=150) with care home representatives, scoping review of care home incident reporting systems, and a review of incident reporting policy related to care homes. The taxonomy will be developed using a standardised approach to taxonomy development. W2 will be structured in three phases (P). P1a will consist of ≤40 interviews with care home staff to develop a better understanding of their specific internal systems for reporting incidents, and P1b will include ≤30 interviews with others involved in transitions between hospital and care home. P1a and P1b will also examine the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on safe transitions. P2 will consist of a retrospective documentary analysis of care home data relating to resident transitions, with data size and sampling determined based on data sources identified in P1a. A validated data extraction form will be adapted before use. P3 will consist of four validation and codesign workshops to develop a service specification using National Health Service Improvement’s service specification framework, which will then be mapped against existing systems and recommendations produced. Framework analysis informed by the heuristic of systemic risk factors will be the primary mode of analysis, with content analysis used for analysing incident reports.Ethics and disseminationThe study has received university ethical approval and Health Research Authority approval. Findings will be disseminated to commissioners, providers and regulators who will be able to use the codesigned service specification to improve integrated care.

Experience of use of advance care planning in care homes

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maggie Stobbart-Rowlands ◽  
Mandy Thorn
Keyword(s):  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Training Programme ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Home Setting ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Advance Care

This chapter describes the care home setting, aspects that have an impact on use of Advance care planning (ACP) in care homes, examples of challenges and best practice, use of ACP in the GSF Care Homes Training Programme, ACP with people with dementia, and culture change. Many people in care homes are in the last year/s of life, and ACP discussions are especially important for them to ensure that the care they receive is in line with what they want. Care homes lead the way in their extensive use of ACP discussions. ACP is more routinely used by care home staff than is often recognized, and can be easier to introduce in care homes than in other settings. Key challenges include poor means of communication due to dementia/cognitive impairment or physical deterioration, and how staff address the expectations of families, and ensure any interventions are in the best interests of the person.

PP102 Developing A Contextually-Informed Deprescribing Intervention

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (S1) ◽  
pp. 104-105
Author(s):  
Charlene Ronquillo ◽  
Ken Stein
Keyword(s):  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Stakeholder Involvement ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Allied Health Professionals ◽  
Home Setting ◽  
Stakeholder Consultation ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
Local Stakeholder

Introduction:Deprescribing – a process for reducing or stopping drugs when the balance of benefits and harms may no longer be in a person's interests – is a key aspect of managing multimorbidity and polypharmcacy in older people. Several deprescribing interventions have been developed (e.g. in Australia and Canada), although significant challenges for successful implementation remain. Through key stakeholder consultation in the care home setting in South West England, we take the initial steps to develop a context-informed deprescribing approach. Engaging stakeholders from the outset gains insight into acceptability, feasibility, and relevance of deprescribing interventions developed elsewhere informing co-production of an effective, implementable approach.Methods:Consultation workshops were held with two groups of stakeholders: (i) care home residents and their families; (ii) care home staff and health care professionals (general practitioners, medical specialists, pharmacists, nurses, allied health professionals). Focus groups were held with each group separately to understand perspectives on: deprescribing in general; contextual considerations; and, perspectives on deprescribing interventions developed in other countries. A combined focus group then considered components of a deprescribing intervention for care homes. Qualitative data were audio recorded, transcribed, and thematically coded.Results:Participants described the nature of local relationships, dynamics, structures, and resources, as important considerations in the development of a deprescribing approach in care homes. Perspectives and concerns around deprescribing among the stakeholder groups varied, although the importance of eliciting local stakeholder feedback in the early stages of developing a deprescribing intervention was a common thread.Conclusions:Early engagement and co-production are crucial in developing an approach to deprescribing in care homes. The combination of stakeholder involvement and qualitative research is important for developing an effective, contextually relevant intervention as the balance between interests can be incorporated into the approach. Leveraging the experience in other countries is a novel and valuable step.

scholarly journals National trends and local delivery in old age mental health services: towards an evidence base. A mixed-methodology study of the balance of care approach, community mental health teams and specialist mental health outreach to care homes

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Challis ◽  
Sue Tucker ◽  
Mark Wilberforce ◽  
Christian Brand ◽  
Michele Abendstern ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Community Mental Health ◽  
Older People ◽  
Mental Health Problems ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Research Programme ◽  
Community Services ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
Mental Health Outreach

BackgroundThe rising number of older people with mental health problems makes the effective use of mental health resources imperative. Little is known about the clinical effectiveness and/or cost-effectiveness of different service models.AimsThe programme aimed to (1) refine and apply an existing planning tool [‘balance of care’ (BoC)] to this client group; (2) identify whether, how and at what cost the mix of institutional and community services could be improved; (3) enable decision-makers to apply the BoC framework independently; (4) identify variation in the structure, organisation and processes of community mental health teams for older people (CMHTsOP); (5) examine whether or not different community mental health teams (CMHTs) models are associated with different costs/outcomes; (6) identify variation in mental health outreach services for older care home residents; (7) scope the evidence on the association between different outreach models and resident outcomes; and (8) disseminate the research findings to multiple stakeholder groups.MethodsThe programme employed a mixed-methods approach including three systematic literature reviews; a BoC study, which used a systematic framework for choosing between alternative patterns of support by identifying people whose needs could be met in more than one setting and comparing their costs/outcomes; a national survey of CMHTs’ organisation, structure and processes; a multiple case study of CMHTs exhibiting different levels of integration encompassing staff interviews, an observational study of user outcomes and a staff survey; national surveys of CMHTs’ outreach activities and care homes. A planned randomised trial of depression management in care homes was removed at the review stage by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) prior to funding award.ResultsBoC: Past studies exhibited several methodological limitations, and just two related to older people with mental health problems. The current study suggested that if enhanced community services were available, a substantial proportion of care home and inpatient admissions could be diverted, although only the latter would release significant monies. CMHTsOP: 60% of teams were considered multidisciplinary. Most were colocated, had a single point of access (SPA) and standardised assessment documentation. Evidence of the impact of particular CMHT features was limited. Although staff spoke positively about integration, no evidence was found that more integrated teams produced better user outcomes. Working in high-integration teams was associated with poor job outcomes, but other factors negated the statistical significance of this. Care home outreach: Typical services in the literature undertook some combination of screening (less common), assessment, medication review, behaviour management and training, and evidence suggested intervention can benefit depressed residents. Care home staff were perceived to lack necessary skills, but relatively few CMHTs provided formal training.LimitationsLimitations include a necessary reliance on observational rather than experimental methods, which were not feasible given the nature of the services explored.ConclusionsBoC: Shifting care towards the community would require the growth of support services; clarification of extra care housing’s (ECH) role; timely responses to people at risk of psychiatric admission; and improved hospital discharge planning. However, the promotion of care at home will not necessarily reduce public expenditure. CMHTsOP: Although practitioners favoured integration, its goals need clarification. Occupational therapists (OTs) and social workers faced difficulties identifying optimal roles, and support workers’ career structures needed delineating. Care home outreach: Further CMHT input to build care home staff skills and screen for depression may be beneficial. Priority areas for further study include the costs and benefits for older people of age inclusive mental health services and the relative cost-effectiveness of different models of mental health outreach for older care home residents.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Programme Grants for Applied Research programme.

scholarly journals Implementation of the National Early Warning Score in UK care homes: a qualitative evaluation

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (700) ◽  
pp. e793-e800
Author(s):  
Siân Russell ◽  
Rachel Stocker ◽  
Robert Oliver Barker ◽  
Jennifer Liddle ◽  
Joy Adamson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Early Warning ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Qualitative Evaluation ◽  
Acute Illness ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Early Warning Score ◽  
Normalisation Process Theory ◽  
Home Setting ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
National Early Warning Score

BackgroundThe National Early Warning Score (NEWS) is a tool for identifying and responding to acute illness. When used in care homes, staff measure residents’ vital signs and record them on a tablet computer, which calculates a NEWS to share with health services. This article outlines an evaluation of NEWS implementation in care homes across one clinical commissioning group area in northern England.AimTo identify challenges to implementation of NEWS in care homes.Design and settingQualitative analysis of interviews conducted with 15 staff members from six care homes, five health professionals, and one clinical commissioning group employee.MethodInterviews were intended to capture people’s attitudes and experiences of using the intervention. Following an inductive thematic analysis, data were considered deductively against normalisation process theory constructs to identify the challenges and successes of implementing NEWS in care homes.ResultsCare home staff and other stakeholders acknowledged that NEWS could enhance the response to acute illness, improve communication with the NHS, and increase the confidence of care home staff. However, the implementation did not account for the complexity of either the intervention or the care home setting. Challenges to engagement included competing priorities, insufficient training, and shortcomings in communication.ConclusionThis evaluation highlights the need to involve care home staff and the primary care services that support them when developing and implementing interventions in care homes. The appropriateness and value of NEWS in non-acute settings requires ongoing monitoring.

scholarly journals Exploring the role of external experts in supporting staff to implement psychosocial interventions in care home settings: results from the process evaluation of a randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire A. Surr ◽  
Emily Shoesmith ◽  
Alys W. Griffiths ◽  
Rachael Kelley ◽  
Joanne McDermid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Process Evaluation ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Psychosocial Interventions ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
External Expert ◽  
Expert Support

Abstract Background Psychosocial interventions offer opportunities to improve care for people with dementia in care homes. However, implementation is often led by staff who are not well prepared for the role. Some interventions use external experts to support staff. However little is known about external expert, care home staff and manager perceptions of such support. This paper addresses this gap. Methods Multi-methods study within a process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial of Dementia Care Mapping™ (DCM). Interviews were conducted with six external experts who also completed questionnaires, 17 care home managers and 25 care home staff responsible for DCM implementation. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and template analysis. Results Three themes were identified: the need for expert support, practicalities of support and broader impacts of providing support. Expert support was vital for successful DCM implementation, although the five-days provided was felt to be insufficient. Some homes felt the support was inflexible and did not consider their individual needs. Practical challenges of experts being located at a geographical distance from the care homes, limited when and how support was available. Experts gained knowledge they were able to then apply in delivering DCM training. Experts were not able to accurately predict which homes would be able to implement DCM independently in future cycles. Conclusions An external expert may form a key component of successful implementation of psychosocial interventions in care home settings. Future research should explore optimal use of the expert role.

Perceptions of care home staff on the effect of the care home environment for individuals living with dementia

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally Dawn Boyden
Keyword(s):  
Social Interaction ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Home Environment ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Home Setting ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Staff Involvement

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore what existing literature about the care home environment for people with dementia reveals. It also evaluates the implications for practice, to show which parts of the care home environment staff feel have the most impact on the day to day lives of residents living with dementia. In turn, this paper seeks to feedback to care home management to improve practice and to contribute to research in care homes in the future. Design/methodology/approach – A literature review forms the basis of this research, in addition to four semi-structured interview conducted with care home staff of different roles; allowing them to share their experiences with little restriction. Participants were recruited through informal discussions with the researcher before the research took place, as part of her job role and using purposive sampling. Findings – Data were analysed using computer software Nvivo and identified four main categories which all participants discussed: social interaction, staff involvement, staff restrictions, staff involvement and physical elements of the environment. This research has shown the importance of staff presence in the care home environment to facilitate social interaction among residents with dementia. Research limitations/implications – The sample is very small due to staff not having the time to take part in the interview and this itself is a key finding. Interviews were able to capture feelings but not the overall experience of interaction between resident and staff, which observations would have achieved if there was more time to conduct the research. Originality/value – A literature review and qualitative research signifying the importance of staff presence in the care home setting in order for the residents to socially engage in their environment. However, it has also show the lack of time that is face by staff and the impact this has on people living with dementia.

scholarly journals How do we provide good mealtime care for people with dementia living in care homes? A systematic review of carer–resident interactions

Dementia ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 147130122110020
Author(s):  
James Faraday ◽  
Clare Abley ◽  
Fiona Beyer ◽  
Catherine Exley ◽  
Paula Moynihan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Good Practice ◽  
Oral Intake ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Synthesis Process ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
People With Dementia

People with dementia who live in care homes often depend on care home staff for help with eating and drinking. It is essential that care home staff have the skills and support they need to provide good care at mealtimes. Good mealtime care may improve quality of life for residents, and reduce hospital admissions. The aim of this systematic review was to identify good practice in mealtime care for people with dementia living in care homes, by focusing on carer-resident interactions at mealtimes. Robust systematic review methods were followed. Seven databases were searched: AgeLine, BNI, CENTRAL, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened independently by two reviewers, and study quality was assessed with Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Narrative synthesis was used to analyse quantitative and qualitative evidence in parallel. Data were interrogated to identify thematic categories of carer-resident interaction. The synthesis process was undertaken by one reviewer, and discussed throughout with other reviewers for cross-checking. After title/abstract and full-text screening, 18 studies were included. Some studies assessed mealtime care interventions, others investigated factors contributing to oral intake, whilst others explored the mealtime experience. The synthesis identified four categories of carer-resident interaction important to mealtime care: Social connection, Tailored care, Empowering the resident, and Responding to food refusal. Each of the categories has echoes in related literature, and provides promising directions for future research. They merit further consideration, as new interventions are developed to improve mealtime care for this population.

scholarly journals Managing Faecal INcontinence in people with advanced dementia resident in Care Homes (FINCH) study: a realist synthesis of the evidence

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (42) ◽  
pp. 1-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Goodman ◽  
Christine Norton ◽  
Marina Buswell ◽  
Bridget Russell ◽  
Danielle Harari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Faecal Incontinence ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Realist Synthesis ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Advanced Dementia ◽  
Limited Evidence ◽  
Daily Work ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
People With Dementia

BackgroundEighty per cent of care home residents in the UK are living with dementia. The prevalence of faecal incontinence (FI) in care homes is estimated to range from 30% to 50%. There is limited evidence of what is effective in the reduction and management of FI in care homes.ObjectiveTo provide a theory-driven explanation of the effectiveness of programmes that aim to improve FI in people with advanced dementia in care homes.DesignA realist synthesis. This was an iterative approach that involved scoping of the literature and consultation with five stakeholder groups, a systematic search and analysis of published and unpublished evidence, and a validation of programme theories with relevant stakeholders.Data sourcesThe databases searched included PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, SocAbs, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, BiblioMap, Sirius, OpenGrey, Social Care Online and the National Research Register.ResultsThe scoping identified six programme theories with related context–mechanism–outcome configurations for testing. These addressed (1) clinician-led support, assessment and review, (2) the contribution of teaching and support for care home staff on how to reduce and manage FI, (3) the causes and prevention of constipation, (4) how the cognitive and physical capacity of the resident affect outcomes, (5) how the potential for recovery, reduction and management of FI is understood by those involved and (6) how the care of people living with dementia and FI is integral to the work patterns of the care home and its staff. Data extraction was completed on 62 core papers with iterative searches of linked literature. Dementia was a known risk factor for FI, but its affect on the uptake of different interventions and the dementia-specific continence and toileting skills staff required was not addressed. Most care home residents with FI will be doubly incontinent and, therefore, there is limited value in focusing solely on FI or on single causes of FI such as constipation. Clinical assessment, knowledge of the causes of FI and strategies that recognise the individuals’ preferences are necessary contextual factors. Valuing the intimate and personal care work that care home staff provide to people living with dementia and addressing the dementia-related challenges when providing continence care within the daily work routines are key to helping to reduce and manage FI in this population.LimitationsThe synthesis was constrained by limited evidence specific to FI and people with dementia in care homes and by the lack of dementia-specific evidence on continence aids.ConclusionsThis realist synthesis provides a theory-driven understanding of the conditions under which improvement in care for care home residents living with dementia and FI is likely to be successful.Future workFuture multicomponent interventions need to take account of how the presence of dementia affects the behaviours and choices of those delivering and receiving continence care within a care home environment.Study registrationThis study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42014009902.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document